David Rockefeller is dead

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby conniption » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:07 am


comment courtesy of the kremlin stooge blog...

Lyttenburgh says:
March 20, 2017 at 3:42 pm


Image

Well, d’uh! Rockfeller was born under Nicholas II the Bloody, survived Lenin, Stalin, all GenSecs, Perestroika, Rough 90s under Yeltsin the Drunk… and died exactly when Putin the Dark One was in charge! Naturally, there could be only one conclusion! #PutinDidIt.

P.S. And Russian hackers.
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby Spiro C. Thiery » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:19 pm

I was under the impression that mentioning Chupacabra fighters was frowned upon at RI.
Seeing the world through rose-colored latex.
User avatar
Spiro C. Thiery
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:58 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:49 am

If David Rockefeller had died in 2007, this thread would be at about the 68th or 70th page by now.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby American Dream » Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:47 am

The End of an Era

Image

The New Global Chaos?

But in the second decade of the twenty first century, the longstanding assumptions concerning Globalization are under fire as never before. The national security state has grown vast and powerful during the War on Terror, far surpassing the not inconsiderate power it wielded during the Cold War. But increasingly this ascension threatens to turn to ash in the mouth of the Pentagon with the rise of the BRICS nations, but most especially China. Decades of free trade have made China wealthy and powerful while threatening the ability of the Pentagon to wage war against other major world powers (noted before here). What's more, there's the glacier size headache of dealing with technological espionage, with has thrived in the era of neo-liberalism. Those super secret weapons that Pentagon is reputed to have may not remain super secret for much longer.

And David Rockefeller is as responsible for this state of affairs as anyone. He and his close partner, Henry Kissinger, laid the foundation for the opening of the global to American corporations in the 1970s with their push for detente with the Soviet Union. As a result, Russia, China and many other formerly closed economies were opened up to extensive US investment during that decade, paving the way for the rise of the BRICS as major industrial powers in the next century.

"Nixon's and Kissinger's arrival in the White House in 1969 coincided with David Rockefeller's becoming CEO of the Chase Manhattan Bank. The Nixon-Kissinger foreign policy of detente was highly congruous with Rockefeller's push to internationalize Chase Manhattan banking operations. Thus in 1973 Chase became the first American bank to open an office in Moscow. A few months later, thanks to an invitation arranged by Kissinger, Rockefeller became the first U.S. banker to talk with Chinese Communist leaders in Beijing. Rockefeller also served as intermediary between the White House and other foreign leaders, such as Gamel Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat in Egypt, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, and the leaders of Oman."
(The Road to 9/11, Peter Dale Scott, pg. 38)


Image
Henry Kissinger

But now an ever growing number of the American elite are becoming disillusioned with these policies. For much of the past two decades the United States has been falling behind while our principal rivals are rapidly closing the gap. Throughout the 1990s and early 00s this was not especially concerning when China seemed committed to the New World Order. But with the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) China has effectively established its own global economic order as a direct challenge to US-dominated institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF.

It would seem that the Chinese elite are not content to play second fiddle to their counterparts in Europe and the US indefinitely and this, along with their massive military build up, are the first salvos in a quest for a new international order.

With such pressures coming to bare against the current globalist world order, Rockefeller's death couldn't have come at a worse time. For years he was the rallying point for the globalists of the United States and Europe. But with his death and the extreme age of his closet colleagues, there should be real questions arising as to how long this system can survive its founder's death. The great Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics already considered these implications several years ago, noting:

"One thing that should be taken into account is that the average age of the Rockefeller clique at the top of ISGP's Superclass Index is about 86. David Rockefeller is a solid century old, George Shultz and Henry Kissinger are in their 90s and a lot of their closest friends and proteges aren't lagging behind very far. There's no clear heir to David Rockefeller either, who, along with his family, built almost the complete worldwide network of NGOs in the post-World War II era. His son, Dr. Richard Rockefeller, died in a plane crash in 2014. While respected in the medical world, Dr. Richard Rockefeller had no influence in the world of business, politics, or think tanks. The same goes for David Rockefeller, Jr., or the rest of David Rockefeller's children (all daughters): they have been involved in various philanthropic projects, maybe a think tank here and there, but they have virtually no political influence and do not possess the vast riches anymore the Rockefeller family acquired in the late 19th and early 20th century through the oil business.

