Jani's at the mercy of her mind

[agitprop]

You, OTOH, are flirting with it and apparently ready to close the deal.

You're having sex with it. Consider me coitus interuptus

[lightningBugout]

AP, I find that your motives continue to appear very suspect.

In addition to the fact that you have gotten away with making a kind of attack that has gotten lesser posters banned, you continue to make statements that are both aggressive as well as incorrect.

You seem to like making broad generalizations out of singular observations. IE Mac, AFAIK, has not suggested that all pychosis is culturally constructed or mediated. Yet you happily hurl said assault.

I'm aggressive? No, actually I'm just not submissive. And I would check carefully the assertion that Mac hasn't repeatedly voiced the opinion that psychotics are made not born. If I didn't get some tiny point of inference correct, I have to apologize for that.

You have to redefine, in your own mind, what it means to be on a forum where occult issues are being brought to light and understand the potential for the daylight to be easily obscured by a lack of nuance and a kind of raving fundamentalism. Is it possible for people to believe in the concept of evil, but hold back on seeing it everywhere and in everything? Not everyone is going to be on the same page, nor should they be.

Don't even go there. You are simply aggressive and not some sort of anti-submissive hero. You hide and invert and accuse me and others of charges we have not made.

Now AP, lets do this - why the fuck do you bring up occultism right here and now? Huh. It is not the primary content here and it has nothing to do with this story. You are either confused or you have an agenda. Which is it?

You are trying to sink Mac and you can't figure out how to do so with anything resembling grace. Leave it alone. Its trashier than Jani's parents radio show.

[agitprop]

LB

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Is rigorous intuition not devoted to Occult issues? Occult means hidden, what lies beneath, etc..?

[lightningBugout]

You, OTOH, are flirting with it and apparently ready to close the deal.

You're having sex with it. Consider me coitus interuptus

Tee hiddle-dy hee, my sharpness.

The good news is that people like you always disappear eventually.

For starters -- fuck you. I am not a bully and never have been. And I've given you scads of my energy trying to reason with you. Not a favor, btw, just what I try to do.

Now, as for this "Consider me coitus interuptus" well, I don't know where to start. You sound rather like you're going for a pre-HBO friday night TV series kind of "cool." I literally feel embarassed for you.

[lightningBugout]

LB

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Is rigorous intuition not devoted to Occult issues? Occult means hidden, what lies beneath, etc..?

Well, yes, on an idiotic surface read.

You apparently are smarter than that. In fact, you had a great line some posts back about how totalizing Illuminati CT explanation is a remnant of old Marxist superstructure problems.

But as a primary concept, not IMHO. Rather RI is a world where the occult is neither ignored or given priority. Just a natural part of the mix.

[agitprop]

For starters -- fuck you. I am not a bully and never have been.

I literally feel embarassed for you.

Love the first statement. It's kind of self cancelling, though. Don't you think?

I feel embarassed for you too, but more metaphorically.

[lightningBugout]

For starters -- fuck you. I am not a bully and never have been.

I literally feel embarassed for you.

Love the first statement. It's kind of self cancelling, though. Don't you think?

I feel embarassed for you too, but more metaphorically.

Jesus, go home.

Saying "fuck you" is hardly bullying. It is, well, saying "fuck you" aka "I am angry and dismiss you."

Move along.

[agitprop]

For starters -- fuck you. I am not a bully and never have been.

I literally feel embarassed for you.

Love the first statement. It's kind of self cancelling, though. Don't you think?

I feel embarassed for you too, but more metaphorically.

Jesus, go home.

Saying "fuck you" is hardly bullying. It is, well, saying "fuck you" aka "I am angry and dismiss you."

Move along.

I am home. And actually saying, "fuck you", is more than a bit dismissive. Imagine if the Schofields addressed someone that way. You'd be calling for indefinite detention or life on a chain gang.

[lightningBugout]

Saying, "fuck you", is more than a bit dismissive.

"fuck you" aka "I am angry and dismiss you."

yeah, as I clearly said, if you had read it, I am *dismissive* of you.

Imagine if the Schofields addressed someone that way. You'd be calling for indefinite detention or life on a chain gang.

Actually the irony is that you have just proved that you have not read my own particular comments terribly carefully. I've never said anything remotely reactionary or lynch-mob like about the Schofields.

You are treating everyone here that you think disagrees with you as a monolithic entity with a shared set of opinions.

[MacCruiskeen]

...

Jesus, go home.

Saying "fuck you" is hardly bullying. It is, well, saying "fuck you" aka "I am angry and dismiss you."

Move along.

I am home. And actually saying, "fuck you", is more than a bit dismissive. Imagine if the Schofields addressed someone that way. You'd be calling for indefinite detention or life on a chain gang.

Imagine if January Schofield addressed someone that way. The Big Schofields would beat her, starve her, give away her toys, hit her as hard as they could, make every possible effort to break [sic] her, and then dope her into a stupor.

You'd support them in their heroic efforts. And if you were boss, you'd institutionalise her permanently or pitch her off a cliff.

Anyone else would have institutionalized her permanently or pitched her off a cliff.

Sic. (You claim to have apologised for this. It's a lie, you never did.)

Leave.

---------------------------------

Back on-topic. Hear how Susan Schofield speaks (or rather screams) to the nation about her tiny daughter. Link on page 31. It's instructive. (Warning: Take care with the volume.)

[agitprop]

Now I'm going to second lightningBugout's admirably restrained request.

With all due respect, you evil-minded, timewasting troll: Fuck. Right. Off.

You've repeated ad nauseum that I wrote that I would pitch a child like Jani off a cliff. That's not what I said. I said other parents would pitch her off a cliff.... And I might add, in a fit of exhaustion and despair. It would be horrible, but that's what people sometimes do when they lose their minds.
Taking this into account the Schofields could well be using a great deal of restraint.

I don't mind if you do the literary equivalent of trying to push me to the ground and pull my hair out, in a major hissy fit, but please refrain from accusing me of endorsing child abuse in any way.

I suggested to Sunny that she moderate this forum several pages ago, without mentioning you imparticular. Perhaps, though, my initial jibe at you is better understood by the mods if they realize you have been repeatedly accusing me of endorsing child murder, from the beginning of the thread.

[MacCruiskeen]

Leave.

[agitprop]

Leave.

Why?

[Cosmic Cowbell]

"Big Dog is a bully who doesn't hesitate to use his superior strength to intimidate other combatants. Big Dog may be smart, articulate or just plain mean, but in any case he is a remorseless fighter, brutally ripping into even the weakest of combatants. Once Big Dog securely fastens his powerful jaws on a hapless victim, Me-Too will join the attack. Me-Too is far too weak and insecure to engage in single combat, and must ally himself with Big Dog or a pack of other Warriors to bring down his quarry."

I agree with Agitprop. I disagree with armchair interweb wannabe pseudo mental health activist. And bullies.

[Jeff]

I won't pretend to have read all of this thread, but I've read enough to think it probably flamed out a few pages ago.

Locking.