rigorousintuition.ca

RocketMan » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:43 pm wrote:This caught even little old me off guard. I am incredibly grateful for the people doing this type of research. They will find no sympathetic ear pretty much in any establishment corner.

A corrupt shitshow, is the Democratic Party.

https://sfbayview.com/2019/09/election- ... sTaLQz5cfI

Election interference: 2016 paper trails suggest fraud in Democratic primaries

stickdog99 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:45 pm wrote:Joe ByeDone: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/03/biden-s ... igieg.html

PufPuf93 » 04 Oct 2019 04:08 wrote:

stickdog99 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:45 pm wrote:Joe ByeDone: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/03/biden-s ... igieg.html

Key Points

Biden announced Thursday that his campaign raised $15 million in the third quarter this year.
Bernie Sanders raised $25 million and Pete Buttigieg raised $19.1 million in the last quarter while Kamala Harris raised $11.6 million. Elizabeth Warren has not yet released her fundraising numbers.
President Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee raised a total of $125 million in the third quarter.

Trump and RNC $125 million!!!

Out of that bunch, I favor Warren (easily).

Grizzly » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:56 pm wrote:Just stopping by with another DRIVE-BY, fam ...'



FUC THE dnc

stickdog99 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:48 pm wrote:

PufPuf93 » 04 Oct 2019 04:08 wrote:

stickdog99 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:45 pm wrote:Joe ByeDone: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/03/biden-s ... igieg.html

Key Points

Biden announced Thursday that his campaign raised $15 million in the third quarter this year.
Bernie Sanders raised $25 million and Pete Buttigieg raised $19.1 million in the last quarter while Kamala Harris raised $11.6 million. Elizabeth Warren has not yet released her fundraising numbers.
President Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee raised a total of $125 million in the third quarter.

Trump and RNC $125 million!!!

Out of that bunch, I favor Warren (easily).

Warren is not among "that bunch" because she has not yet released her fund raising numbers for the quarter.

Biden is done. His campaign is DOA. What a surprise that exactly nobody wanted Obamaquo to the point that our oligarchs would not even chip in enough to maintain the charade.

The oligarchs have clearly already deserted Biden's sinking ship. All aboard the Trump $teamroll$ Pocahontas train!

RocketMan » Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:17 am wrote:Why would you "easily" favour Warren over Sanders? This never ceases to be puzzling to me, this phenomenon. She's Sanders Light. She copies his policies, hell, she even recently copied his idea of "anti-endorsements". She will fold like a cheap suit if elected on her most radical policies, which are fuzzy to begin with.

Belligerent Savant » Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:34 am wrote:.

For all the reasons you outlined and more, if Warren becomes the next President she'll be no different than her predecessors (other than the difference in optics, of course -- that's really the only variance). She will be compromised. She has been compromised already.


Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

6) Warren is the best candidate for Native Americans (despite the manufactured controversy over her genetics, Warren has more to say about NA and is more woke about NA issues and conditions).

Warren is white, both phenotypically and culturally. There is absolutely no genealogical evidence that she has ancestors from North American Indian nations.[1] (Although Christopher Child of the New England Historic And Genealogical Society touted the discovery a “marriage certificate” in May 2012 that bolstered Warren’s claims, his find was quickly debunked – the document in question, it turned out, doesn’t exist and the Society made clear that it “has not expressed a position on whether Mrs. Warren has Native American ancestry, nor do we possess any primary sources to prove that she is.”[2]) The results of the genetic testing she infamously released last October relied on comparisons to markers derived from Native populations in Latin America rather than the continental United States.[3] And such testing remains a dubious enterprise at best – just several months before Warren, a dog in Canada tested positive for Indigenous DNA.[4] [5]

Warren did not just innocently share “family lore.” As the Boston Globe first reported, the senator identified herself as Native American in federally mandated diversity statistics for at least six years while a professor at Harvard Law School despite lacking the “tribal affiliation” outlined in those documents.[6] Contemporaneously, Harvard repeatedly touted Warren as an example of ethnic diversity among Law School faculty to academic press outlets, championing her as the institution’s “only tenured minority woman” and “first woman of color.” The University of Pennsylvania – at which Warren taught prior to Harvard – likewise cited her in a “Minority Equity Report.”[7] And Warren admitted that she had listed herself for a full decade as a “minority” in Association of American Law School Directories from 1986 until 1995, the year she secured tenure at Harvard.[8]

Warren never engaged with Indigenous cohorts on the campuses in question. Although the implicit purpose of diversity initiatives is to ensure representation of perspectives informed by a variety of cultures, the executive director of Harvard’s Native American Program could not recall Warren ever participating in any of its undertakings.[9][10]

Warren can’t keep her prevarications straight about how and why she identified as Native American. In the primary days of her 2012 Senate campaign, she professed to be wholly unaware that Harvard had been promoting her as a minority (“I think I read it on the front page of the Herald”).[11] Then, she insisted that she had never formally declared herself a minority (“there was no, there is no reporting for this. It came up in lunch conversations once with faculty, after the fact.”)[12] She maintained that she had never claimed distinction as a minority to any employers until after she was hired, those Association of American Law School directories – frequently used by law schools during the 1980s for recruiting – apparently notwithstanding. Now, after the emergence last week of a 1986 application to the Texas State Bar on which she described her race as “American Indian,” Warren offers a starkly different characterization than she did seven years ago of just how pervasively she identified herself as an indigenous woman: “All I know is, during this time period this is consistent with what I did.”[13]

Warren has trucked in reductive stereotypes about physical features to justify her ethnic posturing. When Indigenous lineage and tribal links are out of the picture, “high cheekbones” are all you’ve got.[14]

PufPuf93 » Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:20 am wrote:6) Warren is the best candidate for Native Americans (despite the manufactured controversy over her genetics, Warren has more to say about NA and is more woke about NA issues and conditions).