stickdog99 » 14 May 2023 04:01 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » 13 May 2023 02:45 wrote:stickdog99 » 12 May 2023 07:07 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » 11 May 2023 10:28 wrote:Harvey » 11 May 2023 06:34 wrote:Do you worry whether Gates funded PR, readily available from most state and corporate media, international institutions, most state governments, computer/device operating systems/search engines and most science journals - do you worry if all this will be enough to offset a rather limited critique of Bill Gates on a single twitter account?
Wouldn't you rather have a clue about what you're criticising Gates about instead of being manipulated by that crap?
I get annoyed about this cos Bill Gates is involved in stuff that stops poor people in non western countries from using traditional fuels like wood under the banner of climate change action, buying up land in those places to prevent those people accessing the land for renewable resources like food and wood and all you first world problem cunts are worried about is not being able to drive your cars into town cos of climate change action.
And maybe you, Harvey, are more switched on to that stuff than most but bel sav certainly isn't.
Bill Gates also tries to force his shitty vaccines on poor people in non western countries. And he is also buying up millions of acres of US farmland in an attempt to prevent US people from accessing the land for renewable resources like food and wood. And if he gets his way, the only first world problem cunts left on Earth will be his little club of private jet collectors.
You realize this, yet you still seem intent on defending him from "slanted" propaganda, as if he doesn't own the entire apparatus of military intelligence "fact checking" PR.
And yes, you are 100% correct that our most powerful oligarchs fought environmental activism tooth and nail for decades until they managed to successfully coopt the movement and direct its goals toward 100% centralized authoritarian austerity. But that's definitely where we are at this moment. And even though you realize this, useful idiots like you continue to despise your fellow first world cunts for not being sufficiently emissionally austere. Why? Is it really that tough to align yourself with the ignorant first world consumers you so despise even when you know that we have a common arch enemy clearly intent on fucking us all?
Once again, I'll happily support any measures that actually serve to reduce human carbon and nitrogen emissions in any overall manner that do not result in further centralization of power, wealth and control over the masses nor further restrict the rights of the average individual compared to the rights of the elites who are driving the WEF's Net Zero/15 minute cities/CBDCs/total biosecurity awareness/"You will own nothing and be happy" agenda.
You know, just as soon as gourmet foods, private jets, yachts, and military use of fossil fuels are outlawed for everyone, the right to travel is equalized for everyone, and none of the elites currently trying to ram these restrictions down all of our throats with the help of their well-meaning army of jackboot ecobiofascists are allowed to offset any of their own "planet choking" emissions with their overflowing treasure chests of CBDCs.
It's just amazing to me how many people are willing to welcome dystopian authoritarian regulations clearly designed to restrict their own rights and quality of life compared to those of elites if only the cause is marketed to them as somehow virtuous. It's millennialism at its most co-opted since perhaps the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. I mean, how can any of our problems have anything to do with the top 0.01% (who obviously need our defense from "biased" critiques) when so many of the bottom 99% of us first world cunts simply refuse to repent?
I mean, even after COVID-19, are you just going to blindly follow whatever the WEF mandates on you to flatten the curve of the evil scourges of carbon-19 and nitrogen-19 simply because you so cherish the indignant environmental self-righteousness that you have so long relished cudgeling your fellow first world cunts with?
For 25 years i've been fighting bushfires and for that entire time conditions have got worse. During that time flooding has got worse and the times between major floods decrease to the point where we get 1 in 1000 year floods every four years.
Also I consider any regime to be a dystopian authoritarian one. i dunno why you lot suddenly think they started with covid. All states are authoritarian and move toward dystopian behaviour over time. But you lot are distracted by covid and have missed other things that happen before it and since that i consider worse. I don't let the state restrict my rights and stop me doing stuff.
You were whinging about covid affecting your job. IE - you're a gutless sook with a job. Live outside the system if you want to criticise it otherwise you're a dilettante talking crap.
You're not in the 99%. Compared to the rest of the world you're in the 1% and cos you don't earn your money outside the law you support the system that keeps the 1% you're a part of in power. BTW - fighting bushfires is volunteer thing I do to keep my community - ie the people I live around - safe, its not a job and I've never been paid to do it.
I don't live in your stupid suburban bullshit world. Right now my roof is a tarp and no government knows my home address. So kindly fuck off with your bullshit.
I live in an urban, not a suburban world. I used to enjoy the cultural benefits of my urban world. Frankly, I regret not having figured out an exit path from my urban world sooner, but I have never cared about money. I teach people, and I help people to survive and help other people to survive in my urban world almost every day of my life.
I'm not an asshole who constantly expresses vitriol for everybody who does not enjoy the advantages and disadvantages of my personal lifestyle. Unlike you (?), I would like to have a fairer and more just world even for the billions of gutless sooks with jobs.
But thanks for proving my point that you are too invested in cudgeling the billions of gutless sooks with jobs for not finding a way to live outside the system (as so righteously you do) to fully appreciate that the elites who have now co-opted the environmental activist movement to shove centralized dystopian austerity down all of out throats are our common enemy.
And I get it. You don't want to give up the perch of self-righteousness from which you have disdained the teeming mass of gutless consuming sooks for most of your life. Conflating ecological activism with morality is a big part of your haughty perch, and you are not fain to give this up.
You want to whinge about the elites but you don't do anything about their power. You live in their system. They created it millenia ago and it makes you a slave so when they finally pull back the curtain and show the brick wall at the back of the theatre if you only response is basically @Put the curtain back@ why should I have any respect for you.,
I'm talking to you dude.
Not thousands of other people who've never questioned anything cos they're busy living their lives and have never been given a real reason to question anything. You've been on this website for over a decade, longer than I have. How come you haven't worked that out yet.
If you want to live in that economy you need to accept that its owned by the elites and you're one of their resources. You belong to them. Otherwise leave it.
They're your options.
BTW There aren't billions of gutless sooks with jobs. Most of those billions of people are economic slaves to westerners. Who made your computer or your clothes and shoes for two dollars a month? Those people have little or no choice. You do. You live in a society that's so affluent it throws away goods that would be considered luxuries in the rest of the world so people can buy next years model with a different colour case. You don't need to live that way you just need to work out what's really important to you.
), but you're absolutely right. I've lost track of the times I've criticized something specific Stickdog said or posted, only for him to then immediately assume I'm in favor of all the bad things ever on that particular topic. Question one of his claims about vaccines? Then I'm 150% in favor of permanent lockdowns and jail-time for anti-vaxxers. Not outraged enough about congestion pricing or something stupid Schwab said? I'm cheering for an authoritarian green regime! Etc. It's binary thinking cranked up to eleven.
