Page 1 of 1

Jim Marrs - Rule By Secrecy

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:16 pm
by thrulookingglass
I was thinking of purchasing this book and wanted to know if any of the good folks here had read Rule By Secrecy. It seems to get a good deal of glowing reviews over at Amazon...

Thanks in advance...

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:22 pm
by MASONIC PLOT
I enjoyed the book. It is a nice addition to my growing library of such books.

A good primer.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:30 pm
by Hugh Manatee Wins
Rule by Secrecy is a good start for learning how elite groups have worked through history.

Marrs' reverse chronology from today's CIA back to CFR back to Skull and Bones back to Illuminati back to...is a good way to show progressively what we are certain of through contemporary documentation and show how it sourced from previous groups until the trail is lost but can be reasonably hypothesized.

Again, a good start. Not definitive.

marrs book

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:42 pm
by darkbeforedawn
a good read, I agree and quite accessible. Hugh in your opinion what's a definitive read on the subject?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:48 pm
by MASONIC PLOT
The works of Dr John Coleman

http://www.greatdreams.com/coleman.html

CONSPIRATORS' HIERARCHY: THE COMMITTEE OF 300 by Dr. John Coleman
ISBN: 0-922356-57-2
ISBN: 0963401947 (1997)



Diplomacy By Deception
By Dr. John Coleman
ISBN: 0-9640104-8-8 (1998)

One World Order: Socialist Dictatorship
By Dr. John Coleman
ISBN: 0-9640104-9-6

What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights by Dr John Coleman
ISBN: 1893157032 (1999)

A good start!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:05 pm
by LilyPatToo
This is a good place to begin researching conspiracy theory, since it hits many of the high spots, historically speaking. Until you understand the elite and their motivations, it's difficult to get into the mindset that is necessary in order to penetrate and, eventually, transcend the apparent nonsense that is force-fed to us by the popular media. It is utter folly to believe that a media owned and controlled by the elite is going to tell you the truth about the elite...not if your ignorance is a vital part of the equation that delivers huge profits to them.

I didn't come across this book until I was about 2 years into my own research on the subject, so a lot of it was about subjects I'd already learned about. But if you're new to the subject, this is a good way to gain an overview of the history of conspiracy.

LilyPat

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:07 pm
by dbeach
http://www.theuniversalseduction.com/

by branton has many related stories,firts hand accounts and sometimes very controversial authors

"American Dynasty" by Kevin Phillips lays out a broad history of the
multi layered criminal Bush family..{long and he is a historian}

Did anyone here read how the US Congress has followed over the yrs most of the principles of communism as presented by Trotsky in 1928 at the World Communist Forum

Conspiracy 101

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:48 pm
by thurnundtaxis
If I were teaching a course that examined the nature of social control mechanisms in western society and how they manifest themselves through religious and political networks, I would feel that this book gives an excellent overview of most of the well promulgated theories that had come together before it. Certainly after reading it the average person would have a good background towards being able to grasp some of the subject manner and general talking points found on this forum.

He is a good deal more "reeled in" than David Icke in as far as how far "out there" he goes in explainingg the underlying motives for the web of multi-generational elite social-engineering networks, although his eventual thesis does wind its way back to the same extra-terrestrial genesis theories espoused by the likes of Icke, Sitchin, Bramley and others.

A very good book for beginners, one that I frequently pick up used copies of to pass along to friends.

Alhough it may be best understood with some qualifiers about the likely presense of disinformation and bias which may color the motives of the authors of certain "primary sources".