.
This is a bit of a ramble, and yet only broad strokes. And much of this is nothing more than intuition, rumination, and interpretation of materials I've encountered out in the wild (reading materials or real-world observations), all subject to change and error:
One of the 'popular' conclusions in dominant narrative talking points is that this overturn is primarily or almost exclusively driven by the "christian conservative" mindset of the justices involved. And it was only made possible due to Trump's appointments.
If you haven't read the overturn ruling, I recommend dedicating some time parsing through it. I see no hint of "Christian" overtones. One can argue the justices involved are perhaps staunch 'Constitutionalists', given the primary driver in their decision, ostensibly, was to turn it over to the States to determine policy/legislation on this topic.
Here it is:
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... cision.pdfOne either believes U.S. Presidents -- particularly since the removal of JFK -- have agency/autonomy in key decisions, or otherwise they are captured/compromised to various degrees. Perspectives/opinions on this may vary -- and none of us here will have any 'proof' one way or another -- but to me, few if any of the key events over the past ~2 yrs in particular have occurred in a vacuum/solely driven by the decisions/actions of a front-facing 'leader'.
The compromise/capture of U.S. leadership has arguably reached its nadir in 2022 with what essentially amounts to a malfunctioning meat puppet at the podium presenting as a 'national leader'. Trump was no doubt compromised as well, but his ego made him less manageable for the agendas to follow post-2020.
I for one do not subscribe to the notion that current circumstances are simply the result of appointments made by a sitting President.
Since 2021, the notion of bodily autonomy is being challenged
more overtly with: vaccine mandates; marked increase in heavy promotion of 'gender fluid' advocacy & encouragement of
teenage sexual organ removal/hormone infusions; and now in 2022 with the resurfacing and overturn of Roe v Wade (which redirects abortion policies/legislation to the States).
I don't believe the timing of these recent events are mere happenstance. They appear to be part of incremental conditioning, years in development, to soften notions of individual agency over one's body and related privacy/civil rights (Digital IDs are also within this umbrella).
None of the above requires a 'grand conspiracy'; compartmentalizing agendas into 'need to know' info mgmt can be very effective, and will vary depending on social status/position.
(I realize I'm rehashing basics here -- for some reason I feel the need to do so. A few of you may roll your eyes, understandably)
It's one of the primary reasons young men/women enlist to "fight for freedom" (rather than resource/land/power grabs);
It's how many involved (as 'compliance' auditors, etc.) in current ESG initiatives earnestly believe they're doing it to help minimize 'climate change' harms;
It's how entities leverage the zeal of true believers to commit vile acts on behalf of their religion (for the praise of Allah or their Christian god -- and more recently, "The Science" as
secular religion, utilizing the conditioned dogma/zeal of those blindly trusting the experts/"The Science").
Etc...
And also, perhaps even more critical: politicians, judges, attorneys, bureaucrats are incentivized by the lure of increased power/influence, or otherwise lobby/special interest money, or otherwise bribed/threatened (see Epstein's M.O. as only 1 example) to ensure they play along.
Useful idiots abound.