Any Age of Expansion has strong trends towards rationalism because of the need to make decisions between alternative actions in a period when status is being disrupted and social atomism is prevalent because of expansion. Nevertheless, science (which is, of course, entirely different from rationalism because of its faith in observation) usually flourishes in an Age of Expansion and is killed off by irrationalism in the following Age of Conflict. In Classical antiquity this pattern was not followed. There, rationalism was very strong in the Age of Expansion and began to attack science while this period was still in progress. In the following period, science was destroyed, not by irrationalism, but by rationalism. The reason for this aberration in the pattern lies in the fact that in Classical antiquity rationalism became allied with oligarchy and shared in its victory over both science and democracy.
- Evolution of Civilizations, Carroll Quigley, 1961.
this is the illuminati conspiracy. they model everything into numbers, like the matrix, so it can be controlled because they can't control observational reality as the organ of eye is decentralised to each individual. with a model they can control everyone's eyes.
look at the nytimes model the douma syria chemical attack to augment reality to make rationalism observational: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... ar-ul.html
graphical computer modeling is quite literally the destruction of observational science.
reality > numbers > data > binary(0 or 1) > graphical interface displaying electronic picture > eyesight