"Apart from David Rockefeller and Laurance Rockefeller, the only member of the Rockefeller family with any political influence heading into the 1990s was Jay Rockefeller, West Virginia's senator from 1985 to 2015, who served as vice chairman and chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee in the years after 9/11. A son of David's brother, Nelson Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller has been involved in a number of NGOs - including Bilderberg 1971-1972, the CFR, Alfalfa, Trilateral Commission, Japan Society and Asia Society - but his influence on national or international politics never even remotely compared to that of the Henry Kissinger-David Rockefeller duo. Jay is getting into his 80s, so chances are we won't be hearing much from him anymore. And while his son Justin has been active in the NGO world, this also has been at a rather low level, similar to the children of David Rockefeller.

"Thus, it will be interesting to see how the liberal establishment, which for almost a century has had the Rockefeller family to rally around, will adapt to this new situation, especially in a world with dwindling national resources, a recalcitrant Russia, an emerging China, rapidly rising CO2 and methane levels, and other global challenges."

Image
Jay Rockefeller

Thus, it would appear that the Rockefeller family is poised to fade away from the halls of power just as their long time rivals the Morgans did over half a century ago. And with globalism's longstanding "Rock of Ages" now gone, these challenges are only going to become more pronounced. It is likely that the infighting and fractures within the American elite will only become more extreme, which may lead to desperation as their status is threatened both from without (i.e. China and Russia) and within (primarily from the far right).

As such, the prospect of another major war was likely increased even more with Rockefeller's death. While he was able to maintain some semblance of order through sheer force of personality in the twenty-first century, the collapse of the post-WWII order was already inevitable and with it will come another era of chaos and instability. Rockefeller was a monstrous figure on any number of level to be sure, but he was also the product of a generation of elites that had witnessed modern warfare among superpowers first hand. As such, he and many of the elites of that generation seemed to realize that there was a line that should never be crossed.

Those now in the driver's seat do not appear to have such qualms. And that is most distressing.


More at: http://visupview.blogspot.com/2017/03/t ... f-era.html
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby conniption » Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:11 am

Cordelia » Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:27 pm wrote:Given Chuck Berry's death on Saturday and Jimmy Breslin's on Sunday, I thought the demise of notables might now occur alphabetically and George H.W. could be next. But..........


there it is...

Chuck Barris is dead.
By joscelyn paine, associated press

NEW YORK — Mar 22, 2017

Chuck Barris, whose game show empire included "The Dating Game," ''The Newlywed Game" and that infamous factory of cheese, "The Gong Show," has died. He was 87.
Barris died of natural causes Tuesday afternoon at his home in Palisades, New York, according to publicist Paul Shefrin, who announced the death on behalf of Barris' family...
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby Cordelia » Sat Mar 25, 2017 12:26 pm

^^^Except to cooperate with dying in alphabetical (and youngest to oldest) order, Barris should have died on Friday, March 17. Guess he wasn't Irish :wink
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:02 am

Here is a realistic assessment of David Rockefeller's history of "philanthropy" by F. William Engdhal.

http://journal-neo.org/2017/03/26/d-roc ... me-legacy/
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby Peachtree Pam » Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:22 am

Here is an article, written in 2005, by Robert Parry, describing David Rockefeller's contempt for Jimmy Carter (due to his stand on human rights) and Rockefeller's efforts to force Carter to accept the Shah of Iran into the United States for medical treatment. This resulted in the capture of hostages at the US embassy in Tehran. The article also describes efforts by Carter's opponents to sabotage Carter's efforts to get the hostages released before the election in 1980. Due to treasonous backdoor machinations, the hostages were not released before the election, but were released during Reagan's inaugural address.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/03/21/d ... rise-case/
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: David Rockefeller is dead

Postby Peachtree Pam » Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:24 am

Here is a fine article describing the detrimental effect of David Rockefeller's powerful influence in shaping the politics of New York to benefit his family fortune at the expense of ordinary New Yorkers and his personal attention to the promotion or demotion of artists.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/03/davi ... -obituary/
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests