Jose Padilla's Mind has been Effectively Erased

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Jose Padilla's Mind has been Effectively Erased

Postby Gouda » Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:13 am

Though he is wrong that US/Nazi torturers "have found a new way of destroying a human being," (a "new form of torture") - thanks to George Monbiot for remembering Jose Padilla. We should too. And that requires hard work, courage - nothing less than delegitimizing the entire system and bringing these fucking bastards to justice.

***

The Darkest Corner of the Mind

US interrogators have devised a new form of torture. It debases the democracy they claim to be defending.

By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 12th December 2006.

After thousands of years of practice, you might have imagined that every possible means of inflicting pain had already been devised. But you should never underestimate the human capacity for invention. United States interrogators, we now discover, have found a new way of destroying a human being.

Last week, defence lawyers acting for Jose Padilla, a US citizen detained as an “enemy combatant”, released a video showing a mission fraught with deadly risk – taking him to the prison dentist. A group of masked guards in riot gear shackled his legs and hands, blindfolded him with black-out goggles and shut off his hearing with headphones, then marched him down the prison corridor(1).

Is Padilla really that dangerous? Far from it: his warders describe him as so docile and inactive that he could be mistaken for “a piece of furniture”. The purpose of these measures appeared to be to sustain the regime under which he had lived for over three years: total sensory deprivation. He had been kept in a blacked-out cell, unable to see or hear anything beyond it. Most importantly, he had no human contact, except for being bounced off the walls from time to time by his interrogators. As a result, he appears to have lost his mind. I don’t mean this metaphorically. I mean that his mind is no longer there.

The forensic psychiatrist who examined him says that he “does not appreciate the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, is unable to render assistance to counsel, and has impairments in reasoning as the result of a mental illness, i.e., post-traumatic stress disorder, complicated by the neuropsychiatric effects of prolonged isolation.”(2) Jose Padilla appears to have been lobotomised: not medically, but socially.

If this was an attempt to extract information, it was ineffective: the authorities held him without charge for three and half years. Then, threatened by a supreme court ruling, they suddenly dropped their claims that he was trying to detonate a dirty bomb. They have now charged him with some vague and lesser offences to do with support for terrorism.

He is unlikely to be the only person subjected to this regime. Another “enemy combatant”, Ali al-Marri, claims to have been subject to the same total isolation and sensory deprivation, in the same naval prison in South Carolina(3). God knows what is being done to people who have disappeared into the CIA’s foreign oubliettes.

That the US tortures, routinely and systematically, while prosecuting its “war on terror” can no longer be seriously disputed. The Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project (DAA), a coalition of academics and human rights groups, has documented the abuse or killing of 460 inmates of US military prisons in Afghanistan, Iraq and at Guantanamo Bay(4). This, it says, is necessarily a conservative figure: many cases will remain unrecorded. The prisoners were beaten, raped, forced to abuse themselves, forced to maintain “stress positions”, and subjected to prolonged sleep deprivation and mock executions.

The New York Times reports that prisoners held by the US military at Bagram airbase in Afghanistan were made to stand for up to 13 days with their hands chained to the ceiling, naked, hooded and unable to sleep(5). The Washington Post alleges that prisoners at the same airbase were “commonly blindfolded and thrown into walls, bound in painful positions, subjected to loud noises and deprived of sleep” while kept, like Jose Padilla and the arrivals at Guantanamo Bay, “in black hoods or spray-painted goggles”(6).

Alfred McCoy, professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, argues that the photographs released from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq reflect standard CIA torture techniques: “stress positions, sensory deprivation, and sexual humiliation”(7). The famous picture of the hooded man standing on a box, with wires attached to his fingers, shows two of these techniques being used at once. Unable to see, he has no idea how much time has passed or what might be coming next. He stands in a classic stress position – maintained for several hours, it causes excruciating pain. He appears to have been told that if he drops his arms he will be electrocuted. What went wrong at Abu Ghraib is that someone took photos. Everything else was done by the book.

Neither the military nor the civilian authorities have broken much sweat in investigating these crimes. A few very small fish have been imprisoned; a few others have been fined or reduced in rank; in most cases the authorities have either failed to investigate or failed to prosecute. The DAA points out that no officer has yet been held to account for torture practised by his subordinates( 8 ). US torturers appear to enjoy impunity, until they are stupid enough to take pictures of each other.

But Padilla’s treatment also reflects another glorious American tradition: solitary confinement. Some 25,000 US prisoners are currently held in isolation – a punishment only rarely used in other democracies. In some places, like the federal prison in Florence, Colorado, they are kept in sound-proofed cells and might scarcely see another human being for years on end(9). They may touch or be touched by no one. Some people have been kept in solitary confinement in the United States for more than 20 years.

At Pelican Bay in California, where 1200 people are held in the isolation wing, inmates are confined to tiny cells for twenty-two and a half hours a day, then released into an “exercise yard” for “recreation”. The yard consists of a concrete well about 12 feet in length with walls 20 feet high and a metal grill across the sky. The recreation consists of pacing back and forth, alone(10).

The results are much as you would expect. As National Public Radio reveals, 10% of the isolation prisoners at Pelican Bay are now in the psychiatric wing, and there’s a waiting list(11). Prisoners in solitary confinement, according to Dr Henry Weinstein, a psychiatrist who studies them, suffer from “memory loss to severe anxiety to hallucinations to delusions … under the severest cases of sensory deprivation, people go crazy.”(12) People who went in bad and dangerous come out mad as well. The only two studies conducted so far – in Texas and Washington state – both show that the recidivism rates for prisoners held in solitary confinement are worse than for those who were allowed to mix with other prisoners(13). If we were to judge the United States by its penal policies, we would perceive a strange beast: a Christian society that believes in neither forgiveness nor redemption.

From this delightful experiment, US interrogators appear to have extracted a useful lesson: if you want to erase a man’s mind, deprive him of contact with the rest of the world. This has nothing to do with obtaining information: torture of all kinds – physical or mental – produces the result that people will say anything to make it end. It is about power, and the thrilling discovery that in the right conditions one man’s power over another is unlimited. It is an indulgence which turns its perpetrators into everything they claim to be confronting.

President Bush maintains that he is fighting a war against threats to the “values of civilised nations”: terror, cruelty, barbarism and extremism. He asked his nation’s interrogators to discover where these evils are hidden. They should congratulate themselves. They appear to have succeeded.

www.monbiot.com

References:

1. Deborah Sontag, 4th December 2006. Video Is a Window Into a Terror Suspect’s Isolation. New York Times.

2. Dr. Angela Hegarty, cited by Deborah Sontag, ibid.

3. Deborah Sontag, ibid.

4. Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project, 26th April 2006. By the Numbers. http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ct0406/index.htm

5. Carlotta Gall, 4th March 2003. U.S. Military Investigating Death of Afghan in Custody. New York Times,.
6. Dana Priest and Barton Gellman, 26th December 2002. U.S. Decries Abuse but Defends Interrogations. Washington Post.

7. Alfred W. McCoy, 19th September 2004. The hidden history of CIA torture
Abu Ghraib is only the newest U.S. atrocity. San Francisco Chronicle.

8. Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project, ibid.

9. Eg Carol Costello, 4th May 2006. American Morning – CNN. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... tm.01.html

10. Laura Sullivan, 26th July 2006. At Pelican Bay Prison, a Life in Solitary. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=5584254

11. ibid.

12. Peg Tyre, 9th January 1998. Trend toward solitary confinement worries experts. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/US/9801/09/solitary.confinement/

13. Laura Sullivan, 28th July 2006. Making It on the Outside, After Decades in Solitary. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=5589778
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Mind eraser

Postby professorpan » Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:36 pm

It's ironic to me that after all the MKULTRA research (and its follow-ups), the simplest means of destroying a human mind is to isolate it from other humans.

There is a special place in hell for torturers.
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Mind eraser

Postby isachar » Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:45 pm

professorpan wrote:It's ironic to me that after all the MKULTRA research (and its follow-ups), the simplest means of destroying a human mind is to isolate it from other humans.

There is a special place in hell for torturers.


Prof, sustained isolation and denial of sensory input is an effective way to turn almost all mammals mad.

Now, why would they deliberately and purposely turn this guy into a human vegetable?

Only one answer is probable - he knew too much.

Though not conclusive, the similarity between Padilla and the John Doe II sketch is too remarkable to be ignored. His age and known whereabouts do not exclude him.

What did Padilla know that they needed to destroy him for?
isachar
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Is it really so strange?

Postby Spoonerian » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:11 pm

If we were to judge the United States by its penal policies, we would perceive a strange beast: a Christian society that believes in neither forgiveness nor redemption.


Is it really so strange?

Justice-American-style has nothing to do with restitution to victims or forgiveness of victimizers.

Although Christianity-American-style, offers forgiveness for some (for the non-crime of not worshipping their god-man), the rest of us are condemned to revenge torture for all eternity.
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." --Frederic Bastiat
Spoonerian
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Spoonerian » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:18 pm

There is a special place in hell for torturers.


Wouldn't that make the proprieters of "hell" just as evil as the American-Christian revenge torturers themselves?

Justice requires only that the victimizers be forced to repair their damages and make their victims (or their families) whole to the furthest extent possible (unless they're forgiven by their victims).

Revenge torture can never be a part of true justice.
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." --Frederic Bastiat
Spoonerian
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby blanc » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:46 pm

the effects of sensory deprivation and solitary confinement have long been known. these were tried in victorian prisons - with the idea that deprived of all contact and stimulus the prisoner would be able to reflect on his sins. it was found to be useless as a reformist measure, but then its not about that now is it ? what is it about actually ? does anyone have a clue why american taxpayers are funding this ultimate degradation of all human values?
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Spoonerian » Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:54 pm

does anyone have a clue why american taxpayers are funding this ultimate degradation of all human values?


It makes the Church Ladies and Soccer Moms who vote and pay for this feel safe from Muslims and Drug Dealers.

Contrary to what Jack Nicholson's character claims in "A Few Good Men," they CAN handle the truth.

Hence, their popular wise cracks about how you don't want to end up getting raped in their jails and prisons.
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." --Frederic Bastiat
Spoonerian
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby thurnundtaxis » Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:12 pm

Solitary confinement?

it was found to be useless as a reformist measure, but then its not about that now is it ? what is it about actually ? does anyone have a clue why american taxpayers are funding this ultimate degradation of all human values?


I think to a good degree it continues to exist out of institutional and bureaucratic apathy towards progression and reform. At the management and policy making levels there is probably little desire to expend any energy in modifying prison methods. I think that unless impetus in the form of monies and grants from outside agencies enters the corrections systems business simply continues as usual.

However that is not to say that there aren't those who benefit from or take advatage of this malaise. I don't think that the overall driving force behind solitary confinement methodolgies is sinister in its design. Complacent, and sadistic, cetainly. And it is probably this complacency that the spook agencies and black budget operatives exploit and use as cover.

BTW I always thought Padilla looked far too much like John Doe #2, it would not suprise me at all to find that he was an integral part of the network of pawns used to foment the Terror War. It will be harder to conclude this now though for certain. I find that awfully convenient.
User avatar
thurnundtaxis
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Hell

Postby professorpan » Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Wouldn't that make the proprieters of "hell" just as evil as the American-Christian revenge torturers themselves?


'Twas speaking metaphorically, Spoonerian. I don't believe in Hell, unless Hell is spelled Fallujah, Guantanamo, or Crawford, TX....
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Padilla

Postby Marina » Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:37 pm

This post is heartbreaking.
I think one of the things revealed, obviously, is the current "state of the art" torture methods, many of which are experimental things about taking over control of a person so you can then use them for your own ends.
Also, toward the end of his life Carl Jung expressed grave concerns over the fate of humanity, specifically related to the seeming inability of humans to understand/grapple with the tendency of the human mind toward what he termed "projection", the aspect of the human mind that projects onto other people what is actually inside of themselves. Seen in this light the toturers are expressing, through their own actions, the state of their own selves. If they don't know that, however, there is little chance of escape/transcendence for them in this life, or for our escape from their actions.
Marina
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Spoonerian » Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:19 pm

'Twas speaking metaphorically


Professor, Many years ago, when I was a young libertarian evangelist, I used to love to preach fire and brimstone to the right wing Christians and try to scare them into repenting for their many actual crimes.

I figured that if the threat of eternal physical torment was already effective in causing them to become scared shitless of "sin" (pronounced seeeee-yin), then perhaps the exact same rhetorical techniques might cause them to re-consider robbing and murdering people.

Not only did this not work (who would have thought?), but I soon realized that this tactic only re-inforced the Christians' warped senses of justice. So, ever since then I've been a real stickler on this issue of torturing people for eternity--even the robbing, murdering, torturing Christians themselves.
"Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." --Frederic Bastiat
Spoonerian
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

quote without comment

Postby robert d reed » Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:51 am

formerly robertdreed...
robert d reed
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:13 am

Outstanding good read, thanks very much for posting that.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:56 am

1. Thanks, Gouda, for a very important article. Bump. I'll forward it to people, as well.

2. Who is John Doe II?
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:21 am

I nominate the "Prepared Remarks of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales at the U.S. Air Force Academy Regarding Civil Liberties and the War on Terrorism" which Robert posted above for the Goebbels Award of the Day. Yes, just for the day. There'll be more inverted lying fascist horseshit tomorrow and the next from these animals. As to proposed justice for this grade of criminal scum, I am with Spoonerian. Retributive justice - or eye for an eye - is not the way, the truth or the light. Retributive justice, an oxymoron.
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests