Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Election

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:26 am



http://www.trumphotels.org


DISCLAIMER Floormats are penthouse only


Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
Image


Atlanta attorney buys TrumpHotels.org, plasters it with images of immigrant detention centers
“If Trump himself wants to buy the site, I might be willing to part with it in exchange for 10 years of his tax returns and the termination of 25 NDAs of my choosing,” says Loren Collins
BY SEAN KEENAN - JUNE 25, 2018

Atlanta man buys TrumpHotels.org
The TrumpHotels.org satire website uses this handout photo from U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the Central Processing Center in McAllen, Texas, as its lead photo.
PHOTOGRAPH BY U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION VIA GETTY IMAGES

When Atlanta-based attorney Loren Collins realized President Donald Trump’s namesake hospitality company had neglected to purchase TrumpHotels.org, he leapt at the opportunity, snagging the site for a cool $8—$16 if you count the extra $8 he paid to keep his name detached from the page.

TrumpHotels.org
A screenshot of TrumpHotels.org
The Twitter hashtag #TrumpHotels had just sprouted from the popularity of posts mentioning #TrumpCamps, a frequently used digital dig at the conditions of the immigrant detention centers on the U.S. border, as well as at the presidential administration’s policy to separate young children from their parents at intake facilities. (On Wednesday, President Trump signed an executive order to end the practice of family separation at the U.S. border, but that did not reunite families who were previously separated and detained.)

“In the past week, when the detention camps story really started to break, there were some people who were trying to make #TrumpCamps into a hashtag and a label,” he tells Atlanta magazine. A Facebook friend, he said, suggested he try to grow visibility for #TrumpHotels, which Collins found “comedically and satirically” apt for the mission of spotlighting immigration policies he considers to be human rights injustices.

“That hashtag has to go viral,” another friend told him.

Then Collins came up with a cheap, simple plan to do just that: A quick internet search told him Trump Hotels, the international chain of luxury lodging options, was inhabiting TrumpHotels.com. The “.org” option, however, was still up for grabs. So on the afternoon of June 21, Collins’s satirical site hit the web, emblazoned with images not of posh hotels but rather of the detention facilities where border patrol agents have been caging men, women, and children who tried to emigrate from Mexico and South America.

The header image of the website—which is a photograph U.S. Customs and Border Protection released last week of a detention facility in McAllen, Texas—was inspired by a tweet from Congressman Tim Kaine, the vice presidential candidate from Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential run. “The real Trump Hotel,” reads Kaine’s post, complemented by additional handout images from U.S. Customs and Border Protection of people confined to chain-link cages in the McAllen facility.

TrumpHotels.org also features links to different articles showing, among other things, a video of Trump mocking a disabled reporter, a list of the president’s jabs at Mexico and its people, and a story highlighting Trump’s apparent frustration with parenting in general.

TrumpHotels.org
A screenshot of TrumpHotels.org
Additionally, Collins is thinking about trying to gather testimonials from people who have actually spent time in the Border Patrol’s detention camps and frame them as Yelp reviews. In fact, his website has already earned its own profile on the restaurant and hospitality company review site, replete with comments citing the qualms with living conditions within the lockup.

Although Collins has yet to see his website’s visitor analytics, he knows the page has already garnered national attention. D.C.-based politics blog The Hill ran a brief story about the site, as did Gizmodo, and Ana Navarro, a contributor for CNN, ABC, and Telemundo, shared a link to it on Twitter—together yielding more than 1,000 shares as of publication time.

Collins is not a “cyber squatter,” he says—he doesn’t buy up potentially valuable domain names with hopes to capitalize on their monetary appreciation. He has, however, already received an offer to buy TrumpHotels.org. “I got an offer for $200 anonymously through some sort of domain proxy offer system,” he says.

“I turned it down,” he continues. “I wouldn’t rule out selling it, though. For instance, if Trump himself wanted to buy it, I might be willing to part with it in exchange for 10 years of his tax returns and the termination of 25 [non-disclosure agreements] of my choosing.”

Collins, who runs his own legal practice, is trained in criminal prosecution and mostly practices personal injury law, but he’s knowledgeable about copyright law, too, so he’s not worried about the prospect of a cease and desist order finding its way to his mailbox. “Given the past history of the Trump organization, it would not surprise me to get some kind of cease and desist letter, but I’m prepared for that,” he says. “I wouldn’t comply with whatever the demand was because the Trump organization also has a history of sending cease and desists and not following up.”

Additionally, he says, “I’m on more solid legal ground than [Trump] is.” Collins added a disclaimer at the bottom of his site to clarify that it’s purely satire and, he says, protected from potential litigation. He even cited a couple of legal cases to reinforce his safety.

Per the disclaimer:

The use of any intellectual property, including trademarks or names of public figures, is protected under fair use, as TrumpHotels.org serves to comment on social and political issues and problems regarding the federal immigration policies of President Donald J. Trump, as well as other statements and actions made by Mr. Trump, through the use of ridicule and criticism. See the U.S. Trademark Act of 1946, 15 §§ 1051 et seq. (a/k/a, the Lanham Act), and KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., 543 U.S. 111 (2004).

Collins is not, however, trying to bait Trump or his lawyers into a courtroom melee. He says he merely wants to challenge people to take a critical look at the immigration laws and policies enforced by the presidential administration. Collins’s distaste for the country’s current leader largely stems from his aversion to so-called “fake news” and the conspiracy theories spawned or perpetuated by the president and his administration.

When Trump made his official bid for America’s highest office in 2016, Collins, who considers himself politically right-leaning, says he knew he wanted to make a significant effort to attempt to block a man he considers “an ignorant, gullible, intemperate, incurious, pathologically dishonest conspiracy theorist” from becoming president. He tried to hamper Trump’s chances by running a “never-Trump” write-in campaign for president during the 2016 race and by publishing a blog called “Barackryphal: A skeptic’s guide to birtherism.” He’s currently pitching book idea to publishers, aiming to wax on the origins of birtherism, the conspiracy theory that, in some ways, helped Trump establish himself among his supporter base and that Collins describes as “a blight on conservatism and the Republican party.” He also authored a book entitled Bullspotting in 2012, which, Collins said, sold a few hundred copies and encourages skepticism toward possible “misinformation campaigns.”

The real Trump Hotels did not respond to emails requesting comment for this story, nor has it yet reached out to Collins, he said.
https://www.atlantamagazine.com/news-cu ... n-centers/




Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:35 am

We have a trial date for Roger Stone: Nov. 5, 2019

emptywheel


Throw China in with Russia, UAE, and Qatar as a possibility to be Mystery Appellant.
ǝʌɐp

mystery appellant: comparing the foreign statues cited in the december 22, 2018 vs january 3, 2019 submissions gives interesting results
Image
Image
Image

nb: in both filings the section where those statutes are cited -- [redacted] in 12-22 and russia & china in 01-03 -- deal with reciprocity / retaliation:
Image
Image



Nadler: “Unlike in the hearing room, Whitaker did not deny that the president told him to discuss the Michael Cohen case and personnel decisions in the Southern District.”

the acting Attorney General lied to Congress :)

directly involved in conversations about whether to fire one or more U.S. attorneys :)

talked with trump about the Cohen case :)

After Closed Meeting, Nadler Makes New Claims About Whitaker’s DOJ Conduct

Tierney Sneed
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) revealed Wednesday new allegations of former acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker’s conduct while leading the Justice Department — allegations that Nadler described as the main “takeaways” from the committee’s closed door meeting with Whitaker.


Nadler said that Whitaker was “directly involved in conversations about whether to fire one or more U.S. attorneys.”

The committee chairman also said that Whittaker “was involved in conversation about the scope of the recusal” of Geoffrey Berman, the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, from the Michael Cohen investigation, as well as whether the prosecutors there went “too far in pursuing the campaign finance case” that implicated the President.

Nadler also claimed that Whitaker “did not deny” that Trump called Whitaker to discuss Cohen’s case and personnel decisions surrounding it, as had been reported by the New York Times. At a public hearing last month, Whitaker denied a report by CNN that Trump “lashed out” at him about the Cohen investigation in New York.

Nadler, on Wednesday, did not elaborate on what exactly Whitaker said behind closed doors about the phone call.

“He would not say no,” is all Nadler would say.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker ... oj-conduct



DOJ Probes Whether Fugitive Financier Supplied Donation to Trump Re-Election Effort
Justice Department investigates whether the $100,000 contribution came from Malaysian businessman charged in a global scandal
By Tom Wright and Bradley Hope
Updated March 13, 2019 11:46 a.m. ET
The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether $100,000 donated to a Trump-related political fundraising committee originated from a fugitive Malaysian businessman alleged to be at the center of a global financial scandal, according to people familiar with the matter.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/doj-probes ... 1552482187




DOJ investigating $100,000 donation to Trump Victory committee supporting 2020 campaign from Larry Davis, a US citizen who co-owns Hawaii based LNS Capital - which may have been funded by Malaysian businessman Jho Low indicted last year in 1MDB scandal

DOJ Probes Whether Fugitive Financier Supplied Donation to Trump Re-Election Effort

Justice Department investigates whether the $100,000 contribution came from Malaysian businessman charged in a global scandal

Bradley Hope Updated March 13, 2019 11:46 a.m. ET
The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether $100,000 donated to a Trump-related political fundraising committee originated from a fugitive Malaysian businessman alleged to be at the center of a global financial scandal, according to people familiar with the matter.

The $100,000 donation was made in December 2017 to the Trump Victory committee—which is involved in helping re-elect President Trump in 2020—by Larry Davis, a U.S. citizen who co-owns LNS Capital, a Hawaii-based investment company, people familiar with...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/doj-probes ... malertNEWS



Davis’s wife, Nickie Lum Davis, is the co-owner of LNS Capital - this Mar 2018 Hollywood Reporter article described how Nicky Lum Davis had interacted closely with Robin Rosenzweig, wife of ex-RNC finance chair Elliott Broidy, and others involved in 1MDBWendy Siegelman added,


This article by @garymbaum @scott_c_johnson about a March '18 $35,000/person fundraiser Elliott Broidy & Robin Rosenzweig hosted for Trump covers the players in the 1MDB scandal: Jho Low, ex PM Najib Razak, Nicky Lum Davis, Pras Michel and others



SCOOP (buried in story): Jho Low who was indicted in scheme to steal $1 billion from Malaysian 1MDB fund met with Erik Prince for lunch in Hong Kong in 2017 to discuss his case per sources

Also Low had hired Chris Christie, Marc Kasowitz, Bobby Burchfield
https://www.wsj.com/articles/doj-probes ... malertNEWS

Image


House Democrats Target Ivanka Trump (but Through a Side Door)

March 13, 2019
Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s daughter and senior adviser, was notably absent from a blitz of document requests the House Judiciary Committee sent last month.Doug Mills/The New York Times


Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s daughter and senior adviser, was notably absent from a blitz of document requests the House Judiciary Committee sent last month.Doug Mills/The New York Times
WASHINGTON — Rhona Graff, President Trump’s longtime executive assistant, was asked for documents related to foreign governments providing gifts or money to Ivanka Trump or her businesses.

Anatoli Samochornov, the Russian translator who sat in on a meeting between Trump campaign officials and Russian lobbyists, was asked to hand over handwritten notes showing any capital investment from Russian entities to Ms. Trump or her businesses.

And Jeff Sessions, the former attorney general, was asked for any documents related to loans or capital investments from Russians directed to Ms. Trump.

The president’s eldest daughter and top White House adviser was notably absent from a blitz of document requests that the House Judiciary Committee sent earlier this month to 81 individuals and organizations linked to the president. House Democrats have been cautious about targeting Ms. Trump and the other Trump children as they investigate the president, worried about triggering a backlash.

But a close read of the document requests suggests they aren’t exactly tiptoeing around the first daughter, either.

Of the 81 document requests sent, 52 individuals and organizations were asked to turn over documents related to Ms. Trump or her business interests.

You have 2 free articles remaining.

White House officials are viewing the document requests as an attempt by the House Judiciary Committee to set the stage for potentially impeaching the president. But the inquiries related to Ms. Trump follow a side track: They ask for documents related to any financial benefit that Ms. Trump or her businesses reaped from foreign and domestic governments after the 2016 election. And they provide a hint of how Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, may be planning to look into potential financial conflicts of interest from Ms. Trump.

“She’d be in violation of the Constitution if she was getting any business deals from foreign governments,” said Richard W. Painter, who served as chief ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush. Mr. Painter was referring to the emoluments clause of the Constitution, which prohibits government officials from accepting payments or gifts from foreign governments.

“They’re also going after other payments that aren’t emoluments clause violations that we ought to know about that could be creating financial conflicts of interest for her,” Mr. Painter said. “The idea here is to get an awful lot of information we would have had if there had been more detailed disclosures about the entities the Trump family controls.”

A spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee declined to comment on the committee’s interest in Ms. Trump. But Mr. Nadler has said that the 81 requests were only the first tranche and that requests to others, including Ms. Trump, could “quite conceivably” follow.

The characters working behind the scenes on the document requests also provide a hint of what the Judiciary Committee is looking for. In February, House Democrats retained Norman L. Eisen, a litigator and prominent Trump critic, to begin its inquiries into the president. Mr. Eisen, who played a large role in overseeing the document requests, has also been vocal about potential emoluments clause violations from the president and his family. In December 2016, for instance, he was an author of a report for the Brookings Institution, “The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump.”

Ms. Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, never completely divested from their companies even after taking top White House positions. Their income in 2017, from various investments they remained involved in through vehicles and trusts, was $82 million to $222 million, according to their ethics disclosures. In 2017, Ms. Trump earned more than $5 million from her namesake fashion brand, according to financial disclosures.

In July 2018, Ms. Trump shut down her fashion brand, amid concerns that the family was profiting from the presidency. But she has continued to seek trademarks in China to avoid competitors from profiting off her name, according to a spokeswoman.

House Democrats appear to be looking to see if she leveraged her role in government to profit for herself.

Among those asked to produce documents that could show foreign-government involvement with Ms. Trump are George Nader, the Lebanese-American businessman who is cooperating with the special counsel’s inquiry; Erik Prince, the founder of the security contractor formerly known as Blackwater; Matthew Calamari, the former Trump bodyguard turned businessman; and Hope Hicks, a former White House communications director.

Others were Corey Lewandowski, the former Trump campaign manager; Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser, and Allen Weisselberg, the chief financial officer of the Trump Organization.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, did not respond to a request for comment.

Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for Mr. Kushner, declined to comment.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/us/p ... esses.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:10 am

The RNC Deputy Finance Chairman who's under investigation for money laundering is a different guy from the RNC Deputy Finance Chairman who pleaded guilty in a federal fraud case and they're both different from the RNC Finance Chairman who's accused of rape and sexual misconduct.

Judge Pauley has ordered redacted versions of the Michael Cohen search warrant materials to be made public tomorrow.


50 batshit crazy weekend tweets might have an explanation now. :D

Gates is also linked to Eliot Broidy and Gates is STILL cooperating

The warrant to search Elliott Broidy’s office showed interest in records about:

- Rick Gates

- Colfax Law Office - founded by Broidy’s wife Robin Rosenzweig

- Jho Low (Malaysia’s 1MDB scandal)

- UAE, KSA, Qatar and George Nader

- China and Guo Wengui


Federal Authorities Raided Trump Fundraiser’s Office in Money Laundering Probe

A sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica shows federal agents scoured Elliott Broidy’s office for documents related to China, Saudi Arabia and a Miami Beach club promoter.

by Robert Faturechi and Justin Elliott
March 18, 5 a.m. EDT
Federal authorities raided the office of Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy last summer, seeking records related to his dealings with foreign officials and Trump administration associates, according to a sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica.

Agents were authorized to use the megadonor’s hands and face to unlock any phones that required fingerprint or facial scans.

The Washington Post reported in August that the Justice Department was investigating Broidy. The sealed warrant offers new details of federal authorities’ investigation of allegations that Broidy had attempted to cash in on his Trump White House connections in dealings with foreign officials. It also shows that the government took a more aggressive approach with the Trump ally than was previously known, entering his office and removing records — just as it did with Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen.

Broidy served as a major Trump campaign fundraiser and was the national deputy finance chair of the Republican National Committee until he resigned in April 2018, when it was revealed he had agreed to secretly pay off a former Playboy model in exchange for her silence about their affair.

The search warrant cites three potential crimes that authorities are investigating: conspiracy, money laundering and violations of the law barring covert lobbying on behalf of foreign officials. To obtain a search warrant, authorities have to convince a judge that there’s a probable cause they will find evidence of those specific crimes.

The search warrant also for the first time links Broidy to a globe-trotting Miami Beach party promoter.

The warrant, filed in July 2018, targeted Broidy’s office in Los Angeles. The scope of what authorities were seeking was broad. They planned to seize any evidence related to a list of dozens of people, countries and corporate entities, according to the warrant. Among the names on the list are Rick Gates, the former Trump campaign official who has pleaded guilty in the Mueller probe; Colfax Law Office, the firm founded by Robin Rosenzweig, Broidy’s wife; and several foreign countries.

Spokespeople for the Justice Department and the FBI declined to comment for this story.

Broidy’s attorney as well as a spokesman did not answer a list of detailed questions sent by ProPublica.

Broidy, an investor based in Los Angeles, pleaded guilty in 2009 to charges connected to his role in a major New York state public corruption and bribery case. But after backing Trump for president, he saw his star rise again. After the inauguration, he played a central role in filling administration vacancies, according to reports by ProPublica and others.

However, he once again quickly became mired in controversy, amid allegations of influence peddling and his dealings with the former Playboy model.

The search warrant shows that federal authorities are interested in Broidy’s alleged work for the Malaysian financier Jho Low, who is at the center of a sprawling international scandal known as 1MDB. In November, the Justice Department unveiled a bribery and money laundering case against Low.

In a separate filing in November, the Justice Department alleged that Broidy was paid by Low to lobby Trump administration officials to ease off on U.S. investigations into Low. Broidy is not identified by name in the filings, but he is widely reported to be the person referred to as “Individual No. 1.” Broidy has not been charged with a crime, and it’s unclear what the status of the investigation is.

Pras Michel, a member of the hip-hop group The Fugees and an associate of Low’s, funnelled the money to pay Broidy into the United States, the Justice Department alleged. Asked about the Broidy search warrant, a lawyer for Michel, Barry Pollack, said: “There has been news of this Broidy investigation for many months. Mr. Michel has not been charged with any wrongdoing whatsoever related to Mr. Broidy or anyone else.”

Federal authorities were also seeking records in Broidy’s office related to the United Arab Emirates, UAE adviser George Nader, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and any travel to the Middle East.

The New York Times reported last year that Broidy worked with Nader to steer the White House toward decisions benefiting the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Documents reviewed by the Times showed that Nader tempted Broidy with the prospect of more than $1 billion in contracts for Broidy’s private security company. Hacked communications showed Nader praised Broidy for “how well you handle Chairman” — a reference to Trump.

Nader became a cooperating witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian influence in the 2016 election, according to multiple news reports.

Broidy’s attorney has in the past responded to the allegations with a statement saying Broidy “has never agreed to work for, been retained by nor been compensated by any foreign government for any interaction with the United States Government, ever. Any implication to the contrary is a lie.”

According to the warrant, federal authorities also sought to seize any records related to China and Guo Wengui, a Chinese businessman and dissident who fled to New York, where he publicly accused the Chinese government of corruption.

The Times reported that Broidy explored plans to use his influence with the White House to force Guo out of the United States, apparently as part of an effort to curry favor with the Chinese and other foreign officials, and ultimately earn a payoff.

The search warrant for Broidy’s office also lists a name and corporation not previously linked to Broidy: “Joel Rouseau” and “Intelligent Resources.” There is a company by that name incorporated in Miami Beach by a Joel Rousseau, who is a friend of Michel’s. The search warrant does not describe Rousseau or Intelligent Resources’ role in the case.

Rousseau’s Instagram account shows him bouncing from Rio to Paris to Ibiza, frequently surrounded by models. “If you want to be successful, you need the beautiful people,” he told Crain’s New York in 2007, which described him as a specialist “in bringing agency models to clubs.” In another series of pictures, he is at an oil site in Haiti with workers he describes as his drilling crew. Rousseau made a foray into politics in 2012 when he donated tens of thousands of dollars to several Democratic Party groups.

Filings in a court case over unpaid taxes describe Rousseau as an “entrepreneur” with income swinging from under $1,000 for 2009 to over $2 million in 2013. He paid a long-standing bill for back taxes and penalties of more than $700,000 in late 2017, the filings show.

The address for Intelligent Resources is a house on Miami Beach’s exclusive Hibiscus Island. The person answering the door at the house last week told a reporter he had rented the house on Airbnb. Rousseau didn’t respond to requests for comment.
https://www.propublica.org/article/fede ... ring-probe



Justin Elliott

NEW: Feds raided Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy’s office in money laundering probe https://www.propublica.org/article/fede ... ring-probe … from @RobertFaturechi and me



Here's a bit more about an intriguing aspects of this story: there are two new names on the Broidy search warrant -- Joel Rouseau and Intelligent Resources. There’s a company with that name registered in Miami to a Joel Rousseau.

Rousseau, a promoter who has been described as a specialist in getting models for night club parties, has one of the most interesting instagram accounts I’ve seen:

Image

Mostly model parties, trips to Europe, and the like, but then also him at an oil drilling site in Haiti ...

Image

Rousseau is a friend of Pras Michel, the former Fugees star who has been linked to Broidy through the 1MDB scandal -- here they are at a Pras birthday party years ago:
https://celebrityvibe.photoshelter.com/ ... FdatSLKIms


Rousseau is also a one-time political donor, generously spreading tens of thousands to Barack Obama and various Dem outfits in 2012. That was the same year of Pras Michel donations to Dems that have been scrutinized by the WSJ @bradleyhope @TomWrightAsia


Rousseau also has a tax court case showing his income bouncing from close to zero one year to $2 million a few years later. He then paid a longstanding tax and penalty bill of more than $700k in late 2017. Rousseau didn’t respond to requests for comment.
https://www.documentcloud.org/search/pr ... court-case

But we still don’t really know how Joel Rouseau and Intelligent Resources connect to the Broidy case -- do you? My email: justin@propublica.org Signal: 774-826-6240
https://twitter.com/JustinElliott/statu ... 0859139072



OWNED
Russian Tycoon Named in Trump Dossier Lost His Slander Suit, Then Lost His Secrets

The Steele dossier’s tale of Aleksej Gubarev using porn to hack Democrats had been banished to the fringes of the Russiagate narratives—until his own lawsuit gave it fresh oxygen.
Kevin Poulsen

03.18.19 4:42 AM ET

A Russian tech entrepreneur accused in the Trump-Russia scandal two years ago may end up regretting the defamation lawsuit he filed against a U.S. media outlet.

Thousands of pages about his company’s operations and finances were released to the public last week by the federal judge overseeing the case—effectively turning the suit into a WikiLeaks-sized data dump that’s raising new questions about his dealings with computer criminals.

Aleksej Gubarev came to notoriety in 2017 over a single paragraph in the so-called Steele dossier compiled by former U.K. intelligence officer Christopher Steele. The controversial dossier is a 35-page compilation of anonymously sourced tips and anecdotes about Donald Trump’s ties to Russia, a mixed bag of claims ranging from the lurid to the prosaic. Some of the reporting has since been broadly substantiated, much of it has not, and there are parts that have been all but proven false.

The dossier’s claims about Gubarev fall in the latter category.

Gubarev runs a multinational internet hosting company called XBT that boasts subsidiaries in Europe, the United States, and Asia. Shortly after the 2016 election, one of Steele’s sources fingered Gubarev and his businesses as “significant players” in the Kremlin’s election-hacking, claiming Russia’s domestic spy agency the FSB had pressured Gubarev and his companies to use “botnets and porn traffic to transmit viruses, plant bugs, steal data and conduct ‘altering operations’ against the Democratic Party leadership.”

When BuzzFeed published a leaked copy of the dossier in January 2017, Gubarev vehemently denied any role on the Kremlin’s hack and filed a defamation lawsuit against the media company. Over the years, that litigation has produced a mountain of documents and hour upon hour of videotaped depositions, nearly all of which was kept under seal. A federal judge threw out Gubarev’s lawsuit last December on the grounds that BuzzFeed, being a news outlet, was within its rights to publish a document that top FBI agents had cited in surveillance court affidavits, and that two U.S. presidents had received personal briefings about.

Gubarev is appealing that ruling. In the meantime, on Thursday, the same judge unsealed the majority of the documents in the case at the urging of separate petitions by BuzzFeed and The New York Times.

In a twist that must be maddening to Gubarev, the media coverage of the document dump is giving fresh oxygen to the dossier’s claims about Gubarev and his business.

Much of the coverage focuses on a report prepared by one of BuzzFeed’s expert witnesses, Anthony Ferrante of FTI Consulting, a former FBI agent retained to investigate Steele’s claims. Ferrante’s report found that Gubarev’s hosting company “was utilized by Russian civilian and military intelligence services to compromise and exploit networks.”

“Additionally, evidence suggests that Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, the Russian government affiliated APT groups responsible for hacking the Democratic Party leadership, have used XBT infrastructure to support other malicious activity,” Ferrante wrote.

Prior to Thursday, the dossier’s tale of Gubarev using porn to hack Democrats had been banished to the fringes of the Russiagate narratives—buried under far more credible reporting from U.S. intelligence agencies, congressional investigators, and the detailed tick-tock of the election hacks presented in Robert Mueller’s indictment against GRU officers. None of those accounts named Gubarev, or even left space for him in the story. He was essentially vindicated.

Now, the Times notes, “the report’s suggestions of a link between Mr. Gubarev and Russian hacking is likely to spur new demands for renewed investigations.”

Trump-Russia watchers are always interested when new evidence emerges to support the Steele dossier. But in this case there’s much less than meets the eye.

Ferrante’s job in the report was to sniff out links between XBT and the Russian government hackers—known as “Fancy Bear” in the security world—who carried out the election interference intrusions. He and his team did that work with vigor. “The report is well crafted, and although there are some small technical errors it’s obviously been thoroughly researched,” security expert Robert Lee, CEO of Dragos, told The Daily Beast.

The outcome, though, was essentially preordained. That’s because XBT is a hosting company that provides cheap, turnkey internet servers on demand. And Fancy Bear is a ravenous consumer of turnkey hosting services around the world.

“When Ferrante went looking for Fancy Bear’s paw prints at XBT, it’s no surprise he found them.”
The GRU hackers need servers to “drop” malware onto a fresh victim computer, to host the fake login forms for their phishing operations, to serve as command-and-control hubs for their long term surveillance implants. They rent the servers using fake names and disposable email accounts, and pay in bitcoin when they can. According to Mueller’s indictment, the GRU has an entire department, headed by Aleksey Aleksandrovich Potemkin, “responsible for the administration of computer infrastructure used in cyber operations.”

So when Ferrante went looking for Fancy Bear’s paw prints at XBT, it’s no surprise he found them. But a fair reading of his findings suggests the Kremlin’s hackers have no particular affinity for XBT over other server farms. If anything, it’s among their least favorite options.

Consider one of the tendrils supposedly connecting XBT to the election hacks by way of a December 2016 DHS report. Called “Grizzly Steppe,” the report lists 876 internet IP addresses that have been used by Russian hackers over the years, according to DHS. Ferrante reports that some of those addresses belonged to XBT. To be more specific, 12 of them.

Four of the 12 are part of the Tor anonymization network, a free public system open to anyone in need of additional privacy. Assuming all of the remaining eight were indeed XBT servers rented by Russian spies, that’s 1 percent of the list--not exactly a ringing endorsement of Gubarev's business by Putin’s hackers.

It’s worth noting that none of those eight addresses have been linked specifically to the election hacking operation. Others, operated by different companies, have been.

Ferrante also examined a batch of 42 IP addresses connected to the GRU hackers by a website certificate used in a number of their hack attacks, including the 2014 intrusion at German Parliament and the 2016 DNC breach. Ferrante reports that one of the 42 addresses belongs to XBT. That particular address is not known to have been used in the election hacks. The other 41 addresses, including one that did play a role in the DNC breach, trace back to entirely different hosting companies scattered throughout Europe.

“Without more intelligence indicating that Gubarev’s subsidiaries were directly involved with and aware of the malicious activity leveraging their infrastructure… it seems to be an analytic leap to imply significance in those connections,” said Kyle Ehmke, an analyst at ThreatConnect, which has tracked the GRU’s hacking infrastructure closer than most.

Another set of 41 IP addresses comes from logs at the URL-shortener Bit.ly, which the Russians used in their months-long email phishing campaign against Hillary Clinton’s staff and thousands of other political targets. Between October 2015 and and June 2016, a GRU officer set up 11,139 shortened links leading to fake webmail login pages. It was one of those links that tricked Clinton campaign chief John Podesta into giving the Russians full access to his inbox.

Ferrante found that one of the 41 servers the GRU used to connect to Bit.ly and make the links was at XBT. Presumably the other 40 were rented from other firms.

“Is it your opinion that the owners of all 40 of the other IP addresses are also culpable for the hack of the DNC?” Gubarev’s attorney asked during a deposition.

“No,” Ferrante replied. “It's my opinion that XBT and its infrastructure… is linked to a pattern of significant malicious activity.”

Even a small overlap between the election hackers and the man named in the Steele dossier as their tech guy might be interesting if the Russians were the only hackers who use XBT’s services. But the company’s past customer base also includes the spy services of completely different governments at the same or greater adoption rate.

This is even noted in the Ferrante report, but it’s easy to miss because the report sticks with the generic security industry monikers for the non-Russian hacking operations. Ferrante takes pains to observe that Fancy Bear and Cozy Duke have been linked to the Russian government, but neglects to report that “DarkHotel,” “Nitro,” and “Careto”—who’ve also used XBT IP addresses—have been tied to the governments of North Korea, China, and Spain, respectively.

If the Ferrante report fails as vindication of the Steele dossier, it makes a more compelling case for XBT being an equal-opportunity host to all manner of cyber wrongdoing. And on that point the other unsealed documents contain plenty of evidence to back it up.

The documents show that XBT hosted a rogues’ gallery of traditional for-profit cyber criminals over the years, including the professional bank heist crew known as the Carbanak Gang, crooks stealing from consumers and small businesses with the Zeus malware, and the brains behind a sophisticated long-con known as “Methbot” that built an infrastructure twice the size of Facebook to fleece advertisers of millions.

Does that mean the company is more lax in patrolling its servers for criminals than other hosting firms? Ferrante thinks so, but the report doesn’t provide an industrywide comparison. Independent security experts interviewed for this story say it’s hard to tell.

“Not sure that I could really qualify a level of badness for comparison across infrastructure resellers, but based on what I read in that report, it doesn't seem particularly anomalous,” said ThreatConnect’s Ehmke. “We’ve seen similar concentrations of malicious activity on infrastructure procured from resellers like Njalla and ITitch, which offer services that these sorts of actors probably look for, such as anonymity and payment via BitCoin.”

Kimberly Zenz, a veteran threat analyst specializing in Russian cybercrime, told The Daily Beast that XBT’s reputation is “on the wrong side of the line for things like abuse responses, consequences for terms-of-service violations, and illegal behavior.” She said: “They respond slower and less aggressively and less often than they should. They do respond sometimes, or in some ways, though. They’re not like an old-school, 100 percent-crime service.”

The unsealed documents are at their most revelatory when it comes to Gubarev’s relationship with one of his allegedly criminal clients, Aleksandr Zhukov. The 38-year-old native of St. Petersburg, Russia, is in a federal detention center in Brooklyn awaiting trial on four counts of wire fraud and money laundering, in part for allegedly masterminding the Methbot operation. For a time he was XBT’s biggest customer.

Methbot was an enterprising scam that used a fake internet advertising agency called MediaMethane to sell millions of dollars worth of video ad spots on premium content sites.

Instead of running the ads on sites like The New York Times and Fox, the crew used rented hosting in Dallas to operate its own private network of fake sites mimicking the real ones—and then ran the ads there. The audience for the ads were thousands of “consumers” who were actually sophisticated bots happy to watch 300 million video ads a day.

To make the bots look real to advertisers, the perpetrators leased over 800,000 IP addresses and then filed bogus information with internet registries to make them look like residential broadband providers in demographically desirable American neighborhoods.

A sizable portion of those fake Comcast, AT&T, and Cox Cable addresses were leased from XBT. The company says it thought they were being used for an advertising metrics business.

According to prosecutors, the Methbot scheme conned hundreds of brands and advertisers out of $7 million before it was exposed by a New York security company in December 2016. The unsealed documents show XBT was paid millions. In the scam’s final month alone, XBT was paid $400,000, according to internal financial reports, accounting for 7 percent of the company’s earnings that month.

The unsealed documents show that when Methbot was exposed, XBT was worried it would be swept into a press storm at a time when Russian hackers were getting a lot of attention. Gubarev hired an American PR crisis manager who boasted of once repping accused mega-pirate Kim DotCom. In a series of emails, his chief operating office, Nick Dvas, urged the PR consultant to handle reporters with care.

““We know him personally many years. We was [sic] under impression that it is a big data analytics system for ad networks as per his explanation.””
— Aleksej Gubarev
“Please, be very careful with Mr. Krebs,” Dvas wrote in one email, referring to independent security journalist Brian Krebs. “He has been performing lots of research in connection with cybercrime originating from Russia, and he might jump to some sort of unnecessary conclusions.”

In another message to the PR consultant, Gubarev admitted to direct dealings with Zhukov. “We know him personally many years,” he wrote. “We was [sic] under impression that it is a big data analytics system for ad networks as per his explanation.”

Despite the close and lucrative relationship, XBT evidently kept scant documentation pertaining to its biggest customer, according to a filing by BuzzFeed’s lawyers. “Their internal records consist of a credit card check with a ‘tolerance threshold’ of $1,000 and notations regarding multiple Russian names and e-mail addresses they are unable to identify,” read the filing. “And though he was supposedly a client for more than a year who personally visited them several times, they have not produced a single actual e-mail, message or other communication from Zhukov.”

In the end, the evidence knocked loose by Gubarev’s lawsuit doesn’t tie him in any meaningful way to Russiagate. But it does show that his company, perhaps innocently, was paid a lot of money as part of an epic Russian cybercrime caper that’s now headed toward a federal trial in New York. That’s the kind of publicity

https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-t ... is-secrets




2 month extension of Gates' cooperation
investigations Gates is helping on

Mueller
Inauguration
Cambridge Analytica (possibly)
PsyGroup (possibly)
CI on Russia

Gates is also linked to Eliot Broidy.

And Pence. Gates was assigned to “manage” Manafort’s VP pick
[/quote]


YELLOWKERK FLYNN


Brandi Buchman

Flynn is a key witness for the prosecution.

Prosecutors, however, defended their ground saying that they have turned over everything they have to the defense relating to Flynn.
What Kian's attys are really asking for, prosecutors say, is a bridge too far.


Prosecutors told Judge Trenga they don't want to provide full, un-redacted records of all 15 interviews Flynn had with the special counsel because there are "other investigations that would or could be hampered" by sharing "unfettered" access.



"The documents and all [interviews] that relate to this case are available for review in our office. We're happy to make records available but we ask some reasonable conditions," prosecutor James Gillis said.


For his part, Kian's attorney, Mark MacDougall, countered, saying first, they weren't on a "fishing expedition" but want access in order to bring their case since Flynn is no "ordinary witness."


There may also be sensitive records needed for review that are housed with DIA or DoD, defense attys said. Prosecution didn't address this mention of records elsewhere but emphasized to the court that they have already allowed Kian's team to review records in office for 5 days


Gillis also assured Trenga the gov't would fully comply with standard rules and regs when it comes to sharing sensitive data, but he did cite SCOTUS precedent which contends that a prosecutor's decision to disclose discovery is at their sole discretion, unless the court...


suspects there is a reason prosecutors are not disclosing properly.
Gillis also pushed back against defense claims that Kian wouldn't even be at trial if it weren't for the notoriety surrounding Flynn....


Flynn or no Flynn, Gillis says: "This is prosecution for conspiracy to violate [federal lobbying rules] and moreover this a conspiracy which influenced public opinion with the help of foreign governments and high ranking foreign officials."

Here's a copy of the original indictment from way back in December:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... tment.html


And here's a bit of background I wrote around that time:


US Charges 2 With Acting as Illegal Agents of Turkey

BRANDI BUCHMANDecember 17, 2018

Bijan Rafiekian, a onetime business partner to former national security adviser Michael Flynn, leaves the FBI Field Office on Dec. 17, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – Onetime associates of President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn were charged Monday with acting as illegal agents of the Turkish government.

Unsealed this morning in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the 21-page indictment alleges that Flynn’s former business partner Bijan Kian of California and Turkish national Ekim Alptekin “conspired covertly and unlawfully to influence U.S. politicians and public opinion concerning a Turkish citizen living in the United States whose extradition was then being sought by the government of Turkey.”

Though not named in court papers, the Turkish citizen described by prosecutors is Fethullah Gulen, a cleric living in self-imposed exile in Pennsylvania since 1999. Turkish President Recep Erdogan has claimed Gulen was responsible for an attempted coup against him in 2016, allegations he has denied.

Monday’s indictment was filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney James Gillis in the Eastern District of Virginia and Evan Turgeon, a trial attorney with the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice.

According to the indictment, efforts to delegitimize Gulen began in earnest in July 2016 when the U.S. Department of Justice formally denied the Turkish government’s request to have the cleric extradited.

At the time, Flynn was working directly with Trump, and Kian, a former director for the Export-Import Bank, served as vice chairman to his consultancy, Flynn Intel Group.


Pennsylvania-based Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen (Photo credit: Voice of America)

On July 30, according to the indictment, Kian sent an email to Alptekin, with Flynn copied, where he touted a “Truth Campaign” that he had formed with Flynn with the goal of likening Gulen to Iran’s Ayatollah Kohmeini.

Flynn would later draw the same Gulen-Khomeini comparison in an op-ed piece published in The Hill on Nov. 8, 2016 — timed to coincide with Election Day.

Four days before the op-ed ran, Kian wrote to Alptekin: “The arrow has left the bow!”

The indictment describes a $600,000 contract that Flynn Intel struck in August 2016 with Alptekin’s shell company, Inovo BV, whose trade group is indirectly controlled by the Turkish government.

The contract specified “making criminal referrals” against Gulen, according to the indictment, which also notes that the Turkish government instructed Kian to “conceal” his lobbying efforts.

Flynn, who was prosecuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, pleaded guilty last year to making false statements to the FBI.

Kian, 66, of San Juan Capistrano, was released on bail after his appearance in court this morning. The conspiracy charge is punishable by five years in prison; a conviction for acting as an agent of a foreign government meanwhile would carry a 10-year term.

A warrant is still out for the arrest of Alptekin, 41, described as a resident of Istanbul. Alptekin faces four extra counts involving lying to the FBI.
https://www.courthousenews.com/us-charg ... of-turkey/


So, all of that said, where does that leave us here in EDVA? Well, defense attorneys have been ordered to produce a specific list of interviews or records they want pertaining to Flynn for prosecutors to review.

Once that is filed, Judge Trenga will issue an order on how to move forward. That order may be filed today or at a later point but in any event, I'll keep an eye on it here in Virginia for @CourthouseNews.





Ryan Goodman


Breaking: Federal court holds First Amendment does not protect Trump Campaign in alleged conspiracy with Russia-Wikileaks.

Court holds that Supreme Court case (Bartnicki) does not apply for the reasons that Bob Bauer and I argued here:
https://www.justsecurity.org/61327/amen ... ks-russia/

1/4
Image
Image

Also, federal court's reasoning that First Amendment does not protect Trump Campaign in alleged conspiracy with Wikileaks also closely tracks the reasoning of legendary First Amendment expert Floyd Abrams.

Here's the Floyd Abrams piece:
https://www.justsecurity.org/60995/fact ... ng-russia/
2/4



That said, the court does not reach whether a conspiracy existed. Judge Hudson states, "This Court...offers no assessment of the veracity of the factual assertions underlying Plaintiffs' claims."

3/4

Document: #Cockrum et al vs. Trump Campaign
US federal district court for the Eastern District of Virginia, March 15, 2019 (Judge Henry E. Hudson)

https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content ... mpaign.pdf
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1106626013277184000


Kellyanne Conway's husband is trying to tell the public Trump is mentally ill. She doesn't agree - CNNPolitics



Why an unbuilt Moscow Trump tower caught Mueller's attention

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An intriguing area of focus in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Kremlin’s role in the 2016 U.S. election is a proposed Moscow real estate deal that Donald Trump pursued while running for president despite denying at the time any links to Russia.

FILE PHOTO: Special Counsel Robert Mueller (R) departs after briefing members of the U.S. Senate on his investigation into potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., June 21, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
The special counsel has revealed in court filings numerous details about the project, which never came to fruition. Further information has come from Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal lawyer who was instrumental in the negotiations, in congressional testimony and in his guilty plea to a charge of lying to Congress about the project.

Mueller’s team said in a December 2018 court filing that “the Moscow Project was a lucrative business opportunity that sought, and likely required, the assistance of the Russian government. If the project was completed, the Company (the Trump Organization) could have received hundreds of millions of dollars from Russian sources in licensing fees and other revenues.”

The project is significant because it shows Trump was chasing a lucrative business deal in Russia at the same time that President Vladimir Putin’s government, according to U.S. intelligence agencies, was conducting a hacking and propaganda campaign to boost his candidacy. The project also coincided with Trump’s positive comments as a candidate about Putin and his questioning of U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Mueller is preparing to submit to U.S. Attorney General William Barr the report on his investigation into whether Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia and whether the Republican president has unlawfully tried to obstruct the probe. Trump has denied collusion and obstruction. Russia has denied election interference.

Here is an explanation of the Trump Moscow tower project and what the president has said about it.

WHAT IS TRUMP’S HISTORY IN MOSCOW?

Trump, a wealthy New York real estate developer, had discussed expanding his business empire into Russia for more than three decades. In 2013, after visiting Russia and hosting his Miss Universe pageant there, he wrote on Twitter: “TRUMP TOWER-MOSCOW is next.” The Trump Organization’s longtime partner in the project was Felix Sater, a Russian-born, Brooklyn-raised real estate developer, according to company emails released to congressional investigators.

WHAT WAS THE TRUMP TOWER MOSCOW PROJECT?

Trump in October 2015 signed a non-binding letter of intent to move forward with a Moscow tower project with a Russian development firm. The firm, I.C. Expert Investment Co, agreed to construct the skyscraper, and the Trump Organization agreed to license its name and manage the building’s operations. The letter of intent described a building in a Moscow business district with 250 luxury residential condominiums, at least 150 hotel rooms and a luxury spa.

Sater, who has served prison time in the United States for assault and later became an FBI informant on organized crime, assured Cohen in a November 2015 email he could get the Russian government to support a Trump property in Moscow.

“I know how to play it and we will get this done. Buddy our boy can become President of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putin’s team to buy in on this,” Sater told Cohen in that email.

Trump had announced his presidential candidacy in June 2015.

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump arrives aboard Air Force One to rally with supporters in Chattanooga, Tennessee, U.S. November 4, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
In testimony last month to the House of Representatives Oversight and Reform Committee, Cohen said Sater came up with a “marketing stunt” of offering Putin a free penthouse in the tower to drive up unit prices, “no different than in any condo where they start listing celebrities that live in the property.”

Cohen’s House testimony portrayed Trump as keenly interested in completing the deal even as he campaigned for president. “Mr. Trump knew of and directed the Trump Moscow negotiations throughout the campaign and lied about it. He lied about it because he never expected to win the election. He also lied about it because he stood to make hundreds of millions of dollars on the Moscow real estate project,” Cohen testified.

In his guilty plea, Cohen admitted he had lied to Congress in a 2017 letter that claimed he had only discussed the negotiations with Trump three times and that the project talks ended in January 2016. Cohen said he lied to Congress to minimize links between Trump and the project and give the false impression that the proposal had ended before key early milestones in the 2016 race to determine the Republican presidential nominee.

Cohen in his guilty plea said the project was discussed within the Trump Organization multiple times and that he spoke with Sater about obtaining Russian governmental approval as late as June 2016, after Trump had clinched the Republican nomination.

O’Rourke raises $6.1M in campaign’s first day
WHY DID THE NEGOTIATIONS END?

Legal filings in Cohen’s plea deal did not make clear why the negotiations ended. But June 2016 was the month when the Washington Post first reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the Democratic National Committee’s computers, a cyber operation that was a key part of Moscow’s interference in the presidential race, as described by U.S. intelligence.

One of Trump’s lawyers, Rudy Giuliani, indicated in January 2019 that the Moscow tower discussions had continued through the November 2016 election, though he later backtracked.

WHAT HAS TRUMP SAID?

Trump’s public statements about business dealings in Russia have evolved over time. In July 2016, Trump told a news conference: “I have nothing to do with Russia.” Nine days before becoming president, Trump wrote on Twitter, “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA - NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!”

In November 2018, after Cohen’s guilty plea, Trump told reporters that in 2016 he was in a position “to possibly do a deal to build a building of some kind in Moscow.” Trump added, “There would be nothing wrong if I did do it. I was running my business while I was campaigning. There was a good chance that I wouldn’t have won, in which case I would have gotten back into the business. And why should I lose lots of opportunities?” Cohen told the House panel Trump made clear to him that he should lie about when the negotiations ended.

Trump and his allies have called Cohen a liar trying to reduce his prison time after pleading guilty to a series of federal criminal charges.

WHAT ROLE DID TRUMP’S CHILDREN PLAY?

Cohen told the House panel that he briefed the president’s son and daughter, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, about the tower negotiations. Donald Trump Jr., an executive at the Trump Organization, told Congress in September 2017 he was only “peripherally aware” of the talks during the campaign. Ivanka Trump, a former Trump Organization executive, told ABC News last month she knew “literally almost nothing” about the project, saying there were “40 or 50 deals like that were floating around, that somebody was looking at.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1QZ159
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 18, 2019 9:17 pm

E6F22643-6B66-46A4-B0DF-CB922738A628.jpeg

Jared Kushner introduced his father-in-law, Donald J. Trump, to Rosemary Vrablic. Mr. Kushner and Ms. Vrablic attended events together, including this one at the Frick Collection in 2014.


A Mar-a-Lago Weekend and an Act of God: Trump’s History With Deutsche Bank

March 18, 2019
The headquarters of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt. The bank has sought to distance itself from President Trump since his election in 2016.Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters

E0F64852-03D1-4818-9D3B-5792C934EEA2.jpeg


As President Trump delivered his inaugural address in 2017, a slight woman with feathered gray hair sat listening, bundled in a hooded white parka in a fenced-off V.I.P. section. Her name was Rosemary T. Vrablic. She was a managing director at Deutsche Bank and one of the reasons Mr. Trump had just taken the oath of office.

It was a moment of celebration — and a moment of worry for Ms. Vrablic’s employer.

Mr. Trump and Deutsche Bank were deeply entwined, their symbiotic bond born of necessity and ambition on both sides: a real estate mogul made toxic by polarizing rhetoric and a pattern of defaults, and a bank with intractable financial problems and a history of misconduct.

Rosemary T. Vrablic, at top right in a white hooded coat, helped steer more than $300 million in loans to Donald J. Trump in the years before he was elected president.Daniel Acker/Bloomberg


The relationship had paid off. Mr. Trump used loans from Deutsche Bank to finance skyscrapers and other high-end properties, and repeatedly cited his relationship with the bank to deflect political attacks on his business acumen. Deutsche Bank used Mr. Trump’s projects to build its investment-banking business, reaped fees from the assets he put in its custody and leveraged his celebrity to lure clients.

Then Mr. Trump won the 2016 election, and the German bank shifted into damage-control mode, bracing for an onslaught of public scrutiny, according to several people involved in the internal response.

In the weeks before Ms. Vrablic attended his swearing-in, the bank commissioned reports to figure out how it had gotten in so deep with Mr. Trump. It issued an unusual edict to its Wall Street employees: Do not publicly utter the word “Trump.”

More than two years later, Mr. Trump’s financial ties with Deutsche Bank are the subject of investigations by two congressional committees and the New York attorney general. Investigators hope to use Deutsche Bank as a window into Mr. Trump’s personal and business finances.

Deutsche Bank officials have quietly argued to regulators, lawmakers and journalists that Mr. Trump was not a priority for the bank or its senior leaders and that the lending was the work of a single, obscure division. But interviews with more than 20 current and former Deutsche Bank executives and board members, most of them with direct knowledge of the Trump relationship, contradict the bank’s narrative.

Over nearly two decades, Deutsche Bank’s leaders repeatedly saw red flags surrounding Mr. Trump. There was a disastrous bond sale, a promised loan that relied on a banker’s forged signature, wild exaggerations of Mr. Trump’s wealth, even a claim of an act of God.

But Deutsche Bank had a ravenous appetite for risk and limited concern about its clients’ reputations. Time after time, with the support of two different chief executives, the bank handed money — a total of well over $2 billion — to a man whom nearly all other banks had deemed untouchable.

Kerrie McHugh, a Deutsche Bank spokeswoman, said: “We remain committed to cooperating with authorized investigations.”

The White House referred questions to the Trump Organization. A company spokeswoman, Amanda Miller, declined to comment.

‘A Great Son!’

In the late 1990s, Deutsche Bank, which is based in Germany, was trying to make a name for itself on Wall Street. Its investment-banking division went on a hiring binge.

The bank recruited a handful of Goldman Sachs traders to lead a push into commercial real estate. One was Justin Kennedy, the son of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. Another was Mike Offit, whose father was the writer Sidney Offit.

Mike Offit arranged the earliest loans for Mr. Trump at Deutsche Bank. He was fired in 1999.Demetrius Freeman for The New York Times


At Deutsche Bank, Mr. Offit’s mandate was to lend money to big real estate developers, package the loans into securities and sell the resulting bonds to investors. He said in an interview that one way to stand out in a crowded market was to make loans that his rivals considered too risky.

In 1998, a broker contacted him to see if he would consider lending to a Wall Street pariah: Mr. Trump, who was then a casino magnate whose bankruptcies had cost banks hundreds of millions of dollars.

Mr. Offit took the meeting.

A few days later, Mr. Offit’s secretary called him. “Donald Trump is in the conference room,” she whispered. Mr. Offit said he rushed in, expecting to find an entourage. Mr. Trump was alone.

He was looking for a $125 million loan to pay for gut renovations of 40 Wall Street, his Art Deco tower in Lower Manhattan. Mr. Offit was impressed by the pitch, and the loan sailed through Deutsche Bank’s approval process.

Mr. Trump seemed giddy with gratitude, Mr. Offit recalled. He took Mr. Offit golfing. He flew him by helicopter to Atlantic City for boxing matches. He wrote a grateful note to Sidney Offit for having “a great son!”

Mr. Offit commissioned a detailed model of 40 Wall Street. A golden plaque on its pedestal bore the names and logos of Deutsche Bank and the Trump Organization. Mr. Offit gave one to Mr. Trump and kept another in his office.

Mr. Trump soon came looking for $300 million for the construction of a skyscraper across from the United Nations headquarters. The loan was approved. He wanted hundreds of millions more for his Trump Marina casino in Atlantic City. Mr. Offit pledged to line up cash for that, too.

Not long after, Edson Mitchell, a top bank executive, discovered that the signature of the credit officer who had approved the Trump Marina deal had been forged, Mr. Offit said. (Mr. Offit was never accused of forgery; the loan never went through.)

Mr. Offit was fired months later. He said it was because Mr. Mitchell claimed that he was reckless, a charge Mr. Offit disputed.

It was the first hiccup in the Trump relationship. It would not be the last.

Mr. Offit commissioned detailed models of the skyscraper at 40 Wall Street; Deutsche Bank had lent Mr. Trump $125 million to renovate it. He gave one model to Mr. Trump and kept another for himself.Demetrius Freeman for The New York Times


The Mar-a-Lago Reward

Over the next few years, the commercial real estate group, with Mr. Kennedy now in a senior role, kept lending to Mr. Trump, including to buy the General Motors building in Manhattan. Occasionally, Justice Kennedy stopped by Deutsche Bank’s offices to say hello to the team, executives recalled.

At an annual pro-am golf tournament the bank hosted outside Boston in the early 2000s, Mr. Trump sat down for a recorded interview with the bank’s public relations staff, who asked about his experience with Deutsche Bank.

“It’s great,” Mr. Trump exclaimed, according to a person who witnessed the interview. “They’re really fast!”

Donald Trump was a regular participant at the annual Deutsche Bank Pro-Am Championship golf tournament, in Norton, Mass.Charles Krupa/Associated Press


In 2003, a Deutsche Bank team led by Richard Byrne — a former casino-industry analyst who had known Mr. Trump since the 1980s — was hired to sell bonds on behalf of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts. Bank officials escorted Mr. Trump to meet institutional investors in New York and Boston, according to an executive who attended.

The so-called roadshow seemed to go well. At every stop, Mr. Trump was greeted by large audiences of fund managers, executives and lower-level employees eager to see the famous mogul. The problem, as a Deutsche Bank executive would explain to Mr. Trump, was that few of them were willing to entrust money to him.

Mr. Trump requested an audience with the bank’s bond salesmen.

According to a Deutsche Bank executive who heard the remarks, Mr. Trump gave a pep talk. “Fellas, I know this isn’t the easiest thing you’ve had to sell,” the executive recalled Mr. Trump saying. “But if you get this done, you’ll all be my guests at Mar-a-Lago,” his private club in Palm Beach, Fla.

The sales team managed to sell hundreds of millions of dollars worth of bonds. Mr. Trump was pleased with the results when a Deutsche Bank executive called, according to a person who heard the conversation.

“Don’t forget what you promised our guys,” the executive reminded him.

Mr. Trump said he did not remember and that he doubted the salesmen actually expected to be taken to Mar-a-Lago.

“That’s all they’ve talked about the past week,” the executive replied.

Mr. Trump ultimately flew about 15 salesmen to Florida on his Boeing 727. They spent a weekend golfing with Mr. Trump, two participants said.

A year later, in 2004, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts defaulted on the bonds. Deutsche Bank’s clients suffered steep losses. This arm of the investment-banking division stopped doing business with Mr. Trump.

An Act of God

Around that time, Mr. Trump returned to Deutsche Bank’s commercial real estate unit — which was housed in a separate part of the sprawling investment-banking division — for another loan. This one was to build a 92-story skyscraper in Chicago, the Trump International Hotel and Tower.

Josef Ackermann, the bank’s chief executive, had publicly promised soaring profits, and with many of the company’s businesses sputtering, the investment-banking group was under intense pressure to grow.

A Chicago skyscraper was the focus of a court battle between Mr. Trump and Deutsche Bank that equated the 2008 financial crisis with an act of God.Nathan Weber for The New York Times

A Chicago skyscraper was the focus of a court battle between Mr. Trump and Deutsche Bank that equated the 2008 financial crisis with an act of God.Nathan Weber for The New York Times
As Deutsche Bank considered making the loan, Mr. Trump wooed bankers with flights on his private plane, according to a person familiar with the pitch. In a Trump Tower meeting, he told Mr. Kennedy that his daughter Ivanka would be in charge of the Chicago project, a sign of the family’s commitment to its success.

But there were warning signs.

Mr. Trump told Deutsche Bank his net worth was about $3 billion, but when bank employees reviewed his finances, they concluded he was worth about $788 million, according to documents produced during a lawsuit Mr. Trump brought against the former New York Times journalist Timothy O’Brien. And a senior investment-banking executive said in an interview that he and others cautioned that Mr. Trump should be avoided because he had worked with people in the construction industry connected to organized crime.

Nonetheless, Deutsche Bank agreed in 2005 to lend Mr. Trump more than $500 million for the project. He personally guaranteed $40 million of it, meaning the bank could come after his personal assets if he defaulted.

By 2008, the riverside skyscraper, one of the tallest in America, was mostly built. But with the economy sagging, Mr. Trump struggled to sell hundreds of condominium units. The bulk of the loan was due that November.

Then the financial crisis hit, and Mr. Trump’s lawyers sensed an opportunity.

A provision in the loan let Mr. Trump partially off the hook in the event of a “force majeure,” essentially an act of God, like a natural disaster. The former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan had called the financial crisis a tsunami. And what was a tsunami if not a natural disaster?

One of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, Steven Schlesinger, told him the provision could be used against Deutsche Bank.

“It’s brilliant!” Mr. Schlesinger recalled Mr. Trump responding.

Days before the loan was due, Mr. Trump sued Deutsche Bank, citing the force majeure language and seeking $3 billion in damages. Deutsche Bank countersued and demanded payment of the $40 million that Mr. Trump had personally guaranteed.

With the suits in court, senior investment-banking executives severed ties with Mr. Trump.

Luring a Banker

Not long after Mr. Trump got the Chicago loan — but before it went south — Deutsche Bank was expanding its private-banking division, which served the superrich. Executives said they set out to hire Ms. Vrablic, whom they viewed as the best private banker in New York.

Ms. Vrablic, seen in 2012, was not a traditional private banker, and her bosses at Deutsche Bank encouraged her to be aggressive.Michael Nagle


Traditionally, private bankers discreetly manage customers’ wealth and act as high-end concierges. Ms. Vrablic, who started her career as a bank teller and then worked at Citigroup and Bank of America, did that and more. She also arranged large real estate and commercial loans for her best clients.

To lure her, Deutsche Bank guaranteed that she would earn at least $3 million a year, unusually rich terms for a private banker, and would bypass a layer of management to report directly to Thomas Bowers, the head of the American wealth-management division, according to people familiar with her contract.

“Rosemary is widely recognized as one of the top private bankers to the U.S. ultra high-net-worth community,” Mr. Bowers said in a September 2006 news release. Deutsche Bank took out an ad in The Times to celebrate the arrival of her and a few colleagues.

Ms. Vrablic’s superiors encouraged her to make loans that rival banks dismissed as too large or complex. They saw it as a way to elbow into the hypercompetitive New York market.

‘There Is No Objection’

In 2010, Deutsche Bank and Mr. Trump settled their litigation over the Chicago loan. Mr. Trump agreed to repay most of what he owed by 2012, Mr. Schlesinger said.

One of Ms. Vrablic’s clients was Jared Kushner, who married Ivanka Trump in 2009. Mr. Kushner regarded Ms. Vrablic as the best banker he had ever worked with, according to a person familiar with his thinking.

Shortly after the Chicago lawsuit was settled, Mr. Kushner was told that Mr. Trump was looking for a loan and introduced him to Ms. Vrablic, according to people familiar with the relationship.

Jared Kushner introduced his father-in-law, Donald J. Trump, to Rosemary Vrablic. Mr. Kushner and Ms. Vrablic attended events together, including this one at the Frick Collection in 2014.Matteo Prandoni/BFA

Jared Kushner introduced his father-in-law, Donald J. Trump, to Rosemary Vrablic. Mr. Kushner and Ms. Vrablic attended events together, including this one at the Frick Collection in 2014.Matteo Prandoni/BFA
Mr. Trump flew Ms. Vrablic to Miami to show her a property he wanted to buy: the Doral Golf Resort and Spa. He needed more than $100 million for the 72-hole property.

Deutsche Bank dispatched a team to Trump Tower to inspect Mr. Trump’s personal and corporate financial records. The bankers determined he was overvaluing some of his real estate assets by as much as 70 percent, according to two former executives.

By then, though, Mr. Trump had become a reality-TV star, and he was swimming in cash from “The Apprentice.” Deutsche Bank officials also were impressed that Mr. Trump did not have much debt, according to people who reviewed his finances. Aside from his history of defaults, he was an attractive borrower.

Mr. Trump also expressed interest in another loan from the private-banking division: $48 million for the same Chicago property that had provoked the two-year court fight.

Mr. Trump told the bank he would use that loan to repay what he still owed the investment-banking division, the two former executives said. Even by Wall Street standards, borrowing money from one part of a bank to pay off a loan from another was an extraordinary act of financial chutzpah.

Ms. Vrablic and Mr. Bowers tentatively agreed to both loans.

Because these would be the private bank’s first transactions with Mr. Trump, they needed approval up the chain of command.

Investment-banking executives, including Anshu Jain, who would soon become Deutsche Bank’s co-chief executive, pushed back. Lending to Mr. Trump again would be foolish, they argued, and signal to clients that they could default and even sue the bank.

Executives in the private bank countered that the proposed loans had Mr. Trump’s personal guarantee and therefore were low risk. And the Chicago loan, they noted, would lead to the repayment of tens of millions of dollars that Mr. Trump still owed the investment-banking division.

A top executive with responsibility for the private bank discussed the loans with Mr. Ackermann, the chief executive, who supported them, according to two officials. A powerful committee in Frankfurt, which evaluated loans based on risks to the bank’s reputation, signed off.

Josef Ackermann was the first of two Deutsche Bank chief executives to approve the bank’s relationship with Mr. Trump.Ralph Orlowski/Getty Images


“There is no objection from the bank to proceed with this client,” wrote Stuart Clarke, the chief operating officer for the Americas, in a Dec. 5, 2011, email, according to a recipient.

Deutsche Bank wired the money to Mr. Trump. The loans carried relatively low interest rates, executives said, but the business promised to be profitable: As part of the deal, Mr. Trump would hold millions of dollars in a personal account, generating fees for the bank.

“I have no recollection of having been asked to approve that private-banking loan,” Mr. Ackermann said in an interview. He added: “I would have approved it, if it came to me, if it was commercially sound.”

The C.E.O. Meets Trump

Ms. Vrablic’s relationship with the Trumps deepened.

Deutsche Bank lent money to Donald Trump Jr. for a South Carolina manufacturing venture that would soon go bankrupt. It provided a $15 million credit line to Mr. Kushner and his mother, according to financial documents reviewed by The Times. The bank previously had an informal ban on business with the Kushners because Jared’s father, Charles, was a felon.

In 2012, Jared Kushner recommended that the editor of The Mortgage Observer, one of the publications he owned, write a profile of Ms. Vrablic. The editor, Carl Gaines, knew Mr. Kushner was her client and objected, according to a person familiar with the exchange.

“Just go meet with her,” Mr. Kushner said. “You’ll figure something out.”

A gauzy profile of Ms. Vrablic was published in February 2013.

Shortly afterward, the private bank produced a promotional video featuring some of its marquee clients. The video was played at a retreat for Deutsche Bank’s senior leadership in Barcelona. In it, Ivanka Trump extolled the private bank’s work with her family and thanked their relationship manager, according to two people who saw the video.

In early 2014, Mr. Trump and his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, approached Ms. Vrablic about more potential loans.

The owner of the Buffalo Bills had died, and the N.F.L. franchise was up for sale. Mr. Trump was interested, and he needed to show the league he had the financial wherewithal to pull off a transaction that could top $1 billion.

Mr. Trump asked Ms. Vrablic if the bank would be willing to make a loan and handed over bare-bones financial statements that estimated his net worth at $8.7 billion.

Mr. Cohen testified to Congress last month that the documents exaggerated Mr. Trump’s wealth. Deutsche Bank executives had reached a similar conclusion. They nonetheless agreed to vouch for Mr. Trump’s bid, according to an executive involved.

Mr. Trump’s bid did not win, but another lending opportunity soon arose.

A federal agency had selected Mr. Trump to transform the Old Post Office Building in Washington into a luxury hotel. But his financial partner — the private equity firm Colony Capital, run by Thomas J. Barrack Jr. — pulled out. Mr. Trump needed nearly $200 million.

Anshu Jain argued against lending to Mr. Trump when Mr. Jain was part of Deutsche Bank’s investment-banking division. But that changed when he became the bank’s co-chief executive.Jean-Christophe Bott/European Pressphoto Agency


Because of his decades-long pattern of defaults and his increasingly polarizing political rhetoric — among other things, he had been spreading a lie about President Barack Obama being born overseas — Mr. Trump remained untouchable for most banks.

Ms. Vrablic was willing to help.

In a memo outlining the rationale for the Old Post Office loan, Ms. Vrablic said Mr. Trump was expected to add large sums to his brokerage account if he received the loan, according to an executive who read the document.

This time, there was less internal opposition. One reason: Mr. Jain — by then the bank’s co-chief executive — had a solid relationship with Ms. Vrablic. Mr. Jain accompanied her to meetings with high-profile clients, and he praised her work to colleagues, multiple executives said.

On a foggy Wednesday in February 2013, Ms. Vrablic and Mr. Jain went to Trump Tower to meet with Mr. Trump, according to two executives with knowledge of the meeting. Ms. Vrablic’s rapport with the client was immediately clear: Mr. Trump’s assistant greeted her as an old friend, and she seemed relaxed with Mr. Trump and his daughter, one executive said.

They discussed Mr. Trump’s finances over lunch, and Mr. Jain said he was surprised by his low level of debt, the executives said. After lunch, Ms. Vrablic told her colleagues that Mr. Jain had sounded upbeat about Mr. Trump’s finances.

A $170 million loan to pay for the overhaul of the Old Post Office went through in 2015, and Mr. Trump added more money to his brokerage account. (In May 2016, he reported up to $46 million of stocks and bonds in the account.)

On Aug. 6, 2015, Mr. Trump participated in the first Republican presidential debate. He clashed with the Fox News moderator, Megyn Kelly. He flew back to New York early the next morning. That evening, he called in to a CNN talk show and said of Ms. Kelly that there was “blood coming out of her wherever.”

In the intervening hours, Mr. Trump had used a black Sharpie to sign documents for another loan from Deutsche Bank: $19 million for the Doral resort. That brought to more than $300 million the total lent under Ms. Vrablic.

Shock and Anger

On the campaign trail, rivals assailed Mr. Trump’s financial history. In response, he pointed to Deutsche Bank-funded successes like the Old Post Office project, now a gleaming hotel a few blocks from the White House.

In early 2016, Mr. Trump asked Ms. Vrablic for one final loan, for his golf course in Turnberry, Scotland.

The Trump International Hotel, just blocks from the White House, was financed with a loan from Deutsche Bank.Eva Hambach/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images


Ms. Vrablic said yes, but a fight soon erupted.

Jacques Brand, who was in charge of Deutsche Bank’s American businesses, angrily objected, partly because of Mr. Trump’s divisive rhetoric.

Ms. Vrablic appealed the decision. Senior executives in Frankfurt, including Christian Sewing, who would become chief executive in 2018, were shocked that the private bank would consider lending Mr. Trump money during the campaign, bank officials said.

The bank’s reputational risk committee killed the transaction in March 2016.

That same month, as The Times was preparing an article about Mr. Trump’s excommunication from Wall Street, he cited his warm relationship with Deutsche Bank.

“They are totally happy with me,” he said to The Times. “Why don’t you call the head of Deutsche Bank? Her name is Rosemary Vrablic. She is the boss.”

Demagogy and Defaults

After Mr. Trump won the election, Deutsche Bank’s board of directors rushed to understand how the bank had become the biggest lender to the president-elect.

A report prepared by the board’s integrity committee concluded that executives in the private-banking division were so determined to win business from big-name clients that they had ignored Mr. Trump’s reputation for demagogy and defaults, according to a person who read the report.

The review also found that Deutsche Bank had produced a number of “exposure reports” that flagged the growing business with Mr. Trump, but that they had not been adequately reviewed by senior executives.

On Deutsche Bank’s trading floor, managers began warning employees not to use the word “Trump” in communications with people outside the bank. Salesmen who violated the edict were scolded by compliance officers who said the bank feared stoking public interest in its ties to the new president.

One reason: If Mr. Trump were to default on his loans, Deutsche Bank would have to choose between seizing his assets or cutting him a lucrative break — a situation the bank would rather resolve in private.

Two years after Mr. Trump was sworn in, Democrats took control of the House of Representatives. The chamber’s financial services and intelligence committees opened investigations into Deutsche Bank’s relationship with Mr. Trump. Those inquiries, as well as the New York attorney general’s investigation, come at a perilous time for Deutsche Bank, which is negotiating to merge with another large German lender.

Next month, Deutsche Bank is likely to start handing over extensive internal documents and communications about Mr. Trump to the congressional committees, according to people briefed on the process.

Ms. Vrablic, who is intensely private and rarely discusses her personal life with colleagues, declined to comment. People familiar with her thinking said she expected to be called to testify publicly on Capitol Hill.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/busi ... -bank.html


Mueller Might Not Be Done With Manafort Yet
The disgraced operative still needs to answer for his ties to a suspected Russian spy
6:00 AM ET

Paul ManafortAlex Wong / Getty
Seventeen months, two trials, and one voided plea deal later, the former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort has finally learned his fate: He’ll spend about seven years in federal prison for crimes he committed over more than a decade, marking one of the biggest prosecutorial victories for Special Counsel Robert Mueller since he launched his investigation nearly two years ago.

Nevertheless, Mueller might not be quite done with Manafort yet, former prosecutors tell me. Court documents and pre-sentence hearings that dealt with the breach of Manafort’s plea deal suggest that prosecutors might have more ammunition to go after the 69-year-old on matters that go directly to the question of a conspiracy with Russia, rather than the financial crimes and violations of foreign-agent laws that he’s been charged with to date.

Manafort pleaded guilty to tax and bank fraud and failing to register as a foreign agent for Ukraine. But he “intentionally made multiple false statements” to the FBI, the special counsel’s office, and the grand jury “concerning matters that were material to the investigation: his interactions and communications” with the suspected Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik, D.C. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled last month. As such, questions remain about Manafort’s interactions with Russians during the campaign—questions that go to the main focus of the Mueller investigation into a potential election conspiracy.

“The ‘no collusion’ mantra is simply a non sequitur,” Jackson said during Manafort’s sentencing hearing on Wednesday, referring to Manafort’s attorneys’ claim that Mueller had found no evidence of collusion with Russia. “It’s also not accurate because the investigation is ongoing.”

The first clue that Mueller’s interest in Manafort goes beyond his financial crimes came early last month, when one of the top prosecutors on Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, said in a closed-door hearing that a meeting Manafort had in August 2016 goes “very much to the heart of what the special counsel’s office is investigating.” (Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates was also at the meeting, The Washington Post said, citing court records. A status update for Gates, who has been cooperating with Mueller, is due on Friday.) During that meeting Manafort provided internal Trump-campaign polling data to Kilimnik and discussed a “Ukraine peace plan” favorable to Russia. Mueller was appointed in May 2017 to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with” Trump’s campaign, as his appointment memo described it; Jackson agreed that the topic of Manafort’s meeting was at “the undisputed core of the Office of Special Counsel’s investigation.”

But Weissmann’s tantalizing comment wasn’t resolved in the government’s sentencing memo for Manafort; on the contrary, details about the August 2016 meeting were conspicuously absent from the 800-page document. The episode was briefly brought up in Manafort’s sentencing hearing on Wednesday, when Jackson reaffirmed that Manafort had lied to the government about the meeting in his conversations with Mueller’s team. “I still find that the special counsel’s office proved that Manafort intentionally gave false testimony with respect to that matter,” she said. And it was only one of “several matters he lied about with regard to Mr. Kilimnik,” she added.

Read: Why Manafort is still talking about collusion

The topics discussed during the August 2 meeting might be the closest thing to a “smoking gun” of collusion that has been revealed so far. A footnote in a court filing submitted by Manafort’s attorneys last month, first noticed by the national-security journalist Marcy Wheeler, indicates that Manafort and his deputy sent 75 pages of polling to Kilimnik and that Kilimnik sent at least six emails to the pair discussing the data. Richard Westling, Manafort’s lawyer, denied that Manafort had lied about the content of the August 2 meeting and said that while the data that Manafort shared with Kilimnik was “very detailed” and “relevant” to a meeting the campaign had had earlier in the day, it would not have been useful to the suspected Russian spy. "It frankly, to me, is gibberish,” Westling said. “It’s not easily understandable." Jackson shot back: "That’s what makes it significant and unusual.”

Still, the content of the 2016 meeting was only revealed by accident due to a redaction error by Manafort’s lawyers, and the significance of the episode to Mueller’s main probe, while hinted at by Weissmann, has yet to be fully explained.

“It’s hard to imagine that something so explosive and central to the mission of his investigation wouldn’t be addressed either in charges against someone (Manafort or others) or in a report,” Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, wrote in an email. “And the fact that the special counsel hasn’t brought it out but it was only revealed inadvertently, reinforces the idea that [Mueller] is saving it for something else.”

That “something else” could be anything from a line in Mueller’s report to an entire conspiracy charge. “My money is on Mueller including the Manafort efforts as part of the ‘case’ alleging Trump campaign collaboration with the Russians,” Patrick Cotter, a former federal prosecutor who specialized in organized crime, told me in an email. “The question then is, what is the best way to make that case? For myself, I believe a RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] indictment would be the appropriate vehicle to bring such a case: charge the campaign as the ‘racketeering enterprise’ and name Trump, Manafort and the rest of the gang as members of the enterprise … straight out of the mob prosecution playbook.”

Read: Collusion happened

Cotter, who is familiar with Mueller’s by-the-book style but has no direct knowledge of his internal plans, said Mueller is more likely to take the “safer route”—laying out all the facts that would support such a case in a report, “but not actually charging the legally plausible but politically nuclear formal criminal case.” Any RICO indictment against the campaign for a conspiracy with Russia “would be the new definition of bold and cutting edge.” The former federal prosecutor Jeffrey Cramer agreed that Mueller could bring a conspiracy case and name Manafort and others as unindicted co-conspirators—but if the evidence doesn’t rise to the level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, it will likely just be outlined in the report.

A spokesman for the special counsel’s office declined to comment. A lawyer for Manafort didn’t return a request for comment.

Whatever path Mueller decides to take, there is no shortage of lingering questions about Manafort’s role in a potential conspiracy. “This hasn’t been resolved at all,” Representative Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told me on Thursday. “What Manafort chose to do was to conceal evidence of collusion from the special counsel’s office and from the court, and then have his lawyer go out on the courthouse steps and say there was no collusion.”

Schiff suggested, moreover, that Mueller knows a lot more about Manafort than his office has so far let on. “We have not had access to Manafort and I don’t know whether we ever will,” he said. “But the special counsel’s office does have information about this.” Schiff added that the lingering questions about Manafort’s role underscore how important it is that Mueller’s final report be provided to Congress—and that the report include all of the underlying evidence Mueller collected, regardless of whether it results in a conspiracy charge. “Our standard is not whether there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt,” Schiff said, “but whether there is a risk to national security.”

Regardless of Mueller’s next steps, Manafort is set to spend at least six years in federal prison. Kevin Downing, Manafort’s other lawyer, appeared to be playing for a presidential pardon when he told reporters on the courthouse steps on Wednesday that no evidence of Russian collusion had been found. But a pardon might now prove useless—Manafort now faces state charges in New York, where the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office charged him on Wednesday in connection with a multimillion-dollar mortgage-fraud scheme.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... es/584995/
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Mar 20, 2019 6:56 pm

helping pick the next director of the CIA ......Bijan Kian :shock:



Polly Sigh


Alptekin, the now-indicted business associate of Flynn and Bijan Kian, in 2008 had a business deal "with financing from Putin-chaired VEB Bank" [whose CEO met with Kushner in Dec 2016 and whose subsidiary is RDIF, the CEO of which, Kirill Dmitriev, met with Erik Prince].

Matthew Alexander

So the lawyer for Flynn's ex-business partner Bijan Kian, as part of pre-trial discovery, wants information on Michael Flynn's "contacts with Russian officials, including Kirill Dmitriev, following the presidential election in 2016..." Flynn-Dmitriev contacts??? Mistake??? Or...

Image

So the lawyer for Flynn's ex-business partner Bijan Kian, as part of pre-trial discovery, wants information on Michael Flynn's "contacts with Russian officials, including Kirill Dmitriev, following the presidential election in 2016..." Flynn-Dmitriev contacts??? Mistake??? Or...


Bijan Kian is seeking files re Mike Flynn's contacts with RDIF CEO Kirill Dmitriev [who in Jan 2017 met with Erik Prince in the Seychelles and Scaramucci at DAVOS]. Flynn likely made contact with Dmitriev through his now-indicted associate, Ekim Alptekin.

Image
Image
Image

Flynn’s now-indicted associate Alptekin in 2008 had a business deal funded by Russia's VEB Bank [whose CEO met with Kushner in Dec 2016]. Putin personally approved the loan. RDIF [whose CEO Dmitriev met with Erik Prince] is a subsidiary of VEB.


Did Flynn set up the Kushner-VEB meeting? His Turkish boss, Alptekin, did business w/ VEB+Putin
http://politi.co/2q0ZV44

Image
Image


Mar 2018: "Mueller has evidence that a secret meeting in Seychelles was an effort to establish a Kremlin back channel [and] was set up in advance so that a Trump transition representative could meet with a Moscow emissary."
https://twitter.com/dcpoll/status/971554684531027968


Dec 2016: Kushner tells Kislyak he wants a Kremlin back channel. THEN, Kushner, Flynn, Bannon, Erik Prince meet in NY w Prince MBZ, who arranges Erik Prince's Seychelles meeting w Dmitriev, head of RDIF [an arm of VEB, whose CEO met w Kushner in DEC 2016].
https://twitter.com/dcpoll/status/857767920834932742



Recall: Mueller cooperating witness Nader contradicted Erik Prince's claim that the Emiratis introduced him to Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev in Seychelles. It seems Erik Prince already knew Dmitriev, who we now know is close with Putin's family.


Mueller probe cooperating witness Nader contradicts House testimony of Trump transition team surrogate Erik Prince, brother of Education Sec Betsy Devos [who is also a liar]. It seems, Prince knew Putin envoy Dmitriev before the Seychelles meeting.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-dono ... 1520563593

Image
Image

Dec 2016: Foresman, who has close ties to Sergei Gorkov, CEO of Russia's VEB Bank [parent company of RDIF], met with Gorkov, who met with Jared Kushner the same month.
Jan 2017: Per Trump inaugural committee emails, Foresman met with Mike Flynn.

NEW: Mark Burnett sought access via Tom Barrack & Mike Flynn to Trump transition for his friend, Robert Foresman, a US banker with ties to close Putin ally Igor Sechin and Russia's VEB Bank CEO Sergei Gorkov,…

In this Nov 21, 2016 piece [HT @WendySiegelman], Kirill Dmitriev praised Mike Flynn for "his willingness to have open dialogue with Russia" and declined to say if the Russian fund [RDIF, a subsidiary of VEB] had plans to do business with Trump Org.

Image
Image
https://www.ft.com/content/6a2cc100-af3 ... 4a01f1b0fa


If what Bijan Kian alleges is true – that Mike Flynn met with head of RDIF [a subsidiary of VEB Bank], Kirill Dmitriev – Flynn will be the third known member of Trump's transition team to have met with the head of the Russian sovereign wealth fund.


In this Nov 21, 2016 piece [HT @WendySiegelman], Kirill Dmitriev praised Mike Flynn for "his willingness to have open dialogue with Russia" and declined to say if the Russian fund [RDIF, a subsidiary of VEB] had plans…


Dec 2016: Jared Kushner, Mike Flynn and Kislyak talked about arranging a meeting between a representative of Trump [Erik Prince] and a “Russian contact” [Kirill Dmitriev] in a third country [Seychelles], according to the anonymous letter.


Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner tried to set up secret communications w/Kremlin.
http://wapo.st/2qsJQk0?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.3650c0b802c0

Image
Image
Image

In addition to the Seychelles meeting, Jared Kushner's friend Rick Gerson was also present weeks before when Trump officials, Kushner, Flynn, & Bannon, had a covert meeting with Prince MBZ, Nader, & UAE Amb Otaiba at a Four Seasons hotel in NY.


NEW: Jared Kushner close friend Rick Gerson is now under Mueller's scrutiny. NY hedge-fund mgr Gerson met w UAE Crown Prince MBZ & George Nader in Seychelles around the time [Jan 2017] Trump envoy Erik Prince…


Days after the Seychelles meeting, while at Davos [where he met with Trump official Scaramucci], Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev [head of VEB Bank subsidiary, RDIF] sent a 2-page memo summarizing the Seychelles meeting to "Kushner's Guy" Rick Gerson.


What Erik Prince & Putin's envoy discussed in that infamous Seychelles meeting: The memo proposed a task force where the Russians would participate in figuring out what the policy should be..."That’s really…
https://twitter.com/dcpoll/status/868247995271323648






Former Trump confidante Hope Hicks to cooperate with House Democratic probe into Trump

Who is Hope Hicks?

(CNN)Hope Hicks, the former White House communications director and long-time confidante of President Donald Trump, plans to turn over documents to the House Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into potential obstruction of justice.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, sent Hicks a detailed letter earlier this month, asking for documents on a wide-range of topics, including over former national security adviser Michael Flynn's false statements to the FBI, the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey, Trump's involvement in a hush-money scheme to silence stories about his alleged affairs and the drafting of a misleading 2017 statement to the media about Donald Trump Jr.'s 2016 meeting in Trump Tower with Russians.

The request included documents from "any personal or work diary, journal or other book containing notes, a record or a description of daily events" about Trump, the Trump campaign, the Trump Organization and the executive office of the President.

Hicks and other current administration officials have agreed to provide documents to the committee, according to Nadler's spokesman Daniel Schwarz. Hicks' attorney declined to comment.

White House misses Democrats' deadline to turn over docs
The development comes amid a growing fight between House Democrats and the White House over a range of investigations -- after the White House has ignored a number of deadlines set by Democratic chairmen, who now wield subpoena power. The White House has not yet provided information to Nadler, a Democrat from New York, as part of his investigation -- despite a deadline this past Monday.
While she has agreed to cooperate, it's unclear how much information Hicks will ultimately provide the committee.

Last year, Hicks testified behind closed doors before the House Intelligence Committee, but she did not answer all of the questions from Democrats, who at the time were in the minority.

One of the Trump campaign's earliest hires, Hicks in 2018 was willing to answer questions about the 2016 campaign and some questions about the Trump transition, but she would not address questions about her time in the White House. Democrats on the committee had urged their Republican colleagues to subpoena Hicks to answer their questions. Now in the majority, House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, has indicated he also is interested in getting additional information from Hicks, too.

Nadler had set a Monday deadline for 81 individuals and entities to provide information to the panel as part of his investigation into possible abuses of power, corruption and obstruction of justice. Republicans contended that few -- only eight -- complied by Monday's deadline. But Democratic aides said far more witnesses had agreed to provide information in the coming days -- and Hicks is just one such example.

Hicks isn't the only former White House official who is cooperating with the House Judiciary Committee. Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, for instance, has already provided the committee with several thousands of pages of documents.

A spokesman for AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, said "American Media will comply with the request."

Ike Kaveladze, a Russian American who attended the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Donald Trump Jr and the Russian lawyer, has also complied with the request, his lawyer told CNN. Kaveladze is a long -time employee of Russian billionaire Aras Agalarov, who hosted with Trump the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow. Agalarov asked his son Emin, a Russian pop singer, to set up the meeting with Trump Jr.

Others, like former White House counsel Don McGahn, are referring their inquiries from the committee to the White House.

The House Judiciary Committee is also moving toward its first interview tied to the letters it sent to kick off the investigation: Felix Sater, who promoted the Trump Tower Moscow project, is scheduled to testify behind closed doors before the House Judiciary Committee next Thursday, according to two sources with knowledge of the appearance. It's the day after Sater is slated to testify publicly before the House Intelligence Committee.

CNN's Oliver Darcy contributed to this report.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/politics ... index.html




Rep. Cummings accuses White House of obstruction
The Lead

House Oversight committee chairman Elijah Cummings accused the White House of an "unprecedented level of stonewalling, delay and obstruction" in a Washington Post op-ed as his committee seeks information related to multiple ongoing investigations into the Trump administration. CNN's Sunlen Serfaty reports.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/201 ... ad-vpx.cnn



Elijah Cummings Comes With Receipts, Claims the White House Is Involved in 'Unprecedented Level of Stonewalling'

Stephen A. Crockett Jr.
Today 12:00pmFiled to: ELIJAH CUMMINGS
Image

Photo: Alex Wong (Getty Images)
President Donald Trump consistently calls the Democrats the “Obstructionist Party.” The President, who loves a cold Forbes magazine smacked against his untanned naked buttocks, claims that when it comes to pushing his raggedy bills through Congress, the Dems don’t want to play fair. As such, the president of people who only pack shorts to visit Alaska never misses an opportunity to call the Democrats out for delaying what Trump believes is best for the country.

Well, Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) is now calling the pot a racist, bigoted, cantankerous old bitch stonewaller, as the White House is refusing to submit any documents to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, which Cummings serves as chairman.





From an op-ed Cummings wrote for The Washington Post:

Let me underscore that point: The White House has not turned over a single piece of paper to our committee or made a single official available for testimony during the 116th Congress

One of the most important investigations we are conducting is a review of White House security clearances. The White House argues that Congress is not entitled to any information about individual employees, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying about his communications with the Russians; current national security adviser John Bolton, who worked directly with the gun rights group founded by now-convicted Russian spy Maria Butina; or the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was reportedly given access to our nation’s most sensitive secrets over the objections of then-White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly and others.

Instead, the White House offered to let us read — but not keep — a few pages of policy documents that have nothing to do with the officials we are investigating, along with a general briefing on those policies during which they will answer no questions about specific employees.
Cummings added that the committee is also looking into “hush money” payments the president’s former fixer Michael Cohen made to women claiming to have slept with the president.

Cummings notes that while Cohen provided copies of what he claims were reimbursement checks signed by Trump to back the alleged payments, the White House has not turned over any documents that the committee has requested pertaining to these payments, and instead offered officials the opportunity to “read 30 pages, about half of which were already public or entirely blacked out.”

Also from Cummings Post piece:

The White House has also refused to produce any documents or witnesses in response to our other investigations, including White House officials’ alleged use of personal email in violation of federal law; allegations that the president may have violated the Presidential Records Act by destroying documents; and reports from whistleblowers that the administration allegedly rushed to transfer sensitive nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia in violation of the Atomic Energy Act.

The White House is also refusing to provide documents relating to less high-profile issues, such as the use of taxpayer funds to pay for lavish private aircraft. Former health and human services secretary Tom Price had to write his own checks to reimburse the American taxpayers for his wasteful spending, but White House officials on some of those same flights, such as Kellyanne Conway, have refused to provide the documents we need to complete our review.

As a reminder of what used to be “normal,” previous presidential administrations turned over tens of thousands of pages of documents in response to Oversight Committee investigations under both parties just a few years ago. The George W. Bush White House gave us more than 20,000 pages relating to Hurricane Katrina; numerous documents and witnesses relating to the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame’s identity; and nearly 1,500 pages of emails between senior White House officials about the death of Pat Tillman. Similarly, the Obama White House produced many documents and emails relating to the Solyndra controversy, as well as witnesses and documents regarding the Benghazi, Libya, attacks, including communication between top White House officials and National Security Council staff.
This proves that Trump’s White House doesn’t care about congressional oversight. He’s blatantly stated this throughout his run for office that he had no intention of playing nice with Democrats. We all know that Trump’s son-in-law Jared “Got dem Visas” Kushner isn’t supposed to be anywhere near a damn security clearance. But the president has a set of rules that only apply to him. He’s basically the kid that brings the football to the field and won’t let anyone else play unless he gets to score. Everyone hates this kid. Everyone.

The president doesn’t care about the Constitution or checks and balances or what past presidents have done before him, and it’s encouraging to see Cummings willing to take this fight to the people—but he ain’t going to get to see none of those papers. The man in the White House is reckless AF and no one can control him; hell, they can’t even keep him off Twitter. At this point, the only person that can save America is special counsel Robert Mueller, and the longer this investigation takes, the less likely I am to even believe that.
https://www.theroot.com/elijah-cummings ... 1833435960
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 21, 2019 10:18 am


Trump’s Moscow Tower Problem


LISTEN
Embed
March 21, 2019
By Eric Umansky and Heather Vogell
( AP/Alexander Zemlianichenko / WNYC )
This week, we’re exploring President Donald Trump’s efforts to do business in Moscow. Our team — Heather Vogell, Andrea Bernstein, Meg Cramer and Katie Zavadski — dug into just who Trump was working with and just what Trump needed from Russia to get a deal done. (Listen to the podcast episode here.)

First, the big picture. We already knew that Trump had business interests involving Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign — which he denied — that could have been influencing his policy positions. As the world has discovered, Trump was negotiating to develop a tower in Moscow while running for president. Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen has admitted to lying to Congress about being in contact with the Kremlin about the project during the campaign.

All of that explains why congressional investigators are scrutinizing Trump’s Moscow efforts. And we’ve found more:

• Trump’s partner on the project didn't appear to be in a position to get the project approved and built. On Oct. 28, 2015 — the same day as a Republican primary debate — Trump signed a letter of intent with the partner, a developer named Andrey Rozov, to build a 400-unit condominium and hotel tower in Moscow.

In a letter Rozov wrote to Cohen pitching his role, he cited his work on a suburban development outside of Moscow, a 12-story office building in Manhattan’s Garment District (which he bought rather than constructed) and two projects in Williston, North Dakota, a town of around 30,000.We looked into each of them.

Rozov’s Moscow project has faced lawsuits from homeowners, some of which have settled and some of which are ongoing, and the company developing it filed for bankruptcy. It remains unfinished.

Property records show that Rozov owned his New York building for just over a year. He bought it for about $35 million in cash, took out an almost $13 million loan several months later, made no significant improvements and then sold it for a 23 percent profit. Trump’s former business associate, Felix Sater, who once pleaded guilty to financial fraud and reportedly later became an asset for U.S. intelligence agencies, is listed on the sale as an “authorized signatory.”

We did find a developer with a workforce housing project in Williston, as well as approved plans for a mall/hotel/water-park. (The town attracted interest from developers as the center of North Dakota’s oil boom earlier in the decade.) Rozov’s name doesn’t appear on materials relating to the company, but a person familiar with the project confirmed that this is what Rozov was bragging about in his letter. Oil prices cratered and the mega-mall was never built.

Rozov did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Here is a rendering of the plan:

6936D4EC-151E-4DF8-A7D7-A2311DDA0201.jpeg


Plans for "Williston Crossing," a 218 acre site in Williams County, North Dakota.
(Williston Crossing Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment Presentation/Gensler)
• An owner of a sanctioned Russian bank that vouched for the Trump Organization in Moscow had a criminal history that included involvement in a Russian mafia gas-bootlegging scheme in the U.S.

Making a business trip to Russia requires an official invitation. According to correspondence published by BuzzFeed, Sater arranged for an invitation from Genbank, a small Russian bank that expanded significantly in Crimea after Russia invaded in 2014.

One of Genbank’s co-owners is Yevgeny Dvoskin, a Russian-born financier who grew up in Brighton Beach at the same time as Sater. Dvoskin pleaded guilty to tax evasion in federal court in Ohio for the bootlegging scheme and spent time in prison. He was later deported to Russia, according to press accounts. In Russia, he remained tied to criminal networks, according to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. (We were unable to reach Dvoskin for comment.)

• We also get a hint about why Trump may have needed the Kremlin to get his deal done. Some of the sites under consideration for a potential Trump Tower Moscow were in historic areas with strict height restrictions. Just a few years before the 2015 letter of intent that Trump signed, Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin pledged to do all he could to prevent the city from being overrun by skyscrapers.

If Trump’s deal was to move forward in some place like the Red October Chocolate Factory, one of the spots that was considered, getting around zoning restrictions would need help from the very top.

Sater and Cohen were also kicking around a plan to offer Putin the building’s $50 million penthouse, according to BuzzFeed. That need for special help, combined with the potential offer of a valuable asset, raises questions about whether the plan ran afoul of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, according to Alexandra Wrage, the president and founder of Trace International, an organization that helps companies comply with anti-bribery laws. “What you describe is certainly worrying,” she said.

The Trump Organization, the White House, and Michael Cohen did not respond to requests for comment.

For his part, Sater is scheduled to testify before the House Intelligence Committee on March 27. The committee members will undoubtedly have plenty of questions.

You can contact us via Signal, WhatsApp or voicemail at 347-244-2134. Here’s more about how you can contact us securely.

You can always email us at tips@trumpincpodcast.org.

And finally, you can use the Postal Service:

Trump, Inc. at ProPublica

155 Ave of the Americas, 13th Floor

New York, NY 10013

“Trump, Inc.” is a production of WNYC Studios and ProPublica. Support our work by visiting donate.propublica.org or by becoming a supporting member of WNYC. Subscribe here or wherever you get your podcasts
https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/trump ... er-problem



The ‘Deep State,’ Palm Beach, & Donald Trump

March 19, 2019
an excerpt from “Gangster Planet”



The “deep state” is supposed to be sinister, according to Donald Trump. But its hard to look sinister in sunny Palm Beach Florida.

Before the first ballot had been cast in 2016 Donald Trump was worrying out loud that ‘they’— the deep state—were going to steal the election.

Sinister. But it can’t be seen, except by those who can see it.

“It’s invisible to some but familiar to the Poles,” the President explained while visiting Poland. “The steady creep of government bureaucracy that drains the vitality and wealth of the people.”

Sinister. Invisible. Vampire-like.

“They want a scalp. Please believe me when I tell you the deep state is going to get one,” opined one right wing pundit.

And in cahoots with “the Left” and the media.

Deep dish on the deep state

Comet-ping-pong-pizza-pizzagate-podesta-brock (1)

The deep state: government bureaucrats and FBI agents—Hillary’s satanic cabal—sitting around after hours thinking of ways to sabotage Donald Trump.

Picture someone from the Illuminati calling roll at a candle-lit ceremony in the forest.

Or… in a Pizza Hut? Yeah, that’s it! Deep state meet-and-greets over slices of pizza with that extra-crispy dead baby crust.

These are the memes that won the West. But what if they’re not true?

Strong evidence exists suggesting Donald Trump is himself a member of the ‘secret elite’ running the ‘deep state’ he’s been criticizing for years.

Better yet,In fact, you can see it on display in one place, at one address, in one town…

Palm Beach is never far from the news.

Deep state one-stop shopping

2-10-768×512-696×464Over the past decade I’ve developed a reputation for being able to use an airplane’s FAA registration documents listing its series of owners and explain “How to spot a CIA plane.”

I never thought the skill might transfer when examining a series of owners of the same property. But the mansion Trump sold in Palm Beach exposes a network of…something. I’ll let you be the judge of what.

On June 26, 2008, long before Russian oligarchs in business with American organized crime became a thing, I reported my suspicions about Donald Trump’s sale of a Palm Beach mansion.

Even before that I’d done a story, on May 21, 2008, about Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, headlined “CIA Drug Pilot Linked to Russian Mob.”

When Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev came onto my radar, Russiagate was still eight years in the future. Immodestly, I was almost a decade ahead of the curve.

How I got the jump: For more than fifteen years I’ve been following an American industry that’s a rare bright spot in the U.S. balance of payments deficit.

The illicit drug trade—cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine— outperforms every other industry in the U.S. year after year.

Tracking Oleg the Oligarch

oleg-the-oligarchI was following rumors that the Russians were making a serious play for supremacy in the drug trade. I learned from interviews with a former FBI agent there that they had already taken over in Miami, the preferred port of entry into North America’s drug markets.

My immediate interest—more on why later—was Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. I had learned that he and Dmitry Rybolovlev were natural criminal associates.

Oleg had gained a stranglehold on Russia’s world-leading aluminum industry, while Dmitry had cornered the fertilizer industry. The two men’s common denominator is potash. Eight years later, Deripaska was revealed to have been paying Paul Manafort $18 million a year.

Oleg the Oligarch is the chief Russian protagonist—the Oliver North—of Russiagate.

Donald Trump’s first Russian Palm Beach ‘homie’

merlin_142746807_aa1fb51a-ae2c-4113-b448-6a87f91cd390-superJumbo
Gangster at leisure
Donald Trump sold a tacky mansion at 515 N. County Road in Palm Beach, oceanfront property, a wide spot on the beach, to a Russian ‘businessman’ the New York Times euphemistically called a “fertilizer magnate.”

Initial reporting was not all it could have been.

Bringing into their midst a gangster with blood on his hands would have certainly miffed the doyennes of Palm Beach society.

But they didn’t know. The New York Times called him a “fertilizer magnate.”

Dmitry Rybolovlev was—and no doubt still is, because how do you get out? —a successful Russian mobster-turned-oligarch.

This is a key incident in the Russiagate scandal, and it remains very much a part of the Mueller investigation.

Now further investigation reveals people at the address over the years themselves seem to fit the definition of ‘a secret elite running the deep state.’

Remember the Great Recession?

gosman 5But as Abe Gosman, one of Donald Trump’s Palm Beach ‘homies’ as well as the last owner before Trump of 515 N County Road could explain, it’s not always as glamorous as it sounds.

Trump picked up Gosman’s mansion in a bankruptcy auction in 2004. The previous owner was described by a reporter as “nursing home magnate and vulgarian-at-large Abe Gosman.”

The property proved troublesome to sell. A frustrated Trump churned through real estate brokers and then slashed the price. Nothing worked. It sat on the market for almost two years.

By early 2006 the real estate market was already cooling off. Even without a looming recession, it wasn’t clear there was a buyer willing to pay Trump twice what he paid for what was— even with a pasted-on update—an aging behind the times neoclassical palace.

That’s when Trump found a buyer: Russian ‘oligarch’ Dmitry Rybolovlev. Trump’s bizarrely profitable flip of a mansion in Palm Beach —he reportedly made more than $50 million on the deal—raised eyebrows. It seemingly made no economic sense.

Cleaning dirty laundry

180312_r31634Was the sale used to launder dirty Russian money into the American economy?

I believe that at 515 N County Road in Palm Beach, the ‘deep state’ is clearly visible. Apparently I’m in good company.

Glen Simpson—of Steele dossier fame—thought so too.

“I mean this guy was spending money like a drunken sailor on all kinds of things, and people were ripping him off in art deals. So that was my original take on this. Also, when we first heard about it, it didn’t fit with my timeline of when Trump seemed to have gotten deeply involved with the Russians.”

But Simpson later shifted his views when he realized, according to the testimony, that the transaction fit within the “first trimester of the Trump-Russia relationship, in that it actually fit in pretty well with some of the early things that had happened.”

Oleg Deripaska is the Oliver North of RussiaGate. He is probably the key operative involved in the scandal, as well as the subject of my new book “Gangster Planet.”

The history of 515 N County Road

gThe history of 515 N County Road teems with people widely-recognized as comprising, if one existed, a real American ‘deep state,’ but it bears little resemblance to the one bemoaned by Trump.

The first house built at 515 N County Road was built in 1916 by Robert Dun, a member of the Dun & Bradstreet family.

In 1930, he sold it to a utilities tycoon then known as “the richest man in America” named Harrison Williams. Being richest man, however, wasn’t enough. Because his wife was more famous than he was.

Mona (later Countess von Bismarck) was one of the most fashionable women of her time (1930s – 1970s).

A decade after her tycoon hubby utilities’ were cut off, Mona sold the property and moved overseas to a villa on the island of Capri, that had once belonged to Roman Emperors Augustus and Tiberius. (It had presumably been refurbished since.)

Blue-bloods and swells

CB Wrightsman on polo ponySo let’s see… A Dun and Bradstreet founder, America’s richest man in the early 30’s, and the Emperor Tiberius… The property has an unquestionably illustrious recent pedigree.

The star wattage was dialed up even higher by the next owner, a Texas oilman named Charles B. Wrightsman.

Wrightsman was a Texas oilman and an insider. His own father—also a successful oilman— is credited (if that’s the word) with authoring the oil depletion allowance in the 1920’s.

Charles Wrightman’s fascinating career has been covered, in work borrowed here, by respected historians and researchers Texas native Linda Minor and author Bruce Adamson, both deeply-knowledgeable about the arcane history of the old boy Texas oil network, as well as it’s surprising connections to the Kennedy assassination.

C.B. Wrightman attended Exeter (class of 1914) Stanford, and Columbia University in New York, where he developed a passion for flying and became a pilot in 1917 as America began revving up to enter WWI.

millionaires’ unit 1He flew in the “First Yale Unit” of the Aerial Coast Patrol, an early civilian response in WWI. The group was composed of blue-bloods and swells like William A. Rockefeller, Samuel Sloan, and even a member of the family of St Louis tycoon Bert Walker, who was George Bush 41’s grandfather.

In cold weather—airplanes had open cockpits in those days— the unit trained in Palm Beach on property—he was building a new flying boat there—owned by the son of the founder of Philadelphia’s Wanamaker’s Department store, who went on to fund the building of one of the first airplanes to cross the Atlantic.

Texas big money in Palm Beach

image067After the war, C.B. became a crackerjack polo player on championship teams boasting Payne’s, Whitney’s, and Vanderbilt’s.

He was a contemporary of Howard Hughes and belonged to the same Texas big money crowd, some of whom—like CIA Director Allen Dulles, and Kennedy assassination bete noire George de Mohrenschildt— have links to the JFK assassination.

He was friend with President Lyndon Johnson, who stayed at Wrightsman’s estate when he visited Palm Beach. So too did the Shah of Iran. Fashion designer Igor Cassini recalled playing tennis at the Wrightsman estate with the Shah of Iran and CIA Director Allen Dulles.

Screenshot (2)Wrightsman also became famous for owning one of the most fabulous private art collections in the world. After he and his wife donated one particularly famous painting to the Metropolitan Museum in New York, he was approached by a reporter for an interview, and demurred.

“Mrs. Wrightsman and I lead a very quiet life and we try to avoid publicity” he explained. “I had a father who told me, ‘I never saw a deaf and dumb man in jail.’”

In 1985, businessman Leslie Wexner of the Limited bought it for $10 million and tore it down. Some later found it odd that all of Wexner’s money was managed by Jeffrey Epstein.

Three years later Wexner sold his still only half-finished mansion to Abe Gosman, who was described by a business reporter who knew him well as “nursing home magnate and vulgarian-at-large Abe Gosman.”

Palmy times in Palm Beach

gosman-bigamistsIn retrospect, Abe Gosman’s acquisition of the property and construction of Maison L’Amitie marked the beginning of one of the most sensational reversals of fortune in the history of Palm Beach.

But the early 1990s were palmy days for Abe Gosman and his Lin.

Abe was a certified high roller. He bought Santa Anita racetrack in Southern California, and lavished the beautiful blonde Lin with gifts including a Mercedes, priceless art, and $3 million in cash.

At a Pearl Harbor Day Remembrance luncheon he gave at what was now called Maison d’Amite, he hosted top navy brass like Admiral Booda and Vice Admiral Richard C. Allen.

And when Prince Albert of Monaco threw a cocktail party in Monte Carlo to celebrate the induction of a new Commodore at the Commodore Club, the party took place on Abe Gosman’s yacht.

“Italians, Jews, coloreds…we got them all!”

kennedyWhen the Kennedy’s Palm Beach compound was undergoing renovation, Abe’s “fabulous oceanfront estate” hosted Ethel Kennedy.

And at a dinner he threw himself in Boston to honor what the Boston Globe tongue-in-cheek called “his vast accomplishments in the healthcare field,” he was flanked by famous pols who sat on his board like Republican Sen. Edward Brooke, and New York’s Democratic Governor Hugh Carey.

In his after-dinner speech, Abe praised the ethnic diversity of his board. “Italians, Jews, coloreds, we got em all.”

“His offhand remarks caused throats to clear and evening wear to rustle,” sniffed the Boston Globe. In the end it was put down to naivete, because no pol would think of returning one of Abe’s generous checks.

Abe was becoming quite a philanthropist.

Was getting married aboard the ‘Octopussy’ a faux pas?

octo2dAfter Abe got divorced in 1990, the new couple, still unmarried, moved into their dream palace.

Six years later they got engaged. Abe slipped a 20-carat million-dollar diamond on Lin’s finger, and they tied the knot aboard ‘Octopussy,’ his 143-foot yacht.

In hindsight, he might have suspected that exchanging marriage vows aboard a yacht named ‘Octopussy’ would come back to haunt him.

Later the Palm Beach Post reported that ‘All was not rosy,’ and explained about the “tearful pre-nup that had preceded their marriage.”

No Joy in Mudville

71er8m-o7-LAbe Gosman eventually rode three separate public companies to the ground. There’s no telling how much was looted. But it was a lot.

Although several years earlier he was once worth a reputed $470 million—providing a hint of where all that Medicare money goes—Gosman filed for personal bankruptcy in 2001.

Gosman went belly up when Federal auditors began probing his Massachusetts nursing homes as part of a national anti-fraud campaign called—with unintended irony— “Operation Restore Trust.”

Counting on Florida’s homestead law, which typically protect homes in bankruptcy filings, Gosman parked his assets in his wife’s name, until a federal bankruptcy judge dropped a bombshell.

He ruled that Abe wasn’t legally married. At the time of ‘Abe and Lin’s’ big “theme” wedding aboard his 132-foot mega-yacht, the Octopussy, the judge said his new wife wasn’t yet legally divorced.

Abe Gosman lost his “marital shield,” and watched $40 million go up in smoke.

Hidden assets are supposed to stay hidden

marital-shieldTestimony revealed that Lin was clearly upset when Abe didn’t offer her an ownership interest in the house. It got worse when Abe insisted on a pre-nup. A tearful Lin signed it nine days before their marriage.

The bankruptcy court found Gosman had tried to shield assets by shifting them to Lin, and she was ordered to pay $66 million to the bankruptcy trustees.

Lin Gosman committed fraud and perjury that went beyond secreting jewelry in the back of the closet and forgetting to list it. Her mercantile instincts were sharp, testimony indicated, and she had “persistently pestered Abe to fund the marital trust he’d agreed to.”

The bankruptcy trustee’s lawyer told the judge she couldn’t be trusted to produce assets and documents.” He said recovering Lin’s hidden assets hadn’t been easy. “It’s been like climbing Mount Everest.’

He accused her of lying under oath and concealing assets worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. “She doesn’t play by the rules,” he told the judge. “She’s just not credible.’

She often appeared irritated, crossing her arms and shaking her head defiantly at the trustee’s questions. During the bankruptcy trial the judge admonished her, then fined her, then held her in contempt of court.

Three felonies & lots of tears

lin-abe3w3Her trial on half a dozen felony counts two years later was, if anything, worse. When it was over, she’d been convicted of one count of tax fraud, one count of bankruptcy fraud, and one count of mortgage fraud.

She admitted concealing assets in a Swiss bank account she controlled under the name Charm Enterprises Ltd.

She admitted hiding furniture, artwork, and jewelry in a storage locker.

While waiting to be sentenced, she sat weeping on a bench in the lobby, reported the Palm Beach Post. “I am a decent human being. I think the community is horrified at what is happening here.” Still, there was sympathy for her in the community.

The Palm Beach Post asked, “Was Lin Gosman the victim of an abusive and overzealous trustee in her husband’s bankruptcy?’ When there was a sentencing delay, the paper decried it as a “Stressful Setback for Former Socialite.”

Researching a children’s book at Harrod’s

eWhen it came time for final arguments, the cards were laid out. “Lin Gosman tried to hide more than $4 million in assets,” summed up Asst U.S. Atty Carolyn Bell.

“One storage unit was literally filled to the brim with artwork she said she did not have, tapestries she said she didn’t have, and jewelry she said she didn’t own.”

“Her actions were done clearly to hinder delay and defraud creditors. They were “secretive, deliberate, dishonest, and criminal.”

Lin Gosman showed a fine contempt for the law. While out on bail she could travel “while allegedly conducting research for a children’s book.”

Screenshot (1)

U.S. Atty Bell ticked off Lin Gosman’s post-indictment foreign jaunts. She’d been to Paris, Hong Kong, Morocco and Dubai, shopping up a storm on money about to be confiscated because of husband Abe’s bankruptcy.

“She was spending money reserved for her husband’s creditors,” Asst. U.S. Atty Carolyn Bell pointed out.

“This is at the top of the heap,” Carolyn Bell told the judge. “This is the type of bankruptcy fraud where you just go, ‘oh my god.’ This conduct, if we don’t address it, the bankruptcy system doesn’t work.”

Today Carolyn Bell, whose instincts were unerring, is a judge in Palm Beach.

“Vindictive people punishing wealthy people”

SBA-Communications-Judge-RyskampWhat happened at “515 N County Road” during Lin Gosman’s trial for fraud is a real Palm Beach story. There was still mucho trouble in paradise. She and Abe arrived separately for her sentencing.

But, just like Paul Manafort, Lin Gosman got a ‘happy ending.’

The judge admonished the government’s vigorous prosecution of the case. “The U.S. Attorney’s office is hailing this case like it’s the crime of the century. Lin Gosman was a pillar of society,” he said.

“You make this sound like a fraud case!”

Which is technically was. But let the judge continue.

“My decision to spare Lin Gosman more jail time on a series of fraud charges probably will not be popular with vindictive people who want to see wealthy people punished.”

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Ryskamp didn’t sentence her to 30 years in prison—which he could have—but to house arrest. Followed quickly by probation.

Lin Gosman was beside herself. About the Judge, she gushed, “I can’t believe how wise and kind he is, and I appreciate the support. Why couldn’t I have found someone like him (the judge) from the beginning?”

Slings & arrows…and Bargain Bob

abe-lin33Afterwards, for Lin and Abe, alas, the bloom was off the rose.

During bankruptcy proceeding, Abe was the target of insults from creditors. One swore he was going to make sure that Abe ended up “in a one-bedroom condo in West Palm driving a used Volvo.”

The million-dollar condo they moved into placed a lien on his apartment for failure to pay maintenance fees. When Abe didn’t pay a $600 installation fee to “Bargain Bob’s New & Used Carpets” Bargain Bob slapped him with a construction lien.

gp

For Palm Beach, it was pretty gruesome stuff.

What did Dmitry Rybolovlev, Abe Gosman and Donald Trump have in common? By any definition of the word, they’re “connected.”

