Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
RocketMan » Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:04 am wrote:To pretend that one member of this board is not flooding the board with blatantly mainstream news articles / propaganda is just... well... denying reality. I don't understand why it cannot be said as a fact. Does someone have to carry out a statistical analysis? Is flooding not adverse to the general usefulness of the board? This dynamic reminds me of abusive family systems. Someone points out an abusive feature of someone's BEHAVIOUR, then that someone responds with "waah waah why is everybody being mean to me". SLAD has never once addressed their flooding behaviour, always choosing to deflect. It just smacks of gaslighting to me, dunno.
JackRiddler » Sat Oct 05, 2019 2:30 pm wrote:82_28 » Sat Oct 05, 2019 2:03 pm wrote:Hahaha. Nobody is getting banned and everyone is just fine but I cannot (as a "mod") allow such to go on as it was into the future. I hear it from all sides and I semi got Jeff's blessing as to handling it well. I kept him "up to speed". Like I said, as far as the penalty system in college football that you cannot target someone -- someone felt targeted.
Come on! How the fuck is that a standard? "Someone felt targeted" allows the abuser of the discourse to always claim that complaints about their abuses are "targeting" them "personally." It's bullshit on its face. It's designed to allow the flooding abuse to continue ad infinitum by making any discussion about it IMPOSSIBLE since someone can authentically (or as a lying sack of shit) claim to have been "targeted" "personally." Either the abuse of the discourse is happening or it's not.
If you're going to lock this thread I demand that you and Elvis have a further discussion about banning me. (All I care about is that you be nice enough to make it a no-post ban, so I can still log in and search through my own archived posts. If you would be so kind - I already asked Jeff that this be the case.)I am seriously trying to just maintain a comfortable flow. It is not about my mood but it is about all being welcome.
No. All forms of action should not be welcome.I would like this board to just get back to discussion on fascinating happenings
I find it is a fascinating happening to outline the contradictory views of the world that certain adherents of the State Department's political line are attempting to represent here (this may be unavoidable). That is what I did above in the OP.
But they are also trying to force this political line through here as hegemonic, by the means of flooding. (This is something YOU can control. It is YOUR decision how you control it.)What does one do when one considers both friends and shit like this happens? You break it up just like a hockey game and then you shake hands at the end. That's what I did.
We are not friends. We are interlocutors on a message board. Maybe if we meet, we might be friends.
I am not "shaking hands." I do not know these people. I know them only as interlocutors on a message board, and what they do is not a hockey game. They are driving an icecracker on the ice and vandalizing the rink. They have made it their mission, whether it's a personal compulsion or an assigned job, to post here permanently and constantly along the exact same lines ad infinitum.It's pixels where you are free to skip whatever you want to skip and/or post.
If you can even find it through all the thread-proliferating, flooding, and forced scrolling.
It is also turning this place into a closed-club for adherents of the State Department pro-imperialist political line.
We don't have to live "with each other." We could always make the place more open to others who might eventually happen on it. We could do that by prominently offering something OTHER THAN THE CORPORATE MEDIA AND STATE-DEPARTMENT FAKE-WOKE-ANARCHIST PROPAGANDA that people can get EVERWHERE ELSE.
The flooding, thread-proliferation, endless copy-pasting of the same old shit by both, the easily-triggered reflexive finger-wagging and thought-policing of the one and the fake emotional blackmail moves of the other are making that imposssible. That's on you. Limit them or limit me. Hell, it's easier to limit me, I'm not going to wage a seventeen-month campaign to restore my "right" to turn this board into my private storehouse of boring sub-intellectual bullshit or the fourteenth-wave version of the #Russiagate propaganda op.
If you lock this thread, I demand you consult with Elvis on banning me. Long as it is a group decision, I'm fine with it.
.
seemslikeadream » Sun Oct 06, 2019 5:18 pm wrote:unreal it is like Jeff, the owner of this board never came here yesterday, I am not sure what else he can do to maintain order on this board. They are ignoring the owner of this board, truly the mosts disrespectful thing they can do
Jeff » Sat Oct 05, 2019 6:18 pm wrote:There's no way this won't sound anodyne, but isn't the board big enough for everyone?
I won't pretend to be up to speed on all of the disagreements here, but maybe that's good. The issues are maybe irrelevant to my point, which is that you don't all need to be pals, but maybe you do need to give each other some space.
I don't want anybody banned or the board to be heavily moderated. In return, all I'd like is some basic, online courtesy. Like not flooding someone's thread, or driving discussion off topic, or making vicious personal attacks. That kind of stuff.
Jeff out.
82_28 » Sun Oct 06, 2019 8:27 am wrote:You know what I am not going to do, Mac? You guessed it. Suspend or ban you. Raise your hands and ask yourself if you are here to hurt, troll or in approval to others doing so. I am a fucking moderator. I moderate only to make this place last, perhaps and not have others adversely affected. This has been a hell of a week and as mod I am a character that cannot part with the responsibilities of not being my true and usual foul mouthed yet sensitive to others self. I know it is tantalizing to be a dickhead online but end of the day I cannot allow dickheads to go on and moderate as such. To me a moderator must be fair. Maybe it's old fashioned to have common courtesy.
MacCruiskeen » Sun Oct 06, 2019 6:49 am wrote:.
Post by MacCruiskeen » Sun Oct 06, 2019 6:31 am
Well, by damn. After hour upon hour upon hour of blatant dishonesty and prevarication by the guy behind the moniker "82_28", we finally learn the truth (and of course not from him, but from an honest man):Elvis » Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:17 pm wrote:I've been busy and away, and checked in about an hour ago.
No one consulted with me on decisions made the last two days. I am as surprised as anyone.
If 82_28 will have the courtesy to reply to my PM, maybe I'll learn what happened.
Emphasis added, and no apologies for the size, the bolding or the colour. If anything deserves to be made unignorable, this does
NB: That is the second time in nine months that 82_28 has pulled the exact same despicable stunt on his co-moderator and alleged friend, Elvis.
The name "Rigorous Intuition" has become a very sick joke. It is now a dismally depleted Safe Space for liars and sneaks, a place where anyone noticing the most obvious truths will be called a bully or (even more absurdly) a censor.
Someone wants it to be this way.
Elvis wrote: If 82_28 will have the courtesy to reply to my PM, maybe I'll learn what happened.
seemslikeadream » Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:24 am wrote:I am not going to reply to you ever again after this, I am going to respect Jeff the owner of this board and his wishes something you apparently are not willing to do...keep up the disruption it is on you it seems you will not even listen to Jeff. I read his statement and will abide by every single word in the future. It would be helpful if you could do the same and give the mods a break. Jeff's words were very clear and simple to understand, we should be moving forward and not continuing to argue the past
Jeff's statement should have ended this whole episode that is what he THE OWNER OF THIS BOARD wanted, it is a shame that him taking the time to come here to explain everyone is welcome here is being ignored not even 12 hours after he posted, the ultimate in disrespect to him.
I will not be discussing this any further with anyone else period I will not participate in any more disruption ...this is over for me Jeff has spoken
this is it no more no less, Jeff posted what he wanted and EVERYONE should abide by his wishes, this discussion should have ended at 6:18pm yesterday, it has ended for me right now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests