Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spring?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:00 pm

kelley » Tue Mar 06, 2018 7:35 am wrote:Ides of March

a settling of accounts and so forth


That brought to mind something that happened the day after Ides of March in 1978: The kidnapping of Aldo Moro.

The Long Ides of March of Aldo Moro

by Luciana Bohne

How many ages hence
Shall this our lofty scene be acted o’er,
In states unborn, and accents yet unknown.

— William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

“Beware the Ides of March”—or even the day after. On the morning of 16 March 1978 in Rome’s central via Fani, the Red Brigades (BR) kidnapped Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro, head of the Christian Democratic Party (DC), killing five agents of his entourage. The fifty-five days of his detention in a secret “people’s prison” and eventual assassination by his captors on 9 May 1978 marked the climax of over thirty years of internal and external opposition to post-fascist Italy’s chartering its own political and economic course by “parallel convergences.” It is worth revisiting this long and twisted story as an early template for the bad faith with which the US Empire deals with the world today. It is not a story for conspiracy-phobes.

The plot of all plots: whodunnit?

Moro himself coined the phrase, “parallel convergences,” hinting at dark forces behind the facade of the legitimate state. The executors of Moro’s death are not in doubt. The BR condemned him to death on 29 April 1978 for “advancing counterrevolutionary programs in the service of bourgeois imperialism,” shooting eleven bullets into his body curled up in the trunk of a red Renault on 9 May. Moro’s phrase “parallel convergences” challenged translators at the time. Today, we understand it, in part, as the network of economic international elites, whose interest state intelligence structures serve—the CIA first among peers. I asked Douglas Valentine, author of The Phoenix Program and exhaustive histories of CIA, DEA, FBI, what the phrase meant as Moro used it. Valentine said, “A CIA/military intelligence guy I knew well, Col. Tully Acampora, told me that JFK’s station chief in Rome starting mid-1963, Bill Harvey, was sent there to help . . . General Giovanni di Lorenzo, head of Italy’s military intelligence and security services, subvert the government of Leftist Prime Minister, Aldo Moro.”

“Leftist”? Aldo Moro had toyed with the idea of joining the Socialist Party, but he was a devout Catholic and chose the DC instead. He was, however, interested in national sovereignty, the relief of emigration from the underdeveloped South, and an autonomous energy policy of trade with the Middle East. Only a year before the arrival in Rome of CIA station chief, Bill Harvey, the Mafia murdered Italian Energy Minister, Enrico Mattei, a close associate of Moro’s, after Mattei’s fruitful overtures for fair trade with oil-rich, Third World countries. Behind the Mafia lurked the “Seven Sisters,” as Mattei dubbed the cartel of the American oil companies—and the services of the CIA together with Italian secret services. The Italian director, Francesco Rosi, made a film about this dramatic event, titled, The Mattei Affair. The journalist who helped him with research disappeared, presumed killed by the Mafia.

Cold War: Italy’s “Stability” Must Be Secured

Italy’s vassalage to the US in the Cold War mattered tremendously—more than Americans know. One of the earliest directives by the then-recently established US National Security Council made no bones about Washington’s intentions should the Italian Communist Party win the parliamentary elections in 1948. The US, the directive punctuated, would intervene “even at the cost of a civil war.”

Throughout the Cold War, the US considered Italy a front-line state. The “iron curtain” ran vertically north south from Poland’s Stettin on the Baltic Sea to Italy’s Trieste on the northeast tip of the Adriatic Sea. Italy’s eastern neighbor was communist Yugoslavia (until 1948 allied with Moscow) and further south, across a narrow stretch of sea, communist Albania, also allied with Moscow until 1961. Indeed, as NATO and American military bases grew to dot Italy over the decades, their missiles pointed east, at Hungary and Czechoslovakia.

Furthermore, Italy’s central Mediterranean location, especially Sicily’s, provided the US with a key asset location for control of the Middle East. US policymakers were determined to preserve this essential geopolitical asset in their sphere of influence. As they saw it, one thing only threatened American hegemony in Italy: the vastly popular and respected Italian Communist Party (PCI), the largest communist party in Western Europe, which had been one of the two “hero” parties of the Resistance against the Nazi-fascist occupation in WW II from 8 September 1943 to 25 April 1945. In 1948, the PCI, allied with all left parties as the Popular Front, would almost certainly have won the parliamentary elections without the funding of a red-scare campaign by the CIA and the fomented fatal incidents and violent clashes at party rallies that seemed to sound the thunder of a coming civil war. Intimidated, the people voted a majority to the he DC, 48% of the vote; close behind came the Popular Front with 30% of the vote. “Without the CIA. The Communist Party . . . would surely have won the elections in 1948,” writes Jack Devine, former CIA chief-of-station in Rome, in his book, Good Hunting.

In the early 1950s, Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles and Ambassador to Italy, Claire Boothe Luce, insisted that the PCI be outlawed. All Italian political parties, from extreme right to left, refused. They, justifiably pointed out that, because the PCI had been one of the main forces of the Resistance, there would be civil war in Italy if such a measure were enacted. For the Americans, communists in power endangered the security of NATO and the policy of control of the Middle East. When in 1953 William Colby became director of the CIA in Italy his task was to direct clandestine political actions to contain the influence of the PCI. As he wrote in his memoirs, “My task was to prevent that Italy fall in communist hands at the next elections.” Keeping the PCI out of the executive was made a condition, agreed upon by President Harry Truman and Prime Minister Alcide de Gasperi (DC), for the distribution of funds through the Marshall Plan for post-war reconstruction of Italy. Still in the 50s, a secret accord, “Plan Demagnetize,” stipulated a close collaboration between the intelligence services of the US and Italy’s to set back the influence of communism on Italian society.

In the Pre-Dawn of the Cold War: Mustering Their Mafia and Fascist Battalions

This communist threat had been identified and organized against as early as the allied landing in Sicily, in July of 1943. The OSS (predecessor to the CIA), founded in 1941 with 13,000 agents by OSS chief “Wild Bill” Donovan, had assigned the “Italian Section” to James Jesus Angleton, who came from a masonic family and would head the CIA’s Israeli desk by 1950. Angleton recruited a “Mafia Circle”—so denominated in CIA documents—to help with the allied landing in Italy. The circle was made up of Mafiosi (including Michele Sindona, who would become notorious for the crack-up of the Franklin National Bank in 1979) suggested by the gangster, Lucky Luciano, whom American naval intelligence approached in prison in Clinton, New York. The “Mafia Circle,” however, was not dissolved after the Allies’ smooth landing; it widened. The circle rushed to liberate other Mafiosi long imprisoned by Mussolini’s regime. Officials of the American occupation put the “ liberated “Mafiosi in important positions of administrative, police, and military power throughout Sicily to function as an anti-communist network of collaborators. As mayors, for example, the appointees would eventually exert regional influence on the elections and policies of senators and deputies in the parliament in Rome throughout the life of the first Republic—and close ties with the Interior Ministry and its secret services.

Nor did Angleton’s anti-communist recruitment stop at the Mafia. He began to gather exponents of the fascist regime, storing them as future assets in allied-occupied Sicily. Chief among them, was Prince Junio Valerio Borghese, commander of a frogman flotilla unit in the Italian Royal Navy until 1943, expert marine saboteur, collaborator from 1943 to 1945 with the Nazi puppet regime of the Repubblica of Salo’, on on Lake Garda, in Northern Italy. After 1945, Borghese was convicted of Nazi-collaboration but not of war crimes, though it was certainly known that his quasi-private army participated with the SS in some of the most brutal massacres in central Italy—perhaps 10,000 victims in what is known as “the war against civilians.” When the partisans of Resistance leader, General Cadorna, arrested Borghese in Northern Italy on Liberation Day, 25 April 1945, Angleton drove up north in his jeep on 30 April, took charge of Borghese, dressed him in an American uniform, and took him safely to Rome. In a report to OSS, Angleton wrote that Borghese “represented a long-term interest at the heart of our work.” For good measure, Borghese and his loyal army were later absorbed into “Gladio,” NATO’s super-secret select group of paramilitary operatives –but that is another story.

In Sicily throughout the fifties, fascists, through the largesse of funding by the US, organized themselves into neo-fascist groups, with ties to the Italian secret services. The twinning of mafia and fascists, con-joined by the OSS in the 1940s, would prove a formidable force of destabilization in the 1970s, setting off an ideological war in the streets between provocateur neo-fascist groups and extra-parliamentary revolutionary communist formations—a “strategy of tension,” as the violence initiated by the right came to be known. That this “tension” broke out at a moment of increasing gains by the left, threatening a communist electoral victory or a share in the executive could not have been a coincidence, Italian public opinion maintains to this day. Italy’s strictly limited sovereignty as US client or asset state was being defied by gains in social democracy—and the expanding popular democracy was a threat to Italy’s “stability” as US vassal.

Italian Reds Are Winning

On the morning of 16 March, this threat was about to become a reality.

Aldo Moro was scheduled to call for a vote of confidence on the proposed new government of “national solidarity”—a power share with the Communist Party in the cabinet and the executive branch, a first in Italy, a first in Western Europe. This was the culmination of negotiations for the compromesso storico (“historic compromise”) between the DC and the PCI to make the government more representative of the electorate. Three agencies were not pleased: Moscow, because Enrico Berlinguer, leader of the PCI had recognized NATO in order to make power-sharing possible in a NATO-dominated Western European country; Washington, because from long date it had opposed the accession of the communists to the executive; and the Red Brigades, because 1) they thought the PCI should remain an opposition party 2) they regarded the compromesso as a further betrayal or weakening of the PCI’s commitment to class struggle initiated by the Resistance and subsequently thwarted by too many PCI “compromises” with the ruling bourgeois parties, and 3) because the compromesso would dent the drive toward the social and political revolution to which they aspired. This was the turbulent local and geopolitical climate on that fatal morning in March.

Killed as a symbol of the liberal state or its sacrificial gravedigger?

Did the BR kill Moro as a symbol of the “bourgeois, liberal-imperialist” state, as claimed? Franco Bonisoli, with Mario Moretti and Lauro Azzolini, a member of the executive command of the Red Brigades at the time of Moro’s sequestration, declared in 1998 that for the BR the state consisted of the Christian Democratic Party with Moro at its head. Since the BR by then was aiming at the heart of the state, Moro was the intended symbol. Mario Moretti, who alone among the brigatisti interrogated Moro in prison, said the assassination was the ultimate expression of their Marxist-Leninist line.

But in 1998, Aldo Moro’s son, Giovanni, who had been twenty-years old when his father was killed, gave an interview to La Repubblica, insisting that Moro could not have been killed as a mere symbol but to end his political project:

Our impression [in the family] was unanimous: we all felt that he wasn’t targeted as a symbol, as later maintained. What was done was a surgical intervention on Italian politics. Moro was the architect of the encounter with the communists. He was a subject at risk. And, anyway, it’s enough to look at the years of the bombs. When Moro is marginalized, the bombs, too, are marginalized. His political line is strictly connected to this piece of Italian history.

The “years of lead” and the “strategy of tension”: rightists and leftists target the state

To be sure, the year 1978 marked nearly a decade of assaults on members and symbols of state institutions, the media, and the judiciary, a campaign of the left. On the right, the targets were civilians massacred across Italy (“We will bury democracy under a mountain of corpses,” wrote a flyer, acknowledging a massacre by Ordine Nero–Black/Fascist Order, a neo-fascist group). Liberal and left public opinion in Italy then and now holds that this terror by the right was planned and carried out in order to destabilize the multi-party state and supplant it with a decidedly rightist, pro-American, and anti-communist one. The opinion was bolstered by the findings of interminable trials and countless judiciary and parliamentary investigations into subversive activities by the neo-fascists in collusion with organs of the state, operating as extensions of external actors. In this opinion, the “years of lead,” as the season of violence came to be dubbed in Italy, were the expression of a “strategy of tension,” intended also neutralize the Communist Party, which commanded over 34.4% of the popular vote in 1976. The massive support for the Communist Party and its representation in Parliament led, among other progressive measures, to the addition of a Workers’ Bill of Rights, enshrined in the constitution in 1970. For the Red Brigades, this wasn’t enough, but it was more than enough for anti-proletarian neo-fascists.

In fact, almost simultaneously with the pending enactment of the Workers’ Bill of Rights in 1970, the season of terrorism began in earnest in Milan with the bombing of the National Agricultural Bank in Piazza Fontana on12 December 1969, killing seventeen people and wounding 80. The anarchist railway worker, Giuseppe Pinelli, was detained on suspicion, committing suicide by defenestration during a break in interrogations. The absurdity of this reported account provoked the writer Dario Fo (Nobel Prize for Literature) to dramatize it as a farce in “Accidental Death of an Anarchist” (1970), the most famous and acclaimed of his plays. Movimento Ordine Nuovo, a far-right, neo-fascist organization, was suspected of planting the bomb, but in a series of chaotic trials lasting until 2005 no one was ever punished for the massacre, though a court identified two neo-fascists as the terrorists.

Only three days before the Piazza Fontana bombing, a secret neo-fascist coup, code-named “Tora, Tora,” had been called off for reasons never revealed, though three trials followed the disclosure in March 1971 of the plot by the left paper Paese Sera.

In the final trial in 1984, all the accused were found not guilty of conspiring against the state. The plot is known in Italy as the golpe Borghese (the Borghese coup) because Angleton’s “asset” Junio Valerio Borghese, the fascist aristocrat, known as “The Black Prince,” was central to it (the Spanish word golpe gained currency in Italy after the Pinochet coup in Chile in 1973). By the time of the failed golpe Borghese in 1969, Borghese’s fascist-era, quasi-private army had been being trained in the US since Angleton’s time in Sicily in 1943—at first twenty saboteurs; later many more. President Francesco Cossiga, who had been Interior Minister during Moro’s sequestration, declared in an interview years later that the “role of the CIA was to fund anti-communist neo-fascist groups.” However, in the midst of assaulting the Interior Ministry in Rome, Borghese called the operation off. Conjectures suggest that a neo-fascist coup in Italy was not exactly what Washington desired or needed at the time.

Nevertheless, the bombing in Piazza Fontana and the botched coup, with US and NATO warships allegedly waiting on the ready in the Mediterranean, were followed by a relentless frenzy of terrorist attacks. Here is a select list of the bloodiest, perpetrated by the neo-fascist groups:

1970 Gioia Tauro, Calabria: 6 dead; 27 wounded

1972 Peteano di Sagrado, Venezia Giulia: 3 dead, 1 wounded

1973 Via Fatebenefratelli, Milan: 4 dead; 46 wounded

1974 Piazza della Loggia, Brescis: 8 dead; 94 wounded

1974 Train Italicus (between Florence and Bologna): 12 dead; 48 wounded

1980 Bologna Train Station: 85 dead; 200 wounded

What role the “Parallel State”?

Something was really rotten in Italy. Traumatic attacks on civilians, subversions, coups, and false-flags prompted the writer, Pier Paolo Pasolini, to write, shortly before his own murder in 1976, a j’accuse in the pages of the Corriere della Sera: “I know the names, but I have no proof.” Justice was slow or reluctant to catch up with the neo-fascist killers (there was better success with the left). Moreover, members of the secret services, the Interior Ministry and military intelligence derailed pursuit, trials, and investigations—a practice that came to be known as depistaggio, or “throwing off course.” This was not all that surprising. Mussolini’s secret police, army brass, and intelligence, were seamlessly integrated into the Ministries of the Interior, Foreign Affairs, and the military of the new Republic, under the supervision of the American occupation and, after 1949, NATO (and NATO’s “stay behind,” secret program of communist containment). This virtual continuity of the fascist regime, now interlaced with the Mafia, unopposed by the Vatican, supported by shadowy secret societies and Masonic lodges, within the new organs of power popularized the phrase “parallel state” among the Italian public during the “years of lead”—one post-fascist, democratic government on show for unsuspecting citizens; another, neo-fascist, in the shadows undermining national sovereignty. Particularly the intelligence services were known to protect members of neo-fascist groups, thwarting the judiciary under the rubric of “state secret.”

Pasolini’s vatic words rebounded two years later over the fifty-five days of Moro’s captivity and murder, when the whole political class—from the Christian Democrats to the communists, from the socialists to the Vatican– his friends, partners, and allies throughout the life of the republic, ignored the written appeals from his cell to negotiate his release. The government took the hard line: no negotiating with terrorists. The Communist Party agreed, fearing to be lumped in the same terrorist bag with the BR if they did. Pope Paul VI, from a window on St Peter’s Square called for Moro’s release “without conditions.” The refusal to negotiate was as if Italy’s politicians understood that Moro’s fate was sealed—that he was already dead. The Red Brigades’ condition for freeing Moro required that the state release from prison a number of their group, a not unreasonable request in cases of political sequestration, Moro noted in his letters. However, the BR also insisted on the recognition by the state of the BR as a political counterpart, as an armed political party, as a fighting force. No state could legitimize the force that would overthrow it. It was a demand that could not be met. This both closes and opens the mystery: on the one hand, the BR made an offer which was refused, and they killed him; on the other hand, they made an offer so intractable that they knew it would be refused, so his death was pre-ordained–by whom?

Giovanni Moro accuses all parties of shielding the truth:

There is still no truth—historical, judiciary, or political . . .. Moro was killed for his political project. Even the brigatisti have not told the truth: why didn’t they make public all that my father revealed under interrogation? In the letters found in 1990—those never made public at the time—my father mentions Gladio for the first time. With the revelation of Gladio, the BR could have caused embarrassment to the DC, but they kept it secret. It could have destroyed the image of the state as integral and solid. Why didn’t the brigatisti use it? I am sure they are lying to this day. And why did they kill him precisely when a glimmer of hope opened within the DC [for negotiations]? And, finally, why did the state do nothing to save him? Giulio Andreotti {DC] was the political head of the state . . . Francesco Cossiga (DC) was the Minister of Interior. In any other country, a Minister of the Interior to whom such a disaster happened would have been sent to cultivate roses. Instead, he became twice Prime Minister and once President of the Republic.

Losers and Winners

Who, in fact, benefitted from Moro’s death? Not the BR, as the state came down hard and opportunistically on Italian leftists of all stripes, arresting 12,000, and inducing 600 to escape to foreign parts, virtually destroying the historic nucleus of the BR. Not Italy, which ditched the compromesso storico, its chance to form a coalition of national unity, representative of the whole spectrum of Italian voters. Not the two historic parties of the Resistance, the parents of the Republic, and the articulators of its progressive constitution, “founded on labor.” Morally compromised by their refusal to negotiate Moro’s release, both the Communist Party and the Christian Democrat Party lost the confidence and respect of the voters, plunging Italy gradually in its present-day political vacuum, a “failed state” in all but name, a virtual NATO/American military base. The right certainly benefitted, as Mussolini’s old party, Movimento Sociale Italiano, morphed into Alleanza Nazionale (National Alliance) to rule, in tandem with racist, anti-immigrant, separatist Lega Nord (Northern League), and with the party of opportunist media magnate, Silvio Berlusconi. The PCI became the Democratic Party of the Left and then plain Democratic Party (DP). This association of retrograde political forces together with a (counter-) reformist, neo-liberal, mutilated left rules in coalitions on and off as a virtual tributary state and logistical outpost in the American “War on Terror.”

Prime Suspect: “Et tu, Kissinger?”

We must recall that only five years before Moro’s assassination, Salvador Allende’s government was overthrown by a coup, overseen by the CIA. Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger had justified the action in part by saying, “If we allow Chile to go communist, then Italy will follow.” Moro’s widow testified that “a high ranking United States political figure” had threatened her husband’s life, while on an official visit to Washington with the Italian delegation in 1976. She testified at the parliamentary inquest that the official said, “Either you stop your political line, or you will pay dearly.” Moro’s close friend and party associate, Minister Giovanni Galloni, identified the official as Henry Kissinger, at the time US Secretary of State. Textually, the words recorded in the documents of one of five trials, read like this:

“Onorevole, lei deve smettere di perseguire il suo piano politico per portare tutte le forze del suo Paese a collaborare direttamente. Qui, o lei smette di fare questa cosa, o lei la pagherà cara. Veda lei come la vuole intendere”

(“Your honor, you must stop pursuing your plan of getting all the political forces of your country to collaborate directly. Either you stop this thing, or you will pay dearly. It’s up to you how to interpret.”)

Giovanni Moro recalls his father’s theory of “parallel convergences” when he says:

I insist on repeating it: my father was the man who wanted to move Italy beyond the Cold War. There were oodles of people in Italy and outside Italy who considered him dangerous. This is the explanation that takes into account so many possible involvements.

Conclusion

What should resonate for readers in this old story is the similarity to aspects of present–day American “foreign policy.” Think of the “strategy of tension” implicit in “color revolutions,” planned, funded, and staged by US entities (including NGOs), aimed at effecting “regime change.” Think of the mustering, arming, training, and funding of reactionary forces—fundamentalist Islamists or Neo-Nazis—to “destabilize” a place by sowing terror. Think of how funding terrorist rightist groups in Italy evoked the terrorist response of the left—classic “divide and conquer” imperial strategy—and apply it to any place the US interventions have destroyed as integral states—Iraq, Libya, and now Ukraine, with ongoing attempts in Syria.

What do you see? Not only parallel stories but “parallel convergences” maybe?
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:42 pm

Today...

1. Trump revived his "Mexican Rape" greatest hit
2. Trump broke his silence about Stormy Daniels
3. Trump floated Scott Pruitt as the new attorney general
4. Kushner gave the Saudis a list of ”enemies” to arrest

Do anybody feel like somethin' big's about to happen?

we're getting there


someone wants someone to fire Mueller
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:57 pm

Like I said, I think that's the most likely scenario. Though I do wonder if he's stretching things out to wrap up end of the year, when a new Congress comes in? Maybe this spring will just be smoke and mirrors instead of fire and fury.
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:35 pm

Well, this has big potential:

Trump says 'major decisions' on Syria coming in next 24 to 48 hours

By Alisa Wiersema

Apr 9, 2018, 12:06 PM ET

President Donald Trump Monday condemned the recent alleged chemical attack in Syria saying, “It was atrocious, it was horrible.”

During a meeting with his Cabinet on Monday, the president said intelligence assessments are underway and his administration will be making "some major decisions" on Syria over the next 24-48 hours.

“To me there's not much of a doubt. The generals will figure it out.”

He later said a decision could be made "by the end of today."

When asked about possible U.S. military action, Trump said: "Nothing's off the table."

“You don’t see things like that, as bad as the news is around the world, you just don’t see those images,” he said.

“This is about humanity and it can’t be allowed to happen,” he said. “If it’s the Russians, if it’s Syria, if it's Iran, if it’s all of them together, we’ll figure it out."

Asked if Russian President Vladimir Putin bears responsibility for the attack, the president said "he may."

"He may, yeah, he may, and if he does, it's going to be very tough," Trump said.

"Everybody's going to pay a price, he will, everybody will."

Over the weekend, Trump took to Twitter to call the situation in Syria a “mindless chemical attack” while also pointing the finger at “President Putin, Russia, and Iran” for “backing Animal Assad.”

Just over a year ago, another chemical attack in Syria prompted Trump to order a cruise missile strike on a Syrian military airfield shortly learning about the attack. At the time, Trump called it “a brutal death for many” and expressed horror at the images of injured and dead children.

Days earlier, during a press conference with Jordan’s King Abdullah II, Trump began his remarks condemning the “heinous actions” that left at least 72 people dead. He was asked if that attack crossed a red line for him -- a reference to President Barack Obama’s 2012 threat that Syria's use of chemical weapons would cross a "red line."

“It crossed a lot of lines for me,” Trump said at the time. “When you kill innocent children, innocent babies, little babies with chemical gas that is so lethal -- people were shocked to hear what gas it was -- that crosses many, many lines. Beyond a red line, many, many lines.”

The president's third national security adivser, John Bolton, was in the room when the he made his comments Monday.

Image

Bolton, who began his new role at the White House on Monday, referred to President Trump’s 2017 strike as “strong decisive action” on Twitter. In a subsequent op-ed in the U.K. Post, Bolton declared Trump’s action served as the end of the Obama era in American foreign policy.

ABC News' Jordyn Phelps contributed to this report.


I wonder what Trump's reaction would have been if instead of blaming Israel, Putin had blamed ISIS. Just imagine Trump holding court in the war room: "We gotta bomb the shit out of 'em! I campaigned on this, now's the time to deliver! Where do we start?"
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby Jerky » Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:03 pm

When you combine that with the Cohen raids... yeah. You've got yourself an incredibly combustible mixture going on there.

Jerky
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby liminalOyster » Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:21 pm

Asked if Russian President Vladimir Putin bears responsibility for the attack, the president said "he may."

"He may, yeah, he may, and if he does, it's going to be very tough," Trump said.

"Everybody's going to pay a price, ... "


“We have a lot of options, militarily,” the president added. “And we’ll be letting you know pretty soon. Probably after the fact.


from: Trump says Syria decision imminent as Russia warns of 'grave repercussions'
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Apr 09, 2018 10:28 pm

Jerky » Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:03 pm wrote:When you combine that with the Cohen raids... yeah. You've got yourself an incredibly combustible mixture going on there.

Jerky


We have a President prone to temper tantrums and lacking impulse control frothing at the mouth in a meeting about the use of military force sitting next to John Bolton. What could go wrong?

Image


Squire Patton & Boggs, lawyers to Cambridge Analytica. Raided by FBI. Oh, and lobbyists to Gazprom. Did I mention that?


50th floor Apt was SOLD
TrumpTower 50th floor apt sold on July 14th 2016 & same floor the apartment Trump campaign paid an extra $130k in rent for and Right after Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130k. Someone’s pants are on fire-literally

'You better get out ASAP': President's lawyer Michael Cohen told Bethenny Frankel's partner to evacuate Trump Tower as fatal fire raged

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=40179&start=1410
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

This close...

Postby Burnt Hill » Tue Apr 17, 2018 12:43 pm

https://www.livescience.com/62313-asteroid-flyby-not-detected-sooner.html?utm_source=notification

How a Football Field-Size Asteroid Caught Us by Surprise

By Elizabeth Howell, Live Science Contributor | April 16, 2018 12:42pm ET

Earth received a cosmic close shave on Sunday (April 15) when a football field-size boulder passed by at half the moon's distance from our planet. Named 2018 GE3, the asteroid was detected only a few hours before its flyby, spotted by the automated Catalina Sky Survey.

Why did astronomers pick up the object only at the last minute?

At its closest approach, at 2:41 a.m. EDT (0641 GMT), 2018 GE whipped by Earth at a distance of only 119,500 miles (192,300 kilometers), according to EarthSky. That's a close call, given that the asteroid has an estimated diameter of 157 to 361 feet (48 to 110 meters), making it much larger than the cosmic object that exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia, in 2013. [The 7 Strangest Asteroids: Weird Space Rocks in Our Solar System]

While a football field-size asteroid is a small rock in the context of the larger universe, it's still big for an object passing by Earth. Back in February, NASA issued a public statement about a smaller, close-flying asteroid called 2018 CB, which was estimated to be from 50 to 130 feet (15 to 40 m) in diameter.

"Asteroids of this size do not often approach this close to our planet — maybe only once or twice a year," Paul Chodas, manager of the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, said in a statement at the time.

An artist's concept of a "generic" asteroid flyby.
An artist's concept of a "generic" asteroid flyby.
Credit: Shutterstock
Most asteroids reside in the asteroid belt, which lies between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. There are, however, some asteroids that pass by Earth. Sometimes astronomers don't pick them up until a few hours or days before the flyby. Other objects likely pass by us unseen, Michael Busch of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, told Space.com in 2013.

Why? Asteroids are small and dark and therefore very difficult to track. The largest known asteroid is Vesta, which is pretty tiny compared with a planet; it is only 329 miles (530 km) in diameter — roughly the distance from New York City to Buffalo, New York. Vesta, however, isn't representative of asteroid size in general. Many of these small worlds are only a few dozen feet in diameter, making them hard to see but still big enough to cause damage if they hit Earth.

Not only are asteroids small, but they're also pretty dim, at least when perceived in visual wavelengths. The most common kind of asteroid, called a carbonaceous type, is very dark. This kind of space rock may not reflect enough light for an optical telescope to spot it. A near-Earth asteroid also moves quickly in the sky compared with a planet, because the rock is much closer to us. So, a telescope needs to be looking in just the right area, at the right time, to catch it.

The best way to find these asteroids is to have many telescopes scanning the sky at once, and, fortunately, NASA does have such a program. Run through the agency's Planetary Defense Coordination Office, the program uses a large network of telescopes to scan the skies. These instruments, however, are optimized to search for much larger asteroids, which would have a catastrophic impact across huge regions of Earth. (Fortunately, NASA hasn't spotted any imminent threats of this kind; the agency publishes all results publicly at the Small-Body Database Browser.)

NASA's focus right now for near-Earth objects is on cataloging 90 percent of asteroids that are larger than 460 feet (140 m) wide and that will come to within about 4.65 million miles (7.48 million km) of Earth, or about 20 times the distance from Earth to the moon, according to the agency. The largest estimate for 2018 GE3 would make it only about three-fourths that size.
User avatar
Burnt Hill
 
Posts: 2584
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: down down
Blog: View Blog (0)

Something BIG coming soon to a field near you...

Postby Cordelia » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:09 pm

^^^
"Asteroids of this size do not often approach this close to our planet — maybe only once or twice a year," Paul Chodas, manager of the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, said in a statement at the time.

Yikes, maybe a little too often for my comfort zone. :scaredhide:
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby minime » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:15 pm

bmp
User avatar
minime
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby MacCruiskeen » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:40 pm

The truly raging vilification of social media in the last week has me convinced there will have to be a suitably terrifying false flag event soon as a pretext for a major crackdown (if not a total shutdown). Facespook and Twitter are rushing to silence everyone from the former ambassador Craig Murray to the English pensioner Ian56 and the Syrian-American Maram Susli, both of whom were denounced in the media, very foolishly, as "Russian bots". People are laughing. The Guardian, the BBC, Sky, the entire corporate media have already discredited themselves beyond redemption with their stupidly hasty and completely uncritical stenography of the Official Yarns about Syria and Skripal. The spooks won't take this lying down.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby minime » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:55 pm

MacCruiskeen » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:40 pm wrote:The truly raging vilification of social media in the last week has me convinced there will have to be a suitably terrifying false flag event soon as a pretext for a major crackdown (if not a total shutdown). Facespook and Twitter are rushing to silence everyone from the former ambassador Craig Murray to the English pensioner Ian56 and the Syrian-American Maram Susli, both of whom were denounced in the media, very foolishly, as "Russian bots". People are laughing. The Guardian, the BBC, Sky, the entire corporate media have already discredited themselves beyond redemption with their stupidly hasty and completely uncritical stenography of the Official Yarns about Syria and Skripal. The spooks won't take this lying down.


That's what I'm talking about!!

What would it take, Mac?
User avatar
minime
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby MacCruiskeen » Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:19 pm

I don't know, and I almost regret making the prediction, vague though it was. I fear it is going to be something that will be used to justify a serious act of large-scale war, something the hardcore neolib-neocon warmongers have certainly been building up to for years now. The establishment's rage against dissent is palpable and has been growing over the last few weeks, especially in the UK. They know they cannot afford to lose control of "the narrative".They need an excuse to silence that dissent.

Meanwhile, in the US, John "9/11"Bolton is back, Pompeo ("ex"-CIA) is now Sec. of State, and the Trump administration has just appointed a new ambassador to Germany (a position vacant for the last 14 months), presumably to ensure that those shilly-shallying krauts remember who's boss and rediscover their enthusiasm for the War on Terror:

In 2001, [Richard] Grenell was appointed by President George W. Bush as Director of Communications and Public Diplomacy for the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations. Serving in that role until 2008, Grenell became the longest serving U.S. spokesman at the United Nations[/b], advising four different U.S. Ambassadors. During his tenure, Grenell led communication strategies on such issues as the War on Terror, global peacekeeping operations, Iran and North Korea's nuclear weapons programs, and the UN Oil for Food corruption scandal.

[...]

In 2009, Grenell founded Capitol Media Partners, an international strategic media and public affairs consultancy with offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, and Washington, D.C.[6] He is under contract with Fox News where he is a "Contributor" commenting on foreign affairs and the media.[8][9] He has written for The Wall Street Journal,[10][11] CBS News,[12][13] CNN,[14] Politico,[15] Huffington Post,[16] The Washington Times,[17] Newsmax,[18] and Al Jazeera.[19] In 2012, CNN ranked Grenell's social media outreach as one of the top 5,[20] and Time magazine named Grenell as one of the Top 10 Political Twitter Feeds of 2014.[21] Grenell's Twitter account also has featured a number of sexist and disparaging remarks about female political and media figures. During Grenell's confirmation process, Senator Jeff Merkley expressed concern about Grenell's “significant history of making misogynistic and other incendiary statements online.”[22]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Grenell


You might call this a charm offensive, or you might call it something else.

All I feel confident of is that something has got to give, soon. It is going to be a long, hot summer.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby minime » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:19 am

So... in recognition of the impending Summer Solstice of 2019...

Did anything big--BIG--happen last Spring 2018, or last year? Did anything BIG happen this Spring?

Will anything BIG happen this Summer? This year, at all??

Will we get the empty, impotent satisfaction of witnessing a mind-blowing orgasmic cataclysm, or are we merely slouching towards bedlam?

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
User avatar
minime
 
Posts: 1095
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Does anyone else feel something BIG will happen this spr

Postby thrulookingglass » Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:07 pm

I've been waiting for something to happen
For a week or a month or a year
With the blood in the ink of the headlines
And the sound of the crowd in my ear
You might ask what it takes to remember
When you know that you've seen it before
Where a government lies to a people
And a country is drifting to war
And there's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who send the guns
To the wars that are fought in places
Where their business interest runs
On the radio talk shows and the T.V.
You hear one thing again and again
How the U.S.A. stands for freedom
And we come to the aid of a friend
But who are the ones that we call our friends--
These governments killing their own?
Or the people who finally can't take any more
And they pick up a gun or a brick or a stone
There are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
There's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who fan the flames
Of the wars that are fought in places
Where we can't even say the names
They sell us the President the same way
They sell us our clothes and our cars
They sell us every thing from youth to religion
The same time they sell us our wars
I want to know who the men in the shadows are
I want to hear somebody asking them why
They can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are
But they're never the ones to fight or to die
And there are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
Jackson Brown - Blood on the wire


May your life be meaningful enough that you finally GET UP and act like someone else's life matters as much as your own! There's only one way war will stop itself! UNDERSTAND! Profits in the graveyard.
User avatar
thrulookingglass
 
Posts: 877
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: down the rabbit hole USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests