Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:07 am

The private equity industry emerged from the financial deregulatory movement of the 1980s and '90s. Many of their schemes—oops I mean "innovations"—used to be illegal. Their systematic wealth extraction increasingly pervades every sector of the economy.. If they're not stopped, they'll own everything, and we won't be happy.


Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America
This Prosecutor Says We Can Fix It.

By Lynn Parramore

May 2, 2023

In his new book, “Plunder: Private Equity’s Plan To Pillage America,” Brendan Ballou, a federal prosecutor who served as Special Counsel for Private Equity in the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, outlines the dangers of a trillion-dollar industry that hardly anyone understands. He explains how Americans can fight their harmful practices.


One of my favorite NYC restaurants had become understaffed and dirty – a shadow of its former self. I learned an interesting fact: a couple of years ago, a private equity firm had bought the local chain. The same type of firm that had already ruined my beloved neighborhood grocer. The kind that was rapidly taking over vet clinics, dental offices, and gyms on every block – though you wouldn’t know it unless you did some sleuthing.

Price hikes, deteriorating conditions, and poor service — along with a certain slickness of marketing — could be signs that ownership of a business you count on has transferred to one or more firms in a rapidly-expanding Wall Street industry. Names like KKR, Carlyle, and Blackstone tend to fly under the radar, but they’re everywhere, making more money, gaining more influence, and some would argue, wreaking more havoc than anything else on Wall Street.

Federal prosecutor Brendan Ballou provides the scrutiny that an industry with this much economic and political power should invite in his provocative new book, “Plunder: Private Equity’s Plan To Pillage America.” He reveals how private equity will transform our lives over the next decade in ways as profound as Big Tech did in the last, and not for the better unless we change how it does business.

Financier William Simon got the idea for private equity back in the seventies. Simon, a Nixon administration official and right-winger whose heart’s desire was to free finance and corporations from regulation, left Washington to execute the first “leveraged buyout.” He and a partner bought an old greeting card company on mostly borrowed funds, extracted huge fees, and then sold it for enormous profit in a rising market. People like “junk bond king” Michael Milken took notice and started following the model. In the go-go eighties, the Washington Post noted that “greed and debt” had combined to “create the hottest game on Wall Street today.”

Until things went bust. The leveraged buyout industry got a nasty reputation as the “robber barons of the eighties” and retreated.

But there was just too much money to be made. The industry went on to rebrand itself as “private equity” and expanded following the 2008 financial crisis into many of the less regulated corners of finance – some previously occupied by the great investment banks. After yet another run of bad press – you might recall when Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital was denounced as a profiteering predator in the 2012 election — the industry started to rebrand itself once again. Today some of the big firms call themselves “global investment businesses” or “alternative asset management businesses.”

Ballou warns that whatever you call them, many have become incentivized to do great harm to consumers, workers, and taxpayers– and they’re doing it with the help of lavishly-funded political allies.

Advocates say private equity makes companies more efficient when they buy them, but Ballou finds that their real specialty isn’t managing companies – they often screw that up, big-time – but finding legal and regulatory holes that allow them to make profits quickly and shift the risks and costs to somebody else – somebody like you. He criticizes the current business model as far too focused on short-termism and extractive practices.

But, you might ask, isn’t this just capitalism? Nobody said it was pretty.

According to Ballou, this is something different – an industry that has metastasized into a job-killing, business-destroying, community-crushing machine the likes of which we haven’t seen since the money trusts of the nineteenth century. In other words, it’s predatory capitalism on steroids. Most worrisome of all, in Ballou’s view, is the fact that these firms have almost no accountability to the U.S. legal system.

Some liken private equity firms to vultures picking the bones of dying companies, which you could argue is a necessary activity. But Ballou points out that many private equity firms now target healthy companies, leaving them gutted, unproductive, or even bankrupt. Whether it’s Bain, Apollo, or Sun Capital, each firm has its preferred tactics for extracting money from the businesses they buy up, too often hurting the most vulnerable people, like nursing home residents, who can’t fight back. When they buy up rental properties, watch out for evictions. When they target doctors’ offices, expect to pay more for care. They might even be cutting corners at your hospital’s emergency room (the horror stories will make you research your local ER). And they really, really want to get their hands on your 401 (k).

The founders of these companies have become absurdly rich – we’re talking multi-multi-billionaires — so their power in American politics is tremendous. Not only do they influence the political system — increasingly, they are the political system. Just ask men like Timothy Geithner, Newt Gingrich, Paul Ryan, and David Petraeus, all now working in private equity. It’s more than a revolving door between Washington and Wall Street. As Forbes magazine highlights, it’s a “passionate love affair.”

Free from pesky regulations and out of reach of the law, the private equity industry has become so wildly profitable that celebrities like Will Smith and sports stars like Serena Williams are tripping over each other to get in on the action. Last year, Kim Kardashian announced a partnership with a former Carlyle partner to start her own private equity firm!

This trillion-dollar industry owns companies employing millions of Americans, and, Ballou argues, it is hurting us with the active assistance of our government. In the following interview, the prosecutor shares with the Institute for New Economic Thinking his insights and prescriptions for getting this industry under control. (Ballou’s book, and this interview, are made in his personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice).




Lynn Parramore: Private equity is something of a mystery to most people. What do we need to understand about these firms and what they’re up to?

Brendan Ballou: “Private equity” is a term that people might be embarrassed to say they don’t really have a clear idea about. I confess that I didn’t until after I started writing the book.

The basic business model is actually very simple. A private equity firm uses a little bit of its own money, a little bit of investors’ money, and a whole lot of borrowed money to buy companies. Then it tries to impose operational or financial changes with the ambition of selling them for a profit a few years later.

It’s a simple idea but it has three basic problems. One is that private equity firms tend to invest in the short term to get a return on their investment in just a few years. The second is that they tend to load up the companies that they buy with a lot of debt and extract a lot of fees from them. The third is that private equity firms tend not to be held legally responsible for the actions of their portfolio companies.

All this means you’re on a very short timeline with a very risky leverage model and you’re not necessarily going to be held responsible if things go bad, leading to business strategies that can be very extractive and hurt consumers and employees.

LP: This industry, known as “leveraged buyouts” in the eighties, got a negative image and retreated for a while. After rebranding, the model re-emerged as “private equity,” which took off and expanded into whole new areas after the 2008 financial crisis. Why should be concerned about this expansion?

BB: Private equity firms are increasingly taking on the role that the great investment banks used to have before the crisis. For instance, they have moved into private credit, which is an alternative to the public stock market. A company can get a large loan without necessarily making the sort of disclosures that you would have on the public capital market.

The challenge is that private equity firms are vastly less regulated than investment banks, which are generally considered either banks or bank holding companies. What this means is that private equity firms are doing a lot of the work that these companies did prior to the financial crisis. but they’re doing it with even less oversight.

LP: That doesn’t sound good.

BB: It’s concerning. One of the really interesting things to see is how private equity firms often don’t even describe themselves as private equity firms anymore.

LP: There’s the rebranding again. It’s hard for the public to follow what they’re doing, isn’t it, despite the fact that they’ve become a huge part of the economy?

BB: Yes. Some now call themselves “alternative investment managers.” One industry observer said that “Blackstone remind[s] me of Goldman Sachs in the 1990s—every time you see a new business that is growing, that is where they are.” That really stuck with me.

LP: And the business school grads who used to want to work for Goldman Sachs now rush to join KKR and Blackstone.

BB: That’s true. The idea is that the leading private equity firms are really the financial innovators in the way that the name-brand financial institutions, the Goldman Sachses, the J.P. Morgans of the world, used to be. Institutions like Goldman Sachs may still capture the public attention, but private equity firms may be where the action’s at.

LP: Some of the things we learn about this industry in your book seem really contrary to how we normally expect businesses to work. It’s striking that private equity firms can thrive even when the companies they buy fail. In fact, as you point out, sometimes they even want the company to fail. Why would you bankrupt a business you’ve bought?

BB: It’s a really fascinating part of the law and one that far too few people understand. The basic story here is that private equity firms are able to use strategic bankruptcies to slough off obligations they don’t want to pay — pension obligations in particular.

In 2007, Sun Capital bought up Friendly’s, the ice cream and diner chain. They sold off the assets. There were layoffs. Ultimately, they pushed the company into bankruptcy. But Sun Capital was both the owner of Friendly’s and its largest creditor. Now, normally when a company goes bankrupt, the owner of that company loses control of it. But because Sun Capital was both the owner and the largest lender, it’s like they got to flip the script. They moved ownership from one part of the private equity firm to another part. So they managed to hold onto control of Friendly’s. But why then did they do the bankruptcy? So they could slough off the pension obligations, which were eventually taken over by the quasi-government agency, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation [PBGC].

LP: So Sun Capital was off the hook for the cost of paying employees the pensions they were promised. What happens to those workers? Who else does this strategy hurt?

BB: The PBGC, which now has to pay down those pensions, is funded in large part by other pension plans. So it’s other, more responsible companies, that end up having to pay the cost of the private equity firm’s strategic move. Sometimes the PBGC isn’t able to pay all of the pension, so the pensioners can lose their pensions or have their benefits reduced. The retirees lose out.

More broadly, when private equity firms engage in these risky strategies or view a company as more valuable for its component parts than it is whole, often you see very large layoffs in companies and whole industries. This is one of the big challenges. In the retail sector, the Center for Popular Democracy estimated that private equity firms are responsible for about 600,000 layoffs in the past decade. That was during a time when the retail industry was actually growing and adding jobs. Risky strategies, coupled with extractive tactics and the occasional benefits of bankruptcy, hurt not just retirees, but workers, and ultimately consumers.

LP: So in essence, private equity firms can buy up companies and then charge them for the privilege of being looted, or even destroyed.

BB: That’s pretty much it. Often private equity firms make their money from the companies they buy through “management fees” that the company has to pay every quarter or every year for the privilege of being owned by them. They also charge transaction fees, so if the private equity firm directs the company to sell its own assets, a portion of the sale actually goes directly to the private equity firm – not even the firm’s investors. Then there are what are called “dividend recapitalizations” – that’s when the portfolio companies are borrowing money to pay dividends to the owner – in this case, the private equity firm. It’s like being able to use someone else’s credit card. Somebody else borrows the money that they ultimately give to you but they are the ones on the hook for paying.

A big part of the private equity business model benefits from extractive fees that it places on its own companies.

LP: As you point out in the book, things may work out well for a few executives at the top of the purchased company, but everyone else bears substantial costs. Do taxpayers end up footing some of the bill?

BB: There’s a cost to taxpayers. One of the things that was surprising to me about private equity firms is that they often target industries that are highly regulated or those where a big chunk of the money comes from the government. An industry that’s really popular with private equity, and one that has been getting a lot of necessary media coverage, is the nursing home industry.

LP: The story of what private equity has done to nursing homes is among the most disturbing in your book. Why did private equity target nursing homes?

BB: For private equity, part of the appeal of industries like nursing homes is that government funds are an extremely stable source of income. They can rely on the money coming in from Medicare and Medicaid every month. It’s also a situation where private equity’s influence can be really helpful. One of the smartest things private equity invests in is not just companies, but people. If you look at who these firms have hired, it includes secretaries of state, secretaries of defense, speakers of the house, generals, a CIA director, even a vice president. These sorts of people and relationships can be very helpful when it comes to working in highly regulated environments.

What initially frustrated me, and one of the inspirations for the book, was the Carlyle Group’s acquisition of HCR ManorCare, which was the second-largest nursing home chain in America. In 2007, Carlyle bought the company, loaded it up with debt and forced it to sell its assets, making its investment back through various transactions and management fees. While all this was happening, ManorCare was forced to cut back on costs. Health code violations spiked. Eventually, the company went bankrupt, but when people tried to hold Carlyle accountable, they failed.

The story that gets me concerns a specific resident of a ManorCare facility. She struggled to go to the bathroom by herself, but nevertheless was forced to do so and fell and hit her head. She ultimately died of a subdural hematoma – bleeding of the brain. When her family sued Carlyle for wrongful death, the firm managed to get the case dismissed by arguing that technically they were not the owner of ManorCare, but merely advised a series of funds that, through several shell companies, ultimately owned the nursing home. That was enough for the court, which dismissed the case against Carlyle. The firm was never held responsible. This story epitomized for me how often private equity firms are able to exert control over a company and extract assets from it, but then when things go wrong they can walk away without consequence.

LP: And the consequences can sometimes be fatal.

BB: They can be enormous, and sometimes they can be fatal. There has been a crucial study suggesting that private equity ownership is responsible for an estimated 20,000 premature deaths over a decade and a half. It’s just extraordinary.

And listen to the devastating stories of people who lost their jobs. For example, Toys-“R”-Us was bought by private equity firms [Vornado, KKR and Bain Capital] that loaded it up with debt and eventually forced it into bankruptcy. The situation for employees was heartbreaking, made more so by the fact that the executives the private equity firms installed in Toys-“R”-Us allegedly managed to give themselves multi-million dollar bonuses just days before pushing the company into bankruptcy. It suggests that at least some of these firms are taking an awfully narrow view of their responsibilities to their customers, to their employees, to society as a whole.

LP: The amount of money involved in this industry is really mind-boggling. We might think that the CEO of Goldman Sachs makes a good income, but that’s just a small fraction of what the CEOs of the big private equity firms are pulling in.

BB: Yes! I don’t want to say that the leadership of Goldman Sachs is underpaid, but the CEO there makes about one-tenth of what the leader of Blackstone makes. It’s just an order of magnitude difference. There’s so much more money coming in than out of private equity firms. In fact, Blackstone and KKR have ambitions to have one trillion dollars in assets under management each in the coming years.

LP. A trillion each? Wow.

BB: I think in 2021, which was something of a high watermark for the industry because of low-interest rates, there were $1.2 trillion in private equity acquisitions. The entire U.S. GDP is about $25 trillion. It’s not a perfect comparison, but we’re talking about a pretty significant part of the American economy.

LP: Another thing that seems counterintuitive is that private equity firms often move to sue the customers of the companies they buy. And perversely, while they can sue the customers — often working class and poor people – those customers can’t sue them because of forced arbitration agreements. What’s going on here?

BB: I think it goes back to the problem of investing for the short term. When you invest in the long term, you care about your customers. You care about them coming back. You care about them succeeding. But if your goal is to make a profit, to sell the company in just a few years, you’re going to take a far more extractive and aggressive approach.

A woman in Baltimore who made about $800 a month received a check from a payday lender (one owned by a private equity firm) that she could cash in exchange for paying it back with interest. It was more than she could afford and she had to pay an exorbitant rate for cashing the check. But when she tried to sue the payday lender, she was forced to go into arbitration, which is notoriously difficult for plaintiffs to succeed on. Conversely, if the payday lender were to sue her, they would be able to use all the machinery of the state or even the federal court system. This would allow the firm, if they were successful, to garnish wages from any bank account that she has.

This problem is bigger than private equity, but it’s a pretty astounding double standard where customers are forced into often defendant-friendly arbitration but the big companies themselves can rely on the machinery of the ordinary justice system.

One more example—there’s a really interesting comparison of two payday lenders, one of which was bought by a private equity firm and one which wasn’t. The payday lender bought by private equity had a huge spike in the number of cases that it was bringing against its own customers. It appeared it was actually part of the business model of the firm to be more aggressive with the people it was servicing. That may be successful in getting money in the short term, but I doubt it’s particularly fruitful in generating the long-term goodwill of the customer base.

LP: It seems like everyone is becoming affected by this in some way — when we go to the dentist, buy an insurance policy, take a trip to the emergency room. Private equity is even involved in drinking water in some places (very dirty water as you mention in your book). Yet they still manage to operate under the radar.

BB: Exactly. It’s still shocking to me. The names of private equity firms like Apollo, KKR, Carlyle, and Blackstone are mysteries to most people and yet they and other private equity firms surround you and shape your life. If you go to the veterinarian, to the OBGYN, if you go to buy contact lenses, or even, as you mentioned, pay for your tap water, there’s a chance that you are paying private equity for that privilege. It’s sometimes surprising to find out that a private equity firm owns a company that you love or used to love.

I think the ubiquitous nature of private equity can sometimes lead to a certain level of despair for people who think and care about these issues. But I just urge people to try to hold those feelings back. Private equity advocates want you to believe that no reforms are possible. But the mere act of optimism, the belief that you can make a positive change, is pretty revolutionary. It’s necessary if we’re going to actually change the model.

LP: Some have argued that private equity firms shouldn’t even exist. What’s your take?

BB: The world doesn’t need private equity firms to just end. What we need is to change their incentives because we’ve got a business model that’s leading to a whole host of problems for customers and employees.

Whether you call it private equity or something else, the basic project of giving money to companies so that they can grow and thrive is a necessary part of our economy. But the private equity business model has evolved, essentially because of legal incentives, to focus on the short term, to load companies up with debt, to extract fees, and to evade financial and legal liability for their actions. Once you have that, you have bad consequences, whether it’s in nursing homes, prisons, single-family rentals, or what have you. You see all these tales of woe happening across industries and it’s because of those three basic problems I’ve described. If you change those incentives, private equity could be ultimately helpful.

LP: You state in the book that “it’s as if private equity firms and their allies have built a justice system to their liking.” How do we deal with that?

BB: Private equity’s influence pervades not just the machinery of the court, but every level and layer of government, at the federal, state, and local levels. Whether it’s getting favorable contracts for prison health care and phone services, or getting tracts of foreclosed homes from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or protecting the carried interest loophole in Congress, private equity has been enormously successful in achieving its legislative and legal agenda. That said, this has happened before and ordinary people have solved it.

LP: How so?

BB: In a lot of ways, the basic model of private equity is very similar to the trusts of the late 19th century and early 20th century. The trust movement was an effort to rapidly combine small businesses into single entities that could be operated centrally. Today we’ve sort of forgotten that this wasn’t the beginning of a period of American industrialization, but actually something at the end. A lot of the big movements in terms of innovation in steel, oil, sugar, tobacco, and so forth were actually happening in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War. But then, as the trusts were combining, there was a huge amount of economic stagnation and a lack of innovation. Yet ultimately, the Populist movement and later the Progressive movement constrained the powers of the trusts and helped to usher in a genuine people-centered movement in American politics. We got the creation of the most important anti-trust laws, labor laws, a progressive tax system, environmental laws, the creation of the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve – a whole swath of things that constrained corporate power for several generations. It was enormously successful until a series of legal revolutions in the 1970s.

Past isn’t necessarily prologue, but we have an example in American history where tremendously powerful economic and financial concerns were constrained by popular movements. If we’ve done it once, perhaps we can do it again.

LP: So there’s reason for optimism?

BB: Yes. I think that the worst effects of the private equity business model can be constrained. This is a human creation. If we created these broken incentives, we can fix them. We’ve got a challenge, which is that private equity and investment firms have given an estimated 900 million dollars to federal officials and candidates since 1990. That said, whether it’s action in Congress or elsewhere, there are numerous levers of power people can act on. It could be Congress, but it could also be states and localities. It could be federal agencies like the SEC, Health and Human Services, the Treasury Department, and so forth. But it can also be through state attorneys general and litigation. So there’s a role for activists to play.

All of which is to say that there are a lot of different avenues that people who care about these issues can pursue to change the private equity business model.

LP: What’s the first thing you would do to change private equity?

BB: I would want private equity firms to be held legally responsible for the actions of companies they control.

LP: Like some kind of fiduciary duty?

BB: Exactly. You can align responsibilities so that private equity firms are responsible for their actions. That would fundamentally change incentives and make their business moves a lot less destructive in a whole range of industries. We can act through a bunch of different levers to get this done. States and local entities can make sure that the portfolio businesses that have their primary business in their jurisdiction are held responsible. We don’t have to wait on one institution, whether it’s Congress, the executive branch, or a given agency. There are plenty of ways to move forward.


Lynn Parramore
Senior Research Analyst, INET

https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspecti ... can-fix-it

“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:10 am

“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:39 am

This happened in my city.

Private equity firms now control many hospitals, ERs and nursing homes. Is it good for health care?

Private equity firms are buying up hospitals, nursing homes and ER operations. The drive for profits can run counter to helping patients, critics say.

May 13, 2020, 2:55 AM PDT
By Gretchen Morgenson and Emmanuelle Saliba

In March, as the coronavirus gripped the nation, veteran emergency room doctor Ming Lin was growing concerned. Lin felt his facility, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center in Bellingham, Washington, was unprepared for the pandemic, so he went to his superiors for help.

Frustrated by their response, Lin took to social media, criticizing the hospital's operations in a series of posts.

Days later, the hospital removed Lin from the rotation in the emergency department. He had worked at PeaceHealth for 17 years.

Under typical medical industry practice, Lin's case would have been subject to peer review, experts said. But Lin's employer wasn't PeaceHealth. It was TeamHealth, a physician practice and staffing company that provides the hospital with emergency room services. TeamHealth is owned by Blackstone Group, a finance giant.

When a private staffing firm teams up with a hospital, the right to due process can disappear. Lin's case was never heard.

"One of the objectives is to point out any deficiencies in the system that may harm the patient," Lin told NBC News. "Because private equity has taken over health care, it has made that difficult."

Blackstone, which bought TeamHealth in 2016 for $6.1 billion, is what's known as a private equity firm, a type of financial entity that buys companies and hopes to sell them later at a profit.

Over the past decade, private equity firms like Blackstone, Apollo Global Management, The Carlyle Group, KKR & Co. and Warburg Pincus have deployed more than $340 billion to buy health care-related operations around the world. In 2019, private equity's health care acquisitions reached $79 billion, a record, according to Bain & Co., a consulting firm.

Private equity's purchases have included rural hospitals, physicians' practices, nursing homes and hospice centers, air ambulance companies and health care billing management and debt collection systems.

Partly as a result of private equity purchases, many formerly doctor-owned practices no longer are. The American Medical Association recently reported that 2018 was the first year in which more physicians were employees — 47.4 percent — than owners of their practices — 45.9 percent. In 1988, 72.1 percent of medical practices were owned by physicians.

In some parts of the health care industry, private equity firms dominate. For example, TeamHealth, owned by Blackstone, and Envision Healthcare, owned by KKR, provide staffing for about a third of the country's emergency rooms.

This has been a seismic shift. During the 1900s, most hospitals were owned either by nonprofit entities with religious affiliations or by states and cities, with ties to medical schools. For-profit hospitals existed, but it wasn't until recently that they became nearly ubiquitous.

For the past 20 years, private equity has been a source of immense wealth for the executives overseeing the entities. Most of those who head major private equity firms are reported to be billionaires, like the two men atop Blackstone: Stephen Schwarzman, a close adviser to President Donald Trump, and Hamilton "Tony" James, a major donor to Democrats.

The impact private equity has had on employees and customers of the companies it has taken over, however, isn't always beneficial. To finance the purchases, private equity owners typically load the companies they buy with debt. Then they slash the companies' costs to increase earnings and appeal to potential buyers down the road.

In the business of health care, the drive for profits can run counter to the goal of helping patients and protecting workers, critics say.

Research shows, for example, that when private equity firms acquire nursing homes, the quality of care declines markedly. And when COVID-19 hit, hospitals associated with private equity firms were early to cut practitioners' pay and benefits because the operations could no longer generate profits on elective surgical procedures postponed during the pandemic. The heavy debt loads typically associated with private equity-owned businesses hinder their ability to withstand profit downturns.

Finally, some medical professionals say, private equity's growing involvement in health care in recent years has contributed to shortages of ventilators, masks and other equipment needed to combat COVID-19, because keeping such goods on hand costs money. And to private equity, that's like putting dollar bills on a shelf.

Private equity firms have jumped into health care with both feet. Apollo Global Management, a $330 billion investment firm overseen by Leon Black, owns RCCH Healthcare Partners, an operator of 88 rural hospital campuses in West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky and 26 other states. Cerberus Capital Management, a $42 billion investment firm run by Steve Feinberg, owns Steward Health Care; it runs 35 hospitals and a swath of urgent care facilities in 11 states.

[img=https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-560w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2015_20/1020956/150512-obama-tim-geithner-yh-0235p.jpg][/img]
President Barack Obama pats outgoing Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on the back in January 2013. Geithner is now president of Warburg Pincus, which owns Modernizing Medicine. Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

Warburg Pincus, overseen by former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, owns Modernizing Medicine, an information technology company that helps health care providers ramp up profits through medical billing and, to a lesser degree, debt collections. The Carlyle Group owns MedRisk, a leading provider of physical therapy cost-containment systems for U.S. workers' compensation payers, such as insurers and large employers.

Private equity's laser focus on cost cutting and operational efficiencies can benefit consumers, economists say, if lower costs are passed on to end users. Problems arise, however, when the push for profits reduces quality. That can be especially harmful in health care, in which patients' lives are on the line and it is difficult for consumers to comparison shop by analyzing quality of care.

Mark Reiter is residency program director of emergency medicine for the University of Tennessee and past president of American Academy of Emergency Medicine, an advocacy group for practitioners. "Private equity-backed health care has been a disaster for patients and for doctors," he told NBC News. "Many decisions are made for what is going to maximize profits for the private equity company, rather than what is best for the patient, what is best for the community."

Representatives of every firm identified in this article declined to respond to broad criticisms of private equity in the health care arena.

As for PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, spokeswoman Bev Mayhew said it removed Ming Lin from the emergency department rotation because "his actions were disruptive, compromised collaboration in the midst of a crisis and contributed to the creation of fear and anxiety among staff and the community." She said his case wasn't subject to peer review because he still has privileges at the hospital.

A TeamHealth spokesman said it continues to employ Lin and had offered to place him "in another contracted hospital anywhere in the country."
'Physician Extenders'

Private equity firms have targeted health care investments for an array of reasons, most having to do with their potential profits.

First, health care drives a huge part of the nation's economic output — almost 20 percent of gross domestic product. In addition, health care is a fragmented business with many small operators like physicians; private investors often find outsize gains in industries in which they can create economies of scale through consolidation.

Ever on the hunt for efficiencies, private equity has brought changes to traditional health care practices, experts say. One example: the use of so-called physician extenders, like nurse practitioners, to see patients instead of actual doctors.

Because such extenders have less training under their belts, their costs are well below those associated with physicians. In general, employing three extenders equals the cost of one physician, said Robert McNamara, professor and chairman of emergency medicine at Temple University and chief medical officer of Temple Faculty Physicians.

Private equity-owned firms also use practitioners with less experience or training to save money, say doctors associated with the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine.

In February, a patient arrived at the Calais Regional Hospital emergency department in Calais, Maine, near the Canadian border. He required intubation — the insertion of a breathing tube down his throat — but the doctor was unable to perform the procedure and had to call in local paramedics for help. The patient recovered.

The doctor worked for Envision Physician Services, the KKR-owned company that had taken over staffing of the emergency department two weeks before the incident.

DeeDee Travis, the hospital's spokeswoman, said that the doctor is no longer in rotation at the hospital but that his move had nothing to do with the incident. She said rural medicine requires the use of all resources, including local paramedic staff.

Assessing the impact of private equity on the overall quality of care has been difficult, in part because ownership by the firms is relatively new. But in February, four academics at the University of Pennsylvania, New York University and the University of Chicago published an in-depth study analyzing care at private equity-owned nursing homes. The findings were stark.

"In the nursing home setting," the study said, "it appears that high-powered profit maximizing incentives can lead firms to renege on implicit contracts to provide high quality care, creating value for the firms at the expense of patients."

Looking at data from 2000 to 2017 from over 18,000 nursing homes, the academics found "robust evidence of declines in patient health and compliance with care standards" after private equity concerns bought facilities. And when private equity firms' purchases of nursing homes were compared with those bought by other for-profit entities, such as nursing home chains, the private equity-owned properties resulted in greater quality declines, the study concluded.

On April 2, well into the COVID-19 crisis, Steward Health Care, owned by Cerberus Capital, created a firestorm. It suspended intensive care unit admissions at Nashoba Valley Medical Center, a hospital in rural northeastern Massachusetts, and redeployed equipment and staff elsewhere to meet COVID-19 demand, according to a memo from the president of the facility. Hospitals aren't supposed to close such units without first notifying state authorities and holding community hearings.

Audra Sprague, a longtime registered nurse at the facility, said the move "completely took out an entire level of service. Anybody that needed ICU care, we didn't have one, we couldn't keep you."

Darren Grubb, a spokesman for Steward, said that the suspension has "not impacted patient care" at the facility and that state officials had "validated that the ICU at Nashoba Valley remains adequately staffed and equipped to care for clinically appropriate patients."

Sprague said she is proud to serve patients in the same hospital where her grandmother was a nurse. She said that the facility had previously been owned by a private company but that patient safety and staff treatment had worsened since Steward took over. So she joined the nurses' union.

"Even when you say something is unsafe, there's little change that comes out of it," she said. "They're not going to do a single thing that doesn't benefit them first and foremost."

Grubb called Sprague's view a "baseless, selective, hyper-generalized claim."


Doctors as owners in name only

For more than a century, company ownership of doctors' practices was barred under the Corporate Practice of Medicine doctrine, which was enshrined in most state laws. The doctrine and the laws hold that only individual physicians should be licensed to practice medicine, not corporations. But in the years leading up to COVID-19, the laws were rarely enforced.

"The states realized a long time ago that this is a real problem — fiduciary duty to shareholders rather than patients," Reiter said. "These corporations are not taking an oath to do what's best for their patients, and they thought it would be better if doctors owned their own practices."

In response to the laws, private equity firms have structured their health care investments with physicians as owners, but in name only, McNamara said. Staffing companies like TeamHealth, for example, use what he called sham professional associations with doctors to get around prohibitions against the corporate practice of medicine.

McHenry Lee, TeamHealth's spokesman, said the company's "organizational structure is fully compliant with long established laws and precedents." Referring to the American Academy of Emergency Medicine, Lee said the company has prevailed while facing judicial scrutiny "initiated or funded by AAEM, where Dr. McNamara has made identical charges."

In a typical emergency room, McNamara said, the usual physician group charges three to four times the Medicare rate. TeamHealth is charging six times, he said.

Last fall, United Healthcare, the giant insurer, canceled coverage at 500 hospitals with TeamHealth-run emergency rooms, largely because of high costs, a company spokeswoman said.

"A small number of providers are driving up the cost of care for the people and customers we serve," she said. "This is particularly evident with private equity-backed physician staffing companies like TeamHealth."

United Healthcare provided NBC News with examples of TeamHealth costs far exceeding median charges for specific emergency department procedures. A patient visiting an emergency department with chest pains, for example, would face a median charge of $340, United Healthcare said, versus a TeamHealth bill for $976. Stitches on a minor cut would be $200 at the median rate, compared with $888 from TeamHealth. And the median rate for a broken arm is $665, while TeamHealth's charge is $2,947.

Lee of TeamHealth declined to comment on the figures.

Envision Healthcare is a physician staffing, emergency medicine and billing services company bought for almost $10 billion by KKR in 2018. Envision's website says it provides emergency medicine at 650 facilities in 40 states.

Before the acquisition, Envision acknowledged in a 2014 securities filing that its contracts with physician groups might run afoul of laws barring the corporate practice of medicine, as well as fee-sharing arrangements between doctors and companies. It could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, and its contracts with affiliated physician groups "could be found legally invalid and unenforceable," Envision said in the filing.

A flurry of such cases didn't arise. But today, Envision's business has collapsed, again a result of postponed elective operations. Carrying $7.5 billion in debt, the company recently hired restructuring advisers and may file for bankruptcy.

Aliese Polk, a spokeswoman for Envision, said the company is experiencing the same financial problems that many other health care providers are and is "focused on fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, deploying significant resources to front-line clinicians caring for sick patients." She declined to discuss its previous warnings about possible legal violations in its business model.


Congress and private equity health care

Even before the COVID-19 crisis, private equity-owned health care operations had come under criticism from members of Congress and outsiders.

TeamHealth, for example, was featured last year in a report by MLK50 and ProPublica for aggressively suing poor patients who had been unable to pay their emergency room bills. After the report, TeamHealth said it would stop the practice. The TeamHealth spokesman didn't respond to a question from NBC News about why it sued patients.

Surprise emergency care medical bills have also emerged as a problem at private equity-run Envision. Patients can be ambushed by such bills when they visit an emergency department in a hospital that is in their insurance network but whose doctors work outside the network, charging separately for their services.

Polk of Envision declined to comment on the company's role in surprise billing.

Congress tried to address the problematic practice with legislation last year. But as the bill gained traction, Envision and TeamHealth quietly backed a purported grass roots organization called Doctor Patient Unity to advocate against the legislation, according to The New York Times. Doctor Patient Unity funded a $28 million media blitz against the bill, the report said, which didn't pass.

Doctor Patient Unity didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Representatives from TeamHealth and Envision accused insurance companies of causing problems for patients seeking emergency care and said they didn't support the legislation because it would have benefited insurers at the expense of patients.

Emily Maddoff and Chet Waldman, lawyers at Wolf Popper LLP, are fighting surprise medical bills in six class-action lawsuits in state and federal courts across the country. A unit of Envision is a defendant in three of the cases.

A class-action case involving a patient in California has a final settlement hearing scheduled for June. If approved, the deal would provide 100 percent relief to the plaintiffs.

"We should not be running our health care system as a profit-making operation on steroids," said Eileen Appelbaum, an authority on private equity and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-leaning think tank in Washington, D.C. "Health care is not so much anymore about taking care of patients. It's way more about making money."


https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-c ... s-n1203161



Ban the insurers and private equity!
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:49 am

New book by Gretchen Morgenson, author of the above article.

These Are the Plunderers — How Private Equity Runs—and Wrecks—America
By Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner

https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/ ... 1982191283

These Are the Plunderers - Morgenson.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 1.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 2.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 3.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 4.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 5.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 6.jpg


These Are the Plunderers 7.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:50 pm

.
Good topic and thread. Absolutely part of the systemic ills we're facing, collectively.

Whenever I next have more spare time I'll aim to add additional material to this thread.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5268
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:42 pm

I'll try to recall a good Michael Hudson talk on their rise since 2008 (part of a video) and get that in here.

Following is a good overview, but so full of links used in lieu of citations that it's best to just follow to the publication.


We Need to Stop Private Equity from Stealing our Retirement and Ruining our Public Goods
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/11/ ... blic-goods

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Thu Jan 25, 2024 6:01 pm

Great article, Jack, a condensed version of the "Plunderers" book.

It just gets worse:


Goldman Sachs raises $15bn to buy stakes in private equity funds

Goldman Sachs has raised more than $15bn to buy investors’ stakes in private equity funds and invest in deals where buyout groups sell portfolio companies from one of their funds to another, in the latest sign of sustained support for the fast-growing “secondary” strategy.

https://www.ft.com/content/d90c4edc-038 ... f251462aea

Archive: https://archive.ph/IjFQl

“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Wed Feb 07, 2024 5:12 am

It's worse than we think.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/11/ ... blic-goods
We Need to Stop Private Equity from Stealing our Retirement and Ruining our Public Goods

We Need to Stop Private Equity.png


As greedy private equity firms use pension funds to buy up huge swathes of the economy—everything from manufacturing plants to nursing homes, infrastructure, and rental housing—workers and the public are the ones getting screwed.

Aaron Wistar
2023 Sept/Oct


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby stickdog99 » Mon Feb 12, 2024 6:07 pm

Private equity makes up an entire volume of The Decline and Fall of the Capitalistic Empire.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6319
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Private Equity is Out of Control and Looting America

Postby Elvis » Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:33 pm

stickdog99 » Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:07 pm wrote:Private equity makes up an entire volume of The Decline and Fall of the Capitalistic Empire.


Is that a book? Google yeilds nothing definitive by that name. Sounds interesting, though reading about private equity maddens and saddens me.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7435
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests