Honduras Coup: Soldiers kidnap VZ, Cuba, Nicaragua envoys

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby John Schröder » Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:18 pm

http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/200 ... index.html

Honduras' first lady has emerged as the public face of the movement to restore President Manuel Zelaya to power, a role she took against her husband's wishes and despite her continuing fears for her safety.

Xiomara Castro told The Associated Press on Wednesday that she was so afraid the Honduran military would shoot her on sight after soldiers whisked Zelaya out of the country in his pajamas, she fled to the U.S. Embassy.

Though she still sleeps in hiding, she vowed to take to the streets daily in protest of the June 28 coup that ousted her husband. The family of a pro-Zelaya demonstrator slain by soldiers on Sunday urged her to get involved -- over Zelaya's objections.

"He told me that my presence could cause more problems, more persecution on the family. But I insisted," Castro said, while trudging up a steep road with 3,000 Zelaya supporters, who blocked traffic on a route connecting the capital of Tegucigalpa with a highway to Nicaragua. "I consider our presence here as like having the president himself here, like feeling that the president is standing firm."

Zelaya headed to Costa Rica Wednesday to meet with Nobel laureate Oscar Arias, that country's president, who is leading negotiations to end the Honduran political crisis.

Roberto Micheletti, who became interim head of state after Zelaya was apprehended, said a commission will represent him in Costa Rica. He is still deliberating whether to go himself.

"In two days there could be a solution or it could be two months, and we still don't have one," Arias said in the Costa Rican capital of San Jose on Wednesday.

But even as the two sides planned to meet, Castro said she couldn't disclose where she is staying for fear of members of the Honduran political establishment -- people she recently counted as friends.

Zelaya and Micheletti both hail from the Liberal Party. Castro was a longtime friend of Micheletti's wife, whose name is nearly identical: Siomara Castro.

The morning of the coup, Castro said she and her teenage son Hector sneaked to the U.S. embassy, then stayed there until the attorney general's office said no charges would be filed against Zelaya family members.

The pair then headed to the residence of U.S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens.

Castro remained out of sight for nine days after the coup. But she came out of hiding at the request of the family of Isis Obed Murillo Mencia, 19, a protester from Zelaya's home state of Olancho who was shot by soldiers at the airport Sunday during Zelaya's unsuccessful attempt to return.

Castro said she would like to return to her home, but refused to say if she had left the ambassador's residence. But she also said if anyone had wanted to harm her, they would have done so during the coup.

"I know that Romeo Vasquez had the opportunity to kill me and he didn't do so," she said, referring to the head of the Honduran armed forces. Zelaya fired Vasquez after he refused to carry out the military's election duties for a referendum Zelaya had planned the day he was deposed. The Supreme Court ruled it was illegal, setting the stage for the coup.

Arias, negotiating at the behest of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, has a proven record of resolving international crises, winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 for his role in mediating civil wars in Central America.

"We are going to give them both equal treatment," Arias said of the two men claiming to be president of Honduras.

Meanwhile, Venezuelan Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez said his country would cancel oil shipments to Honduras. Zelaya was an ally of that country's president, Hugo Chavez, who had supplied Honduras crude on 25-year credit.

Ramirez said Venezuela can't provide oil "to a dictatorship, and especially not to a small group of businessmen who led a coup."

Zelaya's supporters claim Honduras' wealthy class backed the military uprising because Zelaya's policies favored the poor, including his raising of the minimum wage.

The United Nations, the Organization of American States and governments around the world insist Zelaya is Honduras' rightful president. The country's Congress says it legally made Micheletti, former head of the legislature, interim president.

Marching in a white cowboy hat with a red ribbon reading "Victory for the People: Zelaya," Castro said she spoke briefly to her husband the morning of the coup and then again four days later. But their first lengthy talk came Tuesday, when a radio station put them in touch and aired the conversation.

"In these times of tension, the only thing that we know is we are more united than ever," said Zelaya, brushing off rumors that the couple was close to separating before the coup.

"Today we are a fractured family because (Zelaya is) in one place and my kids are in another and I'm in another," she added. "But all of this has strengthened us."
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:35 pm

http://www.counterpunch.org/kozloff07092009.html

Honduran Destablization, Inc.

By NIKOLAS KOZLOFF



When it comes to U.S. machinations and interventionism in Latin America, I'm not naïve: over the past five years, I've written two books about the inner workings of American foreign policy south of the border, as well as dozens and dozens of articles posted on the Internet and on my blog. As a result, when the Obama Administration claimed that it knew that a political firestorm was brewing in Honduras but was surprised when a military coup actually took place this strains my credibility.

Nevertheless, in the absence of cold, hard facts, I reserve judgment on whether Obama has turned into an imperialist intent on waving the Big Stick in Central America. Furthermore, the fact that Hugo Chávez of Venezuela says North American imperialism was behind the coup in Tegucigalpa does not make it so. In typical fashion, Chávez has failed to produce any shred of evidence to support his provocative allegations.

International Republican Institute

There are, however, a number of intriguing leads that point to U.S. involvement --- not in a coup per se but in indirect destabilization. Eva Golinger, author of the Chávez Code, has just published an interesting piece on her blog about the ties between the International Republican Institute (IRI) and conservative groups in Honduran society. Golinger has followed up on my extensive writings documenting the activities of the IRI, a group chaired by Senator John McCain (R-AZ). Though McCain seldom talks about it, he has gotten much of his foreign policy experience working with the operation that is funded by the U.S. government and private money. The group, which receives tens of millions of taxpayer dollars each year, claims to promote democracy worldwide.

Golinger reveals that IRI has thrown hundreds of thousands of dollars to think tanks in Honduras that seek to influence political parties. What's more, she discloses that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has provided tens of millions of dollars towards "democracy promotion" in Honduras. I was particularly interested to learn that one recipient of the aid included the Honduran National Business Council, known by its Spanish acronym COHEP, a long time adversary of the Zelaya regime.

Otto Reich

Another interesting lead comes via Bill Weinberg, a thorough and dogged journalist, founder of the Web site World War 4 Report and the host of WBAI Radio's thoughtful program Moorish Orthodox Radio Crusade in New York. On Sunday, Weinberg posted an intriguing article on his Web site entitled "Otto Reich behind Honduras coup?" In the piece, Weinberg discloses that the Honduran Black Fraternal Organization, known by its Spanish acronym OFRANEH, has claimed that former U.S. diplomat Otto Reich and the Washington, D.C. based Arcadia Foundation were involved in the coup.

In my first book, I documented Otto Reich's Latin American exploits in some detail. A Cuban native, Reich left the island in 1960. In 1973, while studying at Georgetown, he met someone named Frank Calzon. According to Honduras' La Prensa, Calzon was an "expert in CIA disinformation" who recruited Reich. Later, when Reich served as U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela under Ronald Reagan, he established contact with Gustavo Cisneros, a media magnate, billionaire and prominent future figure in the Chávez opposition.

After his stint as ambassador, Reich went on to be a corporate lobbyist for Bacardi and Lockheed Martin, a company that sought to provide F-16 fighter planes to Chile. In 2002, he became assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere Affairs under Bush through a recess appointment. Although Reich has denied there was any U.S. role in the brief coup d'etat against Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez in April 2002, the veteran diplomat reportedly met regularly at the White House with alleged coup plotter Pedro Carmona. At the height of the coup in Venezuela, Reich called his old friend Cisneros twice. According to the media magnate, Reich called "as a friend" because Chávez partisans were protesting at Caracas media outlets.

Reich has also served on the board of visitors of WHINSEC, formerly known as the School of the Americas, a U.S. army institution that instructed the Latin American military in torture techniques. As a member of the board, Reich's job was to review and advise "on areas such as curriculum, academic instruction, and fiscal affairs of the institute." After leaving the Bush Administration in 2004, Reich went on to found Otto Reich Associates in Washington, D.C. On the group's Web site, you can see a photo of Reich and John McCain shaking hands. A caption from McCain reads, "Ambassador Reich has served America with distinction by representing our fundamental values of freedom and democracy around the world, and I am grateful for his support."

Reich's outfit provides services in "International Government Relations/Anti-Corruption," and "Business Intelligence/Policy Forecasting." Specifically, the group seeks to "design and implement political and business diplomacy strategies for U.S. and multinational companies to compete on an even playing field in countries with complex ethical and legal challenges," as well as "advise major and mid-size U.S. corporations on government relations to support trade and investment goals in South and Central American countries and the Caribbean," in addition to identifying and securing foreign investment and "privatization opportunities" in Latin America.

Otto Reich and The Searing Case of Hondutel

In campaign '08, Reich served as a foreign policy adviser to Republican John McCain. In an interview with Honduras' La Prensa, Reich blasted Honduran President Zelaya for cultivating ties with Hugo Chávez. Reich had particular scorn for the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas, known by its Spanish acronym ALBA, an anti-free trade pact including Venezuela, Honduras, Cuba, and Bolivia. "Honduras," Reich remarked, "should be very careful because the petroleum and Chávez problem is very similar to those who sell drugs. At first they give out drugs so that victims become addicts and then they have to buy that drug at the price which the seller demands."

Reich went on to say that he was very "disappointed" in Zelaya because the Honduran President was "enormously corrupted from a financial and moral standpoint." In another interview with the Honduran media, Reich went further, remarking brazenly that "if president Zelaya wants to be an ally of our enemies, let him think about what might be the consequences of his actions and words."

When discussing Zelaya's corrupt transgressions, Reich is wont to cite the case of Honduras' state-owned telecommunications company Hondutel. In an explosive piece, the Miami newspaper El Nuevo Herald reported that a company called Latin Node bribed three Hondutel officials to get choice contracts and reduced rates. Zelaya, Reich remarked to El Nuevo Herald, "has permitted or encouraged these types of practices and we will see soon that he is also behind this."

Reich would not provide details but reminded readers that Zelaya's nephew, Marcelo Chimirri, was a high official at Hondutel and had been accused of a series of illicit practices relating to Hondutel contracts. "After an outcry in Honduras," writes Bill Weinberg of World War Four Report, "Reich said he was prepared to make a sworn statement on the affair before Honduran law enforcement -- but said he would not travel to Honduras to do so, because his personal security would be at risk there." Reich's pronouncements to the Miami paper infuriated Zelaya who went on national radio and TV to announce that he would sue Reich for defamation. "We will proceed with legal action for calumny against this man, Otto Reich, who has been waging a two year campaign against Honduras," the president announced.

Turning up the heat on Chimirri, the U.S. Embassy in Tegucigalpa denied the Hondutel official an entry visa into the United States, citing "serious cases of corruption." Zelaya may have taken the U.S. ban on his nephew to heart. Zelaya complained to Washington as recently as last December about the visa issue, urging U.S. officials to "revise the procedure by which visas are cancelled or denied to citizens of different parts of the world as a means of pressure against those people who hold different beliefs or ideologies which pose no threat to the U.S."

Bush-appointed U.S. Ambassador Charles Ford was also turning the screws on Zelaya. Speaking with the Honduran newspaper La Tribuna, Ford said that the U.S. government was investigating American telecom carriers for allegedly paying bribes to Honduran officials to engage in so-called "gray traffic" or illicit bypassing of legal telecommunications channels. The best way to combat gray traffic, Ford said, was through greater competition that in turn would drive down long distance calling rates.

Perhaps the U.S. government was using the corruption charges as ammunition against Hondutel, a state company that Reich probably would have preferred to see privatized. The Honduran elite had long wanted to break up the company. In the late 1990s, none other than Roberto Micheletti, the current coup president of Honduras, was Hondutel's CEO. At the time, Micheletti favored privatizing the firm. Micheletti later went on to become President of Honduras' National Congress. In that capacity, he was at odds with the Zelaya regime that opposed so-called "telecom reform" that could open the door to outright privatization.

The Mysterious Case of Arcadia and Robert-Carmona Borjas

Building up the case against Hondutel and Chimirri was none other than the Arcadia Foundation, a non-profit and anti-corruption watchdog that promotes "good governance and democratic institutions." For an organization that purportedly stands for transparency, the group doesn't provide much information about itself on its Web site. The two founders include Betty Bigombe, a Ugandan peace mediator and World Bank researcher, and Robert-Carmona Borjas, a Venezuelan expert in military affairs, national security, corruption, and governance. The Web site does not list any other staff members at its D.C. branch. Outside of the U.S., the organization has outlets in Spain, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Chile, Argentina, and Guatemala.

In his columns published in the conservative Venezuelan newspaper El Universal, Borjas has gone on the attack against Chávez. In recent months, he had expressed skepticism about Obama's foreign policy openness, particularly if it meant dealing with "totalitarian" figures such as the Venezuelan President. According to his bio, Borjas left Venezuela after the 2002 coup against Chávez and sought political asylum in the U.S.

Interested in knowing where Arcadia's funding comes from? You won't get any pointers from the Web site. Click on "In The Media" however and you get an endless list of Borjas' articles and links to news pieces related to Hondutel (and I mean endless: I saw about 70 articles before I got tired and stopped counting). There's no other published research on Arcadia's site, leading one to wonder whether the organization's sole purpose is to pursue the Hondutel case. There's no evidence that Borjas knows Reich, though given their common interest (or should I say obsession) in the Hondutel affair it seems at least possible that the two might have crossed paths.

In recent months, Borjas had driven his anti-Zelaya campaign into overdrive. As Weinberg has written, "The Honduran newspapers El Heraldo (Tegucigalpa) and La Prensa (San Pedro Sula) noted June 11 that Carmona-Borjas had brought legal charges against Zelaya and other figures in his administration for defying a court ruling that barred preparations for the constitutional referendum scheduled for the day Zelaya would be ousted. A YouTube video dated July 3 shows footage from Honduras' Channel 8 TV of Carmona-Borjas addressing an anti-Zelaya rally in Tegucigalpa's Plaza la Democracia to enthusiastic applause. In his comments, he accuses Zelaya of collaboration with narco-traffickers."

So, there you have it: the International Republican Institute, an enigmatic Washington, D.C.-based organization intent on driving back Hugo Chávez, an inflammatory former policymaker with business connections and a high profile effort to discredit Zelaya and the Honduran state telecommunications company. What does it all amount to? There's no smoking gun here proving U.S. involvement in the coup. Taken together however, these stories suggest destabilization efforts by certain elements in the United States --- not the Obama administration but the far right which was more allied to Bush and McCain. Perhaps if the mainstream media can drag itself away from the likes of Michael Jackson and Sarah Palin, we can get a more thorough picture of the political tensions between Washington and the Zelaya regime.



Nikolas Kozloff is the author of Revolution! South America and the Rise of the New Left (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2008)
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:59 pm

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/9/in ... d_honduran

In Rare U.S. Broadcast, Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya Discusses Coup, Costa Rica Talks, U.S. Role and More

Talks between the ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and the leaders of last week’s military coup begin today in Costa Rica. Shortly before leaving Washington DC for Costa Rica, Zelaya sat down with us for a rare U.S. television interview. He discusses how military coup forces forced him out, the upcoming talks in Costa Rica, his domestic policies in Honduras, the role of the United States and more.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Talks between the ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya and the leaders of last week’s military coup begin today in Costa Rica. Speaking late Wednesday Zelaya said he is seeking the resignation of the interim Honduran government within 24 hours. He emphasized he was in Costa Rica for talks but not for negotiations with the forces that ousted him. Citing widespread international support Zelaya added that he expects to be shortly reinstated as president. Zelaya and his rivals agreed to talks mediated by Costa Rican president and former Nobel Peace Prize winner Oscar Arias after Zelaya met Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Washington this week. The interim government led by Robert Micheletti has said Zelaya will not be reinstated as president and tried for abusing the constitution if he returns.

AMY GOODMAN: Well shortly before the ousted president Manuel Zelaya left Washington, DC for Costa Rica, he set down for brief interview with Juan Gonzalez and me.

    Mr. President, welcome to “Democracy Now!” can you tell us what you have agreed to, what you expect from these talks, and if you been satisfied with your meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] I think that both President Barack Obama and Secretary Clinton as well as U.S. Ambassador in Tegucigalpa, Hugo Lawrence, and all the other officials have been completely categorical and clear. While there have been other opinions voiced in the United States, they’re not been official government statements. They have condemned the coup, asked for my reinstatement and in addition are not recognizing the de facto government’s decisions.

    JUAN GONZALEZ: Mr. President, your opponents who engineered the coup claim that you were trying to subvert the constitution of 1982. What were you trying to do with the referendum that you were holding and is it true that as they say, your were trying to illegally extend your term?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] That is completely false. In Honduras we do not have reelections and I never intended to be reelected. That will be a matter for another government, another constitution and another Constituent Assembly. The Popular Consultation is a survey, just like the Gallup one does or other polling groups. It does not create rights. It has no power to impose. It is not obligatory, its an opinion poll. How could this be a motive for a coup d’etat? No one has tried to me. I was expelled by force by the military. This is an argument made up by the coup plotters. Don’t believe them.

    AMY GOODMAN: Mr. President, the United States has not cut off aid to Honduras. Do you think they should because of the coup?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] We only have humanitarian aid coming from the United States the U.S. held up military aid, our officials in Washington have been replaced because they left with the coup. They were changed yesterday. And all of the U.S.’s messages have been consistent with the firm condemnation of the coup and supporting democracy in Latin America.

    JUAN GONZALEZ: Mr. President, you came to office thought to be conservative leader, but yet in your time in office, you sharply increased minimum wage, provided for free school lunches for children, you lowered the price of public transportation. Do you think these policies are the reason behind the elite of Hondurans supporting the coup against you?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] I came to power with a very clear programmatic and ideological platform, to empower citizens in their rights, to empower them economically, socially and culturally and also politically, all the reforms I have proposed are meant to give more power to the population. I do not believe in elites. I don’t believe in military elites or economics elites. I believe that it is the people who have the strength to make the changes. That is why I called my campaign “citizen power." The first law I made was that a citizen participation and the law I was applying with the survey was for citizen participation. We helped the poor along with the First Lady, we have reduced poverty by 10% we’ve had the country growing by 7% economically. So, there is a reactionary group in Honduras. Honduras is controlled by a group of 10 families that control the entire economy. So, they have been jealous of my actions in favor of development for themselves and their families. But they refuse to allow change or transformation. They looked for a political arm and a military arm to stage a coup d’etat.

    AMY GOODMAN: Mr. President, can you describe exactly what happened the morning of the coup and who exactly you think is behind this?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] They attacked my house at 5:30 in the morning. A group of at least 200 to 250 armed soldiers with hoods and bulletproof vests, and rifles aimed their guns at me, fired shots, used machine guns, kicked down the doors and just as I was, in pajamas, they put me on an plane and flew me to Costa Rica. This all happened in less than 45 minutes.

    JUAN GONZALEZ: Mr. President, some people have speculated there were former members of the Bush Administration that were waging a campaign against you here in the United States. Otto Reich, a former administration official in charge of Latin American affairs had been making allegations about corruption in your country, specifically related to the government-owned telephone company, HONDUTEL. Do you think this had any impact in terms of how the current administration is regarding your presidency?

    MANUAL ZELAYA:[translated] The bad guys always join together. But there are more of us good people and we’re also united and we will win out over them. So don’t worry about that. I need to tell you I have to leave for Costa Rica and I am grateful for your interview, and I will continue to support you. The only system I believe in is democracy. It is the political system that gives political rights to the citizenry. Human rights guarantee our freedoms, but the political system we must support is democracy. If we allowed armies, drug, trafficking elites or economic elites or international mafia, even the transnational corporations to impose governments or presidents on us by force, we will be losing five decades of democratic reform in America. President Obama has a firm position and I hope it will remain so until we resolve this problem so it will serve as an example. So that a fractious group of military men never again break into the home of a president and without trying him first, without taking into court but rather capturing him and then wanting to try him. This should not happen.


AMY GOODMAN: The ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya spoke with us right before leaving for Costa Rica with the mediated talks with the leaders of the military coup. The U.S. has not cut off economic aid to Honduras which amounts to more than $43 million. But after our interview yesterday, U.S. Embassy in Honduras announced is had suspended $16.5 million in military aid to Honduras shortly after the coup. This is Democracy Now!
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:01 pm

User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:50 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ton-zelaya

US leaves Honduras to its fate

Washington is unwilling to take the side of democracy in Honduras by opposing the coup leaders it helped to train

Mark Weisbrot
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 8 July 2009 20.30 BST


The military coup that overthrew President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras took a new turn when he attempted to return home on Sunday. The military closed the airport and blocked runways to prevent his plane from landing. They also shot several protesters, killing at least one and injuring others. The violence and the enormous crowd – estimated in the tens of thousands and reported as the largest since the coup on 28 June – put additional pressure on the Obama administration to seek a resolution to the crisis. On Tuesday, secretary of state Hillary Clinton met Zelaya for the first time.

In many ways this is similar to the 2002 coup in Venezuela, which was supported by the US. After it became clear that no government other than the US would recognise the coup government there, and hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans poured into the streets to demand the return of their elected president, the military switched sides and brought Hugo Chávez back to the presidential palace.

In Honduras, we have the entire world refusing to recognise the coup government, and equally large demonstrations (in a country of only seven million people, with the military preventing movement for many of them) demanding Zelaya's return. The problem in Honduras is that the military – unlike Venezuela's – is experienced in organised repression, including selective assassinations carried out during the 1980s, when the country was known as a military base for US operations in El Salvador and Nicaragua. The Honduran military is also much closer to the US military and state department, more closely allied with the country's oligarchy and more ideologically committed to the cause of keeping the elected president out of power. Colonel Herberth Bayardo Inestroza, a Honduran army lawyer who admitted that the military broke the law when it kidnapped Zelaya, told the Miami Herald: "It would be difficult for us, with our training, to have a relationship with a leftist government. That's impossible." Inestroza, like the coup leader and army chief General Romeo Vasquez, was trained at Washington's infamous School of the Americas (now renamed Whinsec).

This puts a heavy burden on the people of Honduras, who have been risking their lives, confronting the army's bullets, beatings and arbitrary arrests and detentions. The US media has reported on this repressiononly minimally, with the major print media sometimes failing even to mention the censorship there. But the Honduran pro-democracy movement has in the last few days managed to change the course of events. It is likely that Clinton's decision to finally meet with Zelaya was the result of the large and growing protests, and Washington's fear that such resistance could reach the point at which it would topple the coup government.

The Obama administration's behaviour over the last eight days suggests that if not for this threat from below, the administration would have been content to let the coup government remain for the rest of Zelaya's term. This was made clear again on Monday, at a press briefing held by the state department spokesman Ian Kelly. Under prodding from a reporter, Kelly became the first on-the-record state department official to say that the US government supported the return of Zelaya. This was eight days after the coup, and after the United Nations general assembly, the Organisation of American States, the Rio Group and many individual governments had all called for the "immediate and unconditional" return of Zelaya – something that Washington still does not talk about.

Meanwhile, on the far right, there has been a pushback against worldwide support for Zelaya and an attempt to paint him as the aggressor in Honduras, or at least equally as bad as the people who carried out the coup. Unfortunately much of the major media's reporting has aided this effort by reporting such statements as "Critics feared he intended to extend his rule past January, when he would have been required to step down."

In fact, there was no way for Zelaya to "extend his rule" even if the referendum had been held and passed, and even if he had then gone on to win a binding referendum on the November ballot. The 28 June referendum was nothing more than a non-binding poll of the electorate, asking whether the voters wanted to place a binding referendum on the November ballot to approve a redrafting of the country's constitution. If it had passed, and if the November referendum had been held (which was not very likely) and also passed, the same ballot would have elected a new president and Zelaya would have stepped down in January. So, the belief that Zelaya was fighting to extend his term in office has no factual basis. The most that could be said is that if a new constitution were eventually approved, Zelaya might have been able to run for a second term at some future date.

Another major rightwing theme in the media and public perception of the Honduran situation is that this is a battle against Chávez (and some collection of "anti-US" leftist allies: Nicaragua, Cuba, take your pick). This is a common subterfuge that has surfaced in most of the Latin American elections of the last few years. In Mexico, Peru, Nicaragua and El Salvador, for example, the conservative candidates all acted as if they were running against Chávez – the first two with success, and the second pair losing. It is true that under Zelaya Honduras joined Alba, a grouping of countries that was started by Venezuela as an alternative to "free trade" agreements with the US. But Zelaya is nowhere near as close to Chávez as any number of other Latin American presidents, including those of Brazil and Argentina. So it is not clear why this is relevant, unless the argument is that only bigger countries or those located further south have the right to have a co-operative relationship with Venezuela.

Clinton has just announced that she has arranged for the Costa Rican president Oscar Arias to serve as a mediator between the coup government and Zelaya. According to Clinton, both parties have accepted this arrangement. This is a good move for the state department, as it will make it easier for it to maintain a more "neutral" position – as opposed to the rest of the hemisphere, which has taken the side of the deposed president and the Honduran pro-democracy movement. "I don't want to prejudge what the parties themselves will agree to," said Clinton in response to a question as to whether Zelaya should be restored to his position.

It is difficult to see how this mediation will succeed, so long as the coup government knows that it can sit out the rest of Zelaya's term. The only thing that can remove it from office, in conjunction with massive protests, is real economic sanctions of the kind that Honduras's neighbours (Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala) imposed for 48 hours after the coup. These countries account for about a third of Honduras's trade, but they would need economic aid from other countries to carry the burden of a trade cut-off for a longer time. It would be a great thing if other countries would step forward to support such sanctions and to cut off their own trade and capital flows with Honduras as well.

So it is up to the rest of the world to help Honduras; it is clear that Hondurans won't be getting any help from the US. The rest of the world will have to scream bloody murder about the violence and repression there, too, because Washington will not make much of an issue about it.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:20 pm

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2009/07/n ... fy_09.html

"Mr. Zelaya, a close ally of the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez, has been accused of flouting the law in an effort to amend the Constitution so he can run for re-election. His opponents — who include a broad cross-section of Honduran society — said those charges led to his ouster." In every article on the Honduran coup, the New York Times manages to insert a sentence or two just to justify the coup.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:07 pm

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul20 ... -j09.shtml

Tehran and Tegucigalpa: A Tale of Two Capitals

9 July 2009

In Tehran, demonstrations called by the defeated US-backed presidential candidate are given non-stop, wall-to-wall coverage by the American media. The charges of former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi of a stolen election and a “coup d’etat” are embraced uncritically and reported as fact by the New York Times, the Washington Post and other “authoritative” newspapers, without any independent investigation or substantiation. A media propaganda campaign ensues aimed at isolating and destabilizing the ruling faction in Iran headed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The protests are dominated by better-off sections of the urban middle class, who largely voted for Mousavi and support his right-wing program of closer ties to American and European imperialism and a rapid introduction of pro-market policies. The working class, seeing nothing to support in the faction of “reformists” headed by Mousavi and the billionaire former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, abstains from the protests.

The media dispenses with any pretence of objectivity and proclaims the protest movement and its leaders the spearhead of a “green revolution” for democracy. Every act of repression by the Iranian regime is given headline coverage, and rumors of hundreds of deaths are reported as fact. The US media focuses its wrath in particular on the regime’s efforts to block Internet and mobile phone communication.

Two weeks later, the US-trained and equipped military of Honduras breaks into the home of the elected president, bundles him onto a plane and flies him out of the country at gunpoint. The basic crime of the deposed president, Manuel Zelaya, is aligning his government with Washington’s nemeses in Latin America, Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and Cuba’s Fidel Castro, and carrying out modest popular reforms within Honduras, such as raising the minimum wage.

There can be no dispute that Honduras has undergone a coup. But the event is barely reported by the US press and broadcast media. Neither are the arrests and deportations of ministers of Zelaya’s government, the closures of local media outlets sympathetic to the ousted president, the arrests of foreign journalists and shutdown of US-based outlets such as CNN, and the imposition of a de facto state of siege, including a dusk-to-dawn curfew and the mobilization of thousands of Honduran troops in every major city.

The coup regime, which is backed by the Honduran business elite, the Congress, the courts and the Church, seeks to halt Internet and cell phone communication—evoking no protest from the US media.

Demonstrations in support of the coup staged by the new regime are dominated by the wealthy middle class of the capital, Tegucigalpa.

In the teeth of state repression, the Honduran teachers union launches a 60,000-strong strike that closes the schools, and thousands demonstrate in Tegucigalpa. The demonstrations are dominated by trade unionists, workers, the unemployed and the rural poor. This working class resistance to the coup barely gets a mention in the US media.

On Sunday, July 5, troops barricading the airport at Tegucigalpa fire on unarmed demonstrators who have gathered to welcome Zelaya as he attempts to land a chartered plane and resume his office. A 19-year-old youth is shot and killed. Again, barely a mention in the US news media.

One can only imagine how the US media would have responded had Ahamdinejad arrested Mousavi and thrown him out of Iran. Or the howls of indignation that would have erupted had the Iranian president blockaded the airport to prevent him from returning.

Examples of the double standard applied to Iran and Honduras abound. Just to cite a few:

CNN made great play of the efforts of the Iranian regime to censor the news and intimidate foreign journalists. It has said nothing about the shutdown of its own broadcasts by the Honduran coup government.

On July 4, CNN.com reported that it had received a video tape showing Honduran troops shooting out the tires of buses bringing anti-coup demonstrators to Tegucigalpa from the countryside. This video has been given little, if any, airplay by the network.

Most significant is the virtual absence of coverage in the US media of the murder and wounding of anti-coup demonstrators at Tegucigalpa airport on Sunday. The Financial Times on Monday provided a chilling account of the atrocity which makes clear its premeditated character. Reporting that a crowd of about 1,500 had gathered at the perimeter fence of the airport to welcome Zelaya’s plane, the newspaper writes:

“However, at about 3 PM on Sunday, soldiers guarding the runway to prevent the return of Mr. Zelaya launched an offensive against the unarmed crowd, according to witnesses.

“They opened fire from positions inside the airport and then sent teargas into the crowd.

“Moments later, a handful crossed the perimeter fence, which had been cut by the demonstrators, raised their automatic rifles and pointed them towards the mass of terrified men, women and children. Then they opened fire again. At least one person was killed, and as many as 30 were injured.”

The Latin American press has widely published photos of the fatally wounded youth, Isis Obed Murillo, being dragged away by fellow protesters. No such photos have appeared in major US newspapers or on television news channels. Murillo remains unnamed and unmourned in the American media.

One need only compare this callous treatment to the media frenzy over the death on June 20 of Neda Agha Soltan in Tehran. The death of the 27-year-old student, who was reportedly a bystander at a pro-Mousavi protest, occurred under murky circumstances. The government denied responsibility, but the media immediately declared her a martyr of the “green revolution.” Her picture was splashed across the front pages of newspapers and broadcast by every TV channel. “Neda” was proclaimed the “Joan of Arc” of the Iranian opposition.

This tale of two capitals provides a graphic illustration of the character and role of the American media. Owned and controlled by corporate goliaths, it functions as an adjunct of the state and a propaganda machine in behalf of US imperialist interests. Its class bias—and that of the lavishly paid individuals who serve as top editors, senior reporters and TV anchormen—is underscored by the diametrically opposed responses to the protests in Tehran and Tegucigalpa.

The same role is played by the so-called “progressive” liberal media, which has uniformly lined up behind the US campaign against the ruling faction in Iran. The web site of the Nation magazine on Wednesday carried as its lead an article by its Iran correspondent, Robert Dreyfuss, hailing calls by pro-Mousavi forces for new demonstrations. One searches in vain for an article on the events in Honduras. (For more on Dreyfuss, see: Nation’s man in Tehran: Who is Robert Dreyfuss?”.)

The American media adheres to no standards and observes no limits in carrying out its function of manipulating public opinion in accordance with the objectives, domestic and foreign, of the American ruling elite. Nothing so clearly demonstrates the decay of American democracy and the “free press” in the United States than the manner in which it lines up behind phony “color revolutions” against regimes deemed inimical to US interests and ignores flagrantly antidemocratic measures by regimes backed by the CIA, the military and the State Department.

Barry Grey
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:22 pm

http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/othe ... 33623.html

I did not orchestrate coup in Honduras
BY OTTO J. REICH
oreich@ottoreich.com

It is not often that an ambassador of a foreign country publicly accuses a private U.S. citizen of being the ''architect'' of a coup d'état against a third country. Yet that is what happened recently when the Venezuelan ambassador to the Organization of American States, Roy Chadderton, charged me with orchestrating the removal of Honduras President Manuel Zelaya.

What would lead a diplomat to utter such fabrications?

First, we should remember that Chadderton is the envoy of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chávez, a lieutenant colonel who once tried to shoot his way into the Presidential Palace in Caracas, then reached power by disguising his intentions and now holds it by intimidation and deception.

Second, Chadderton stands for more than just Chávez. Speaking before an emergency session of the OAS Permanent Council, Chadderton represented a collection of the least democratic and, therefore, least successful nations in the Americas. It's a group invented in Havana, financed by Venezuelan oil money and self-described as the Bolivarian Alternative of the Americas (ALBA, in Spanish), which Zelaya had recently joined and whose members include such anti-American despots as the Castro brothers, Chávez, Daniel Ortega, Evo Morales and other autocrats.

Chadderton and his ilk repeat falsehoods because they can. His government has said for years that I was responsible for the ''coup'' against Hugo Chávez in 2002 even though a three-month investigation by the State Department's Inspector General clearly proved there was no U.S. involvement. Chávez has presented no evidence to the contrary.

Chadderton attacked me because I have been pointing to Zelaya as the enabler of the corruption in Honduras. In April, Zelaya announced he was suing me for ''defamation.'' Zelaya commandeered all radio and TV stations and, surrounded by his cabinet and legal advisors, proclaimed he was dispatching a team of cabinet ministers and the president's legal advisors to the United States to ``sue Otto Reich.''

No lawsuit filed

With great fanfare, Zelaya's emissaries landed in Miami and announced that they were looking for a law firm willing to sue me.

After a large expenditure of Honduras' scarce cash, the team announced the successful conclusion of the search.

I have yet to receive notification of a suit, nor do I expect one. Not because Zelaya is no longer in power but, because, like so many of Mel Zelaya's actions, the much-ballyhooed lawsuit was a fake, a ruse to portray him as the innocent victim. Perhaps when Zelaya learned that to sue a U.S. citizen he had to renounce his diplomatic immunity and testify under oath in a U.S. court -- one that he could not buy or intimidate -- he lost interest.

In court, Zelaya would have been asked why he named his nephew, Marcelo Chimirri, as manager of the state-owned phone company, Hondutel. About $100 million ''disappeared'' from the company after Chimirri's arrival. Though Zelaya protected him, an independent prosecutor appointed by the Honduran congress charged Chimirri with embezzlement. Since Zelaya's removal last week, Chimirri has been arrested.

Zelaya may be facing much more serious charges than grand theft and abuse of power. His most recent felony was to undermine the constitution and to disobey the laws he was sworn to uphold.

With advice and support from Chávez, he tried -- but failed -- to subvert the electoral process so that he could remain in office indefinitely.

Had I really been the ''architect'' of Zelaya's removal, I would had advised that he be charged with the almost 20 crimes with which the Honduran Judiciary has now charged him, and be arrested by civilian authorities. I would have urged that the constitutional process be followed: the elevation to the presidency of the next-in-line, President of the Congress Roberto Micheletti, and the continuation of the electoral process, culminating in a November election.

Finally, the Congress would have voted overwhelmingly, as it did by a 125-3 vote, to ratify the removal of Zelaya.

A legal government

Without my involvement, these steps were taken. Therefore, under Honduran law, the new government is legal and constitutional.

The United States should not betray our values by joining the efforts of some of the most repressive and undemocratic leaders of this hemisphere to seek the reinstatement of lawbreaker Mel Zelaya.

Otto Reich, a government-relations consultant in Washington, served in senior positions at the White House and State Department for 12 years.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby geogeo » Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:27 am

"This coup crisis has become one of the biggest tests so far for the Obama administration in Latin America.

OAS Secretary-General Jose Miguel Insulza expressed concern that if the Honduran crisis is not resolved, it could leave the door open for other coups in Latin America.

"I'm not going to mention countries," Insulza told reporters in Washington on Thursday."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090709/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_honduras_coup_184

This is why i insist that this is not an anachronism but rather the opening of pandora's box. i saw a good argument for the fury of the anti-castro cubans in miami over cuba's invitation to OAS, and the subsequent possibility that Martinez and Ros-Lehtinen were involved somehow in the coup. remember that the historic OAS meetin was in Teguz.

I stand by my original hypothesis that this is cooked up by Negroponte and Company (Arcadia Foundation is quite obviously a CIA front) and ushers in a new strategy of tension.

I've been studying Honduras for almost 20 years, and have lived there for several.

BTW our sources in Teguz tell us that in addition to mass arrests, there has been torture and extra-judicial killng--slicing and dicing--of activists. But it's being done exactly like in the 80s, under the noses of the urban bourgeoisie, who are assured everything all right.

Regular, internet-savvy, educated Hondurans don't get it--it's eerie. They insist they are misunderstood; they are so brainwashed that they don't understand they're living in the Latin American equivalent of Insta-North Korea. Like they're caught up in the psychopathic hallucinations of the tiny elite running this thing.
as below so above
geogeo
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:51 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:51 am

geogeo wrote:"This coup crisis has become one of the biggest tests so far for the Obama administration in Latin America.

OAS Secretary-General Jose Miguel Insulza expressed concern that if the Honduran crisis is not resolved, it could leave the door open for other coups in Latin America.

"I'm not going to mention countries," Insulza told reporters in Washington on Thursday."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090709/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_honduras_coup_184

This is why i insist that this is not an anachronism but rather the opening of pandora's box. i saw a good argument for the fury of the anti-castro cubans in miami over cuba's invitation to OAS, and the subsequent possibility that Martinez and Ros-Lehtinen were involved somehow in the coup. remember that the historic OAS meetin was in Teguz.

I stand by my original hypothesis that this is cooked up by Negroponte and Company (Arcadia Foundation is quite obviously a CIA front) and ushers in a new strategy of tension.

I've been studying Honduras for almost 20 years, and have lived there for several.

BTW our sources in Teguz tell us that in addition to mass arrests, there has been torture and extra-judicial killng--slicing and dicing--of activists. But it's being done exactly like in the 80s, under the noses of the urban bourgeoisie, who are assured everything all right.

Regular, internet-savvy, educated Hondurans don't get it--it's eerie. They insist they are misunderstood; they are so brainwashed that they don't understand they're living in the Latin American equivalent of Insta-North Korea. Like they're caught up in the psychopathic hallucinations of the tiny elite running this thing.



It seems that there could be a connection between this and the CIA dustup with Congress


Why does this remind me of Haiti?


The mind wanders


I don't know what the program is. No one I asked would shed any light on it. From the reports of others, though, and from guesswork derived from a knowledge of what the CIA is chartered to do (provide exclusive political intelligence (that can only be clandestinely obtained) to our political leaders about major developments), I can come up with a few possibilities.

1. We know the program had nothing to do with the terrorist interrogation program or with extraordinary rendition. We know that it was primarily a CIA program, which means that it probably did not have anything to do with Sy Hersh's "executive assassination" ring disclosures, which relate to special access programs of the Department of Defense's Joint Special Operations Command. (Basically, if the CIA wants to kill someone, it requires a finding of Congress. The Bush administration believed that the DoD could kidnap or kill suspected terrorists under the president's inherent authority.)

