by NewKid » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:49 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Newkid sez "For the last time, I'm not here to make the anti-peak oil case." <br><br>Then why say "At best, peak oil is wild speculation. Much more likely it's sensational disinformation fed to gullible idiots like Wintler who probably moved out into the wilderness suckered by Y2K end of the world scams."<br>?<br><br>Keep wriggling Newkid, keep smearing and keep requoting JD. Who, Smithtalk, apparently lives in that epicentre of oil production, Japan. If you're really interested in JD's circular innumeracy, search for 'johndenver' on peakoil.com, where you'll find him enthusing about space mirrors, thousands of new and novel nuclear reactors, and helium tankers from Mars, before he ran away with his tail between his legs and started that blog). I suspect JD would still be a 'peaker' if only other peakers hadn't kept asking pointed questions about how, why, how again, and WTF?!<br><br>Oh, and keep banging on about Simmons NK, and pretending he is particularly significant. He's not, he's just a semi-acceptable talking head who (surprise surprise) gets alot of coverage in the right-biased US media. He did of course conduct a fairly serious review of Saudi petroleum journal papers (see his book 'Twilight in the Desert'), but i already know you aren't interested in discussing information, just your opinion. <br>I hated what DE had to say about Heinberg, but DE put it there on the page and i had/have to admit there was smoke and quite possibly a fire - kudo's to him. You, however, have done nothing but rerun 1 very weak blog.<br><br>The only thing i got out of this thread was pleasing reminder of some other readers scepticism, and the consolation that i didn't sink to the abuse NK seems to habitually hand out. Are you sure you're not JD of peakoildebunked yourself NK? He frequently got nasty when cornered. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>You really can't read or write the English language very well can you? What part about check his cites don't you understand? And what part about Smithtalk's question asking for evidence that Simmons was a charlatan don't you understand? You see, that was the question Wintler. That's why we're talking about Simmons. When someone asks a question, the other person answers it. That's what the question called for. See how this works? <br> <br>Space mirrors and the rest of the incoherent drivel in your comment have nothing to do with anything. <br><br>And no, saying peak oil is wild speculation doesn't mean I'm making the anti peal oil case either, Wintler. If you were right, Wintler, I'd agree with you, so please, stop wasting my time with your idiocy. <br> <br>If you don't like the PeakOildebunked guy, great, I don't really care. If you want to believe in Peak Oil, great, I don't really care. <br><br>Now Wintler, I like you and all, but I'm going to give you the same friendly advice Dream's End gave DarkBeforeDawn in the Franklin/Larouche section:<br><br>Get the fuck off this thread. <p></p><i></i>