However that’s not always a guarantee of smooth sailing. Abe Gosman was the odd man out. He was the Palm Beach ‘homie’ who met a bad end.

I coined an aphorism almost twenty years ago and still use it often:

“Being connected means never having to say you’re sorry.”

The minions of transnational organized crime today, Russian and American alike, all share this characteristic.

By the way— in case you were wondering—what Trump’s flip of that Palm Beach mansion to a Russian gangster means is this: All our worst fears about Donald Trump have already come true.

How it happened is the story of ‘Gangster Planet. ‘
https://www.madcowprod.com/2019/03/19/t ... ald-trump/




CBS

Pecker and AMI have agreed to turn over trump-related documents to the House Judiciary Committee

same documents that they’ve already turned over to the SDNY

will serve to publicly incriminate trump

public hearings on trump’s crimes......public hearings took down Nixon

Public Congressioal Hearings will be the end of trump



______________________


replies that mentioned Putin or Russia in this 135 page 2015 replies thread

putin 46

Russia 80

just a reminder this is NOT all about Russia...no where near

2015 - 126 = 1989 replies that do not have the words Russia or Putin



Trump Crimes Include:

Witness Intimidation
Obstruction of Justice
Conspiring with a foreign power against the U.S.
Money Laundering
Witness Tampering
Campaign Finance Fraud
Tax Fraud
Wire Fraud
Bank Fraud
Insurance Fraud


WHY MY POST PREDICTING THE MUELLER END GAME WON’T PREDICT ANYTHING


March 21, 2019/1 Comment/in 2016 Presidential Election, Mueller Probe /by emptywheel
The DOJ beat reporters are on tenterhooks this week, having been led to believe that The Mueller Report will be delivered today, tomorrow, or soon thereafter. That has intensified the already fever pitch around what will happen next.

Given that there is great confidence the conclusion is imminent, here’s why such speculation is misplaced.

We have no idea, and there are many possible options.

Those options include:

A request for a conspiracy indictment naming Trump as a defendant, which would be denied, therefore triggering a report of that denial to the Judiciary Committees (but which would also presumably result in an indictment of others).

An overarching conspiracy indictment including Don Jr and other players, with Trump named as an unindicted co-conspirator.

A Road Map akin to the Watergate one, sharing grand jury material with the House Judiciary Committee; this would be a strong possibility in case of option 2.

No further indictment, but a report showing a great deal of evidence a conspiracy took place, with The Report explaining why (including Presidential prerogative on foreign policy) it can’t be indicted, with or without an accompanying HJC Road Map.

Some kind of report submitted as a counterintelligence report, in addition to indictments (a possibility some have floated but which I believe to utterly misunderstand the nature of Mueller’s task).

The Report showing much ado about nothing.

I happen to think there’s a great deal of evidence a quid pro quo conspiracy took place, but certainly entertain the possibility that Mueller thinks he wouldn’t have an 85% chance of conviction, which DOJ would likely require before he indicted it. But even if I’m right, it still leaves open most of these options.

And the aftermath of every single one of these options is contingent. Meaning it is way premature to get into debates about what William Barr will include in his report and whether Trump can quash the report by invoking privilege until we know whether the The Report is what the regulations require them to be — with the really important details in either an indictment and/or Road Map, or in fact something more comprehensive.

Which is why I think, given the promise that Mueller’s end game is imminent, doing anything but admitting that we don’t know is a waste of air.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/03/21/w ... -anything/
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:37 pm

Mueller report will come and go ....but the House Hearings will go on for years :)

and those hearings will show the public just what is going on in detail


FINAL WARNING!

BIG

Oversight Dems also obtained docs showing KT McFarland & Steve Bannon were talking with Tom Barrack about transferring “sensitive U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia.”

Barrack pitched the plan to Bannon through Bannon’s personal email account.




In letter to WH, Rep. Cummings reveals that KUSHNER was routinely using WhatsApp to conduct official business as recently as Dec. 2018. Kushner's lawyer told lawmakers he screenshots messages to preserve them.

Cummings wants details by April 4.





southpaw


A special WH letter argues, with some force, that Trump’s sacred right to have secret assignations with Putin without so much as the presence of a US note-taker or subsequent briefings to NSC staff is not something Congress can even ask questions about.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000169 ... effbf10001

Image
Image
Image
Image


-Jared used WhatsApp to communicate with foreign persons, probably including MBS
- Ivanka still uses a home brew server she shares with Jared for emails about official business
- KT McFarland used an AOL email to participate in Flynn’s shady nuclear deal

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000169 ... df7a170001

Image
Image

Tommy Vietor


Well this seems like a problem!

Image

Spirited defense by Kushner's attorney
Image
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw


From the Politico article:
Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby BenDhyan » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:14 am

Hmmm...

Letter from deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein offers potential road map to special counsel Robert Mueller's probe

Sources familiar with the probe believe there are no more indictments expected.

By Jonathan Karl Mar 22, 2019 7:12 AM ET

There's no shortage of speculation on the special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, much of it totally uninformed.

But we don't need to speculate on the scope – the man who appointed Mueller has already given us a potential road map on what to expect from the special counsel.

The bottom line: Do not expect a harsh condemnation of President Donald Trump or any of his associates if they have not been charged with crimes.

The road map comes in the form a little-noticed 12-page letter written by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last June to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley.

The letter was in response to Grassley's demands for more information on the special counsel investigation, offers a brief history of special counsel investigations and actually quotes former and future Attorney General William Barr who appointed three special counsels during his time as attorney general under President George H.W. Bush.

In the letter, Rosenstein makes it clear he believes the Department of Justice will not – and cannot without violating long-standing Department of Justice policy – include disparaging or incriminating information about anybody who has not been charged with a crime.

"Punishing wrongdoers through judicial proceedings is only one part of the Department's mission," Rosenstein wrote. "We also have a duty to prevent the disclosure of information that would unfairly tarnish people who are not charged with crimes."

Sources familiar with the investigation believe there are no more indictments coming from the special counsel. If Mueller follows the guidance of the man who appointed him and supervised his investigation, he cannot publicly disparage those who have not been charged with a crime.

Rosenstein is emphatic on this point: "In fact, disclosing uncharged allegations against American citizens without a law-enforcement need is considered to be a violation of a prosecutor's trust."

Later in the letter, he makes it clear this standard applies to anybody under investigation, even public officials.

"No matter who an investigation involves -- an ordinary citizen, a local or state politician, a campaign official, a foreign agent, an officer of the federal legislative, executive, or judicial branch -- agents and prosecutors are obligated to protect its confidentiality."

In the letter Rosenstein directly takes issue with the justification then-FBI Director James Comey used to publicly criticize Hillary Clinton in 2016 even as he decided not to charge her with a crime. At the time, Comey justified the break with long-time DOJ practice as an "extraordinary step" necessary because of circumstances so unusual they were comparable to a "500-year flood."

"It is important for the Department of Justice to follow established procedures, especially when the stakes are high," Rosenstein wrote.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/letter-deputy-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-offers-potential/story?id=61847216

Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 879
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 22, 2019 8:12 am

Wonder if those sources are Rudy and Giuliani?

Rudy was right in 2017 when he said they would be finished with the investigation by Thanksgiving, why wouldn’t he also be right this time? :D

Rudy has gone on the record with exactly the line that Karl regurgitated yesterday.

More
emptywheel Retweeted Glenn Greenwald
Uh. Glenn? The campaign manager who shared polling data w/Russia amid discussions of sanctions relief then lied to minimize that pled guilty to conspiring w/a Russian.

I'm not aware DOJ has ever charged a conspiracy with an entire country.

Why do you keep getting this wrong?


emptywheel


Dear reporters: When reporting Rudy G's claim he doesn't expect any more indictments, try this:

"The President's TV lawyer, who is currently under investigation by his former SDNY for witness tampering, says he doesn't expect any indictments."


THERE’S A DECENT CHANCE JON KARL’S SOURCE IS BEING OR WAS INVESTIGATED FOR OBSTRUCTION


March 22, 2019/0 Comments/in 2016 Presidential Election, emptywheel, Mueller Probe /by emptywheel
Jonathan Karl, ABC White House correspondent, reported yesterday with a certainty I’m hearing from none of the DOJ beat reporters that Mueller’s report will amount to nothing.

Sources familiar with the investigation believe there are no more indictments coming from the special counsel. If Mueller follows the guidance of the man who appointed him and supervised his investigation, he cannot publicly disparage those who have not been charged with a crime.


From that, he spun out a letter Rod Rosenstein wrote at a time when Republicans were trying to expose some bureau and CIA informants, and ignored the intent of the Mueller Report, to suggest that Mueller can’t say anything bad (in a confidential report to Bill Barr, not to Congress) about Trump.

[W]e don’t need to speculate on the scope – the man who appointed Mueller has already given us a potential road map on what to expect from the special counsel.

The bottom line: Do not expect a harsh condemnation of President Donald Trump or any of his associates if they have not been charged with crimes.


I said yesterday I have no idea what The Mueller Report will bring — or even if The Mueller Report is actually where we’ll learn about Mueller’s findings. I said that, while there’s abundant evidence of a conspiracy between Trump and the Russians, it may never get charged, including for reasons that have to do with DOJ’s treatment of sitting presidents. That remains true.

But what is also likely true is that at least one of Jonathan Karl’s sources saying that they “believe there are no more indictments coming from” Mueller is either currently or already has been investigated for obstruction.

That’s because the chief source of claims like this — particularly in reporting from White House correspondents — is one or another of Trump’s lawyers, especially Right Wing operative Jay Sekulow and TV lawyer Rudy Giuliani. And we now know that both would have at least been scrutinized for obstruction.

In Sekulow’s case, Michael Cohen says the lawyer edited his perjurious statement to Congress. And even in the Sekulow denial — as reported by ABC News — he denies just that he changed the timeline of Cohen’s statement, not that he edited it.

During a closed-door hearing with the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney and fixer to President Donald Trump, shared documents and emails with committee members showing what he said were edits to the false statement he provided to Congress in 2017, in an effort to bolster his public testimony last week, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

Testifying publicly before the House Oversight Committee last week, Cohen said Trump’s current personal lawyer Jay Sekulow changed the former Trump loyalist’s statement to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees regarding the duration of discussions about the Trump Tower Moscow project before he submitted it to Capitol Hill.

Last week Sekulow denied the claims in a statement to ABC News.

“Today’s testimony by Michael Cohen that attorneys for the President edited or changed his statement to Congress to alter the duration of the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations is completely false.”


Mueller cited Cohen’s description of his communications with the White House in this period — and specifically the circumstances of preparing the statement — among the ways he helped the investigation.

Third, Cohen provided relevant and useful information concerning his contacts with persons connected to the White House during the 2017–2018 time period.

Fourth, Cohen described the circumstances of preparing and circulating his response to the congressional inquiries, while continuing to accept responsibility for the false statements contained within it.


With regards to Rudy, ABC News was among the outlets that recently provided details of what appears to be a pardon dangle to Cohen after he was raided.

In the weeks following the federal raids on former Michael Cohen’s law office and residences last April, President Donald Trump’s former lawyer and confidant was contacted by two New York attorneys who claimed to be in close contact with Rudy Giuliani, the current personal attorney to Trump, according to sources with direct knowledge of the discussions.

The outreach came just as Cohen, who spent more than a decade advocating for Trump, was wrangling with the most consequential decision of his life; whether to remain in a joint defense agreement with the president and others, or to flip on the man to whom he had pledged immutable loyalty. The sources described the lawyers’ contact with Cohen as an effort to keep him in the tent.

Yet for all the attention paid to what Cohen was willing to say about the president, his reluctance to answer a question about the last communications he had with Trump or someone acting on his behalf made news on its own. Cohen clammed up and claimed that federal prosecutors were actively probing that very issue.

“Unfortunately, this topic is something that’s being investigated right now by the Southern District of New York, and I’ve been asked by them not to discuss and not to talk about these issues,” Cohen said.

The sources familiar with the contacts said the two lawyers first reached out to Cohen late in April of last year and that the discussions continued for about two months. The attorneys, who have no known formal ties to the White House, urged Cohen not to leave the joint defense agreement, the sources told ABC News, and also offered a Plan B. In the event Cohen opted to exit the agreement, they could join his legal team and act as a conduit between Cohen and the president’s lawyers.

At one point in the discussions, one of the attorneys sent Cohen a phone screenshot to prove they were in touch with Giuliani, the sources said.


According to ABC’s sources, this matter is currently under investigation by SDNY.

I mean, it’s certainly possible that someone else is sourcing Karl’s seeming unique certainty about what will come of the Mueller report. It’s certainly possible that ABC’s White House correspondent has better sources at DOJ than all the DOJ reporters who say they don’t know. It’s certainly possible his sources don’t include someone that DOJ had at least reason to believe had participated in obstruction.

But if Karl’s sources are people that his own outlet has reported to be under investigation for obstruction, he ought to at least temper his certainty that they can be believed.

Update: Rudy has gone on the record with exactly the line that Karl regurgitated yesterday.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/03/22/t ... struction/



“Sources familiar with the investigation believe there are no more indictments coming from the Special Counsel.”

Yawn. They’re referencing a Rosenstein letter that was written before Stone was indicted. Nobody knows what Mueller will do but Mueller.


Paul Manafort is in prison for charges that include conspiring with a Russian.

“The mob takes the Fifth Amendment. If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” - Donald J Trump

Roger Stone invokes 5th Amendment, refuses to turn over documents for top Dem's probe

Image

Image




Neal Katyal

5 RULES FOR WHEN NEWS ABOUT MUELLER REPORT COMES OUT.

1. Believe only the text of the Report, not others’ characterizations of it. This WH in particular spins “up” as “down” (like the Nunes documents).

2. Ask what the scope of the Report is. Is it just conspiracy with Russia? Does it include, for example, the campaign finance allegations, where federal SDNY prosecutors have said the President ordered the commission of felonies?

It’s almost never happened in American history that federal Prosecutors have said a sitting President orchestrated the commission of felonies.

3. Examine whether the Report is limited to criminal acts. Some of the most egregious allegations against Trump, like lying to the American people about his business dealings with Russia before the 2016 election and saying he had no biz in Russia, are not necessarily criminal.

Others, like being beholden to the Kremlin out of self interest, may be. Has Mueller only resolved the latter? If not, expect Congress to be taking all of that up.

4. Ask whether Mueller has actually resolved anything. Has he said there are other avenues to investigate for matters within the scope of his Report, such as a sit-down interview with Trump? Again, Congress may investigate further — but also don’t forget about state prosecutors.

5. Ask yourself, if the American people knew in 2016 what Mueller’s Report says,even if the Report says Mueller won’t indict the President, Trump would have won the election. Does this President have the judgment&transparency appropriate to serve as the nation’s highest official?

Don’t focus on the one-line spin. Focus on the facts, judgments, and limitations in the Mueller Report.

And ask yourself, if Trump had just been honest and forthcoming about all of this, we could have spared this

https://twitter.com/neal_katyal



Mueller has already sprinkled crumbs in the existing charging documents. As we have all noted, paragraph 12 of the Roger Stone indictment is one such example.

Image




Adam Schiff: Don't hide Mueller, FBI findings on Trump. Protect America and rule of law.

The conclusion of the Mueller investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia in the election is expected imminently. And, Mueller's report will be governed by rules written in the wake of the Starr Report. We explain. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

Justice gave the GOP Congress 880,000 pages on the Clinton email probe. There's no excuse to bury information on Trump, Russia and counterintelligence.


Last week, the House voted 420-0 to make special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings and report public. I hope Attorney General Bill Barr was watching.

The House vote was necessary because, contrary to the public’s near universal expectation and support for making Mueller’s conclusions known at the end of his investigation, transparency is not assured. Barr, who expressed skepticism about the special counsel’s investigation before his nomination, may claim that Department of Justice regulations and policy justify withholding nearly all of Mueller’s work from Congress and the public.

The overwhelming nature of the House vote makes clear that would be completely unacceptable. With narrow redactions for classified information, we expect the public release not only of Barr’s report regarding Mueller’s activities, but also of Mueller’s complete report to the attorney general.

That is not all. While Mueller has brought numerous successful prosecutions, the probe that he has supervised began as a counterintelligence investigation, first made public by former FBI Director James Comey in testimony to the House Intelligence Committee. The evidence uncovered during that investigation, whether or not it results in criminal charges, is of the utmost importance. It may reflect on a threat to the country’s security, and it cannot be withheld.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Read more commentary:

Don't cover up Mueller investigation. We need to know everything he finds.

Here's why you should have faith in Robert Mueller and the Russia investigation

4 ways to make sure we find out what's in Robert Mueller's Russia report

Congress has a fundamental and overriding interest in obtaining this underlying evidence. The Justice Department and the intelligence community are obligated to share with the intelligence committees any counterintelligence findings and information related to the president or those in his orbit, including evidence collected by the special counsel’s office or ancillary investigations by the FBI. If the president or anyone around him has been compromised by a hostile foreign power — whether criminal or not — that compromise must be exposed to protect the country.

Nevertheless, there are troubling suggestions that the attorney general may resist. In recent public remarks, the outgoing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein cast doubt on the need for transparency. Last week, two anonymous sources described as senior department officials told ABC News that if Justice chose to withhold information from Mueller’s investigation, doing so would be consistent with past practices.

No excuse to bury findings on Donald Trump

This claim withers under scrutiny, and an examination of the department’s actions over the past two years.

During the last session of Congress, the Republican majority sought voluminous discovery from the department regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation, as well as the ongoing Mueller investigation. Last July, I was informed by the department that it had provided more than 880,000 pages of internal investigative records from the Clinton probe to the GOP-led Congress, with more to come. These documents were predominantly from the Clinton probe, but also included thousands of pages of highly sensitive documents related to the ongoing Mueller investigation.

At the time Republicans were seeking these records, I repeatedly made clear to top department officials that if they reinforced a precedent of providing evidence of this kind to Congress, they would have to live with it, even if Congress changed hands. Surely the department could not provide ample information about charged and uncharged persons in an investigation concerning Clinton but then withhold equivalent information about the potential compromise of a sitting president.

Yet this appears to be where the department is heading. The justification given by the two anonymous Department of Justice sources is head-spinning: They put the blame on Comey. In this view, by publicly foreclosing prosecution of Clinton while also criticizing her behavior, Comey gave the department no choice but to oblige congressional requests for materials from the email probe. Because there has been no analogous “Comey moment” in Mueller’s investigation, the argument goes, the DOJ may withhold information from Congress and the public.

Reject double standard on transparency

There is a major problem with blaming Comey for the department’s predicament: DOJ gave the more than 880,000 pages of documents to Congress in response to subpoenas issued after his firing, not before. The reality is that the department did so because of the intense public interest, and because Congress insisted on transparency. Doing so was also not an aberration. Beginning with Watergate, DOJ and the intelligence community have provided investigative and counterintelligence records to Congress in matters of surpassing public interest.

Congress’ institutional interest in obtaining Mueller’s evidence clearly meets and exceeds this bar. Because President Donald Trump is positioned to interfere in an investigation in which he may be implicated — and indeed has sought to do so repeatedly — the prospect of a cover-up is far from speculative. That was not the case in the Clinton email investigation, in which there was no risk that the candidate could influence a probe carried on under someone else’s administration.

Finally, the Justice Department's policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted makes the need for transparency even more compelling. If the department holds that the president cannot be indicted, but at the same time withholds evidence of his wrongdoing from Congress and the public — that is a recipe for impunity. No one is above the law. Not this president. Not any president.

The special counsel regulations were drafted to ensure public confidence in the impartiality of investigation through the independence of the prosecutor, and by leaving intact the attorney general’s ability to make that work public to dispel any concern of a cover-up. Should Justice abandon its own practices and employ a double standard when the need for transparency is most vital, it will stain the department’s reputation for years to come.

Attorney General Barr, do not make that your legacy.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Follow him on Twitter: @RepAdamSchiff
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 234442002/


Jared Kushner did what with the WhatsApp app?

The Kingdom and the Kushners: Jared Went to Riyadh. So Did His Brother.

March 21, 2019
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump in Riyadh in 2017.Jonathan Ernst/Reuters


Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump in Riyadh in 2017.Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
In late October 2017, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and Middle East adviser, dropped into Saudi Arabia for an unannounced visit to the desert retreat of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who was in the process of consolidating his power. The two men talked privately late into the night.

Just a day earlier, Mr. Kushner’s younger brother, Josh, then 32, was flying out of the kingdom.

Jared came to talk policy, but Josh was there on business.

The founder of an eight-year-old venture capital firm, Josh Kushner had spent the three days before his brother’s arrival at an investor conference, where Prince Mohammed had promised to spend billions of dollars on a high-tech future for Saudi Arabia.

As others sat through speeches in a gilded conference hall, several participants said, the younger Mr. Kushner frequently ducked out for more exclusive conversations with Saudi officials.

Some government ethics lawyers say those conversations — never hidden, but not previously reported — create the appearance of a potential conflict of interest. Although Jared Kushner severed his ties with his brother’s company and divested his interest in his brother’s funds around the time he entered the White House, he was nonetheless discussing American policy with the rulers of the kingdom at virtually the same time that his brother was talking business with their top aides.

Josh Kushner has largely managed to keep a low profile while building his venture capital business.Richard Perry/The New York Times


Josh Kushner has largely managed to keep a low profile while building his venture capital business.Richard Perry/The New York Times
A spokesman for Josh Kushner’s firm, Thrive Capital, said that it was not in a formal fund-raising period at the time of the conference. A year later, however, the company raised $1 billion. And two people who spoke with Josh Kushner at the conference said he had been actively promoting a health insurance start-up he founded in 2012, Oscar Health, which five months later announced a fresh $165 million round of financing.

A spokesman for Josh Kushner said the management of Oscar Health knew of no direct investment by Saudis. But the spokesman, Jesse Derris, declined to disclose whether Saudis had invested in any Thrive funds. Mr. Derris said only that Thrive had received no money since the presidential election from any Saudi who had not previously invested in its funds.

“Out of an abundance of caution, Thrive instituted a policy shortly after the 2016 election to prohibit investments from new foreign investors with business in front of the current administration,” Mr. Derris said in a statement. “It has abided by that prohibition.”

But he declined to answer whether Thrive has continued to receive money from Saudis who began investing before November 2016.

Jared Kushner appears to have been closely involved in Josh’s venture capital firm, having sat on the board and investment committees of Thrive Capital until January 2017, his financial disclosure forms show.

He also received at least $8.2 million in capital gains from various Thrive funds while working in the White House, according to a financial disclosure form filed in May 2018.

King Salman of Saudi Arabia and President Trump, flanking the flag bearer, in Riyadh in 2017. Jared Kushner has pushed Mr. Trump to strengthen ties to Saudi Arabia.Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

King Salman of Saudi Arabia and President Trump, flanking the flag bearer, in Riyadh in 2017. Jared Kushner has pushed Mr. Trump to strengthen ties to Saudi Arabia.Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Whether Jared Kushner was aware of his brother’s visit to Riyadh or of any Saudi investment in his brother’s funds could not be determined. Spokesmen for the White House and for Jared Kushner’s lawyers declined to address those questions publicly.

Jan Baran, a Republican lawyer specializing in government ethics, said an investment in a fund run by Thrive Capital did not appear to pose legal problems for Jared Kushner, unless his role in the White House gave him oversight over matters related to the Saudi investment.

But Kathleen Clark, an expert on government ethics and a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, said Saudi discussions with Josh Kushner raised issues for his brother.

“The timing looks bad, O.K., but the bigger issue is his brother’s business,” she said. “It is reasonable to question Jared Kushner’s ability to be impartial in dealing with the Saudis.”

At the time of the conference, Prince Mohammed was basking in favorable attention from many in the West for having taken preliminary steps to open up the kingdom’s economy and relax its social codes. The New York Times was one of several media companies that co-sponsored the 2017 investment conference. Several Times journalists attended, and one spoke briefly with Josh Kushner.

But the bond between Jared Kushner, 38, and Prince Mohammed, 33, has drawn more scrutiny as the crown prince has displayed more aggression.

A mosque holding a symbolic funeral for the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was killed in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul.Bulent Kilic/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

A mosque holding a symbolic funeral for the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was killed in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul.Bulent Kilic/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
A week after the Kushners left the Saudi capital, Riyadh, Prince Mohammed ordered the extrajudicial detention of about 200 businessmen and former officials in a Ritz-Carlton hotel, some of whom were evidently tortured. He was also behind the bizarre kidnapping of Lebanon’s prime minister. And months later, he directed the arrests and, according to relatives, torture of prominent women’s rights advocates.

Then, last October, his agents killed and dismembered the Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi inside a consulate in Istanbul — on the orders of Prince Mohammed, American intelligence agencies concluded.

The crown prince has led a four-year military intervention in Yemen that has brought on a humanitarian catastrophe with no end in sight. At the same time, he has sown division among American allies in the region by trying to isolate Qatar over policy disagreements.

Jared Kushner, though, has steadfastly supported the prince.

From the start of the administration, Mr. Kushner has argued persistently that Prince Mohammed can become a vital ally, especially in bringing the Palestinians into agreement with a promised American peace plan. He pushed past the objections of cabinet members and senior officials to persuade Mr. Trump to visit Saudi Arabia on his first trip abroad as president.

And even after a bipartisan backlash over the killing of Mr. Khashoggi, Mr. Kushner argued successfully that Mr. Trump should stand by the prince. Last month, the White House defied a congressional deadline for a report from Mr. Trump about who directed the killing, sidestepping pressure to acknowledge the intelligence findings about Prince Mohammed’s role.

Professor Clark said that ethics laws could require Jared Kushner to recuse himself from White House deliberations about the response to those congressional demands or other specific proceedings involving the Saudis.

Prince Mohammed visited the White House in 2017.Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

Prince Mohammed visited the White House in 2017.Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Not long after the congressional deadline expired, Jared Kushner flew to Riyadh for his first face-to-face meeting with Prince Mohammed since Mr. Khashoggi’s death.

Critics of Mr. Trump have often argued that a tacit financial interest hovers over his administration’s dealings with the oil-rich rulers of the Persian Gulf, if only because they are major investors in American real estate. Both Mr. Trump and Jared Kushner are expected to go back into the business of selling real estate investments when they leave the White House.

Josh Kushner, however, has largely escaped the scrutiny that has fallen on the Trump administration, in part because he kept his distance. He stepped away from the family business to found his venture capital firm, and he is a Democrat who has said he voted against Mr. Trump despite the family connection.

Supporters of Josh Kushner note that his young firm has scored early wins — like a timely investment in the photo-sharing app Instagram — and that he was regularly invited to major tech investment conferences before 2016.

But the Riyadh conference drew Wall Street titans, and some attendees questioned how a relatively small player enjoyed high-level access to Saudi officials. On a list of the top 100 venture capitalists compiled by the trade publication CB Insights in collaboration with The New York Times, Josh Kushner appeared for the first time in 2018, entering at 99.

One of those he met, during an opening night party for V.I.P. guests, was Yasir Al-Rumayyan, an aide to the crown prince and the managing director of the kingdom’s vast Public Investment Fund. Another was Mr. Al-Rumayyan’s son Faisal, a student at New York University, and two of his associates said that after returning from Riyadh, they socialized together. (A person close to Josh Kushner said the two met face to face only once after the conference.)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/worl ... rabia.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 22, 2019 2:35 pm

Well Attorney Barr has the Mueller Report

The war of “what it means” is underway

This isn’t over........ today is the starting point.

Barr will give it to congress as soon as this weekend

SDNY YOU ARE UP NOW! .....and so is the House ...let the hearings begin

Image

Supreme Court to meet behind closed doors to discuss mystery Mueller-related grand jury subpoena

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 21: Rain falls on the White House March 21, 2019 in Washington, DC. The second day of spring brought showers to the United States capital region. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court will meet behind closed doors on Friday to discuss whether to add cases to the court's docket next term, including one petition brought by a mystery company related to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

If the court denies the case, it will represent the last stop for a company that has been fighting a subpoena issued last year by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC.

For months now, the case has been one of the most closely watched and guarded secrets among Mueller's work. The company, that calls itself a wholly owned agency of an unnamed foreign state, fought the subpoena arguing it was immune under a federal law called the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act that limits such prosecutorial action.

It also said that complying with the request for documents would violate the country's own laws.

The case was so secret that at one point court security took the almost unprecedented step of clearing an entire floor of a courthouse in Washington to keep secret the identities of the lawyers arguing the case.

Court filings initially blacked out the names of the lawyers representing the company and that the special counsel's office was involved, but both are now publicly known.

Mueller wait-and-see mode hangs over White House, too
A lower court ruled against the company holding that the request fell within the so called "commercial activities" exception in the law, and the court imposed a $50,000 per day sanction until the company complied. Those fines began accruing more than two months ago, on January 15. The ruling was affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

That court held that if the company's view were to prevail, "a foreign-sovereign-owned, purely commercial enterprise operating within the United States could flagrantly violate criminal laws and the US government would be powerless to respond save through diplomatic pressure."

In January, in an emergency petition, the company asked the Supreme Court to freeze the sanctions while the company prepared its appeal, but the justices, with no noted dissents, declined to do so.

In briefs filed with the Supreme Court, Brian D. Boone and Edward T. Kang, Alston & Bird lawyers, who were finally revealed as the company's lawyers, told the justices if the lower court opinion were not reversed, the judgment would "create chaos in the international community -- possibly alienating American allies, undermining diplomacy, and all but guaranteeing that American agencies and instrumentalities will (despite their protestations) face criminal proceedings abroad."

Solicitor General Noel Francisco, countered however, that the Supreme Court should allow the lower court opinions to stand because there was no "pressing need for this Court to intervene in the absence of a conflict."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/21/politics ... index.html



Democrats will order FBI, White House counsel to preserve records shared with Mueller

Rachael Bade

The Democratic chairs of the six House committees investigating potential abuse of power by President Trump and his campaign’s business and alleged foreign ties will ask several executive branch agencies to preserve information they provided to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III as he investigated Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, according to congressional aides familiar with the plan.

The six House leaders and their Senate Democratic counterparts have signed a letter that will be sent to the Department of Justice, FBI and White House Counsel’s Office, among other agencies, shortly after Mueller submits his report to Attorney General William P. Barr, signaling the investigation’s conclusion.

It’s an effort to ensure the agencies retain correspondence, memos, reports and other material should the committees request it, the aides said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss lawmakers’ planning.

[House Democrats demand documents from more than 80 people and institutions affiliated with Trump]

House Democrats have struggled to obtain documents relevant to their investigations due to the administration’s aggressive posture toward the lower chamber, where Democrats hold the majority. The White House, for example, has refused to hand over materials sought in at least 15 letters authored by congressional investigators on topics ranging from security clearances to the use of personal email by top Trump advisers, including the president’s daughter Ivanka Trump.

Beyond that, House Democratic chairmen say other agencies and department chiefs have rebuffed at least 30 inquiries on policy questions, according to a list provided to The Washington Post by senior Democrats overseeing the investigations. The administration’s strategy, Democrats argue, is an affront to Congress’ oversight responsibility.

Under the Presidential Records Act, all presidential records — except duplicates — are required to be preserved. Under the Federal Records Act, federal records are required to be preserved until the archivist of the United States permits their destruction. Unauthorized willful destruction is a crime. The letter reminds the agencies of these obligations and directs them to preserve the material, a senior congressional aide said.

[Analysis: When Mueller finishes his report, what will the people be told?]

The feud could wind up in court. House Democrats have discussed issuing subpoenas for the information, to compel the administration to cooperate. But even then, the White House could assert executive privilege, daring Democrats to sue.

The CIA, National Security Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Treasury and State departments also will receive preservation letters, congressional aides said.

House Democrats issued similar letters last year to most of the same agencies when Trump fired his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions.

[Giuliani: Waiting for Mueller report is ‘like waiting for a baby’]

Mueller was appointed in May 2017 by Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election, potential obstruction of justice by the president and related matters.

The congressional investigations are wider ranging — to include looking at actions that may not constitute federal crimes.

“Our job is to protect the rule of law,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-Calif.), one of the six chairmen signing the letter. Lawmakers are looking, for instance, at Trump’s attacks on the media, the federal judiciary and law enforcement agencies. “We have to look into questions of corruption, violations of the emoluments clause — it’s much broader than Mueller’s assignment.”

The other signatories are House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.); Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.); Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.); Ways and Means Chairman Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.); and Financial Services Chairman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).

On the Senate side, signatories include: Judiciary Committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.); Intelligence Committee ranking member Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) and committee member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.); Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Robert Menendez (D-N.J.); and Banking Committee ranking member Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... 361a68fd0c







replies that mentioned Putin or Russia in this 135 page 2019 replies thread
putin 46
Russia 80
2019 - 126 = 1989 replies that do not have the words Russia or Putin
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 22, 2019 6:13 pm

Now it is required full and complete discloser

There are indictments



Neal Katyal
5 FOR WHEN NEWS ABOUT MUELLER REPORT COMES OUT.

1. Believe only the text of the Report, not others’ characterizations of it. This WH in particular spins “up” as “down” (like the Nunes documents).

2. Ask what the scope of the Report is. Is it just conspiracy with Russia? Does it include, for example, the campaign finance allegations, where federal SDNY prosecutors have said the President ordered the commission of felonies?

It’s almost never happened in American history that federal Prosecutors have said a sitting President orchestrated the commission of felonies.

3. Examine whether the Report is limited to criminal acts. Some of the most egregious allegations against Trump, like lying to the American people about his business dealings with Russia before the 2016 election and saying he had no biz in Russia, are not necessarily criminal.

Others, like being beholden to the Kremlin out of self interest, may be. Has Mueller only resolved the latter? If not, expect Congress to be taking all of that up.

4. Ask whether Mueller has actually resolved anything. Has he said there are other avenues to investigate for matters within the scope of his Report, such as a sit-down interview with Trump? Again, Congress may investigate further — but also don’t forget about state prosecutors.

5. Ask yourself, if the American people knew in 2016 what Mueller’s Report says,even if the Report says Mueller won’t indict the President, Trump would have won the election. Does this President have the judgment&transparency appropriate to serve as the nation’s highest official?

Don’t focus on the one-line spin. Focus on the facts, judgments, and limitations in the Mueller Report.

And ask yourself, if Trump had just been honest and forthcoming about all of this, we could have spared this long ordeal. END




THIS LETTER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SDNY

The AG’s letter to Congress, notifying them Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election is over.

—Friday, March 22, 2019

Image



All the Legal Trouble in Trumpworld
Robert Mueller may be the least of the president’s worries.
BY JEFCOATE O’DONNELL
MARCH 8, 2019, 6:00 AM
Image

The looming conclusion of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into U.S. President Donald Trump may be dominating the conversation in Washington. But Trump faces a long list of other ongoing inquiries, some of which may ultimately cause him far more trouble. Here are the 10 most pressing investigations into the president, his campaign staffers, and his inner circle.

Violation of campaign finance laws
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney and longtime fixer, has testified that Trump ordered him to pay hush money to silence adulterous scandals that could have hurt his presidential campaign.

Image

Who's Implicated: Michael Cohen

Danger for Trump: This case directly implicates the president.

Status: Cohen has pleaded guilty to “felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with” Trump. Additionally, in testimony before the House Oversight Committee on Feb. 27, Cohen showed off personal checks signed by Trump, which Cohen testified were to reimburse him for the payoffs. Cohen added that Trump was involved in other illegal activities but said he could not comment because of the ongoing nature of the investigations.



Irregular spending by Trump’s inaugural committee

THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, THE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE

Trump raised a record $107 million for his inauguration, but investigators have little idea where the money went. Prosecutors are investigating an array of troubling maneuvers that include allegedly booking rooms at the Trump Hotel at inflated prices and mail and wire fraud and money laundering. WIS Media Partners, a firm run by a friend of first lady Melania Trump, was the highest paid contractor for the inauguration, earning $26 million.


Image
Image
Image
Image

Who's Involved: Trump’s inaugural committee, Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., former Trump campaign official Rick Gates, and WIS Media Partners

Danger for Trump: Trump is facing intense scrutiny across three jurisdictions as a result of his inaugural committee’s behavior.

Status: In February, courts subpoenaed the inaugural committee for documentation, though no one has been charged with any wrongdoing. The case is ongoing.


Unregistered foreign lobbying
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort used a shell organization to lobby for the pro-Russian government of Ukraine, enlisting white-shoe lobbyists Podesta Group and Mercury Public Affairs, as well as the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, without properly registering as a foreign agent.

Image
Image
Image


Who's Implicated: Paul Manafort’s lawyer Gregory Craig, and lobbyists Vin Weber and Tony Podesta

Danger for Trump: The case shows the pro-Russian tilt of his campaign manager and his allegedly illegal operations. It also shows Mueller’s ability to work closely with other prosecutors to investigate a broader range of potential wrongdoing than he can as special counsel.

Status: Skadden, which allegedly advised Mercury not to register as a foreign agent, settled its case for $4.6 million, representing the amount it earned from its shadowy work in Ukraine. Skadden, Mercury and the now defunct Podesta Group have all registered retroactively as acting on behalf of a foreign government.


Irregular super PAC finances
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Paul Manafort lied about a $125,000 payment he received from the Trump super PAC “Rebuilding America Now” in 2017. Coordination between political action committees and campaigns is illegal. Manafort’s associate, Sam Patten, has pleaded guilty to FARA violations and his testimony shed light on the details of how foreign actors worked to gain access to Trump's inauguration. Patten revealed that he secured tickets to the event on behalf of an oligarch from Ukraine by organizing a U.S. citizen to act as a proxy buyer.

Image
Image


Who's Implicated: Paul Manafort, Sam Patten, and Rebuilding America Now

Danger for Trump: The case shows how those close to Trump misused campaign money and facilitated improper access to the president by foreign influencers from Ukraine and Russia from the very start of his term.

Status: Manafort is behind bars for violating his plea deals with Mueller and will face sentencing on March 13 for conspiracy against the United States and conspiracy to obstruct justice through witness tampering. Patten has pleaded guilty to violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act and faces sentencing in April; he is cooperating with investigators.


Allegedly illegal operations by the Donald J. Trump Foundation
THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE AND THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE

The lawsuit skewers the Trump Foundation for alleged “extensive unlawful political coordination with the Trump presidential campaign” as well as “repeated and willful self-dealing transactions” and “violations of basic legal obligations for non-profit foundations.” The alleged misconduct of the Trump Foundation includes using funds to buy a portrait of the president at a fundraiser in an effort to burnish his image, as well as allegedly using its money to funnel resources into organizing a campaign fundraiser in Iowa that raised millions of dollars.

Image
Image
Image
Image



Who's Implicated: Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, and Donald Trump Jr.

Danger for Trump: This case is especially damaging for the president. Former New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said the Trump Foundation functioned as “little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump’s business and political interests,” and Letitia James, who took the case over when she was sworn in as Attorney General is seeking a 10-year ban on Trump and his adult children from running nonprofits, as well as repayment of $2.8 million.

Status: The case is ongoing, but the Trump Foundation has been dissolved, and its remaining funds are set to be distributed to other nonprofits.


Allegations of tax fraud and tax evasion by the Trump family
THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE AND NEW YORK CITY MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO

Following a New York Times investigation into the Trump family’s finances, city and state officials said they were investigating allegations that the Trump family may have committed tax fraud and tax evasion over the course of several decades.

Image
Who's Implicated: Donald Trump and the Trump Organization

Danger for Trump: Evidence of systemic tax evasion could strike a major blow to Trump’s credibility. Trump’s unreleased tax returns have been a high-profile departure from U.S. political norms. The House Ways and Means Committee has the power to demand the release of Trump’s tax returns, something that Democrats are now calling for with renewed energy after Michael Cohen told Congress that he believed Trump had failed to release his tax returns because he did not want tax experts to “run through his tax return and start ripping it to pieces” and feared “taxable consequences [and] penalties.”

Status: The investigation is ongoing.


United States v. Maria Butina
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION OF THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

Maria Butina is the first Russian to be prosecuted directly for attempting to influence the U.S. political landscape in the Trump era. Butina posed as a gun rights activist and gained influence in the Republican Party and the National Rifle Association, all while allegedly working as a Russian agent.

Image

Who's Implicated: Maria Butina

Danger for Trump: The case is an additional indication of Russia’s interest in advancing Trump’s candidacy. Butina also managed to directly ask Trump a question about Russia and sanctions at the start of his run for president. “What will be your foreign politics … and do you want to continue the politics of sanctions?” Butina asked. Trump responded, “I believe I would get along on very nicely with [Vladimir] Putin.”

Status: Butina pleaded guilty to conspiring against the United States. In late February, the court declined to set a date for her sentencing, as she continues to cooperate with U.S. authorities. She will likely be deported to Russia at the conclusion of any time she serves.

Russian disinformation campaigns
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

“Project Lakhta,” a Russian disinformation campaign that used social media to interfere in the 2016 presidential and 2018 midterm elections, worked to “sow discord in the U.S. political system and to undermine faith in our democratic institutions,” according to prosecutors.

Who's Implicated: Elena Alekseevna Khusyaynova, allegedly the chief accountant for Project Lakhta

Danger for Trump: The case provides insight into the inner workings of Russian efforts to boost Trump’s electoral chances, as well as prosecutors’ determination to hold foreign actors accountable for interfering in U.S. elections.

Status: Khusyaynova has been indicted, and the case is ongoing.


Improper Turkish influence inside Trump’s campaign and administration.
THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and his business partner Bijan Kian allegedly served as unregistered lobbyists for Turkish interests and were paid to undermine Turkish cleric and regime gadfly Fethullah Gulen as a part of a 90-day campaign against him that was dubbed “Operation Confidence.”

Image
Image
Image


Who's Implicated: Michael Flynn, Bijan Kian, and Kamil Ekim Alptekin, who created the firm Inovo that allegedly hired the Flynn Intel Group to launch an anti-Gulen campaign

Danger for Trump: The president’s efforts to get the FBI to stop investigating Flynn during the early days of his administration led directly to the appointment of Mueller as special counsel.

Status: Kian and Alptekin were indicted in December 2018, and Kian pleaded not guilty. Alptekin has yet to appear in a U.S. court, and his location is unknown. Flynn is cooperating with the Mueller investigation and will serve as a principal witness when Kian goes on trial in July.


Alleged violations of the U.S. Constitution’s emoluments clause
THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL’S OFFICES FOR MARYLAND AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Constitution bars the president from using his office to profit from foreign states. The Washington Post reported in December 2018 that Saudi lobbyists had paid for an estimated 500 nights in Trump’s D.C. hotel over a three-month period so that military veterans could come to Washington and lobby against a bill the Saudi government opposed. Profits from the Saudi government going to a Trump-owned hotel would seem to violate the emoluments clause.

Image

Who's Implicated: Donald Trump and the Trump Organization

Danger for Trump: He is directly implicated. A clear constitutional violation could raise the question of impeachment.

Status: The court rejected Trump’s initial efforts to shut the investigation down. The case is ongoing.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/08/al ... als-trump/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 22, 2019 6:36 pm

There are 17 remainin' criminal investigations.

southpaw


It's on the smaller side, but one of the more dizzying things to me about today's news is that this candidate for the US Congress, who requested and received stolen materials directly from the (disguised) Russian conspirators, won't be named or charged

Image

Possible that another US Attorney has taken this over and we'll see a charge some day, I suppose, but it's so at the core of the SCO's subject matter, could've been a lower-stakes test case for a 371 conspiracy charge, seems like they had all the facts already, idk
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/ ... 0038989825


Wendy Siegelman

Good time to remember charges and investigations being pursued at the state level including into the Trump inauguration and Donald J. Trump Foundation - an important space to watch https://medium.com/@wsiegelman/chart-ro ... b2b7574e5b
Image



Richard Blumenthal, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee stated that there is a “high likelihood that there are indictments in this president’s future.” He explained that these indictments are likely to come from SDNY and/or other federal prosecutors.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff stated that he thinks it’s “likely” there are more indictments coming




So does this mean they can finally build the beautiful Trump Tower Moscow after all?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby BenDhyan » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:20 pm

Done...

Image

Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 879
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:24 pm

"I want you all to stonewall it, let them plead the Fifth Amendment, cover-up or anything else, if it'll save it--save the plan."

Richard Nixon

March 22, 1973


Image

trump is Individual 1


no way is this over ....on to SDNY and multiple house hearings!


Image


"Further" does not factor in indictments already under seal, or ones farmed out to US Attorneys/state AGs.

Evidence from Mueller could be used by US Attorneys to bring additional charges (and there are still ongoing state investigations), but Mueller will not issue further indictments.


_________________


Don’t focus on the one-line spin. Focus on the facts, judgments, and limitations in the Mueller Report.
- Neal Katyal

The Mueller Report Is Done, But The Investigations Into Trump Aren’t Over

Here’s what prosecutors are looking at when it comes to the president and his campaign.

Nick Robins-Early
After months of speculation and dozens of indictments, special counsel Robert Mueller finally wrapped up his investigation on Friday evening. As Mueller delivered his report to Attorney General William Barr, he ended a crucial phase in the incredibly contentious probe into the president and Russia.

But even though Mueller’s investigation into 2016 U.S. election interference is over, there are several different ways inquiries into President Donald Trump, the Trump Organization and the Kremlin will continue. Here’s a look at what’s next for investigators.

Campaign Finance Investigations


Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York have been working parallel to the special counsel’s team for some time, and are now set to take over as the most prominent investigators targeting Trump. A primary subject of their investigation is the hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal to keep the women quiet about their alleged sexual affairs with Trump.

These payments, totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars, could mean the president committed campaign finance violations during the 2016 election race. Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen already pleaded guilty last year to campaign finance violations related to the $130,000 payoff to Daniels and has told investigators and Congress that he made the payment on Trump’s orders.

Cohen is reportedly continuing to provide SDNY federal prosecutors information on the case, but he’s not the only Trump associate who is cooperating with investigators. The SDNY’s prosecutors also reached a non-prosecution agreement in December with American Media Inc., which owns the National Enquirer. AMI admitted to prosecutors last December that it worked with the Trump team to pay McDougal $150,000 as a means of suppressing her story and bolstering Trump’s election chances.

The Trump Organization’s former chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, has also been cooperating with the SDNY since last August, leading to speculation that he could become an important figure in any future indictments.

Whether these payments constituted campaign finance violations will hinge on proof that they were specifically intended to influence the election, not because of ”personal reasons,” as Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani claims.


House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a former attorney and congressman from New York, is leading the committee’s corruption probe of Trump.
Congressional Investigations


The House Judiciary Committee opened up a wide-ranging corruption probe into Trump in early March and sent document requests to 81 individuals, agencies and entities connected to the president.

The investigation is set to focus on whether Trump was involved in any campaign finance violations, obstructions of justice or abuses of power such as misuse of pardons. It will also further investigate possible criminal conspiracy between Trump and Russia, as well as efforts to cover up any potential conspiracy.

Many former and current members of Trump’s staff and family received document requests, including the president’s sons Eric and Don Jr. and his son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner. The details of each document request vary based on the recipient, but range from audio and video recordings to personal diary entries that relate to the president.

Subscribe to the Politics email.

How will Trump's administration impact you?

Leading the investigation is House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a former attorney and congressman from New York. The White House and many Trump allies appear to be stonewalling Nadler’s document requests, however, and only eight of 81 requests for documents were returned by the deadline. Nadler expects that more individuals will eventually comply, but the White House has already rejected requests for certain materials, such as those related to Trump’s meetings and phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

One problem for the House Judiciary Committee is that Trump and the White House may find it much easier to denigrate the Democrat-led probe as a leftist political attack on the president, as opposed to federal investigations that receive more bipartisan support. The congressional investigation is likely to continue on into the 2020 election race, which will also intensify pressure on the probe to produce results.

Trump, Deutsche Bank And The Buffalo Bills


A New York state attorney general investigation is looking into Trump’s dealings with Deutsche Bank, including his failed 2014 attempt to buy the Buffalo Bills football team. In early March, The New York Times reported that the attorney general’s office subpoenaed Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank for records related to the Bills deal, as well as other Trump Organization plans.

Although the banks are the primary target of the subpoenas, the investigation is yet another way Trump’s businesses and associates are coming under the microscope. Deutsche Bank loaned Trump at least $2 billion over recent decades despite other banks cutting him off for his financial instability.

Buffalo Bills head coach Rex Ryan shakes hands with Donald Trump after introducing him during a campaign stop in Buffalo, New
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Buffalo Bills head coach Rex Ryan shakes hands with Donald Trump after introducing him during a campaign stop in Buffalo, New York, on April 18, 2016.
Investigation Into Trump’s Inaugural Committee


Federal investigators have also had their eye on Trump’s inauguration committee for potentially committing illegal acts such as fraud, conspiracy, money laundering and a host other crimes. The inauguration raised an unprecedented $107 million dollars and spent exorbitant amounts on expenses such as makeup and rooms in the Trump International Hotel.

Federal prosecutors subpoenaed the inaugural committee in February for documents on how it spent the $107 million, requesting a wide range of materials that include records of payments to the Trump International Hotel or Trump Organization. It also singled out one donor by name: venture capitalist Imaad Zuberi, who donated $900,000 to the committee via a private equity company.

The subpoena was the most revealing incident to date related to the investigation and indicated that investigators are looking for a wide range of possible crimes. It’s likely that the SDNY, which issued the subpoena, will take the lead in the probe. Much like the other inquiries into Trump’s operations and inner circle, there’s no immediate end in sight for the investigation.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-in ... mg00000004




Lawyer Who Bested Roy Cohn Tapped for Big Gig in SDNY

March 22, 2019 ADAM KLASFELD

MANHATTAN (CN) — A few years after he defended the burgeoning Trump real estate empire against claims of housing discrimination, the future president’s oft-described mentor Roy Cohn fought to overturn the convictions of two Mafia clients.

Image
Roy Cohn
Even with Cohn in their corner, however, Joseph Gambino, the cousin of “boss of all bosses” Carlo Bambino, and his right-hand man Carlo Conti, failed to secure a reversal from the Second Circuit.

“These findings of the experienced trial judge cannot lightly be set aside,” a unanimous three-judge panel ruled in 1977. “Nor do we see any reason for so doing.”

The case was an early success for rookie prosecutor Audrey Strauss, a graduate of Columbia Law School who edited appellate briefs in her new job at the Southern District of New York.

Strauss would go on to field more than 20 other cases before she was promoted in 1983 to the chief of appeals in the Criminal Division and chief of the Securities and Commodities Fraud Unit.

On Friday, Strauss returned to the Southern District to serve as second-in-command to U.S. Attorney George Berman, succeeding the prosecutor who secured the conviction of disgraced former Trump “fixer” Michael Cohen.

In a statement, Berman said that his outgoing deputy decided to spend more time with his family.

“Rob Khuzami is an extraordinary and brilliant lawyer who has upheld the ideals of integrity and professionalism that characterize the work of this office,” Berman said of his departing No. 2.

“There can be no higher praise,” he added.


President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House on Thursday. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
With rumors about the Russia probe dominating Washington — U.S. Attorney General William Barr just received a confidential copy of special counsel Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report this afternoon — Khuzami’s sudden exit fueled anxiety about the future of his docket.

Berman recused himself for undisclosed reasons from the Cohen case, which reportedly spun off other investigations into possible campaign-finance violations and illegal fundraising for Trump’s inauguration.

Mimi Rocah, a former Southern District of New York prosecutor, called those fears understandable but unfounded.

“I think people will want to read into this,” Rocah said in an interview. “It isn’t uncommon for people to come and take executive positions for a few years and then return to other things.”

Finding the reasons for Khuzami’s departure credible, Rocah emphasized that a team of agents, investigators and assistant prosecutors build such cases.

“No one person at any level makes or breaks a case,” she added.

Long before the Cohen case, Khuzami’s appointment inspired a similar controversy over his lengthy work as general counsel for Trump’s lender of choice: Deutsche Bank.

That experience did not prevent Khuzami’s team from convicting Cohen of what a federal judge described as a “veritable smorgasbord of fraudulent conduct” and implicating Trump in directing the illegal hush-money payments to Michael Cohen.

Observers scouring the resume of Khuzami’s replacement also might find plenty of grist for conflicting narratives.

In 1986, following her tenure as a prosecutor, Strauss served as a partner for Mudge Rose Guthrie & Alexander, a firm that The New York Times described as the legal launching pad for Richard Nixon.


Roger Stone, a confidant of President Donald Trump, leaves the federal courthouse following a Jan. 25, 2019, hearing in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. Stone was arrested in the special counsel’s Russia investigation and was charged with lying to Congress and obstructing the probe. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)
Trump’s indicted “dirty trickster” Roger Stone famously has a tattoo of the 37th president on his back, and of course, Nixon’s impeachment proceedings lurk in the background of the Russia probe, its shadow dividing a hesitant Democratic Party.

Strauss’ experiences as a mob prosecutor has the potential to create the opposite mythology. Trump’s organized crime associations have loomed in the periphery of multiple special counsel cases.

Felix Sater, who was Cohen’s intermediary in the aborted plan to build a Trump Tower in Moscow and will testify before Congress next week, was convicted in a pump-and-dump fraud scheme orchestrated by the Russian mafia before agreeing to work for the U.S. government.

The indictment of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, showed him using the Cyprus-based Lucicle Consultants Ltd. to wire millions of dollars into the United States.

The Daily Beast noted that same shell company received millions from an associate of Semion Mogilevich, frequently described as the “most dangerous mobster in the world.”

At the nexus of the political and criminal underworlds stood Trump’s former attorney, Roy Cohn, the henchman for the anti-communist witch hunts of late Senator Joseph McCarthy and a prolific defender of gangsters.

When the Department of Justice accused Trump of discriminating against black tenants in 1973, Cohn was quoted advising the young developer: “Tell them to go to hell and fight the thing in court.”

Image

Robert Khuzami, the outgoing second-in-command to U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in New York, formerly served as director of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Before dying of AIDS-related complications in 1986, Cohn defended Genovese underboss Tony Salerno, Bonnano boss Carmine Galante and Gambino “Dapper Don” John Gotti.

Strauss is not the only prosecutor whose appointment today will provide fodder for Russia probe-watchers. Rising to the post of Berman’s chief counsel is Craig Stewart, whose stint as a prosecutor also featured organized crime experience. Stewart later became a partner at Arnold & Porter, where he helped the white-shoe firm’s clients comport with foreign bribery laws.
https://www.courthousenews.com/lawyer-w ... g-in-sdny/




House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) gets people ready for the likelihood that the Mueller report will not answer all their questions — and making clear why House committees will continue to investigate.

Image



Here’s Everyone Robert Mueller Charged

Mueller indicted more than three dozen individuals for a variety of crimes during his investigation, including top Trump campaign officials and members of Russian intelligence.

Zoe Tillman
Last updated on March 22, 2019, at 5:52 p.m. ET

Special counsel Robert Mueller
Alex Wong / Getty Images
Special counsel Robert Mueller

WASHINGTON — On Friday, Attorney General Bill Barr alerted Congress that special counsel Robert Mueller was done with his investigation into the Trump campaign. The much-awaited announcement was light on details, but the string of criminal cases that Mueller’s office pursued as the probe unfolded over the last year and a half offers insight into what they’ve been doing.

The charges filed by Mueller’s team touched members of President Donald Trump’s inner circle: his former campaign chair Paul Manafort, his former deputy campaign chair Rick Gates, his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, his former personal attorney Michael Cohen, and his longtime adviser Roger Stone. There were no charges alleging collusion between the Russians and Trump’s campaign, but there were allegations that Russians actively sought to boost the campaign and communicate with people working on it.

A senior Justice Department official said Friday that Mueller is not recommending any further indictments.

The prosecutions in the Mueller probe covered diverse ground, reflecting the range of experience Mueller brought to his team — complex financial crimes, cybercrime, international schemes, and illegal conduct by high-ranking government officials and politically connected individuals. They recovered millions of dollars in forfeited property from Manafort’s case (although much of that will go to the financial institutions Manafort still owes) and secured broad cooperation agreements that reached beyond Mueller’s probe.

[Related: Robert Mueller Is Done And He’s Sent His Report To The Attorney General]

And while Mueller is finished, some of the criminal cases he brought are still open. Most of the Russian nationals whom Mueller charged with interfering in the election have refused to participate in the US court proceedings, delaying those cases indefinitely. Gates and Flynn haven’t been sentenced yet and are still bound by cooperation agreements that require them to work with any law enforcement agency that needs them.

Here’s everyone Mueller charged:


George Papadopoulos

Charged: July 28, 2017
Status: Sentenced and served 14 days in prison
The former Trump campaign adviser was the first person charged out of Mueller’s investigation, but no one found out about it until months after his arrest in July 2017 — the charges, and his plea deal, were kept secret until they were unsealed three months later. He pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his communications with a London professor in the spring of 2016 about the Russians having “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Mueller also found that Papadopoulos had tried several times to set up a meeting between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, but that he was unsuccessful. Papadopoulos agreed to cooperate with investigators as part of his plea deal, although he later unsuccessfully tried to raise a challenge to Mueller’s authority.

Papadopoulos was sentenced on Sept. 7, 2018, and has already served his 14-day sentence.


Paul Manafort

Charged: Oct. 30, 2017
Status: Sentenced and serving nearly seven years in prison
Trump’s former campaign chair was hit with not one, but two indictments from Mueller’s office. Both cases stemmed from his years as a political consultant for the Ukrainian government and his failure to pay taxes on the millions he earned, report the foreign bank accounts he used to stash that money, and report his work to the US government. In his second case in federal court in Virginia, he was also charged with committing bank fraud to boost his assets when the Ukraine work dried up. After losing an early legal challenge to Mueller’s authority, Manafort went to trial in Virginia, where a jury found him guilty of eight counts. He took a plea deal in his other case in Washington, DC, only to lose any benefit from that agreement when a judge found he had intentionally given false information to investigators and the grand jury.

Between the two cases, Manafort was sentenced to serve 90 months in prison — minus the roughly nine months he’s already spent in jail while his cases were pending — which means he’ll spend at least another six years and nine months behind bars. His legal woes aren’t over, though — the same day as his final sentencing in Mueller’s cases, he was indicted on new fraud charges by the Manhattan district attorney’s office.


Rick Gates

Charged: Oct. 30, 2017
Status: Cooperating and awaiting sentencing
Gates was indicted at the same time as his former boss Paul Manafort, but Gates flipped and became the government’s star witness at Manafort’s trial in Virginia. Gates was charged with the same tax- and foreign agent registration–related crimes as Manafort, and in February 2018 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the United States — a count that encompassed many of the financial crimes he was charged with — and lying to the FBI about a 2013 meeting between Manafort, an unnamed lobbyist, and an unnamed member of Congress, later confirmed as Dana Rohrabacher, who lost his reelection last year.

Gates agreed to cooperate as part of his plea deal in February 2018, and he hasn’t been sentenced yet. His agreement required him to cooperate not only with Mueller’s office, but any other law enforcement office that needed him. Given his role as deputy campaign chair and his later involvement in planning Trump’s inauguration, he’s seen as an important witness. In a court filing on March 15, prosecutors said that Gates “continues to cooperate with respect to several ongoing investigations.”


Michael Flynn

Charged: Nov. 30, 2017
Status: Cooperating and awaiting sentencing
Trump’s short-lived national security adviser pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts in December 2016 — during the presidential transition period — with then–Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn agreed to cooperate as part of his plea deal and hasn’t been sentenced yet. He came before a judge for sentencing in December, but after the judge repeatedly asked if Flynn was sure he wanted to proceed, given that his cooperation might not be completely finished and he might not get the full benefit of it until it was, Flynn backed out and decided to wait.

Flynn has been cooperating with prosecutors in a criminal case against his former business partner Bijan Kian, who is charged with failing to register his work on behalf of the Turkish government in the United States. In a court filing in Flynn’s case on March 12, his lawyers asked to delay sentencing at least until Kian’s case is finished. Mueller’s office didn’t take a position on the request — the judge granted it — but said that although it was true Flynn might testify in Kian’s case or provide other assistance, in their opinion his cooperation was “otherwise complete.”


Alex van der Zwaan

Charged: Feb. 16, 2018
Status: Sentenced and served 30 days in prison
The Dutch lawyer was the first person charged in Mueller’s investigation who didn’t have a direct connection to Trump. Van der Zwaan was in Manafort and Gates’s orbit — van der Zwaan’s now-former law firm, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, had been hired to do a report about the trial of former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko. Manafort and Gates were accused of secretly paying millions of dollars for the report, at the behest of Tymoshenko’s political rivals who were in power at the time, using offshore funds. Van der Zwaan pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about his contacts with Gates and an unnamed person about the Tymoshenko report.

Van der Zwaan’s deal with Mueller’s office was unusual in that it didn’t include a cooperation agreement. He was sentenced on April 3, 2018, to 30 days in prison, and served his time. After his release from federal custody, he was turned over to US immigration officials and left the country.


Internet Research Agency

Charged: Feb. 16, 2018
Status: One defendant fighting the charges
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller, held a press conference last February to announce the indictment of the Russian-based Internet Research Agency, two other Russian entities, and 13 Russian individuals charged with trying to interfere in the 2016 election through social media campaigns and contacts with political organizers in the United States. According to the indictment, Russians communicated with people associated with Trump’s campaign and other political groups, but Rosenstein noted there was no accusation that any American was a “knowing participant” in the alleged criminal activity. Trump jumped on the case as proof there was no collusion with his campaign.

To date, only the Internet Research Agency has participated in the case, and has aggressively fought the indictment, to the point of ticking off the judge.


Richard Pinedo

Charged: Feb. 7, 2018
Status: Sentenced and serving six months in prison
Pinedo was charged with one count of identify fraud — he was accused of running a company designed to circumvent the security features of online payment sites such as PayPal. Although prosecutors alleged that the Russians charged with election interference bought credit card and bank account numbers from online sellers to evade security measures at PayPal, there was no claim that Pinedo knew he was aiding the alleged election interference campaign. Mueller’s office never explicitly accused Pinedo of facilitating the sales to the Russians, but his criminal case was unsealed the same day that Rosenstein announced the indictment against Russian entities and individuals charged with interfering in the election.

Pinedo agreed to cooperate with investigators and is serving a six-month prison sentence; he is due for release in May, according to federal Bureau of Prisons records.


Konstantin Kilimnik

Charged: June 8, 2018
Status: Charges pending, never participated in court
Manafort’s longtime Russian Ukrainian associate was added to Manafort’s case in DC as a codefendant in June. He was charged with conspiring with Manafort to try to tamper with potential witnesses — they were accused of trying to direct members of a public relations group they had worked with to lie to investigators about the extent of lobbying efforts in the United States by a group of former European officials on behalf of Ukraine. Prosecutors have said US intelligence believes Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence; Kilimnik has denied that. Manafort pleaded guilty to the witness tampering conspiracy.

Kilimnik is not believed to be in the United States and has not participated in the US court proceedings.


Viktor Netyksho et al.

Charged: July 13, 2018
Status: Charges pending, never participated in court
Rosenstein held a press conference in July to announce charges against 12 members of the Russian intelligence agency GRU accused of orchestrating hacks of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chair John Podesta, and releasing those stolen emails to interfere with the election. Although the indictment alleged that the defendants, through an online persona known as Guccifer 2.0, communicated with an unidentified person regularly in contact with senior Trump campaign officials, there was again no claim that the campaign was in on the alleged scheme. According to the indictment, the Russian agents used Guccifer 2.0 to release stolen documents through “Organization 1,” which, based on reporting, is a reference to WikiLeaks.

None of the defendants are believed to be in the United States and none have participated in the case so far.


Michael Cohen

Charged: Nov. 29, 2018
Status: Sentenced and about to serve three years in prison
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan had charged Trump’s former personal attorney in August 2018 with campaign finance law violations, tax evasion, and bank-related charges, a case that had been built based on some information referred by Mueller’s office. In November, the special counsel’s office brought a case of its own against Cohen, charging him with lying to Congress about the timeline of the Trump Organization’s efforts in 2016 to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Cohen pleaded guilty in both cases and agreed to cooperate with the government. Unlike Manafort, who managed to stay in Trump’s good graces even after he had agreed to cooperate, Cohen’s deal with the government marked a public break with the president, who at one point called Cohen a “rat.”

Between the two cases, Cohen was sentenced to spend three years in prison. Before turning himself in to the Bureau of Prisons, however, Cohen made multiple trips to Capitol Hill to testify. During a blockbuster public hearing before the House Oversight Committee in February, Cohen told lawmakers that Trump “in his way” told him to lie to Congress about the Trump Tower deal — an account that BuzzFeed News had reported in January. Cohen is due to begin serving his sentence in May.


Roger Stone

Charged: Jan. 24, 2019
Status: Fighting the charges
Mueller’s final case was against Trump’s longtime adviser. Stone is charged with lying to Congress about his contacts with WikiLeaks and also witness tampering. According to his indictment, Stone directed associates to contact WikiLeaks and told senior Trump campaign officials about information obtained by the site. Cohen also told Congress in February that Stone had personally told Trump in July 2016 that WikiLeaks would soon release emails that would damage the Clinton campaign; Stone told BuzzFeed News that Cohen’s statement was untrue, but did not specify what was inaccurate.

Stone pleaded not guilty and vowed to fight the charges against him, but already suffered a setback when the judge imposed a gag order that largely prohibits him from talking about the case or Mueller’s investigation. The judge had originally given Stone room to publicly comment on his case, but she changed her mind after Stone posted a photo of the judge on Instagram with a symbol that resembled crosshairs. The judge is mulling whether Stone violated her order with the rerelease of a book he wrote that includes a new introduction slamming the special counsel.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zo ... estigation
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby RocketMan » Sat Mar 23, 2019 2:50 am

THE WALLS ARE INCREASINGLY CLOSING IN ON HIM AND THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE END.

Yaaaas.
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2812
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests