The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Aug 30, 2021 11:47 am

.

@Henrik_Palmgren

The World Health Organization has just released a guiding document for a digital vaccine certificate that will be blockchain based. This will be used to implement a vaccine passport in every country. It’s funded by the Bill & Melinda Gate’s Foundation & Rockefeller Foundation.

Image
Image

-----------------------------------------------

@Sarah19735

Replying to
@Henrik_Palmgren and @DackStevon

This is getting so oppressive and discouraging… I’ll die in about 30 years but I’m so sad for my daughter and later generations… I cannot imagine the hell on earth for them.

---------------------------------------------

@RodrigoRamone6
·
I'm 28 years old and sometimes I think dying tomorrow would be better than staying on this earth for much longer. If it comes to a point survival is denied to me because I didn't take the vax, I'll run to the woods, away from all the madness, maybe I'd last, maybe not, who knows.

---------------------------------------------

@PostGlobo
·
The digital passports aren't just about "medical tyranny," it's about tyranny period. With basic amenities locked behind the prerequisite of digital ID, they will be able to micromanage every aspect of life for the average pleb. They have wanted this for years—health is a cover.


https://twitter.com/Henrik_Palmgren/sta ... 15648?s=20
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Belligerent Savant » Thu Sep 16, 2021 1:18 pm

.

Directly related:

Harvey » Thu Sep 16, 2021 10:30 am wrote:Discussion: The Political Economy of Covid. With Professors Jared Ball, Piers Robinson and Fabio Vighi



Edited to add, this is essentially a discussion about the last remaining question for all sceptics of Covid: Why? Answer: to manage the largest global financial crash in history. That is to say, the biggest since the last one in 2008.


The article by Vighi, referenced in the above segment:

https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-sel ... imulation/

A SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY: SYSTEMIC COLLAPSE AND PANDEMIC SIMULATION

A year and a half after the arrival of Virus, some may have started wondering why the usually unscrupulous ruling elites decided to freeze the global profit-making machine in the face of a pathogen that targets almost exclusively the unproductive (over 80s). Why all the humanitarian zeal? Cui bono? Only those who are unfamiliar with the wondrous adventures of GloboCap can delude themselves into thinking that the system chose to shut down out of compassion. Let us be clear from the start: the big predators of oil, arms, and vaccines could not care less about humanity.

Follow the money

In pre-Covid times, the world economy was on the verge of another colossal meltdown. Here is a brief chronicle of how the pressure was building up:

June 2019: In its Annual Economic Report, the Swiss-based Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the ‘Central Bank of all central banks’, sets the international alarm bells ringing. The document highlights “overheating […] in the leveraged loan market”, where “credit standards have been deteriorating” and “collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) have surged – reminiscent of the steep rise in collateralized debt obligations [CDOs] that amplified the subprime crisis [in 2008].” Simply stated, the belly of the financial industry is once again full of junk.

9 August 2019: The BIS issues a working paper calling for “unconventional monetary policy measures” to “insulate the real economy from further deterioration in financial conditions”. The paper indicates that, by offering “direct credit to the economy” during a crisis, central bank lending “can replace commercial banks in providing loans to firms.”

15 August 2019
: Blackrock Inc., the world’s most powerful investment fund (managing around $7 trillion in stock and bond funds), issues a white paper titled Dealing with the next downturn. Essentially, the paper instructs the US Federal Reserve to inject liquidity directly into the financial system to prevent “a dramatic downturn.” Again, the message is unequivocal: “An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough. That response will likely involve ‘going direct’”: “finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders” while avoiding “hyperinflation. Examples include the Weimar Republic in the 1920s as well as Argentina and Zimbabwe more recently.”

22-24 August 2019: G7 central bankers meet in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to discuss BlackRock’s paper along with urgent measures to prevent the looming meltdown. In the prescient words of James Bullard, President of the St Louis Federal Reserve: “We just have to stop thinking that next year things are going to be normal.”

15-16 September 2019: The downturn is officially inaugurated by a sudden spike in the repo rates (from 2% to 10.5%). ‘Repo’ is shorthand for ‘repurchase agreement’, a contract where investment funds lend money against collateral assets (normally Treasury securities). At the time of the exchange, financial operators (banks) undertake to buy back the assets at a higher price, typically overnight. In brief, repos are short-term collateralized loans. They are the main source of funding for traders in most markets, especially the derivatives galaxy. A lack of liquidity in the repo market can have a devastating domino effect on all major financial sectors.

17 September 2019: The Fed begins the emergency monetary programme, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars per week into Wall Street, effectively executing BlackRock’s “going direct” plan. (Unsurprisingly, in March 2020 the Fed will hire BlackRock to manage the bailout package in response to the ‘COVID-19 crisis’).

19 September 2019: Donald Trump signs Executive Order 13887, establishing a National Influenza Vaccine Task Force whose aim is to develop a “5-year national plan (Plan) to promote the use of more agile and scalable vaccine manufacturing technologies and to accelerate development of vaccines that protect against many or all influenza viruses.” This is to counteract “an influenza pandemic”, which, “unlike seasonal influenza […] has the potential to spread rapidly around the globe, infect higher numbers of people, and cause high rates of illness and death in populations that lack prior immunity”. As someone guessed, the pandemic was imminent, while in Europe too preparations were underway (see here and here).

18 October 2019: In New York, a global zoonotic pandemic is simulated during Event 201, a strategic exercise coordinated by the Johns Hopkins Biosecurity Center and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

21-24 January 2020: The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting takes place in Davos, Switzerland, where both the economy and vaccinations are discussed.

23 January 2020: China puts Wuhan and other cities of the Hubei province in lockdown.

11 March 2020: The WHO’s director general calls Covid-19 a pandemic. The rest is history.

Joining the dots is a simple enough exercise. If we do so, we might see a well-defined narrative outline emerge, whose succinct summary reads as follows: lockdowns and the global suspension of economic transactions were intended to 1) Allow the Fed to flood the ailing financial markets with freshly printed money while deferring hyperinflation; and 2) Introduce mass vaccination programmes and health passports as pillars of a neo-feudal regime of capitalist accumulation. As we shall see, the two aims merge into one.

In 2019, world economy was plagued by the same sickness that had caused the 2008 credit crunch. It was suffocating under an unsustainable mountain of debt. Many public companies could not generate enough profit to cover interest payments on their own debts and were staying afloat only by taking on new loans. ‘Zombie companies’ (with year-on-year low profitability, falling turnover, squeezed margins, limited cashflow, and highly leveraged balance sheet) were rising everywhere. The repo market meltdown of September 2019 must be placed within this fragile economic context.

When the air is saturated with flammable materials, any spark can cause the explosion. And in the magical world of finance, tout se tient: one flap of a butterfly’s wings in a certain sector can send the whole house of cards tumbling down. In financial markets powered by cheap loans, any increase in interest rates is potentially cataclysmic for banks, hedge funds, pension funds and the entire government bond market, because the cost of borrowing increases and liquidity dries up. This is what happened with the ‘repocalypse’ of September 2019: interest rates spiked to 10.5% in a matter of hours, panic broke out affecting futures, options, currencies, and other markets where traders bet by borrowing from repos. The only way to defuse the contagion was by throwing as much liquidity as necessary into the system – like helicopters dropping thousands of gallons of water on a wildfire. Between September 2019 and March 2020, the Fed injected more than $9 trillion into the banking system, equivalent to more than 40% of US GDP.

The mainstream narrative should therefore be reversed: the stock market did not collapse (in March 2020) because lockdowns had to be imposed; rather, lockdowns had to be imposed because financial markets were collapsing. With lockdowns came the suspension of business transactions, which drained the demand for credit and stopped the contagion. In other words, restructuring the financial architecture through extraordinary monetary policy was contingent on the economy’s engine being turned off. Had the enormous mass of liquidity pumped into the financial sector reached transactions on the ground, a monetary tsunami with catastrophic consequences would have been unleashed.

As claimed by economist Ellen Brown, it was “another bailout”, but this time “under cover of a virus.” Similarly, John Titus and Catherine Austin Fitts noted that the Covid-19 “magic wand” allowed the Fed to execute BlackRock’s “going direct” plan, literally: it carried out an unprecedented purchase of government bonds, while, on an infinitesimally smaller scale, also issuing government backed ‘COVID loans’ to businesses. In brief, only an induced economic coma would provide the Fed with the room to defuse the time-bomb ticking away in the financial sector. Screened by mass-hysteria, the US central bank plugged the holes in the interbank lending market, dodging hyperinflation as well as the ‘Financial Stability Oversight Council’ (the federal agency for monitoring financial risk created after the 2008 collapse), as discussed here. However, the “going direct” blueprint should also be framed as a desperate measure, for it can only prolong the agony of a global economy increasingly hostage to money printing and the artificial inflation of financial assets.

At the heart of our predicament lies an insurmountable structural impasse. Debt-leveraged financialization is contemporary capitalism’s only line of flight, the inevitable forward-escape route for a reproductive model that has reached its historical limit. Capitals head for financial markets because the labour-based economy is increasingly unprofitable. How did we get to this?

The answer can be summarised as follows: 1. The economy’s mission to generate surplus-value is both the drive to exploit the workforce and to expel it from production. This is what Marx called capitalism’s “moving contradiction”.[1] While it constitutes the essence of our mode of production, this contradiction today backfires, turning political economy into a mode of permanent devastation. 2. The reason for this change of fortune is the objective failure of the labour-capital dialectic: the unprecedented acceleration in technological automation since the 1980s causes more labour-power to be ejected from production than (re)absorbed. The contraction of the volume of wages means that the purchasing power of a growing part of the world population is falling, with debt and immiseration as inevitable consequences. 3. As less surplus-value is produced, capital seeks immediate returns in the debt-leveraged financial sector rather than in the real economy or by investing in socially constructive sectors like education, research, and public services.

The bottom line is that the paradigm shift underway is the necessary condition for the (dystopian) survival of capitalism, which is no longer able to reproduce itself through mass wage-labour and the attendant consumerist utopia. The pandemic agenda was dictated, ultimately, by systemic implosion: the profitability downturn of a mode of production which rampant automation is making obsolete. For this immanent reason, capitalism is increasingly dependent on public debt, low wages, centralisation of wealth and power, a permanent state of emergency, and financial acrobatics.

If we ‘follow the money’, we will see that the economic blockade deviously attributed to Virus has achieved far from negligible results, not only in terms of social engineering, but also of financial predation. I will quickly highlight four of them.

1) As anticipated, it has allowed the Fed to reorganise the financial sector by printing a continuous stream of billions of dollars out of thin air; 2) It has accelerated the extinction of small and medium-sized companies, allowing major groups to monopolise trade flows; 3) It has further depressed labour wages and facilitated significant capital savings through ‘smart working’ (which is particularly smart for those who implement it); 4) It has enabled the growth of e-commerce, the explosion of Big Tech, and the proliferation of the pharma-dollar – which also includes the much disparaged plastic industry, now producing millions of new facemasks and gloves every week, many of which end up in the oceans (to the delight of the ‘green new dealers’). In 2020 alone, the wealth of the planet’s 2,200 or so billionaires grew by $1.9 trillion, an increase without historical precedent. All this thanks to a pathogen so lethal that, according to official data, only 99.8% of the infected survive (see here and here), most of them without experiencing any symptoms.


the rest at source, including embedded links.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Harvey » Thu Sep 16, 2021 1:56 pm

^ This.

Attention all ostriches...
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby stickdog99 » Thu Sep 16, 2021 3:36 pm

conniption » 30 Aug 2021 13:32 wrote: Larry & Carstens' Excellent Pandemic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYOEvurCVuk

BestEvidence
• Aug 14, 2021 •
The pandemic presented forensically for what it is, namely, a massive theatrical edifice intended to distract popular attention away from the fact that criminal bankers running the monetary system are making a concerted push toward full-on totalitarianism through monetary and financial control.

Special thanks to Robert D. for removing the air conditioner from the audio track.

References

(1) BIS General Manager Agustin Carstens explains with gusto that central banks will have full control over retail CBDC transactions, including ability to block individual transactions:
https://youtu.be/mVmKN4DSu3g?t=1537

(2) Sovereign Money (2017), by Joseph Huber
https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?ac...

(3) “Can banks individually create money out of nothing?,” by Prof. Richard Werner https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...

(4) “Mommy, Where Does Money Come From?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_dBK...

(5) Steven Van Metre, “Fed’s Latest Scam to Force More U.S. Debt on Depositors,”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMpI6...

(6) “Wherefore Art Thou, Reserves?”
https://youtu.be/1owSYjIT9og?t=945

(7) “Quantitative Easing Is the Biggest Sham Ever”
https://youtu.be/rDtVABEzcy4?t=275
[/size]


Great video, Any comments from our resident MMT experts?
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Harvey » Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:05 pm

"Markets like totalitarian governments."

Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock Inc.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby conniption » Sun Sep 19, 2021 6:56 pm

RT

Social media recoils as Bloomberg praises Amazon’s warehouse-based exurban ‘factory towns’ as ‘the future of working class’

17 Sep, 2021

Amazon’s massive new distribution centers, soon to be surrounded by infrastructure built to serve workers, are being compared to Gilded Age company towns. While many are aghast at the idea, fellow billionaires are praising it.

The e-commerce empire founded by Jeff Bezos will offer the American working class a better option than scraping to get by in increasingly expensive cities, investment adviser Conor Sen wrote in a Friday oped for Bloomberg, the financial news outlet whose namesake is billionaire former New York mayor and failed presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg.

“Let’s call them ‘factory towns,’” Sen suggests, apparently in an effort to avoid the baggage that accompanies the concept of “company towns.” Popular in the late 19th century among the new breed of mega-corporations – railroads, steel mills, and the like – many of these dormitory communities held workers as veritable prisoners, paying them in scrip that was only redeemable at the company-run store and retaining groups of thuggish Pinkerton “detectives” to stamp out any attempts to unionize.

continues... https://www.rt.com/usa/535162-amazon-fa ... nequality/


~~~

RT

No, Bloomberg, Amazon’s ‘factory towns’ will NOT solve inequality, they will be satanic mills for the working class

Dr Lisa McKenzie
19 Sep, 2021


Dr Lisa McKenzie is a working-class academic. She grew up in a coal-mining town in Nottinghamshire and became politicized through the 1984 miners’ strike with her family. At 31, she went to the University of Nottingham and did an undergraduate degree in sociology. Dr McKenzie is the author of ‘Getting By: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain.’ She’s a political activist, writer and thinker. Follow her on Twitter @redrumlisa.

Amazon and its hyper-neoliberal cheerleaders are polishing turds again. Jeff Bezos, the billionaire spaceman, and his company are about to ‘lift the working class’ by creating new ‘factory towns,’ Bloomberg writes.

“Plentiful new jobs at higher wages in places with cheaper housing sounds like a solution to inequality,” investment adviser Conor Sen wrote in a piece for the news agency.

Bloomberg and Amazon are putting such a shine on this idea, it reminds me of those Victorian texts where the working class living on the master’s land would bow and doff their caps every time his carriage passed them on their way to a 14-hour shift in his mine or mill.

Old books are full of those cheery commoners thanking landlords and industrialists for allowing them to live and work in poverty. Have we really come full circle?

continues... https://www.rt.com/op-ed/535213-amazon- ... ing-class/
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby BenDhyan » Wed Sep 22, 2021 7:41 am

You are probably aware of the protestors against the covid restrictions in Melbourne, it has now reached a new phase, they're rubber but can you believe it?

Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby drstrangelove » Wed Sep 22, 2021 12:24 pm

Wasn't that bad today in Melbourne. Got shot at with these guns from a moving armoured truck. Ended up with a group of protestors that all looked like criminals, so got lunch and headed home instead of joining them at the shrine.

Cops did a good job today from a tactical standpoint. Protestors didn't show up in enough numbers. Too tired from walking 25 KMs yesterday to shutdown the highway.

You win some, you lose some. Cops won today. Probably not too bad either, as they were losing Soo much authority the criminal elements were getting too confident. Everything is a fine balance.
User avatar
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Belligerent Savant » Fri Feb 04, 2022 9:38 pm

Image

Klaus Schwab
@KlausSchwurbel
.
Feb 3

A big thank you to our employees of the year 2021

Image

https://twitter.com/KlausSchwurbel/stat ... PuPZ2AV4NQ
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:05 am



So how the fuck is the head of the World Economic Forum a Marxist?

Seriously how?

What does it matter what video that bloke shows when he is saying stuff like "Schwab is a Marxist" and the modern economy is communism?

I'm not in favour of corporate globalist technocrats running countries but this isn't news. Its been happening for decades and we all know about it.

They all have their educational programs to control the way knowledge is directed by society.

But it (ie WEF) is being framed as Marxism and communism in that link when it obviously isn't. Its (ie the WEF) is being framed as an attempt to bring about material equality when it clearly isn't.

There is another agenda at play here.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby Harvey » Fri Feb 18, 2022 1:10 pm

Joe Hillshoist » Fri Feb 18, 2022 1:05 pm wrote:So how the fuck is the head of the World Economic Forum a Marxist?

There is another agenda at play here.


Perceived-Identity Politics. How else does one divide and rule on such a breathtaking scale? Fanatical oppositions can be held despite almost total agreement. Fanatical attachment despite radical opposition.

We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False.

William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987


And not just Americans.

As for the question of attribution for the above quote...

I am the source for this quote, which was indeed said by CIA Director William Casey at an early February 1981 meeting of the newly elected President Reagan with his new cabinet secretaries to report to him on what they had learned about their agencies in the first couple of weeks of the administration. The meeting was in the Roosevelt Room in the West Wing of the White House, not far from the Cabinet Room. I was present at the meeting as Assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser to the President. Casey first told Reagan that he had been astonished to discover that over 80 percent of the ‘intelligence’ that the analysis side of the CIA produced was based on open public sources like newspapers and magazines. As he did to all the other secretaries of their departments and agencies, Reagan asked what he saw as his goal as director for the CIA, to which he replied with this quote, which I recorded in my notes of the meeting as he said it. Shortly thereafter I told Senior White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who was a close friend and colleague, who in turn made it public.

Barbara Honegger


https://infiniteunknown.net/2015/01/15/ ... -is-false/
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:44 pm



Obviously, he is an elitist, oligopolist, would be world tyrant and anything but a Marxist. I didn't even watch the video you are referring to. I watched the first video on the page. You know, the one that actually matters.

Did you?

It's so fucking bizarre to me what you take away from the propaganda I link. Please understand that I assuming an adult audience.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Covid19 New World Order and the World Economic Forum

Postby drstrangelove » Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:31 pm

I'm still waiting for someone to define marxism. It's one of those conveniently ambigious terms. I would say it's an ideological which reduces the political field of action to a dichotomy between capital and labour. So in sense even 'capitalists' who make up one half of this debate are Marxist.

Though technically speaking, we do live in a communist industrial system. The means of production are corporations. These are publicly owned by workers through their pension funds. Though the dictatorship of the proletariat are the mutual funds like Vanguard and BlackRock wrapped up in a complex hierarchy of custodian banks. Remember, the communist manifesto said 'own the means of production', it did not say 'control'. Granted, it's probably no help pointing this out because what people really mean when they use the term marxist is, "on the side of the workers" or the 'average Joe'. Though they should probably know that any theory that becomes this popular and encouraged by those who control the means of production, for instance in publication of books, has a very different perspective on what its actual definition is to mean in practise.

Pretty sure Klaus Schwab's brother, Charles Schwab, has some kind of controlling stake in Vanguard. Which is interesting. I only recently even heard of the name Wallenberg when W-Rex name dropped them. I'd been looking into this stuff for two years and had never heard of them. Just goes to show how well these families of industrial civilisaiton have scrubbed themselves of notoriety.

The whole WEF play is to become the solution to the problem of 'capitalism' through replacing shareholder profits with stakeholder interests, this being done through a number of ESG institutes which will become information authorities of what is good or bad for stakeholders, primarily the council of inclusive capitalism, founded by a Rothschild. Seems to me an argument can be made that this is pretty close to communism.

If anyone is interested in going balls deep into this, I'd suggest looking into the Jacobins of the French Revolution. You can follow a legacy of extreme left political theory, primarily concerned with private property rights, from about 1790 all the way through till today.

The scary thing is that people who don't live in communities, so atomised individuals, do not have internet controls. Which only leaves external ones.
User avatar
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Elihu and 57 guests