JackRiddler » 04 Oct 2017 21:11 wrote:.
I presume someone's guilty of these murders. If you want an alternate scenario to the story as told (at least the main outline), it has a lot more moving parts than most of you seem to realize.
LOL. Why does this sound like somebody arguing that life had to begin on Earth because the panspermia theory has "too many moving parts"? Or that Oswald must have killed Kennedy because of Occam's razor?
So some questions:
- What's the motive? On behalf of which cause?
Why doesn't this question need to answered about Paddock before you express "near zero doubt" that he not only murdered dozens after 40 years with no police record but that he obviously pulled all of this off on his own?
- Who's the crew? How might they pull it off?
The customers he thought he was stinging asked to handle the merchandise they were considering purchasing. When the local cops got there, the purchasers flashed their FBI (or whatever) badges and pointed out the dead lone shooter. And the rest is history. I'm not saying this is what happened, but I am saying Operation Gladio was not a movie. Can you say "strategy of tension"?
- How are you going to get any evidence not provided for you by the corporate media or the cops?
We almost certainly aren't. So why give this "evidence" any credence whatsoever?
- How are you going to deal with the 130-decibel noise and toxic bullshit over the whole thing being blasted out from Jonestown and the rest?
I don't follow.
Some of you just can't see this in your moral universe, and neither can I. But the observation that millions of people might engage in mass murder out of misanthropy (against a given group or generally) if given the means is not at all foreign to me. A lot of people would murder strangers if all it took was pushing a button without consequences (like in the movie The Box, except there were consequences in the movie). First-person shooters and zombie films partly market to this, right?
But there are consequences. The narrative we are supposed to buy is that the guy shot himself before the authorities arrived and met whatever maker he did or did not believe in directly after murdering scores of innocent people for no discernible reason then offing himself. How is that not a consequence? Furthermore, in whose interest is it that you are so eager to believe that a large plurality of your fellow citizens would love to shoot scores of innocent people like you for no reason whatsoever so much that they are more than willing to face such consequences to do so?
The brother totally convinces me
because you are looking in the mirror.