Men’s Rights Activists: Use Bitcoin to Hide Money From Your Future Ex-Wife
To that I say awesome! Protect yourself from frivorce.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Men’s Rights Activists: Use Bitcoin to Hide Money From Your Future Ex-Wife
of course be as much of an ass as you can and keep it a secret before you marry someone you "love"
man if that ain't the dickish thing I have heard all day but the day is still young
I didn't see "wealthy" women being so diabolical
after all marriage is all about money and nothing else...for some men
surely that is all that women are after or so I have heard from a man
Rupert Murdoch: Fox News Harassment Scandals ‘All Nonsense’
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/r ... s-nonsense
O’Reilly Accuser: Time Bomb of Info on Sex Harasser Executives in ‘Highest Positions’ at Fox News Is Counting Down
Juliet Huddy speaks out against Bill O'Reilly on Megyn Kelly TODAY.
“Tick tock, tick tock,” wrote conservative commentator and Bill O’Reilly sexual harassment accuser Juliet Huddy on Saturday. “Executives who not only covered up for sexual harassers/predators (statements by 21st Century Fox co-chairman Rupert Murdoch, who said on Friday that the sexual harassment and abuse scandal at his network is merely “nonsense,” and that it’s a “political” attack on the network “because we’re conservative.”
LawAndCrime.com said that in a post that she deleted from Facebook, but then posted on Twitter, Huddy wrote, “Rupert Murdoch is not just a media mogul. He’s a perpetrator, complicit in wrecking careers of hardworking, talented people while protecting their tormentors.”
She continued, “The more we shame disgraceful executives like Murdoch, the faster we send the message that sexual harassment will not be tolerated.”
In a statement to Law and Crime, Huddy said, “It’s ironic that O’Reilly, Murdoch and others have suggested that I, along with the other accusers, are part of some left wing conspiracy. [One], I’m fiscally conservative and socially liberal so let’s just get that out of the way. [And two], based on everything I have seen and has been reported, the participants in this, The Grand Conspiracy, are the executives at Fox.”
She said that Murdoch himself is not accused of harassing women, but that he was instrumental in covering up and burying stories about O’Reilly, former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes and others.
Huddy is one of multiple women to whom Fox News has paid out tens of millions of dollars in settlements related to O’Reilly alone. A parade of other women have come forward with accusations of harassment, sexualized bullying and a “locker room” culture at the network.
https://www.alternet.org/human-rights/o ... s-fox-news
Doug Jones, the Democrat who last week beat alleged child molester Roy Moore to become senator of Alabama, said that he doesn't believe President Trump should resign over numerous sexual harassment allegations because those accusations were made "before the election" and that the country needed to "get on with the real issues."
seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:33 pm wrote:Joe Biden is not a pedophile
Joe Biden has never raped anyone
Joe Biden is not a sexual predator
Scott DworkinVerified account
@funder
1h1 hour ago
More
NEW Research: GOP Congressman Ron DeSantis, one of the House Republicans attacking Mueller, got $10,800 in 2016 from Russian billionaire who made his fortune off Russian oil. I’m filing a House Ethics Complaint on @RepDeSantis for all of this.
redsock » Sun Dec 17, 2017 4:29 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:33 pm wrote:Joe Biden is not a pedophile
Joe Biden has never raped anyone
Joe Biden is not a sexual predator
How do you actually know this? Obviously, you cannot possibly know this. ... And it is not just about Biden. None of us can truly know it about anyone.
So you make these definitive statements about someone you do not know (and most likely have never met) - why? - because no one has come forward and accused him of anything? Seriously? That puts him completely in the clear? After all of the news stories that have come out in recent months - many of which you have referred to several times (the famous and not-famous alike) - you think simply because a man has not been charged or convicted of something that appears to be much more widespread than most people can fathom that he is 100% innocent?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests