Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a champ

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a champ

Postby liminalOyster » Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:12 pm

Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a champion
The shooting of a black, gay councillor has dealt a new blow to communities oppressed by gangs

Dom Phillips in Rio de Janeiro
Sat 17 Mar 2018 20.05 EDT Last modified on Sun 18 Mar 2018 12.44 EDT

Marielle Franco and her driver were shot dead last week in an attack that bore the hallmarks of a professional killing. Photograph: Mídia Ninja
The morning after tens of thousands of people thronged streets across Brazil to express their anger over the murder of black, gay Rio councillor Marielle Franco, it was business as usual in the Maré favela where she grew up. Armed drug gang members openly patrolled behind a police base.

The favela is hidden from the roaring highway that connects the nearby international airport to Rio’s centre by an opaque plastic fence. Authorities call it an “acoustic barrier”. Local people scoff and say it is there to hide their ramshackle but vibrant community from tourists, noting that in front of the nearby new schools the fence is transparent. It is symptomatic of how Brazilian authorities see the favelas that house almost a quarter of Rio’s population: as places to be hidden, abandoned to gangs, and occasionally invaded by police in armoured cars who don’t care who gets killed in the crossfire.

“This is a feudal system. The state is not in charge here,” said Alberto Aleixo, president of a local non-profit group called Maré Networks that offers culture and education.

Just yards from the locked back gates of the police barracks, a man in a baseball cap with a machine-gun slung around his neck rode past on a motorbike – a footsoldier for the Red Command gang, which runs a drugs market in an alley near the favela’s entrance. “These guys are in charge here,” said Aleixo.

Franco’s death last week at 38 – a carefully targeted shooting by apparently professional killers – sent shockwaves across the world and is forcing Brazilians to ask searching questions about their country’s inherent racism, violence and culture of impunity. European parliament deputies condemned the killing. Brazil’s prosecutor general, Raquel Dodge, called it an attack on democracy. The great Brazilian music star Caetano Veloso wrote a song for her.

Aleixo had known her for years, ever since they campaigned together against the Rio police’s introduction of armoured vehicles in 2006. “She always had an opinion, and a desire to find a solution,” he said.

Franco fought for the rights of women, single mothers like herself, gay people and favela residents. She denounced the violence inflicted by Rio’s police on the community as they fight – and occasionally collude – with the drug gangs and another force active on the streets: the unofficial militias whose members include serving and former police officers.

In Rio state 154 people were killed “in opposition to police intervention” in January alone, 57% up year-on-year. Many think this is the reason Franco and her driver, Anderson Gomes, were riddled with bullets last Wednesday night – and fear the killing will discourage others like her.

“She knew what she was doing for us,” said Sonia Vieira, 64, a Maré pensioner who had voted for Franco. “Whenever someone comes along who can do this, they get rid of them.”

Franco’s death has come as a divided and desperately unequal country struggles through troubled times. The worst recession in recent history has hit poor communities like Maré hard. Liberal economists blame the economic policies of leftwing former president Dilma Rousseff, controversially impeached for breaking budget rules amid revelations of a sprawling corruption scheme involving her party and its allies.

Her former vice-president, Michel Temer – whose party plotted to oust Rousseff – took over and introduced austerity measures to cut soaring spending, cutting benefits to the poor.

With support for Brazil’s tainted politicians at an all-time low, Franco’s triumphant win of a city council seat for a small leftwing party in 2016 presented a rare glimmer of hope for a country in urgent need of political renewal. It was especially so in Rio, where the former state governor is in jail and the state is virtually bankrupt.

She was an educated, articulate, and capable young woman from a favela: a far cry from the moneyed, middle-aged, white male politicians Brazilians are accustomed to, in a country where more than half the population is black or mixed-race.

“She represented renewal,” said Ernani da Conceição, a Maré teacher who taught Franco the classes that helped her get a scholarship at Rio’s prestigious Pontifical Catholic University. He and other locals described how Franco began her political education in the local Catholic church, at a time when churches were influenced by Latin America’s leftwing “liberation theology” and offered safe, neutral spaces for debate. As a teenager, she was a church volunteer and worked in a creche.

She became militant after a friend was killed by a stray bullet in a shootout between police and gang members, and she joined a pre-university course at the Maré Centre for Studies and Solidarity Action, known as CEASM in Portuguese. At 19, she became pregnant and had a daughter.

“She wanted to be different,” said Vera de Carvalho, 54, whose daughter Amanda was a close friend of Franco. “She had ambition. She wanted to be someone.”

Franco got a scholarship to study for a social sciences degree and later a master’s in public administration.Lourenço da Silva, 47, a fellow CEASM student who also won a scholarship, remembered her balancing political activism, studies and caring for a young child as a single mother. “Everything you gave her to do, she did,” he said. Both he and Carvalho work at the Maré Museum, a community project that documents how the favela once consisted of wooden shacks on stilts above the sea.

CEASM’s Antonio Carlos Vieira said the project’s aim was to educate and politicise Maré’s young people, who would then come back and work for their communities, forming a generation of favela intellectuals. “Marielle was the best example of this,” he said.

Franco worked for Marcelo Freixo, a deputy in Rio’s state legislature for the Socialism and Freedom party, who has twice stood for mayor. Freixo was placed under protection after leading an inquiry into the involvement of police and politicians in militias. Franco stood for the same party, receiving the fifth highest number of votes. She moved out of Maré into an apartment with her partner, Mônica.

“She was one of my best friends,” Freixo said. “A very, very strong, brave person, but very sensible, with an unforgettable smile.”

A red-eyed Freixo helped carry Franco’s coffin past thousands of weeping mourners into a ceremony at Rio’s council chambers on Thursday afternoon. Since her death she has dominated the Brazilian press and social media as she never did in life, forcing a debate over many of the issues she championed: racism and representation, LGBT rights, and violence against the poor.

Brazilians are now calculating their loss. Ricardo Ismael – Franco’s course tutor for her social sciences degree – said Brazil had lost a capable new political leader. “She was already standing out in terms of debate, leadership capacity and intellect,” he said.

Her murder has also focused attention as never before on the “federal intervention” decreed by President Temer a month earlier, in which he cited rising crime as a reason to put the army in charge of Rio’s state police forces and prisons. Franco attacked the intervention and served on a council commission to oversee it.

Unnamed police officers and prosecutors have told Reuters they believe her murder may have been linked to her political work or her denouncing of police abuses. On Friday, Brazilian media reported that the bullets that killed her were part of a batch sold to federal police in Brasília in 2006; the public security minister, Raul Jungmann, said they had been stolen from a post office.

In 2015 Maré emerged from a 15-month occupation by the army, the benefits of which were invisible on Friday morning. On the other side of a drainage ditch, a few hundred yards from the Red Command, the Pure Third Command gang dominates. Houses and schools are flecked with bullet holes. Young men carry pistols and radios.

Some residents collect birds. Retired João Cardoso, 53, recently sold one he had called Gaza Strip, named after this stretch of the favela. He hadn’t voted for Franco, but remembered her fondly. “She had a vision for the less fortunate people,” he said. “She was a good person.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/ ... h-champion
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 18, 2018 10:27 pm

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby American Dream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:28 am

BRAZIL: INTERVIEW ON THE ASSASSINATION OF MARIELLE FRANCO

Image


ImageBRRN: Tell us about the political context of her assassination. We understand that the military and federal government intervened and took over policing in Rio de Janeiro last month. Marielle was from a favela neighborhood and a vocal critic of the military’s involvement in policing.


FARJ: Rio de Janeiro has a long story of military intervention after the end of the Military Regime (1964-1985) since the 90s, especially in favelas. However, these interventions became more common after 2007, during the second PT government with Lula de Silva and during Dilma Rousseff’s two administrations. In 2008, the Pacification Policy Units (UPP) project started to be implemented in several favelas of Rio. The objective was to occupy the favelas with police, expel drug traffickers and, according to them, bring along social improvements to the neighborhoods. However, this never happened and since the beginning the only thing that occurred was many reports of human rights infringements, people being murdered, disappearances, houses being invaded and occupied by the police force, while drug trafficking continued to take place, but on the down-low.

The UPP project was a clear preparation for receiving the future big events, like the Olympics and the World Cup. During these events, military forces were used in favelas to transmit a sense of security to the population and tourists, while favela dwellers, formed mostly of Black people, kept suffering and dying. Rio went through other federal-military interventions, always focusing on operations in different favelas and this long-term intervention has not been different. Military forces occupied different favelas, are filing dwellers (by taking pictures of their ID and their faces) and several reports of human rights infringements had been made. Only in January of 2018, 66 people were murdered in Rio during police operations, almost all of them in favelas. The excuse of the “war on drugs” have been used for a long time as a blank check for the police forces to kill and jail black people in Brazil.

Marielle has always been an opponent of the militarization of city and acted firmly against police brutality in favelas and the periphery of Rio. Recently she has been denouncing cops from the 41st Police Unit, which conducts operations in Favela de Acari and is the most lethal police unit in Rio. Only in 2016, cops from this police unit killed 117 people. The killing of Marielle is a clear response to her actuation against the Black people genocide and being a Black woman herself, she was, as usual, the chosen target.

Image

BRRN: The media is reporting street protests in response to the assassination. What has been the response so far both from the government, in the streets and from social movements?

FARJ: So far there has been huge demonstrations all over the country for two days straight and there are several others already planned. Marielle was a member of a political organization, member and supporter of social movements and previously worked for several NGOs. So, very quickly a network of support was formed and demonstrations were organized, but they have been more mourning rallies than anything, protests to ask for the end of the military intervention and for investigation of the case. For us, Marielle’s murder has strong involvement of the police and is directly related to her denunciations of police brutality.

The government, along with corporate media, is trying to use the case as one more excuse for the military intervention, as her case there was nothing to do with it in the first place.

The investigation has already revealed that the bullets used to kill her were from a batch sold for the federal police and which was already used in other crimes by the police like the slaughter of 18 people in São Paulo three years ago.

BRRN: One aspect of Marielle’s political work that has been highlighted was her rising prominence as a Black activist and her criticism of the historic and embedded racism in Brazil which is rooted in anti-Blackness. For those in the US who may not be familiar can you briefly talk to us about what Black movements and struggles look like in Brazil today? And can you also discuss some of the influence in Brazil of US based civil rights and Black Power movements as well?

FARJ: Here in Brazil, the Black movement are very connected to favela movements, as favela’s dwellers are mostly Black. So groups and collectives from favelas, even if they are not completely formed by Black people, have strong actuation in Black people’s rights.Today we can see a few different kinds of groups that actuate in favelas. Most favelas have a strong presence of NGOs and most of them are very limited in their objectives as they are funded by international capitalist organizations and are formed by professional activists. Also, there are several autonomous and independent groups that make community work in favelas focusing in police brutality and Black genocide. They work with families of victims of police brutality, with children, cultural activities and popular education helping people to get into college. There is still not a prominent Black national movement as Black Lives Matter there, but there are several groups and connections are being made.

Black people in Brazil has a long history of resistance, from the quilombos during the slavery from riots in favelas when someone is killed by the police. The US movements and figures are certainly an inspiration for the organizations here, but Brazil’s historical formation has very strong differences from the US and things can’t be simply transported. Although in general the problems Black people suffer here are pretty similar to the ones there, there are lots of singularities that make organization different. For example, in 2016 in the US there were 913 (2.8 people per one million inhabitants) people murdered by the police while in Brazil there was 4200 (20.2 people per one million inhabitants). So, Black movements here in Brazil have a strong time in organizing long time struggles as everyday there are people dying, innocent people being jailed and they must always react to something made by the state.


Read more: http://blackrosefed.org/brazil-farj-interview-marielle/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby American Dream » Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:14 am

It's so much bigger than just one more murdered Afro-Latina:

Image

Brazilian Democracy in Peril

GIANPAOLO BAIOCCHI, MARCELO K. SILVA


On March 14, Brazil was shaken by the killing of Marielle Franco in Rio de Janeiro, where Franco served as a leftist city councilor representing the favela community of Maré. Franco had recently been named to head a commission investigating military abuses during President Michel Temer’s February “anti-gang” deployment in Rio. A human rights activist beloved by her community, Franco was also one of the only black LGBT elected official in the country. She had just attended a roundtable discussion of Afrofeminist youth when unknown assassins opened fire on her car, using bullets traced back to the federal police.

Marielle Franco represented a progressive new left, built on advocating for Brazil’s most vulnerable citizens, making her murder doubly tragic.


Despite its unique horror, Franco’s murder can best be understood as the latest episode in the political crisis that has engulfed Brazil since the months before the 2016 impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff, a member of the center-left Workers’ Party. The appeal of far-right politics and a general distrust of democratic institutions is rising in worrying ways as the country faces its next scheduled elections in November. One of the fastest-rising candidates, riding the wave of this revanchism, is the ultra-right Jair Bolsonaro, “Brazil’s Trump,” an avowed fan of Brazil’s 1964–85 military junta who regularly serves as public apologist for police violence and torture, and who last year was censured in Congress for telling a leftist congresswoman that she was “too ugly to be raped.”

Every time there is political upheaval in Brazil, there is some talk of military intervention and a return to dictatorship, but it is usually limited to fringe figures and shadowy military generals. This time, though, things are different. From Facebook to talk radio, nostalgia for authoritarianism—and fret about the excesses of democracy—have become prevalent, and increasingly figures in the speeches of politicians such as Bolsonaro. Open expressions of homophobia, sexism, and racism are continuing to gain traction in response to the perceived overreach of political correctness under the previous dozen years of Workers’ Party rule. More broadly, there is a widely-held belief that democratic institutions have failed; that the courts are partial and political instruments; and that political parties are uniformly corrupt.

**

It is worth remembering how we got here.

In late January, former president “Lula”—Workers’ Party’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who held office from 2003 until 2011—faced an appeal hearing following his September conviction under Operação Lava Jato (Operation Carwash), a wide-ranging corruption investigation. The allegations revolved around an apartment Lula allegedly bartered in exchange for preferential treatment for government contracts. The original trial did not actually produce a single piece of documentary evidence, despite months of investigation and wiretaps. This however did not stop the judges, who were also the prosecutors, from finding Lula guilty. A second court affirmed the original conviction and lengthened the sentence to twelve years. Now Lula’s case is before the Supreme Court, where it seems unlikely that he will prevail or be permitted to continue his run for president.

If Operation Carwash was a hit job aimed at the Workers’ Party, its aim went wide, taking out nearly all other democratic institutions with the same spray.


Yet Lula remains an extremely popular figure in Brazil, particularly among the poor, and is currently leading the polls by a wide margin. He has declared he will not seek asylum elsewhere, and will instead stay and fight for his innocence, even if he must do so from prison.

A case of anti-corruption politics gone awry, Operation Carwash has implicated politicians from all major political parties and construction companies, as well as the state-owned oil company, Petrobrás, yet the operation has selectively prosecuted politicians from the Workers’ Party. For its part, Globo—the Brazilian media giant known for its anti-left bias—has been presenting Operation Carwash much like a round-the-clock soap opera, replete with a handsome protagonist, prosecuting judge Sérgio Moro, and a cast of unsavory villains such as Lula and Rousseff. This media circus has energized elite Brazilians who feel that they have been excluded during the three terms of Workers’ Party rule, which saw the enactment of affirmative action programs and cash transfers to the poor.

Michel Temer, who became president upon the impeached of Rousseff in 2016, is today often described as “the world’s least popular president”—and indeed, some polls have him pulling single-digit approval rating. Prior to her impeachement, Temer had been Rouseff’s coalition partner and vice president, a kind of Faustian bargain between the Workers’ Party and Temer’s right-leaning Brazilian Democratic Movement. But as political winds shifted, Temer (himself indicted by Operation Carwash) played no small part in orchestrating Rousseff’s ouster. Upon his swearing-in, he promised a program of clean government and market orthodoxy, his so-called “Bridge to the Future”: government austerity, loosened labor laws, reductions in pensions and taxes, and wide-ranging privatization.

Temer and his legislative allies actually managed to pull off some of this platform, notably passing a constitutional amendment that freezes social spending for the next twenty years. Temer has also overseen significant rollbacks in labor rights—but his political capital was quickly exhausted. Beginning in January 2017, a series of militant protests and strikes around the country opposed his proposed pension reforms. At the same time, very serious corruption allegations came to light involving Temer, including an attempt to buy the silence of a convicted politician. Temer soon faced the prospect of impeachment himself, and although he was able to kill it in Congress, the cost was huge, doling out favors left and right to buy the votes to save his neck. Even for elites who had supported the impeachment, the hypocrisy was too much. Since then even the right wing has been distancing itself from Temer, who now finds himself an isolated figure.

From Facebook to talk radio, nostalgia for authoritarianism—and fret about the excesses of democracy—have become prevalent.


The impeachment of 2016 left the country deeply polarized, and also established a set of terrible precedents: that unpopular presidents can be impeached simply for being unpopular; that laws matter less than popularity; that Congress is less a place for debate than for making deals; that political office can be openly used for individual gain; and that laws can be bent to suit the interests of the powerful. And all of these have been confirmed in the popular imagination by subsequent events.

And now both the left and right are in disarray. Lula is unlikely to be able to run for president, though he is still campaigning. From the progressive sector there is no agreement on what an alternative candidate or strategy might be. Social movement activists have managed to energize a base and coordinate across cities, successfully lighting revolt against Temer’s policies. But the energy of the streets is, as of yet, disconnected from the political parties. The Workers’ Party, for so long the traditional channel for social-movement energies, is seen by activists, particularly millennials, as too close to the establishment and status quo politics. There is agreement that neoliberal policies must be stopped. But there is little sense of what alternative routes might be. Franco was seen by some as representing a progressive new leftist politics, organized around advocating for the country’s most vulnerable citizens, making her murder doubly tragic.

Conservative forces, however, are faring badly too. Nearly all nationally prominent figures from right-of-center parties have now been linked to corruption. While most are at-large and continue to exercise their functions (nearly half of Congress is implicated in corruption investigations), so far no one has emerged who appears to be able to articulate a broader coalition, let alone negotiate with political opponents. If Operation Carwash was a political hit job aimed at the Workers’ Party, its aim went wide, taking out nearly all other parties and democratic institutions with the same spray.

And this is the worrisome scenario in which we find ourselves. Some pessimistic analysts are predicting elections will not take place in November, given the lack of viable options. Our worry is actually more immediate: calls for law and order, for military intervention, for a state of exception, and for criminalizing dissent are becoming more common and seem to gain currency every day. At the same time, wildcard political outsiders are giving voice to resentment and anger in ways that stoke the basest authoritarian instincts of the populace. The question now before the country is whether incidents such as the violence that took Franco’s life will spark outrage or simply be accepted, as so much else is, under this new dispensation.


http://bostonreview.net/global-justice/ ... assination
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby liminalOyster » Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:33 am

A`good friend from Rio tells me the popular response movement, though, has been overwhelming and inspiring.
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby American Dream » Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:02 pm

That's hopeful- we need more of that!
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby liminalOyster » Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:09 pm

The Fight for Rio’s Future
BY THERESA WILLIAMSON | MARCH 21, 2018
Marielle Franco represented a new, empowered generation of favela leaders. Despite her death, they are unlikely to back down.

"They tried to bury us, but didn't realize we are seeds." – Proverb cited at events marking the March 14 death of Rio de Janeiro city councilwoman Marielle Franco.

RIO DE JANEIRO – When Brazil abolished slavery in 1888, enslaved Africans comprised 40 percent of Rio de Janeiro’s population. Lacking rights in what was, and remains, one of the world’s most unequal countries for land ownership, newly freed slaves mostly settled into informal communities, favelas, which today shelter 24 percent of Rio’s population.

More than a century of public policy, often repressive and discriminatory by design, has kept the favelas and their residents from realizing their potential and from making full use of the assets they have developed in their communities.

Though the deck has been stacked against them, Rio’s favela residents have succeeded in weaving together a vibrant cultural and collaborative fabric over generations. This emerging, more positive favela identity has been made possible by a growing generation of local leaders who have taken on roles to organize themselves, improve their communities and confront often neglectful authorities.

Marielle Franco, a city councilwoman who on March 14 was shot and killed in what authorities say was a targeted assassination, was one of those leaders. A 38-year-old black LGBT woman and human rights defender from the Maré favela – in a country where a black youth dies every 21 minutes, a woman every other hour, an LGBT person once a day, and a human rights defender every five – Franco, more than anyone in Rio, represented hope for the city’s dispossessed.

But she was not alone. Indeed, if the public outcry in the days since Franco’s death has proved anything, it is that Rio’s favela residents won’t give up her fight to change the status quo.

Brazilian society is still in many ways based on the slave-holding social structure in place in its not-so-distant past. Favelas are offered little in the way of critical public services, like quality education. The elite do little to serve the favelas, the favelas do much to serve the elite. I once heard a member of the city government say that favelas were “convenient to have nearby” because they represented an offered source of cheap labor.

The Brazilian elite for decades has had little incentive to change that dynamic, and indeed the government continues to set up new roadblocks to the favelas’ development. A prime example is the pre-Olympic build-up from 2010-2016, when officials spent $20 billion on the city. Yet if anything the Games exacerbated inequality in Rio, with little to show in the city's most marginalized communities. What’s more, using violence in the favelas, and their informality, as a pretext, officials evicted over 77,000 residents in the run-up to the Games. This was followed by a new pattern of development in which favela residents were carelessly forced hours away to federal public housing while some favelas gentrified.

But while the government invests little in local talent and potential in the favelas, the favelas do plenty to invest in themselves.

Franco was a rare elected representative among hundreds of networked and collaborative organizers in the favelas that have been maturing and consolidating their individual and collective missions. These groups are finding ever more space to express themselves and rewrite the narrative about their communities, often through avid social media use. They believe, like Franco did, that "the favela is not the problem. It is the solution." The solution to affordable housing and marginalization, to neglect and repression. Communities built on resilience and resistance, as young leaders are increasingly reclaiming with pride the very term "favela," apt given its origin in the robust, resilient and spiny favela bush, and given all these communities have accomplished through self-organizing.

These groups have only been further galvanized by Franco’s assassination. In Franco, they had a black favela woman behind the city council podium dealing directly with the problems they face on a daily basis, from police abuse to gender violence. For them, as for many others, she represented a future they are determined to see come to fruition.

Of course, that future will not arrive overnight. One of Franco’s final tweets read, "How many more will have to die for this war to end?" The same question was posed after her death on Wednesday. And two days later, the same question was being posed again, when a 1-year-old boy and a 58-year-old woman were shot by police in the Alemão favela, a community teeming with innovation and youth leadership.

One army colonel has argued publicly against the “martyrization of Marielle,” essentially ignoring the experience and sheer number of people who felt reflected in and represented by her. The truth is, something has fundamentally shifted in Rio’s consciousness.

Now, everyone knows Franco’s name. Now there's a hunger to know who this woman was, what she stood for, what issues she was working on that would lead her killers to take such action. She has become a symbol and an inspiration, affirming the black, favela woman as a source of admiration and courage. Millions of seeds of insight and determination are being planted with every thought, feeling, sharing of her message, her beaming face and forceful presence. It is inevitable that Brazil will be transformed. The question is, how many more have to die?

http://americasquarterly.org/content/fight-rios-future
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby American Dream » Wed Mar 21, 2018 9:19 pm

I wonder how clear of a pathway we could trace from the Coup of 1964 and the kill squads and torture units it spawned (I'm thinking Dan Mitrione, Jim Jones, Condor), on through to the present?

I 'm thinking it's all part of one big vector of cruelty and repression...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Marielle Franco: Brazil’s favelas mourn the death of a c

Postby liminalOyster » Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:26 pm

WHO KILLED EDUARDO, MATHEUS AND REGINALDO?
Brazil’s Marielle Franco Denounced Three Murders in the Days Before Her Assassination. These Are the Stories.

ARIELLE FRANCO’S KILLERS were not out to rid themselves of a 38-year-old member of Rio City Council who dedicated her days to pressing political causes. They wanted to silence an idea.

Franco was killed in a nighttime ambush with no chance to react. It’s the same cowardly way that people are killed in impoverished favelas across Rio de Janeiro and the rest of Brazil — places where the mail isn’t delivered, the electricity is spotty, the water is polluted, and schools close when gunfire begins. In these parts of town, residents’ main point of contact with the government are armored personnel carriers — known as a “Big Skull” — who enter their neighborhood with a license to kill.

In her first campaign for public office in 2016, Franco ran from a scrappy, progressive political party, and still won the fifth-highest vote total out of her colleagues on Rio de Janeiro’s City Council. A black, lesbian single mother, born and raised in a favela, Franco was a rare face of representation in an overwhelming white and male political landscape. And with two degrees from one of Brazil’s most elite universities and over a decade of experience in politics, she was an undeniably powerful charismatic force in the growing movement to confront the epidemic of violence perpetrated or perpetuated by the state. Last year, Rio saw only slightly fewer killings by police than in the entire United States, which is itself a dramatic outlier.

“It was a message,” came the refrain from mourners. But what were Franco’s killers trying to say? And to whom?
Stunned mourners filled the streets of downtown Rio de Janeiro last Thursday to grieve and protest Franco’s death. “It was a message,” the oft-heard refrain came from the crowd. But what were Franco’s killers trying to say? And to whom? The killers seemed to shout in a whisper: “Don’t you dare mess with the systems around you.”

It is too early to know whether Franco’s murderers took her life in retaliation for her activism against police violence. A few scant facts have emerged in the days since her assassination suggesting that perhaps Franco’s murder shares similarities with the killings she regularly denounced. Police investigators traced bullet casings found at the crime scene to a purchase made by the Federal Police. Bullets from the same batch were used in the deadliest massacre in São Paulo’s history in 2015. Two police officers and a municipal guard were convicted of murdering 17 and the attempted murder of seven more. The connection to the police bullets led a top federal criminal prosecutor in Rio to quickly go on the record to say the details of Franco’s murder “denote a certain degree of planning that leads me to consider police officers as suspects in this crime,” but that other hypotheses should also be considered.

Whatever the result of the investigation into Franco’s death and its possible connection to her advocacy, all the killings offer a window into the violence and impunity that reigns on Rio de Janeiro’s streets.

In Rio, around one in six homicides are solved, according to official statistics — though that number hasn’t been updated for more than three years. From 2010 to 2015, police killed 3,441 people, yet charges were only filed in four of those cases — about 0.1% — despite, for instance, Human Rights Watch having independently documented 15 cases over that period which merited investigation.

These statistics are just symptoms of much bigger problems. Approximately 2 million people live in areas controlled by milícias, gangs run by current and former members of the police and firefighter corps. Milícias were explicitly supported by state institutions, which sold them as an answer to combat drug traffickers. Soon, however, the milícias proved themselves to be as violent and oppressive, or worse, while making small fortunes by extorting local businesses, running illegal rackets, and, in some areas, selling drugs. While milícias battle drug gangs for territory head to head, on-duty cops are notorious business partners of traffickers, demanding a fixed monthly cut of the profits in exchange for protection and intelligence. Corrupt cops also sell guns and munitions to the very gangs their colleagues may do battle with the next day. Politicians benefit from the criminality in a variety of ways and have shown themselves to be unwilling or unable to fight against it.

Marielle Franco is gone, but the pressure to respond to these murders – and all crimes against young people in poor neighborhoods – cannot stop. The conventional wisdom that organized crime can’t be confronted without using weapons is wrong. The idea that people in Brazil’s poor suburbs cannot have personal freedoms is as tired as it is wrong. Perhaps a single woman cannot stand down Brazil’s lords of war, but the masses can.

Just days before her execution, Franco denounced the murders of three men. They were all young and from poor neighborhoods, members of the “target demographic” for violent death, the type of killings that fill Brazil’s cemeteries. Two of the victims’ killings took place in a police district infamous for the bloody terror it inflicts on residents; another died at a police checkpoint in a different favela. These are the stories Marielle Franco told.

3-1521266962Illustration: Pedro Franz
Matheus Melo Castro, 23. Killed on March 12
It was a short trip on the route he always took. Matheus Melo Castro, a pastoral assistant, had wrapped up a Monday meeting at the Mission of Faith Evangelical Church in a favela called Manguinhos. He hopped on the motorcycle he had bought with his earnings as a garbage collector to drop off his girlfriend in the Jacarezinho favela. A single avenue separates the two communities. On his way home, around 10 p.m., Melo came across a police checkpoint. Onlookers said the officers were stopping and frisking underage boys. Melo’s family said he was not told to stop his bike. He went through the checkpoint, and just a few yards ahead, two bullets tore through his body, one in the chest and the other in the right arm.

Melo fell to the ground. Police watched from a distance, as if they’d just taken down an animal in a hunt. They offered no first aid. Gravely wounded but still alive, crack users wandering the nearby streets came to his aid. Unsure what to do, they decided to put him in a wheelbarrow and ran across a heavily trafficked avenue to get to an urgent care clinic.

Police offered no first aid. Gravely wounded but still alive, crack users wandering the nearby streets came to his aid.
Drivers passing by witnessed the scene and word about the incident spread. More than 100 friends and relatives quickly assembled to keep vigil outside the clinic. Many of those present were with Melo singing and praying in church just a short while earlier. He had led the service they called “youth refuge” that night.

The medical attention was not enough, and Melo succumbed to his wounds.

“It was cruel. He went by and they shot him up,” one of Melo’s aunts told The Intercept Brasil.

A cousin added, “Worst of all, they didn’t offer first aid. It was the crack addicts that carried him to the clinic. If he had been a trafficker, the police would have captured him and guarded him in a hospital. But since he was just a random guy, they shot him and left him, like he was nobody.”

His family members asked to not be named, fearing reprisals for speaking publicly about the crime.

In cases such as Melo’s death, a stilted, perfunctory apology from the police is the norm. Usually, they put out a short press release that says nothing, because these deaths are just collateral damage — unlucky victims caught in the eternal crossfire between the Good Guys and the Bandits. Yet local residents in Manguinhos said there had been no confrontations going on at the time Melo — who was well-known in the neighborhood and said to have no criminal connections — was killed. Some hours later, however, people began to hear gunshots.

Melo’s family believes the shootout after the fact was an attempt to portray Melo as another tragic victim of a “stray bullet.” The family saw it as smoke and mirrors. The local police united responsible for “pacifying” – a euphemism used by the Rio government to designate a crumbling, decade-old community policing initiative – the favela said that its base in the neighborhood was “attacked by criminals” and they were therefore obliged to return fire. Additionally, a bus had been set on fire in the early-morning hours on a main access road into the favela. All of this took place within walking distance from a sprawling “Police City” compound, which sits wedged between the favelas of Manguinhos and Jacarezinho. The bus arson, just like Melo’s death, is under “confidential investigation,” like so many other cases that collect dust in Rio’s police stations.

Melo’s family feels threatened and is considering fleeing, following advice proffered by some some neighbors. But the family is also considering fighting back. The family is looking for his killers despite their fear, and Melo may well have his day in court. His family intends to sue the state government and has already begun a parallel investigation to find out who pulled the trigger. Their lawyers are looking for images from the city’s traffic surveillance cameras that may have captured his last minutes of life. Security cameras from a nearby animal shelter may also offer crucial footage.

The press office of Rio’s Civil Police, responding to queries about Melo’s death, said in an email that the probe is “ongoing and, at the moment, there are no updates to report about this case.”

The police high command from the unit responsible for “pacifying” the favela said it has opened an inquiry to verify if one of its officers was involved in the shooting. By phone, a representative from the unit told The Intercept Brasil that an internal probe had been opened the day after the crime. They were not able to confirm whether a police vehicle was at the location where Melo was killed. “Even if there were one, it was not necessarily from the pacifying police unit. It could have been from the local Military Police battalion or the Civil Police,” the source said. The police probe underway is an “inquiry,” not a full-blown “investigation,” which means that it cannot produce formal accusations.

Into this fog of uncertainty waded Marielle Franco — as she so often did. “Yet another young man’s murder that may have been at the hands of the police,” Franco tweeted last Tuesday. “Matheus Melo was leaving church. How many more need to die for this war to end?”

The next day, amid hymns and cries for justice, Melo was buried in a Rio de Janeiro cemetery. Just hours later, Franco was executed.

2-1521267456Illustration: Pedro Franz
Eduardo Ferreira, 39, and Reginaldo Santos Batista, age unknown. Killed March 5
Locals heard gunshots shortly before sunrise. They thought it odd at such early hour. It didn’t look like there was any shootout going on with drug traffickers – their usual points of sale weren’t even open yet. When the shots died down, a small group of neighbors went to investigate the scene. They found two bodies in a sparsely forested area near the Acari River in the northern part of Rio de Janeiro.

The first was lying facedown, wearing board shorts and a T-shirt, his eyes shut. The neighbors decided to pull him up by his legs and get him off the slope in order to identify the body. In times like these, no one waits for a forensic crew to arrive – that can take hours. So bystanders try to divine for themselves if the victim was a friend or relative. Later, the locals would discover the body belonged to Eduardo Ferreira, 39.

“Here, we learn how to hoist a body when we’re just kids.”
The other body, a few yards ahead of him on a steeper incline, belonged to Reginaldo Santos Batista, whose age was unknown. More effort was required to lift Batista off the hillside. “Here, we learn how to hoist a body when we’re just kids,” said one of the locals. “Do you know how to do that? I think not, right?”

It took all day for the homicide unit of the police to arrive. At around 7 p.m., they filled out a body tag: “Black man, muscular, strong features, shaved head.”

Ferreira lived in Acari since he was a child. He left behind two children and a girlfriend. His mother, siblings, and cousins are all evangelical Christians who also live in the neighborhood. Ferreira was self-employed and “always chatting” with locals in the area, according to his friends. “He was a solitary guy. Somewhat shy,” said a local resident. “I remember him telling me to be careful in this area. He was concerned about his neighbors.”

Little is known about Batista. No one came forward to claim his body.

The circumstances of the deaths remain shrouded in mystery. Eyewitnesses said a group of police officers were hiding in the forest just outside the Acari favela and left the bodies there before taking off. The 41st police battalion, infamous for being the most lethal unit in Rio, posts near daily updates about its actions usually appear, but there are no entries for March 5. The Twitter account of the Rio state police also has no mentions of an incident in Acari.

When questioned, the police said they were unaware of any operation underway in the area at that time. A few hours later, they sent out a press release saying that police from the 41st battalion were patrolling the area to “repress drug sales, car robberies, and arrest criminals.” The release also said that police had arrested a suspected drug dealer, who goes by “Timbau,” that was carrying a walkie-talkie.

After the Monday killings, there were shootouts every day for a week. The following Saturday, a neighborhood woman was going to pick up donations at the community residents’ association when she heard shots. She looked around to see if there were any drug dealers engaged in a shootout or if the points of sale were open, but it was early and everything was closed. Police were “shooting at random from their vehicle,” she said. “I looked all around and I could not tell why they were shooting. There was nothing. Just residents out on the streets.” She took shelter at a neighbor’s. It was 8 a.m.

“Around 1 p.m., I went back to the same place and there were even more police, and they kept shooting. That’s when two armored police vehicles entered the favela,” she said.

Other residents sent voice messages around to alert the neighborhood. “My God, so many gunshots here,” one said. Another, on the verge of tears, related: “Guys, I am so scared. Really scared. They’re right in front of my house.” Another neighbor responded: “These guys are harassing residents. Shooting up other people’s houses. This isn’t right. On a Saturday?”

As the hail of gunshots from the police continued to ring out through Acari, Marielle Franco answered the call. She denounced the police operation. On her Facebook page, she wrote: “We need to raise our voices so everyone knows what’s happening in Acari right now. Rio’s 41st Military Police Battalion is terrorizing and abusing residents of Acari. This week, two young men were killed and thrown into a gulley. Today, the police walked the streets threatening residents. It has always happened and with the military intervention it has gotten even worse.”

Adapted to English by Taylor Barnes and Andrew Fishman

https://theintercept.com/2018/03/21/mar ... ce-police/
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests