Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, London

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby Elvis » Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:53 pm

Guardian ups its vilification of Julian Assange
28 November 2018

https://www.jonathan-cook


That's the best analysis of this brouhaha so far, thanks! (Will read the David Gilmour piece next.)

An administrative error this month revealed that the US justice department had secretly filed criminal charges against Assange.

An old friend suggested something I don't think I've heard anywhere else; he thinks the "error" was quite deliberate because, "what better way to flush people out!"

Interesting take, and I'm curious what others here make of it. What kind of reactions would prosecutors (or whoever, behind the 'oops' op) look for, once an indictment was public knowledge? (Though I'm not fully convinced that a standing indictment actually exists...yet.)


The timing of all this is a little fishy. Is Mueller's real job to bring in Assange?
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7422
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby MacCruiskeen » Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:11 pm

J. Cook's piece is great, so is this from MoA today:

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/11/t ... l#comments

sent from my bloody tablet
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby liminalOyster » Thu Nov 29, 2018 5:29 pm

The timing of all this is a little fishy. Is Mueller's real job to bring in Assange?


Or even is this actually the fruition stage of an approximately decade long obscure and semi-occult cold war?
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby Grizzly » Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:21 pm

Image
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby MacCruiskeen » Fri Nov 30, 2018 11:04 pm

"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby Rory » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:35 pm

SmartSelect_20181203-173251_Twitter.jpg


https://twitter.com/AssangeLegal/status ... 19841?s=19
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:03 pm

I fail to see the import of this omission from the online edition.
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:57 pm

mentalgongfu2 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:03 pm wrote:I fail to see the import of this omission from the online edition.


So does anybody, at least until the question is answered. Whoever he is - an Ecuadoran journalist - what did he contribute? Why is he omitted in the online (i.e., the revisable) version? Whose decision was that? Theirs? His? How do the two versions differ, if at all?

I can get through the first paragraph already but someone read this for us. ;-)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Villavicencio
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15983
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby MacCruiskeen » Tue Dec 04, 2018 2:50 pm

JackRiddler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:57 am wrote:
mentalgongfu2 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:03 pm wrote:I fail to see the import of this omission from the online edition.


So does anybody, at least until the question is answered. Whoever he is - an Ecuadoran journalist - what did he contribute? Why is he omitted in the online (i.e., the revisable) version? Whose decision was that? Theirs? His? How do the two versions differ?

[...]


This exposé was published yesterday at a site I'm not familiar with by an author (Elizabeth Vos) whose name I'd also never heard. But it looks like a serious and well-researched piece of journalism, and it's backed-up by numerous links and quotes (and the photo of the threesome):


The Guardian’s Reputation In Tatters After Forger Revealed To Have Co-Authored Assange Smear

December 3, 2018 Elizabeth Vos

https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/12/th ... nge-smear/

Image

Regular followers of WikiLeaks-related news are at this point familiar with the multiple serious infractions of journalistic ethics by Luke Harding and the Guardian, especially (though not exclusively) when it comes to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. However, another individual at the heart of this matter is far less familiar to the public. That man is Fernando Villavicencio, a prominent Ecuadorian political activist and journalist, director of the USAID-funded NGO Fundamedios and editor of online publication FocusEcuador.

Most readers are also aware of the Guardian’s recent publication of claims that Julian Assange met with former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort on three occasions. This has now been definitively debunked by Felix Narvaez, the former Consul at Ecuador’s London embassy between 2010 and 2018, who says Paul Manafort has never visited the embassy during the time he was in charge there. But this was hardly the first time the outlet published a dishonest smear authored by Luke Harding against Assange. The paper is also no stranger to publishing stories based on fabricated documents.

In May, Disobedient Media reported on the Guardian’s hatchet-job relating to ‘Operation Hotel,’ or rather, the normal security operations of the embassy under former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa. That hit-piece, co-authored by Harding and Dan Collyns, asserted among other things that (according to an anonymous source) Assange hacked the embassy’s security system. The allegation was promptly refuted by Correa as “absurd” in an interview with The Intercept, and also by WikiLeaks as an “anonymous libel” with which the Guardian had “gone too far this time. We’re suing.”