2. The program was not primarily a technical collection program, but it may have involved the use of technology to collect information from human sources.

3. Newsweek's sources seem to suggest that the program was related to the war on terrorism, but it might simply have been informed by the CIA's other war on terrorism programs. That is, perhaps the CIA borrowed controversial techniques and applied them to another main target, like, say, China, or Israel (yes), or Pakistan or Afghanistan or India or Venezuela.

4. What type of program would be acceptable to President Bush and objectionable to President Obama?

One can guess: perhaps the CIA found a way to covertly place information implicating Hamid Karzai's brother in various drug-related offenses in the foreign media.....perhaps the CIA was covertly providing funds to an opposition candidate in Afghanistan or Pakistan in a way that was bound to be discovered by the regime we officially support. Perhaps the CIA created a front company to process, say, the encryption keys that Israeli's Air Force uses to protect communications. (Israel manufacturers this stuff endogenously, but you can be sure that the American government wants to know everything it possibly can about Israeli Air Force strategy vis-a-vis Iran.) Perhaps the program involved sabotage in a country like Syria, which the U.S. is currently trying to court. Perhaps it involved the planting of covert communications devices on unwitting international scholars who travel to North Korea.

The mind wanders.

http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/ ... hp?t=99423


http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/ ... hp?t=99398
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Postby Sweejak » Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:55 am

In Rare U.S. Broadcast, Zelaya Discusses Coup, Costa Rica Talks, U.S. Role

Talks between the ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and the leaders of last week’s military coup begin today in Costa Rica. Shortly before leaving Washington DC for Costa Rica, Zelaya sat down with us for a rare U.S. television interview. He discusses how military coup forces forced him out, the upcoming talks in Costa Rica, his domestic policies in Honduras, the role of the United States and more.[includes rush transcript]


http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/200 ... -u-s-role/
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

the pollsters weigh in...or is it the polled?

Postby geogeo » Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:41 pm

"A CID-Gallup poll published in Honduran media on Thursday showed 41 percent of Hondurans thought that Zelaya's ouster was justified versus 28 percent who opposed the coup."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090710/wl_nm/us_honduras_97

1. margin of error?
2. 41+28=69. Where do the other 31% sit?
3. What was the question?
4. How honest is CID-Gallup?

gotta love the media!
as below so above
geogeo
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:51 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:23 pm

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4612

Honduran Oligarchy: “The War is Against Chavez”

The Honduran de facto government and private media insist on denying the coup d'etat and say that they accept the mediation of Costa Rican president Oscar Arias, but exclude any conversation over the return of Zelaya to the presidency. At the same time they sustain that they are the spearhead of a "war" against the "dictatorship of Hugo Chavez."

The daily newspapers, Heraldo, Tribuna and La Prensa, lead the way in defending the coup d'etat and repeat, almost in the same words, the accusation against the Venezuelan president for his supposed interference. They also promote the withdrawal of Honduras from the ALBA accords, because they claim, "it has only benefited the left."

The headlines of these newspapers and the declarations of the current leaders of the State are a copy of the anti-communist manual of the press campaigns in the decades of the sixties and seventies in the last century.

With contrived arguments, the Honduran media promotes a campaign accusing the Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez of interfering in the country and provoking the confrontations last Sunday near the surrounds of the Tegulcigalpa International Airport, when 200 000 people waited for the return of the constitutional president.

By extension, they sustain that the UN and the OAS are manipulated by Chavez, and that the presidents of Argentina, Cristina Fernández, of Paraguay, Fernando Lugo, of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega and the Honduran president himself, Manuel Zelaya, also obey the orders of the Venezuelan president.

Even the highest authorities of the Catholic Church have joined the campaign.

The Honduran oligarchs continue ignoring the demand of the people for a return to institutionality and to allow Zelaya to finish his term. "We have communicated with president Arias to tell him that we are prepared for any dialogue, always and when it is not for the return of president Zelaya, but rather when it is to hand him over to the justice tribunals," Roberto Micheletti, the defacto president, said. He insisted, "we are not going to negotiate anything, we are going to dialogue."

"We are clear that everything that has happened here was within the framework of the law and the Constitution of the Republic, here what there was, was a constitutional situation," the dictator concluded.

At the same time, the de facto president continued naming new authorities in the cabinet and substituting governors and mayors.

Legislator, Mauricio Reconco, of the Liberal Party, defended the legality of the overthrow of Zelaya, "we know what was done was best, if not we would have been in a worse situation," he said. Immediately he went on to attack Chavez, "in this moment we are seeing internationally that Honduras has shown it is a country that has put a block the path of Hugo Chavez. The war is no longer against ex-president Zelaya, but against Hugo Chavez."

"It is lamentable that in organisations such as the UN and the OAS, Hugo Chavez continues have strength and power, he has chess pieces - such as these presidents, Correa, Lugo, Kirchner, Mel Zelaya and Daniel Ortega - who he manouvres at his whim," he concluded.

Cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodríguez, after defending the coup d'etat and critising the protests calling for the return of the constitutional president, attacked the Venezuelan president;

"We totally reject the interference of the Venezuelan president, we are a small but sovereign country, since he came to insult us in the month of August, that Mister has been trying to put his hands in here, he should leave us in peace, he should dedicate himself to governing his own country".

Meanwhile, the rightwing movement Generation for Change, continues holding mobilizations in support of the coup, as they did previously against president Zelaya, and they repeat the same arguments of the old rulers. Luis Colindres, one of the youth leaders said during an event on Tuesday, that a dictatorial system exists in Venezuela, and that "if Zelaya Rosales returns the same thing could happen in our country."

The Retired Officials of the Armed Forces Association mobilized together with the "youth" of the Generation for Change. At the same time as they defended what they claimed was a legal presidential substitution, they criticised the OAS, which they considered to be biased in favor of Zelaya and through a communiqué condemned the intervention in internal affairs by said organization.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:25 pm

http://www.chavezcode.com/2009/07/day-1 ... odays.html

President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras, ousted in the military coup on Sunday, June 28, was in Costa Rica today for meetings with Costa Rican president Oscar Arías, who was selected by the Department of State (handpicked by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) to "mediate" the conflict in Honduras. Coup leader Roberto Micheletti also flew in from Honduras and attended a separate meeting with President Arias, after real President Zelaya met with Arias in the presidential residence in San José.

President Zelaya was clear that the only "negotiation" he would engage in regarded how the coup leaders would step down and either leave the country or pay some form of justice. Meanwhile, coup leader and dictator Micheletti was also holding his own, stating he would negotiate all matters except for President Zelaya returning to power.

So things are pretty much where they were 12 days ago. And in the meantime, 12 days have passed and the people of Honduras are living in a dictatorship!! And their constitutional president, who is trying to return back to his elected position, is getting the brush away from the White House, which seems to be controlling the situation at this point. The people of Honduras are still living in a militarized state, with a curfew imposed and a suspension of constitutional rights. They are also still resisting in the streets, despite the dangers and risks, to try and force the coup government to step down.

Both Zelaya and Micheletti have left "delegations" in Costa Rica to continue "negotiating". The whole thing is getting pretty circusy and not looking good in the short time.

Personally I think the ALBA countries need to step forward here and take some hardcore action to return President Zelaya to the presidency by any means necessary.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:30 pm

http://quotha.net/node/110

J'accuse, by Rodolfo Pastor Fasquelle
Thu, 07/09/2009 - 21:07 — AP

I Accuse

Rodolfo Pastor Fasquelle, Honduran Minister of Culture (Translation by Adrienne Pine)
Tegucigalpa, 07/07/09

Before the High Court--that of history--I accuse those who, in different ways, have participated in the coup that has been perpetrated against José M. Zelaya, who Honduras elected to hold office for four years and who is unanimously backed by the community of nations- of treason.

I accuse Romeo Vásquez Velásquez--who positioned himself, up to the final hours of his legitimate post, as the friend of the President and a disciplined soldier--of having planned and carried out this treasonous and violent act, together with the generals of the State, controlling a puppet Congress along with the institutions that depend on it, motived by vanity, his pride wounded by his dismissal, invoking the supposed "illegality" of the poll, according to the rigged verdict, to carry out the unforgivable crime of kidnapping his Commander in Chief, for which he later pretended to have an "arrest warrant," something the judge denies. And I accuse you, General, of ordering a repression that is getting worse; the illegal arrests, the violent soldiers; the injuries and deaths that may occur are on your shoulders, Sir.

I accuse his accomplice Carlos Flores Facusse of having planned the coup and having conspired with and urged on the coup forces just like his father before him, of having schemed for months--together with José R. Ferrari and his acolytes and Jorge Canahuati, cut of the same cloth--planning the publicity campaign aimed at influencing a broad swath of the public, hiring experts on psychological warfare in Miami to bombard the population with obfuscatory messages, lies and fabrications repeated a thousand times, taking advantage of the ignorance and naïvete generated by the system in a smear campaign against the government and a campaign of intimidation against those who planned to participate in the poll, campaigns that were carried out without scruples in preparation for the coup. And I accuse Carlos Flores of hiding now and feigning innocence when his puppets have played strategic roles in the coup.

To Flores' acolytes: Elvin Santos and Roberto Micheleti B, presidential candidates--both unconstitutional--on the inside and the shameless members of Congress, who lent themselves to the maneuvers of the military, in whose hands they have remained perfectly useless, and to the candidates for Congress and local governments who followed the order to sabotage the poll and who will receive the implacable condemnation by our thinking companions for their great betrayal of the Party, and the same goes for the madman E. Ortez Colindres. I accuse them of having destroyed the Party of my forefathers, of having buried it alive, though admittedly injured.

I accuse Pepe Lobo, Rafael L. Callejas and Rodolfo Irías Navas who hatched the opportunistic and irresponsible plan of the National Party facing crisis, under the supposition that, with the enemy fractured, they were the beneficiaries and winners, without giving thought to the discredit that would be brought by the unanimous vote of the National Party in favor of accepting first an assault, then a false resignation and then the illegal dismissal of the President. As such, if one day the National Party were to end up being judged by the Supreme Court of the country, it would be subject to the same treatment and would have the obligation to please the darkest circles of power to remain "in power."

I accuse, before the higher court of posterity and history, these turn-coat judges, who followed the instructions of their bosses and political patrons to produce unjust verdicts, who betray the State, who make up sentences to cover their own crimes and a new type of crime which could be hypothetically committed in the future, who try to ban freedom of expression and intervene in the Executive Branch. [I accuse] the businessmen of the employers' organizations COHEP [The Honduran National Business Council], CCIC [The Cortes Chamber of Commerce], ANDI [National Industrial Association of Honduras], FENAGH [National Federation of Agricultural and Livestock Producers], who, despite that fact that part of their membership (myself included) dissents, want to give a false legitimacy to the coup, and who invoke democracy and legality and peace while at the same time promoting a coup that destroys any chance of providing the conditions necessary to defend those flags. Who manipulate public opinion, forcing their employees to march for Micheletti and who have confessed (I can attest to this) having financed mercenaries, provocateurs, to infiltrate and create chaos in protests defending the only legitimate government, thereby justifying their repression. And [I accuse] their followers who shamelessly congratulate themselves for defending their petty interests. Prepare to pay the price, now that no one else has the means.

I accuse the journalists who have become accomplices in crimes against the nation, finally demonstrating their shamelessness, not when they take a position (which they would have the right to do) but when they -systematically- manipulate the facts which they have an obligation to transmit with objectivity, when they hide them or make them up and when they slant their reporting to gloss over the vilest actions of the coup leaders and denigrate even the most noble of intentions of the popular movement, inciting irrationality and the coup itself, as many of the most notable journalists have done. I accuse you Rodrigo, you Renato, Edgardo, Alfredo, you, my namesake [Rodolfo]. Shame! You are responsible for the coup. [I accuse] the ideologues and spokespeople of the coup, Leitzelar, Valladares. And the intellectuals who wielded their supposedly neutral academic positions, an immoral stance in this context because it had to do with choosing between right and wrong, as is the case here.

I accuse these self-appointed "apostles", false prophets and backstabbers who call themselves pastors, invoking the name of God in vain against a civic proposal for social reform, democratization and betterment of Honduran society, who have tried to politicize sacred symbols and aided and blessed the darkest and most corrupt forces; who manipulated their congregations and followers and then justified the coup and subsequent repression and who now ask us to prevent a "bloodbath," as if the armed groups were not their own troops. For these hypocrites who are fed in order to extol their own virtues, fanatical followers of false religion with their vile business of buying and selling the heaven and earth (at whatever price they name, given that their empty words cost nothing), manipulating their congregations with fear, may they rot in hell! Because, as Father Milla says, the marriage of money and religion is the worst form of sacrilege.

I also accuse of treason those empty-headed people in our middle class, who gave free reign to these lies and who placed their petit-bourgeois comfort above the principles that their elders taught them, those of justice and decency and empathy for the suffering of the poorest. And in the end what good will the media dogma, the drugs and the incense do for he who is responsible for the coup, the usurper? No one will forget your infamy (that of a whitewashed tomb), the fact that you are an apocalyptic beast in sheep's clothing or how, in your wickedness, you feign innocence. We will not even forgive you nor your successors for three generations, so that the memory of your evil deeds be a lesson for all.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests