Fauci is seriously dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:13 am

AIER
Search - fauci
Found 205 Results
Page 1 of 21


August 24, 2021
Max Borders

Fawning Over Fauci
“The lack of any serious investigation into Anthony Fauci is an object lesson in groupthink and the ‘gated institutional narrative. Though it might mean sacrificing short-term gains, journalists who do their jobs will be rewarded in the long run.'” ~ Max Borders
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fawning-for-fauci/


June 4, 2021
Donald Siegel

Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, the Godfather, and Dr. Fauci’s Book Tour
“Perhaps the proceeds from Dr. Fauci’s upcoming book, including the large speaking fees he will earn and the undisclosed advance he garnered for writing the book while ‘serving’ the taxpayer, can be used to compensate his underage victims and the other public health collateral damage caused by his maniacal and myopic focus on one infectious disease.” ~ Donald Siegel & Robert M. Sauer
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/exit-voice ... book-tour/


June 3, 2021
Barry Brownstein

Liberating Yourself from Faucism
“In place of helplessness, we can choose not to participate in lies. ‘Let their rule hold not through me!’ is the key to our liberation. We can be open and eager for public jousting and arguments from diverse points of view. If this is too much to ask, we will lose our remaining freedoms.” ~ Barry Brownstein
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/liberating ... m-faucism/


May 23, 2021
John Tamny

Imagining Year 2020 Without Fauci, Redfield, USIAID, and the CDC
“Scared of their own shadow politicians let experts like Fauci and Redfield terrify them into a command-and-control stance. The rest is tragic history as jobs and businesses vanished in a climate of fear created by politicians and bureaucrats who would never miss a paycheck or a meal.” ~ John Tamny
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/imagining- ... d-the-cdc/


May 21, 2021
Micha Gartz

Fauci: “It’s a Manifestation of Your Honesty to Say, ‘Hey, I Was Wrong.’”
“Both Fauci and the CDC’s lack of transparency and honest communication during Covid will be remembered and will undermine public support in future pandemic responses. Perhaps if Dr. Fauci had spent less time indulging his desire for air time (with 300+ media appearances in 12 months) and honestly communicated up-to-date scientific findings, more Americans would feel comfortable about returning to normal life.” ~ Micha Gartz
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-its- ... was-wrong/


April 22, 2021
Jordan Schachtel

Fauci Has Chalked Up 300+ Media Appearances Over Past Year
“Fauci is having the best year of his life. It has become clear that he desperately wants the show to continue, even if that means demanding that tens of millions of people suffer by conforming to his pseudoscience-based edicts. The TV doctor sure knows how to drive ratings, with the hopes that this is just Season One of his long running hit pandemic series.” ~ Jordan Schachtel
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-has- ... past-year/


April 16, 2021
John Tamny

Where’s Dr. Fauci As Another Corona-Myth Dies?
“In this case, the deniers who lived their lives were correct. Avoiding all contact proved idiotic. The ‘doubters’ had science on their side. It’s all yet again a reminder that hysterical certitude isn’t the same as knowledge. Emotion is its own form of denial.” ~ John Tamny
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/wheres-dr- ... myth-dies/


March 23, 2021
Phillip W. Magness

The Many Variants of Fauci’s Mutating Covid Advice
“Although reinfection from new strains continues to be an avenue of research and investigation, the evidence we currently have suggests it remains uncommon. That hasn’t stopped America’s ‘leading infectious disease authority’ from indulging in wildly irresponsible speculation from a national stage though, invariably appealing to alarmism as a pretext for continuing the same failed lockdown policies he has been peddling for over a year now.” ~ Phillip W. Magness
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/the-many-v ... id-advice/


March 10, 2021
Jordan Schachtel

Fauci and the Communists
“It’s important to recall that the United States and over 100 countries initiated lockdowns exclusively because of the ‘data’ that was being transmitted out of Wuhan. It was faulty, unchallenged Chinese data, repeated by authoritative figures like Fauci and his colleagues, that convinced the world to undergo lockdowns and embrace early, aggressive ventilation of COVID-19 patients, among other botched, unscientific treatment and mitigation measures.” ~ Jordan Schachtel
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-and-the-communists/


February 23, 2021
Phillip W. Magness

Fauci Was Duplicitous on the AIDS Epidemic Too
“If you want to see an end to the lockdown madness, the ongoing destruction of human lives and livelihoods, and the unprecedented government failures that have come to characterize our daily routines for the last year, the lessons of this administrator’s performance should be obvious. It’s time to stop listening to Fauci, and time to stop treating his wildly inconsistent political posturing as if it carries any scientific authority.” ~ Phillip W. Magness
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-was- ... demic-too/


++++++++++++++++++++++

Page 2 of 21
Older posts Newer posts



August 10, 2020
Phillip W. Magness

Fact-Checking Fauci
“The pro-lockdown position favored by Fauci and several US media outlets has become a matter of ideological commitment. Whether they are doing so to rationalize the costs we have already incurred from this disastrous approach or to further politicize the pandemic response for a variety of electoral and partisan purposes, they have embraced a pro-lockdown stance that is unchained from any evidence or clear data.” ~ Phillip W. Magness
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fact-checking-fauci/


August 3, 2020
Phillip W. Magness

Fauci Pushes Goggles. Are Snorkels Next?
“It was my pleasure to join Liz Wheeler’s show ‘Tipping Point’ to discuss the devastating GDP figures and the broader economic contraction facing America as we continue to follow the flawed strategy of government imposed lockdowns. I also demonstrated a possible next phase of clothing mandate.” ~ Phil Magness
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-push ... kels-next/


July 30, 2020
Ethan Yang

Should Dr. Fauci Be the Economic Czar?
“Much like how the response to COVID-19 requires understanding and input from a variety of perspectives, the same goes for economic policy. Dr. Fauci and public health experts like him have more than a right to voice their opinions on the economy. Whether or not we should take them seriously is another question entirely.” ~ Ethan Yang
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/should-dr- ... omic-czar/


July 23, 2020
Fiona Harrigan

Fauci Is Wrong: New York Did Not Do it “Correctly”
“The deep human costs of this virus and its corresponding policies have been exacerbated by blind hubris and unfounded pride––which, to no small extent, saw their expression in the conceit of rule by models. Though it might be too little too late, diligent reflection and readjustment in future pandemic combat efforts will be the only way to honor those who were lost so unnecessarily.” ~ Fiona Harrigan and Peter C. Earle
READ MORE https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-is-w ... correctly/



continues: https://www.aier.org/header-search-resu ... sf_paged=2
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:46 am

conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby Harvey » Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:38 pm

He fucking well is! And worse, he's not alone.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby stickdog99 » Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:09 pm

Full Kary Mullis Interview

stickdog99
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby stickdog99 » Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:11 pm

stickdog99
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Dec 07, 2021 8:30 pm

.

Modern-day Mengele, going back to the 80s

User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5218
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby stickdog99 » Wed Dec 08, 2021 7:47 pm

stickdog99
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:55 am

AIER
(embedded links)

Fauci, Emails, and Some Alleged Science

Phillip W. Magness
James R. Harrigan
– December 19, 2021
Reading Time: 5 minutes

From October 2-4, 2020, the American Institute for Economic Research hosted a small conference for scientists to discuss the Covid-19 lockdowns. Just four days later, Dr. Francis Collins, the retiring Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), would call the three of the scientists in attendance “fringe epidemiologists,” in a directive he sent to Anthony Fauci and other senior staff of his agency. They were “fringe epidemiologists” because they had the temerity to ask whether the lockdowns of 2020 were effective. Those three, Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, Sunetra Gupta of Oxford, and Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford were simply doing what any good scientist would do: They were following the evidence.

They wrote the Great Barrington Declaration [GBD] as they parted company at AIER, posting it for all to see.

So why was Dr. Collins so intent on impugning these three scientists? It’s hard to know exactly, mostly because any scientist worth his salt should have been happy to see further research being done. That is, after all, how ignorance is replaced by knowledge. But Collins was clearly in no mood to replace his own possible ignorance with any kind of knowledge. He was pretty sure he knew all he had to know; and this is one of the most dangerous positions a scientist can take.

In an email obtained by AIER through a Freedom of Information Act request, Collins told Anthony Fauci, CCing Lawrence Tabak, Deputy Ethics Counselor at NIH, that he wanted “a quick and devastating published take down (sic)” of the Great Barrington Declaration’s premises.

Image

One wonders why he would CC the Deputy Ethics Counselor on this, given the trouble these people seem to have with ethics, but here they were in October of 2020. Fauci wrote that same night to let Collins know that there was already a devastating take down of the Great Barrington Declaration…in that august scientific publication Wired.

“Francis,” Fauci wrote, “I am pasting in below a piece from Wired that debunks [the GBD].” There, science reporter Matt Reynolds told us there was no “scientific divide” over herd immunity, but that’s not the funny part. The funny part came when Reynolds declared quite confidently that we no longer had anything to worry about, as lockdowns were – as of October 2020 – a thing of the past.

“The problem [with the GBD] is that we aren’t in lockdown,” Reynolds explained. “It’s hard to find people who are advocating for a return to the lockdown we saw in March. When the Great Barrington Declaration authors declare their opposition to lockdowns, they are quite literally arguing with the past.”

This Fauci-endorsed passage may be one of the worst takes of the entire pandemic. Less than a month later, lockdowns came roaring back with a vengeance.

Fauci wrote to Collins again the next day, this time referencing a breathless op-ed by Gregg Gonsalves, a public health professor at Yale, in The Nation. And here we arrive at yet another funny part. Gonsalves’ article was not exactly a critique of the Great Barrington Declaration. Instead, Gonsalves went after Martin Kulldorff, who in an interview with the leftist magazine Jacobin quite reasonably pointed out that the lockdowns hurt the poor more than most talking heads were willing to admit. Gonsalves’s grievance was that by interviewing Kulldorff, Jacobin had broken the lockdown “solidarity” of other far-left websites including the Nation and the Boston Review.

By October 10, the lines were well drawn, and Fauci thrust himself into the middle of the media hootenanny that was clearly emerging. Collins emailed again to boast about calling the three scientists “fringe” in the Washington Post, although he told Fauci that their ongoing campaign to take down the GBD “will not be appreciated in the W[hite] H[ouse}.” The White House, Fauci retorted, was “too busy with other things to worry about” the GBD. There was an election to deal with, after all.

As the bedfellows became more strange, Gregg Gonsalves wrote directly to Collins, thanking him for his undiplomatic approach. For his part, Gonsalves became ever more hostile and profane, in his remarks on the GBD. “This f*****g Great Barrington Declaration is like a bad rash that won’t go away,” Gonsalves tweeted, shortly before reaching out to Collins. A day earlier, the Yale professor also began promoting unhinged conspiracy theories about the GBD and AIER that traced to the blog of a former 9/11 Truther movement activist.

Some of the emails between Collins and Fauci sent in response to AIER’s FOIA request have been redacted, but surrounding context makes it pretty clear that they were looking for a way to impugn the GBD further if it came up at the White House Covid Task Force meeting on October 16. That morning, Fauci emailed Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator. He pressed the need for her to oppose the GBD, and set the stage for an attack on Scott Atlas, who was the most friendly champion of the GBD on the Task Force.

Fauci, it turns out, had to miss the October 16 task force meeting, though he likely breathed a sigh of relief when Collins emailed him two days later. “Atlas did not take part in the [task force] meeting on Friday,” Collins wrote, “and the Great Barrington Declaration did not come up.” Another partially-redacted email hints that Fauci celebrated this outcome. Atlas’s opposition to the lockdown faction on the task force “is driving Deb [Birx] crazy,” he continued.

Fauci and Collins were not done, though, in their campaign to “take down” the GBD scientists.

Our story picks up again in earnest on November 2, when Fauci’s chief of staff Greg Folkers replied to an email that was not made public in pursuance to AIER’s FOIA request. It seems pretty clear, though, that Fauci asked Folkers for a list of sources that would allow him to argue effectively against the GBD. The email’s subject line references a previous correspondence from Fauci “as discussed,” noting that Folkers had “highlighted the three i found most useful” (sic).

Multiple sources, and particularly Scott Atlas’s recently-published account of his time on the task force, have noted that Fauci often relies on aides to curate lists of sources in advance of his many media appearances. He seldom reads the scientific literature on Covid-19 himself, and instead arrives at meetings with staff-prepared talking points. It appears that Folker’s email was an answer to one such request for talking points to attack the GBD scientists.

Note that Fauci frequently portrays himself as a staunch defender of science who stays above the political divide and remains outside of partisan debates. In light of that, you might expect that Folker’s response to Fauci’s request would yield a small sample of scientific analysis on the logic behind lockdowns, even if only in a format bullet pointed by his staff. But you’d be wrong. Folkers sent Fauci a list of seven political op-eds and articles opposing the GBD from popular media outlets.

So yeah. Science.

https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-emai ... d-science/

~~~

Brownstone Institute

Fauci’s War on Science: The Smoking Gun

By Jeffrey A. Tucker
December 19, 2021


Those weeks following the release of the Great Barrington Declaration did feel odd.

On the good side, medical doctors, scientists, public health workers, and citizens all over the world were thrilled that three top scholars in fields of public health and epidemiology had spoken out against lockdowns and for a reasoned approach to Covid. They eagerly signed the document.

Yes, there were some attempts to sabotage it too, with fake names and so on, which should have been a clue about what was coming. The fakes were deleted in days and new methods of confirming signatures were deployed.

The document, on the one hand, said nothing controversial. The right way to deal with this pandemic, it said, was to focus on those who could face severe outcomes from disease – a very plain point and nothing new. There was nothing to be gained by locking down the whole of society because of a pathogen with such a huge differential in its demographic impact.

The virus would have to become endemic in any case (including the realization of “herd immunity,” which is not a “strategy” but a descriptive term widely accepted in epidemiology) and certainly would not be stopped by destroying peoples’ lives and liberties.

The hope of the Declaration was simply that journalists would pay attention to a different point of view and a debate would begin on the unprecedented experiment in lockdowns. Perhaps science could prevail, even in this climate.

On the bad side, and at the very same time, following the release, the attacks began pouring in, and they were brutal, structured to destroy. The three main signers – Sunetra Gupta (Oxford), Martin Kulldorff (Harvard), and Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford) – made the statement as a matter of principle. It was also born of frustration with the prevailing narrative.

Mostly this declaration was intended as an educational effort. But the authors were being called vicious names and treated like heretics that should be burned. There certainly was no civil debate; quite the contrary.

It was all quite shocking given that the Declaration was a statement concerning what almost everyone in these professional circles believed earlier in the year. They were merely stating the consensus based on science and experience. Nothing more. Even on March 2, 2020, 850 scientists signed a letter to the White House warning against lockdowns, closures, and travel restrictions. It was sponsored by Yale University. Today it reads nearly like a first draft of the Great Barrington Declaration. Indeed on that same day, Fauci wrote to a Washington Post reporter: “The epidemic will gradually decline and stop on its own without a vaccine.”

But following the March 13-16, 2020 lockdowns, the orthodoxy had evidently changed. And suddenly. The signers of the GBD had declined to change with it. Thus did they endure astonishingly brutal smears. What felt odd at the time was the sheer intensity of the attacks, as well as their dogmatism and ferocity. These attacks also had a strong political flavor that had little regard for science.

Already by the summer, it was very clear that the lockdowns had not achieved what they were supposed to achieve. Two weeks had stretched into many months, and the data on cases and deaths were uncorrelated with the “mitigation measures” that had been imposed on the country and the world. Meanwhile, millions had missed cancer screenings, schools and churches had been shut, public health was in a state of crisis, and small businesses and communities were fighting to stay alive.

It was obvious on October 4, 2020, when the Declaration was released, that it was a correct statement and that the lockdowns had failed by every measure. Following Trump’s fatal March 2020 decision to acquiesce to Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, the president had pushed for reopening the country and treating this pathogen as a disease with normal medical methods. He was not making much headway, however. The handful of people around Trump who had been responsible for pushing them were digging in, prepared to wage a full war on dissent.

What historian Phil Magness has discovered, with newly unearthed emails, comes not as a shock to any of us but it is satisfying to see the confirmation of what we suspected. It seemed at the time that the effort to attack and destroy both the GBD and its authors was coordinated from the top. Here at last is the proof that our intuition was not crazy.

The author of the initial email is Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health. The recipients were Anthony Fauci and H. Clifford Lane, NIAID Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects.The email calls for a “published take down” of the GBD that is both “quick and devastating.”

Image

That evening, Fauci wrote back, not with a reference to any scientific papers supporting lockdowns and so on but with a piece from the gadget publication called Wired, which said the GBD is wrong because “quite literally arguing with the past” because the lockdowns are no longer being used. Collins responded: “excellent.”

Image

The next day, Fauci struck again with an article from the pro-lockdown leftist newspaper The Nation. It’s a demoralizing reference simply because the public was led to believe that between his endless TV interviews, Fauci was scouring “the science” to find out more about SARS-CoV-2, not googling and landing on highly politicized and ideological webzines. What we find in these emails are highly political people who are obsessed not with science but with messaging and popular influences on the public mind.

Image

Days later, Collins himself gave quotes to the Washington Post that ridiculed the position that society should reopen. He was clearly attacking Trump and the White House generally. Fauci said not to worry about it because they were too busy with other things, e.g. the election.

Image

Over the following weeks, many new pieces appeared in the popular press. These gentlemen eagerly shared them.

What do we learn from these emails? The attacks on tens of thousands of medical professionals and scientists were indeed encouraged from the top. The basis for the attacks were not scientific articles. They were heavily political popular pieces. This adds serious weight to the impression we all had at the time, which was that this was not really about science but about something far more insidious.

You can discover more about this in Scott Atlas’s book on the topic. These new emails confirm his account. It was an outright war on top scientists, people whose views on matters of public health were not different from the professional consensus only earlier in the year. For that matter, Anthony Fauci himself warned against lockdowns in January and February, favoring instead normal methods of mitigation.

My own estimate is that the convinced advocates of lockdowns when they took place were probably fewer than 50 in the US. How and why they managed to grab hold of the reins of power will be investigated by historians for many decades. The incredibly positive response to the Great Barrington Declaration, which has garnered 900,000 signatures in the meantime, demonstrates that there was and is still life remaining in traditional public health measures deployed throughout the 20th century and still respect for human dignity and science remaining among medical professionals and the general public.

Please remember that Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins are not just two scientists among hundreds of thousands. As the NIH site says, it “invests about $41.7 billion annually in medical research for the American people.” With that kind of spending power, you can wield a great deal of influence, even to the point of crushing dissent, however rooted in serious science the target might be. It might be enough power and influence to achieve the seemingly impossible, such as conducting a despotic experiment without precedent, under the cover of virus control, in overturning law, tradition, rights, and liberties hard won from hundreds of years of human experience.

This war on dissent against lockdowns is not only a scandal of our times. The lockdowns and now the mandates have fundamentally transformed society and its relationship to government, technology, media, and much more. The emergency continues. Protests have arisen the world over but they are hardly even covered by the media. We seem ever more to be on the precipice of total disaster, one that will be difficult to reverse. It is urgent that we know who did this, as well as how and why, and take steps to stop it before more damage is done and then becomes permanent.

https://brownstone.org/articles/faucis- ... oking-gun/

~~~

More Than 400 Studies on the Failure of Compulsory Covid Interventions
By Paul Elias Alexander November 30, 2021
https://brownstone.org/articles/more-th ... rventions/
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:50 am

Image
Isn't it odd, that a real life movie villain is still in government blocking effective treatments? #Ivermectin #HCQ

"Look up "Fauci and Azt" on a search engine other than Google. It's quite familiar"

flashback
Video Resurfaces of Fauci Warning ‘Household Contact’ with AIDS Patients Could Put Kids at Risk
https://news.yahoo.com/video-resurfaces-fauci-warning-household-180945365.html


bonus

“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Wed Dec 29, 2021 4:04 am

Speaking of smear pieces...

NYPost

Anti-vax, conspiracy theorist, collector of dead animals — RFK Jr. is the dumbest Kennedy

By Maureen Callahan
September 23, 2021


Image
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new book is titled "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health." Sean Gallup/Getty Images

How does this guy still have a platform?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the left’s most prominent anti-vaxxer — wait, doesn’t the left despise all things anti-vax? — has a new book, a big feature in Town & Country online, and a starring role on op-ed pages agitating for parole for his father’s assassin.


I thought there wasn’t much lower RFK Jr. could go than accusing two unknown black teenagers in the 1975 murder of 15-year-old Martha Moxley — a crime his cousin Michael Skakel was convicted of, and a conviction he worked to successfully overturn.

Or the smear campaign he waged against his late wife, Mary, who died by suicide in their barn, telling the New York Times and other national media that Mary was crazy, it was a miracle he survived, he was the real victim here, then secretly and without permission exhuming Mary’s remains from the family plot in the dead of night, burying her on the other side of a hill, alone.

The only thing RFK Jr. is successful at, it seems, is lowering the bar for atrocious behavior and the deliberate spread of misinformation. Here he is in Town & Country on whether he would ever take a COVID vaccine:

“ ‘Oh yeah, if it did what people think it’s going to do, which is, you know, if you get a single injection, and it was safe, and it gave you protection from Covid for life, of course I would take it, as I think everybody would.’ But he is skeptical. ‘It’s hard to imagine that they’re going to find — they might! I mean, there’s 140 vaccines out there, and one of them might actually find a magic bullet.’ ”

Is he transmitting from this galaxy?

Even Bobby’s own family members have called him out publicly — something Kennedys almost never do, especially if you are a sexual assaulter or rapist or have left a young woman paralyzed for life or to die alone in a shallow body of water.

Never complain, never explain. That’s the Kennedy way.

Image
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with his late wife, Mary Richardson Kennedy.
Ron Galella Collection via Getty


Yet Bobby’s anti-vax nonsense, which he has been peddling for years — traveling all over the world even now, in a pandemic, getting paid to spread his anti-vax propaganda! — has been enough.

“RFK Jr. is Our Brother and Uncle,” read a 2019 Politico op-ed by Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Joe Kennedy II (who left Pamela Kelley paralyzed after flipping a Jeep in 1973), and the late Maeve Kennedy McKean. “He’s Tragically Wrong about Vaccines.”

His niece, Dr. Kerry Kennedy Meltzer, in the New York Times, December 2020: “I love my uncle. But when it comes to vaccines, he is wrong.”

Instagram banned Bobby in February “for repeatedly sharing debunked claims about the coronavirus or vaccines,” according to a company statement.

Yet someone at Skyhorse, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, thought it was a great idea to give him a book deal on this very topic. Must have been the same editor who acquired his book defending Michael Skakel. “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health” will be published this November.

see also - Instagram yanks Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s account over bogus COVID vaccine claims

Unlike other works by prominent authors, RFK Jr.’s has yet to be given an advance review by Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Library Journal or Booklist, as is industry standard. Simon & Schuster isn’t promoting it. His book has one lone blurb on Amazon from someone described as the founder of “the most visited natural health site on the web for the last twenty years.”

What does that tell you?

As for Sirhan Sirhan, his father’s assassin, RFK Jr. subscribes to yet another conspiracy theory: that Sirhan didn’t fire the shot that killed his father, even though the whole world saw it on TV, he was almost immediately arrested, and the parole board is confident in Sirhan’s guilt — guilt Sirhan himself admits — and utter lack of remorse.

Yet RFK Jr. wrote a letter to the parole board arguing for release, which was granted. To read this gentle profile in T&C, this is all Bobby being Bobby: He’s wacky! He’s a contrarian! He does crazy things like pick up dead roadkill out of compassion for animals and keep rotting carcasses in the family minivan for days or weeks — a minivan he never cleans! What a wild and zany guy.

Image
Sen. Robert F. Kennedy lies on the floor of the Ambassador hotel in Los Angeles after he was shot by Sirhan Sirhan.
Boris Yaro, Los Angeles Times/AP


“It’s so foul, the minivan,” his brother Max says. “A few years ago, oh my God, a seagull had died, and that was in there way too long.”

Conspiracy theories, paranoia, the denial of empirical facts, hoarding dead animals: Does this not sound like mental illness to you? No? How about comparing oneself to Jesus Christ?

Yes, Bobby goes full Kanye here, comparing the criticism he bears to the Crucifixion. And just like Jesus, Bobby will do what it takes to be with us always, whether we like it or not.

“I just grew up knowing that’s what you do. That’s what Jesus did,” he says. “That was the message of Jesus falling three times on his way to Calvary: It wasn’t that he fell, it was that he kept getting back up again.”

Should these points fail to convince publishers, parole boards and anyone in power from giving this guy a platform, may I submit: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in a speech to protesters in Berlin last August, compared Dr. Anthony Fauci, vaccines and the CDC to Nazi Germany.

Image
Sirhan Sirhan (right) with his attorney Russell E. Parsons in Los Angeles after the RFK shooting in 1968.
AP Photo

Image
Sirhan Sirhan was granted parole on Aug. 27, 2021.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation via A

Finally, the T&C writer challenges him: Why would he make such a vile comparison?

Oh no, Bobby said. Everyone else got that wrong — even though the speech was filmed, even though Herman Goering was invoked, and Bobby said Bill Gates invented something called Alexis that is spying on us.

“That’s the problem,” Bobby said. “I use language really precisely, and I can’t help how people interpret it.”

At least that message is on-brand for Kennedys: No matter how much trouble they cause, how carelessly they move through the world, imposing what little they think they know, the lack of education jaw-dropping — it’s we who are always the problem.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/23/anti-vax- ... t-kennedy/


~~~


msn - The Wrap

Dr. Fauci Rips ‘Very Disturbed’ RFK Junior Over Attacks: ‘It’s a Shame’ Because He’s a Kennedy

Jolie Lash - Wednesday

Infectious disease specialist Dr. Anthony Fauci has addressed attacks made on his career and reputation by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who last month released the book “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”

Speaking to Yahoo News, the director of the NIAID said, “it really is a shame that he is attacking me in my career,” when asked about RFK’s book not being “a flattering portrait of” his career.

“I think if you look at my career there are not a lot of people that would be attacking my career, but he seems to do that,” Fauci continued in the comments published earlier this week. “It’s very unfortunate because I don’t think he is inherently malicious. I just think he’s a very disturbed individual. And I … I don’t like to have to say that, but it’s very, very clear. And it’s a shame because he comes from such an extraordinarily distinguished family, many members of whom I know personally, and I was very close to Senator Ted Kennedy, who was such an extraordinary person and a real warrior for public health. And to have RFK Jr. just spouting things that make absolutely no sense.”
...continues:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dr-fa ... ar-AAS4eaW


I don't see this ending well. JFK Jr. will find out just how dangerous Fauci & Co. are. If he isn't silenced in the traditional manner, maybe they will lock him away in a mental institution as a warning to all those nasty anti-vaxers/conspiracy theorists, because...you know ... they gotta be crazy.
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby Harvey » Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:23 am

On the contrary, it may well be that RFK Jr helps win the war, where his father and uncle lost the battle. Everything is fluid right now in a way that has never happened before. Many on the real left actually do realise the scale of the opportunity for change which exists in this moment.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Thu Dec 30, 2021 12:38 am

RFK, Jr. DISCUSSES The Real Anthony Fauci

Watch - https://www.bitchute.com/video/6H5WumhgFqfC/

The Highwire with Del Bigtree
First published on December 10th, 2021.

RFK, Jr. DISCUSSES The Real Anthony Fauci
Activist and environmental lawyer, Robert Kennedy, Jr., highlights for Del just a few of Fauci’s most nefarious actions in the name of medicine from his #1 best selling new book, The Real Anthony Fauci.


+

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/rfk-jr ... iolations/

RFK Jr. Wins Case Against Government For Vaccine Safety Violations

Posted on Nov 11, 2018

This will come as big and important news for anyone concerned with the safety of vaccines: as it turns out the federal government has been neglecting safety obligation for decades, which has been proven in a court of law bringing RFK Jr and ICAN to victory over DHHS.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr teamed up with Del Bigtree of the Informed Consent Action Network to take on the Department of Health and Human Services for vaccine safety violations and they have won. Their lawsuit has brought forth evidence that vaccine safety has been neglected for over 30 years, and as we know it is nothing but a sham, showing that the government agencies we are to trust are not doing their jobs to ensure and improve the safety of immunizations.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 compels DHHS to take responsibility for improving efficacy and safety of vaccines; and charges them with continuous monitoring and improving of adverse event reporting. The DHHS is also tasked with providing a report on improvements by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccine clause to the Congress at least every 2 years.

The DHHS has failed to meet even the most basic aspects of these important duties entrusted to them by failing to file a single report for the past three decades. It has been over 30 years since NVICA was put into place and entrusted to the DHHS to safeguard children, despite being the agency tasked with the responsibility of investigating and improving safety they have not done as much as to raise a finger towards vaccine safety.

This is an issue which should have been a top priority given the fact that NVICA completely voids industry responsibility regarding vaccine injuries and entrusts DHHS to the task of safeguarding. This can be seen as the government granting Big Pharma unprecendented economic immunity and carte blanche towards the matter of vaccine injury; and yet again another agency has dropped the ball which was charged with protecting the public, moreover innocent children from vaccines.

Additionally ICAN has reported that DHHS has not eschewed from their vaccines responsibilities completely, as they have reportedly taken their obligation to promote vaccine uptake seriously via spending billions of dollars on conduction reports showing how to increase vaccination rates.

ICAN has stated: “ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports. The result of the lawsuit is that HHS had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety. This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn’t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses, and growing, of vaccines given by one year of age.”

“Regrettably, HHS has chosen to focus on its obligation to increase vaccine uptake and defend against any claim vaccines cause harm in the National Injury Vaccine Compensation Program (aka, the Vaccine Court) to such a degree that it has abandoned its vaccine safety responsibilities. If HHS is not, as confirmed in Court this week, even fulfilling the simple task of filing a biennial report on vaccine safety improvements, there is little hope that HHS is actually tackling the much harder job of actually improving vaccine safety.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr and ICAN have sued the US Government about the safety of vaccines, and have won. The question that remains is will the government agencies charged with protecting the public and failing to do so be held accountable for the negligence, will the Department of Health and Human Services finally be held accountable for their failure? Or will things continue on as is with the vaccine industry continuing to be allowed to spread its toxic injections, just how deep do those Big Pharma pockets go and encompass; and when do the blinders come off?

Materials provided by:

Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-11-11- ... tions.html

https://www.texansforvaccinechoice.com/ ... iolations/

http://icandecide.org/government/ICAN-H ... y-2018.pdf

https://worldmercuryproject.org/advocac ... l-thorsen/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-c ... 9-7-17.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12949291

https://www.naturalnews.com/032216_Thorsen_fraud.html

https://www.aimintegrativemedicine.com/ ... safety-won



Edited to add:

Rio Times Online

Covid-19: Pharmaceutical giants, Gates, Fauci, UK officials accused of crimes against humanity in International Criminal Court complaint

In addition, they argued that effective treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, were suppressed, resulting in a more significant number of COVID-19 deaths than should have occurred.

By
The Rio Times -
December 19, 2021


RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – UK officials and the most influential public health figures are accused of genocide, citing a series of statistics on the impact of “vaccines” and policies imposed under the guise of “mitigating COVID.”

Read also: Check out our coverage on curated alternative narratives

A group including former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) (worth reading) on behalf of U.K. citizens against Boris Johnson and U.K. officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, CEOs of major pharmaceutical companies, World Economic Forum executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and others for crimes against humanity.

The ICC has acknowledged the case and has attributed the following reference number OTP-CR-473/21.
Image
International Criminal Court, The Netherlands. (Photo internet reproduction)

The defendants included:

Dr. Anthony Fauci;

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO);

June Raine, executive director of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA);

Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and

Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code … war crimes and crimes of aggression” in the United Kingdom and other countries.

Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer

Stephane Bancel, CEO of AstraZeneca

Pascal Soriot, CEO of Moderna

Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson

Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister

Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser

Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum

After repeated unsuccessful attempts to bring a case before the English court system, the plaintiffs resorted to asking with “the utmost urgency” that the ICC “stop the deployment of COVID vaccines, the introduction of illegal vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the United Kingdom.”

The group’s complaint filed Dec. 6 presents evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” are experimental gene therapies designed with bat coronavirus gain-of-function research, arguing that these “vaccines” have caused massive deaths and injuries and that the U.K. government has failed to investigate such reported fatalities and injuries.

* that the numbers of COVID cases and deaths have been artificially inflated; that the masks are harmful from hypoxia, hypercapnia, and other causes;

* and the PCR tests are “completely unreliable” and “contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide.”

Video Player
00:00
08:04

In addition, they argued that effective treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, were suppressed, resulting in a more significant number of COVID-19 deaths than should have occurred.

They argue that the blockades were enacted under the guise of artificially inflated infection and death numbers from a modified virus, as well as the experimental “vaccines” that have resulted:

* Massive short-term harm and death, with at least 395,049 reported adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” in the U.K. alone;

* a sharp increase in ChildLine calls from vulnerable children during lockdowns;

* “Wealth and business destruction” through imposed lockdowns.”

* “Severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law,” including travel and assembly bans, and forced quarantine and self-isolation;

* apartheid due to segregation by possession or vaccination passport;

* and “expected reduction infertility” following “vaccination,” among other harmful physical and psychological effects.

In addition, the petitioners contend that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.”

They noted that in addition to censorship of online information and promotion of these alternative treatments, “some academic journals are blocking publication of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”

The petitioners also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who have drawn “strong parallels between Covid’s restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust.”

In an open letter, the Holocaust survivors have called on medical regulatory authorities to “stop this unholy medical experiment on humanity immediately,” which they contend violates the Nuremberg Code.

Video Player
00:00
02:19

They even allege that “before our eyes, another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place.” One survivor, Vera Sharav, noted in an interview quoted in the complaint:

“The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever physicians join forces with the government and deviate from their personal, professional, and clinical commitment not to harm the individual, medicine can pervert from a healing and caring profession to a murderous apparatus.”

“What distinguishes the Holocaust from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. The academic and professional medical establishment supported every step of the murderous process.

Doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, the mass murder of civilians.”

According to the petitioners, all the harmful consequences of the “vaccines,” the enclosures and the virus meet the criteria of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes against the people of the British, because the culprits “members of the U.K. government and world leaders have knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”

Indeed, they argue that the destructive consequences of “vaccines,” blockades, and modified viruses are deliberate attempts at depopulation and social destabilization as part of a globally coordinated plan to consolidate wealth and power in the hands of the few.

Image
COVID-19, Covid-19: Pharmaceutical giants, Gates, Fauci, UK officials accused of crimes against humanity in International Criminal Court complaint

Therefore, they argue that these measures also constitute a “crime of aggression,” i.e., the effort “to effectively exercise control or direct the political or military action of a State.”

In this case, they claim, the aim is to “dismantle all Democratic Nation States, step by step”, and “destroy small and medium-sized enterprises, transferring market shares to the largest corporations”, owned by the ultra-rich, to give this “elite” group greater political and monetary control.

You can find the acknowledgment from the court including the case reference number at the link below and all updates regarding the case will also be posted here.

Download the 46-page complaint here

https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-n ... complaint/
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Wed Jan 05, 2022 5:08 am

'Thousands Died Because Fauci Ignored Natural Immunity' - With Special Guest Sen. Rand Paul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpkVxD661y0

RonPaulLibertyReport
• Premiered Dec 27, 2021 •

Exclusive! Senator Rand Paul joins the Liberty Report to discuss the massive errors - driven by arrogance - committed by White House coronavirus advisor Anthony Fauci. Dr. Fauci's insistence on ignoring natural immunity and his refusal to consider therapeutics have cost thousands and thousands of lives! And here's a bombshell you'll only here in today's Liberty Report: Sen. Paul's shocking explanation of why the coming mid-term elections will be Fauci's worst nightmare!


Odysee link - https://odysee.com/@RonPaul:d/'thousand ... -ignored:d
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby conniption » Sat Mar 26, 2022 10:43 am

Catherine Fitts and Robert Kennedy on Fauci and vaccine fraud

Watch >>> - https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/the-r ... ny-fauci:3

Jerm Warfare
March 24th, 2022


Catherine Fitts and Robert Kennedy have, at separate times, been on my podcast.

This time they joined me, together, for a conversation around Bobby’s incredible book about Fauci; Fauci’s powerful influence; vaccine fraud in America; corruption in the pharmaceutical industry; vaccine passports being a trojan horse; how to push back against the attempts at globalist control.

Recommended podcast - Jerm Warfare
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fauci is seriously dangerous

Postby Harvey » Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:23 pm

conniption » Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:43 pm wrote:
Catherine Fitts and Robert Kennedy on Fauci and vaccine fraud

Watch >>> - https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/the-r ... ny-fauci:3

Jerm Warfare
March 24th, 2022


Catherine Fitts and Robert Kennedy have, at separate times, been on my podcast.

This time they joined me, together, for a conversation around Bobby’s incredible book about Fauci; Fauci’s powerful influence; vaccine fraud in America; corruption in the pharmaceutical industry; vaccine passports being a trojan horse; how to push back against the attempts at globalist control.

Recommended podcast - Jerm Warfare


It is excellent, full of gems. @ 13:20 is just one example, suggesting unexplored alignments of interest Re: 9/11 & Anthrax.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belligerent Savant and 47 guests