A shared element of The Guardian’s ‘Operation Hotel’ fabrications and the latest libel attempting to link Julian Assange to Paul Manafort is none other than Fernando Villavicencio of FocusEcuador. In 2014 Villavicencio was caught passing a forged document to the Guardian, which published it without verifying it. When the forgery was revealed, the Guardian hurriedly took the document down but then tried to cover up that it had been tampered with by Villavicencio when it re-posted it a few days later.

How is Villavicencio tied to The Guardian’s latest smear of Assange? Intimately, it turns out.


Who is Fernando Villavicencio?

Earlier this year, an independent journalist writing under the pseudonym Jimmyslama penned a comprehensive report detailing Villavicencio’s relationships with pro-US actors within Ecuador and the US. She sums up her findings, which are worth reading in full:

“…The information in this post alone should make everyone question why in the world the Guardian would continue to use a source like Villavicencio who is obviously tied to the U.S. government, the CIA, individuals like Thor Halvorssen and Bill Browder, and opponents of both Julian Assange and former President Rafael Correa.”


As most readers recall, it was Correa who granted Assange asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Villavicencio was so vehemently opposed to Rafael Correa’s socialist government that during the failed 2010 coup against Correa he falsely accused the President of “crimes against humanity” by ordering police to fire on the crowds (it was actually Correa who was being shot at). Correa sued him for libel, and won, but pardoned Villavicencio for the damages awarded by the court.

Assange legal analyst Hanna Jonasson recently made the link between the Ecuadorian forger Villavicencio and Luke Harding’s Guardian stories based on dubious documents explicit. She Tweeted: 2014 Ecuador’s Foreign Ministry accused the Guardian of publishing a story based on a document it says was fabricated by Fernando Villavicencio, pictured below with the authors of the fake Manafort-Assange ‘secret meeting’ story, Harding and Collyns.”

2014: Ecuador's Foreign Ministry accuses The Guardian of publishing a story based on a document it says was fabricated by Fernando Villavicencio, pictured below with the authors of the fake Manafort-Assange 'secret meeting' story, Harding and Collyns. https://t.co/OTLNJ20kOn https://t.co/1wPk8WEBqA

— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) December 1, 2018


Jonasson included a link to a 2014 official Ecuadorian government statement which reads in part: “There is also evidence that the author of this falsified document is Fernando Villavicencio, a convicted slanderer and opponent of Ecuador’s current government. This can be seen from the file properties of the document that the Guardian had originally posted (but which it has since taken down and replaced with a version with this evidence removed).” The statement also notes that Villavicencio had fled the country after his conviction for libeling Correa during the 2010 coup and was at that time living as a fugitive in the United States.

It is incredibly significant, as Jonasson argues, that the authors of the Guardian’s latest libelous article were photographed with Villavicencio in Ecuador shortly before publication of the Guardian’s claim that Assange had conducted meetings with Manafort.

[...]

- continues here, with links:

https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/12/th ... nge-smear/
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:00 pm

Thanks for posting that! Very important.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15983
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:16 pm

JackRiddler » Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:57 am wrote:
mentalgongfu2 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:03 pm wrote:I fail to see the import of this omission from the online edition.


So does anybody, at least until the question is answered. Whoever he is - an Ecuadoran journalist - what did he contribute? Why is he omitted in the online (i.e., the revisable) version? Whose decision was that? Theirs? His? How do the two versions differ, if at all?

I can get through the first paragraph already but someone read this for us. ;-)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Villavicencio


Re: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Villavicencio

Some of the sentence structure is a bit awkward; attempted to clean it up a bit while keeping the language intact (I grew up speaking Italian and Spanish -- not quite as fluent as I once was..):

Fernando Alcibiades Villavicencio Valencia (October 11, 1963) is an Ecuadorian journalist and political activist, known for his denunciations of Petroecuador, against the regime of Rafael Correa, for which he was denounced for insults and espionage against an ex-agent.

He started his career as one of the founders of Pachakutik in 1995. He joined Petroecuador in 1996 first as a social communicator and then as a trade unionist until 1999, when he was fired by the government of Jamil Mahuad, he stated that during his time in this public company he reduced state expenditures within contracts, among which are those of this company with the Napo River.

He continued his political activism as a journalist in the newspaper El Universo and in the magazine Vanguardia. At the same time, he was a leader of the Coordinadora de Movimientos Sociales. He denounced different governments, including Gustavo Noboa, whom he accused of handing over the Palo Azul oil field to the Isaias.

Cléver Jiménez appointed him his advisor in the National Assembly, at that time he was accused by Rafael Correa of ​​insults against him, after accusing the president of crimes against humanity during 30-S. He would travel to Washington to request precautionary measures against his arrest to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which he was granted, and returned to Quito. With a warrant for his arrest, he undertook a trip to Sarayaku, where the other defendants were already present; he had to leave that place as well and move to reside in safe houses.

In August 2016, Correa sued him for insolvency, in order to force him to pay the 47,000 dollars that the court established as reparation in the sentence of Case 30-S; He paid under pressure. Approaching the elections of 2017, he tried to be a candidate of the Alliance for Change, made up of CREO and SUMA, but the National Electoral Council prevented it after challenges from Gustavo Baroja for his affiliation to Pachakutik. After the results of the elections, he would flee to Peru where he requested political asylum. He returned in September of 2017 to continue his denunciations while continuing a trial against him for espionage, from which he would be released on February 22, 2018, as innocent.

On July 11, 2018, he filed a new complaint that involved Julian Assange, as there was an alleged use of special expenses by the Intelligence Secretariat for the safety of Assange, asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador in London. To that he added a publication on a supposed pact between Assange and the Correa regime to prevent the disclosure of documents about corruption of this government in exchange for asylum in the embassy.


User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5253
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby MacCruiskeen » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:22 pm

MODS: I was looking for several posts from this Assange thread and from the "Blonde Land" thread from a while back, but they appear to have vanished. Unless I'm badly mistaken about this (possible, of course), someone has gone back and deleted a whole load of old posts by several different posters, on at least two different threads, silently and without warning or explanation. If so, that's unprecedented on this board.

What's happening?

On Edit: No mistake. My link on page 1 of this thread suddenly links to a completely different post.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby Elvis » Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:24 pm

MacCruiskeen wrote:MODS: I was looking for several posts from this Assange thread and from the "Blonde Land" thread from a while back, but they appear to have vanished. Unless I'm badly mistaken about this (possible, of course), someone has gone back and deleted a whole load of old posts by several different posters, on at least two different threads, silently and without warning or explanation. If so, that's unprecedented on this board.

What's happening?

On Edit: No mistake. My link on page 1 of this thread suddenly links to a completely different post.


Could the posts you seek be in "The Wikileaks Question" or the "Julian Assange is a Lying Sack of Shit" threads? There may be other pertinent threads.

I went back a year in the moderator log, and in four Assange/Wikileaks threads I found seven posts that were deleted by their (three) authors, mostly in May this year. The log doesn't say when the deleted posts were originally posted, but we can assume the deletions occurred within the edit time limit (which is...? three hours? I forget). No moderator deletions occurred in those threads in that time period (I could go back further).
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7422
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby MacCruiskeen » Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:34 pm

Well,16 hours later, after a patient search on another computer:

There is not the slightest doubt about it, Elvis: a whole bunch of posts have suddenly gone missing, several from this here Assange thread, and many many more from the marathon eight-year-old "Blonde Land" thread. Old posts, months and sometimes years old; not just posts by me, but also posts by JackRiddler and posts by slad. Those posts were still there until very recently.

Here's the proof: A search for my own posts in "Blonde Land" produces only 8 results, and they are all posts by other posters quoting something I had posted there.* But the posts themselves have vanished. Not a single actual post of mine survives in that eight-year-old thread. Not one:

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/sear ... sf=msgonly

I considered taking this to PM, but that would not be right. This is precisely the kind of thing that needs to be clarified in the open.

* And NB: all eight of those posts are from November 2010 (?!).
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Julian Assange, 2018: Year 6 in Ecuador's Embassy, Londo

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:58 pm

look here

Rigorous Intuition Discussion Board Archive
Postby Joao » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:34 am
An archive of this discussion board has been created and posted to the Internet Archive:

https://archive.org/details/RigorousInt ... ve20161123


After downloading a copy, the archive is accessed as normal through one's web browser. It's a 1.1GB zip file which unpacks to 3.79GB, and is complete (as was publicly available) through November 23, 2016

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=40198.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests