Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Hammer of Los » Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:01 am

The neo-malthusians are full of it.

And I rather enjoy it when Stephen is in full contrarian mode. He always brings a refreshing informational diversity. Besides which his grammar is impeccable, he is unfailingly polite, often very astute (sometimes displays blind spots too, don't we all), and a marvellously idiosyncratic scholar. The people who argue with him don't even understand what he is saying half the time, to their detriment. He could certainly argue the hind legs off a donkey, but this is a discussion forum after all, so one might expect that. Some folk just can't abide a dissenting opinion. It shows how small minded they are.

But please, keep on sticking it to the neo-malthusians though. They talk a lot of rot.
Hammer of Los
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Searcher08 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:03 am

Hammer of Los wrote:The neo-malthusians are full of it.

And I rather enjoy it when Stephen is in full contrarian mode. He always brings a refreshing informational diversity. Besides which his grammar is impeccable, he is unfailingly polite, often very astute (sometimes displays blind spots too, don't we all), and a marvellously idiosyncratic scholar. The people who argue with him don't even understand what he is saying half the time, to their detriment. He could certainly argue the hind(*) legs off a donkey, but this is a discussion forum after all, so one might expect that. Some folk just can't abide a dissenting opinion. It shows how small minded they are.

But please, keep on sticking it to the neo-malthusians though. They talk a lot of rot.


I think you are spot on, HoL, I'd also like to add his humour. I sometimes wonder if it Stephen Fry under a secret identity :lol2:

When taxidermy goes wrong
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... wrong.html

(*) Front legs , actually

This donkey had its front legs ACTUALLY TALKED OFF by Stephen Morgan
Image
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:59 am

Image
Image
Image
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby hanshan » Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:04 pm

...

Searcher08 wrote:
Hammer of Los wrote:The neo-malthusians are full of it.

And I rather enjoy it when Stephen is in full contrarian mode. He always brings a refreshing informational diversity. Besides which his grammar is impeccable, he is unfailingly polite, often very astute (sometimes displays blind spots too, don't we all), and a marvellously idiosyncratic scholar. The people who argue with him don't even understand what he is saying half the time, to their detriment. He could certainly argue the hind(*) legs off a donkey, but this is a discussion forum after all, so one might expect that. Some folk just can't abide a dissenting opinion. It shows how small minded they are.

But please, keep on sticking it to the neo-malthusians though. They talk a lot of rot.


I think you are spot on, HoL, I'd also like to add his humour. I sometimes wonder if it Stephen Fry under a secret identity :lol2:

When taxidermy goes wrong
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... wrong.html

(*) Front legs , actually

This donkey had its front legs ACTUALLY TALKED OFF by Stephen Morgan
Image


:rofl:

Morgan - a most rare combination for all the reasons listed (& then some)


...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby vanlose kid » Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:24 am

Stephen Morgan wrote:Image
Image
Image


"Screaming" Stephen "the Beast" Morgan representing the Sheffield metal school of anthropology.
"A concise history of the Americas (with band)."



*
"Teach them to think. Work against the government." – Wittgenstein.
User avatar
vanlose kid
 
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Hammer of Los » Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:09 am

Iron Maiden - Run to the Hills

White man came across the sea
He brought us pain and misery
He killed our tribes, he killed our creed
He took our game for his own need

We fought him hard we fought him well
Out on the plains we gave him hell
But many came too much for Cree
Oh will we ever be set free?

Riding through dust clouds and barren wastes
Galloping hard on the plains
Chasing the redskins back to their holes
Fighting them at their own game
Murder for freedom a stab in the back
Women and children and cowards attack

Run to the hills, run for your lives
Run to the hills, run for your lives

Soldier blue in the barren wastes
Hunting and killing their game
Raping the women and wasting the men
The only good Indians are tame
Selling them whiskey and taking their gold
Enslaving the young and destroying the old

Run to the hills, run for your lives


I'd say that was about right. Good old Bruce Dickinson. I bought this album when it came out. Fantastic stuff. Love 'em.

On the subject of that awful killing, enslaving, raping white man, I also rather like this. In fact I totally love it to bits. Hats off to Roy Harper;

Hammer of Los
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:23 pm

Hey, y'all! I'm a loooonnngg time reader of Jeff's and of the forum. I have to tell you all, straight up, that you are truly the most brilliant group of forum participants in this genre, bar none.

Okay, so I wanted to get in on this discussion, but couldn't get logged in. Jeff finally fixed that tonight, so I hope I'm not too late to add to the gaiety of nations here.

I am just finishing up a second degree, this time a B.A. in Native American Studies. Yep, that's right. Wasting time in the remnants of the university system of the good old U.S.of A.

When I saw this thread I couldn't believe it, as I just finished a class (Ecological Perspectives of Native America) this summer. GAWD. Firstly, I signed up for the class last year, and right off the bat I knew I was in trouble when the first thing the professor passed out was 'Tragedy of the Commons.' I got into heated "discussions" in the first week and dropped the class. However, I needed that class to get the degree, so....

Well, he toned it down when I told him I was coming back, and actually ended up pretty mealy-mouthed about old Hardin. So much so that one kid in the class thought he was against Hardin. I said, "Oh, no, he likes him very much." I think this guy is trying to hide is Fox News loving heart. ;) And for anyone who thinks that Universities are filled with liberal pinkos....uh, yeah. They are old white guys, playing golf, and massaging their retirement accounts.

Anyhoo.....there's lots to say on this subject. Some of you are wrong, some of you are right, and some of you are wrong and right.

First, I would recommend a book entitled 'The Ecological Indian' by Shepard Krech III. Much of this "ecological" business we hear is something that came directly from that 1970s commercial about polluting with the Indian crying. Even Native Americans believe that.

This is so involved, so complex, that I hope I'm not going to simplify it too much, and water it down; for, I don't want to do that. I'd like to do service to Native Americans, and what they believed.

Fire: They used fire EXTENSIVELY to clear grazing land for deer, elk, bison, etc. To move animals where they wanted them to be, etc. To improve berry patches- fire is a very good fertilizer. To burn off garden areas. This particular professor I speak of uses the term, "slash-and-burn," so you can take that for what it is worth. There is more, but I won't go into it here.

The horse: I cannot overemphasize what the introduction of the horse did to Native American culture. Mostly what white people picture as Native American culture is the Plains Indians. They were the ones who used the horse. NOT most of the California tribes, as someone said. And the high horse culture lasted, at most 150+/- years. Horses were first acquired after he 1680 revolt of the Pueblos and quickly built into a massive bison hunting/trading empire of vast proportions. It changed ABSOLUTEY EVERYTHING about plains culture. It changed their religion, their livelihood, their marriages, absolutely everything. It created a VAST wealth gap between the haves and the have-nots. Also, I will quickly say, that one elder long before this ever occurred, told someone, "Before the horse our lives were nothing but bad."

Of course, California and coastal cultures lived lives of relative emphasis on RELATIVE) ease due to great resources. They also had huge trading networks, and when Lewis and Clark, and even earlier explorers showed up, they talked about piles of salmon estimated to weight ten THOUSAND pounds, for trade with inland groups. How "environmental" is that? They were hardly Adam and Eve type characters.

I have one instructor (in the history dept., not the NAS dept.) who is an expert on Western Environmentalism. He's written several books and many, many journal articles on the subject. He says it does Native Americans a disservice to treat them like they were animals, just living at one with mother nature. They had GREAT impact on the land.

Now, as far as their religion goes, and this is just my opinion, having also taken a Medical Anthropology course: a lot of it is just like every other religion: how people react to make sense of their world. One can call that superstition, I suppose; however you'd like to term it, really. I go to school with a lot of Native Americans, btw, and count several as my friends, and many as good acquaintances. They are just like every other group on the planet. (Shocking, I know ;) There are racists, and not. Scholars and not. Kind and not. etc. etc. One of the most racist people there is a professor who is just as white as I am (my father was half-Native American,) but is pretty bad to white people. Said professor is discussed in the anthro dept. Said professor's racism is noticed. Called reverse racism. There are actually two of those. Otherwise, I have a mix of N.A., white, African American professors who are wonderful. Some don't agree with the Sheperd Krech view, others do.

Anyway, this is just a small sampling of the things I"ve learned. Would be willing to discuss it further, as I find the whole thing fascinating- obviously. Lots of horrific history for N.A.s Read about boarding schools if you want your hair curled, uncurled, and fried. But they also had slavery. REAL slavery, though there was also an adoptiong process, as well, for some tribes.

One N.A. author rightly says that to compare an Iroquois with a Sioux or a Zuni with a Navajo is like comparing a German with a Guatemalan. One of the most fascinating things to me (and most N.A.s DO NOT like this mentioned) is how many N.A.s were willing to sell out. Just like the whites who fled to N.A. villages to escape their lives. I think human nature hasn't changed that much. I think there were N.A.s who felt trapped and had no way out of their lives, just like white people felt the same, and wanted something different. Anyway, this is a very hard subject to research, as far as N.A.s views on leaving their people to live in the white world, as it's something that really isn't discussed that much. Not nearly as much, say, as whites that left to live with N.A.s

Okay, I've rambled enough.
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:37 pm

Here is something interesting. I learned this from my daughter who is a graduate student in anthropology: an anthropologist went to study the Hurons, one of their elders had written a book covering everything about them; their dress, religion, ceremonies, everything.

Except it all turned out to be a lie. He'd made the whole thing up. Why? Because their entire culture was almost obliterated by Euro-American encroachment. Many Native Americans were ashamed of having no culture. Most of the plains tribes borrowed much of their ceremonial processes from the Sioux, who became a gigantic group during the bison high cultural era, and, because of people like Sitting Bull purposefully evading the U.S. army, were able to survive much of the disease, etc. longer.

It is very interesting to study N.A. religion/spirituality and realize how much has been synchrotized from each other and from Christianity. This isn't unusual for indigenous cultures, however. Indigenous cultures the world over tend to be very inclusive. It is how they adapt, adopt, and survive. It is only since agricultural civilization has had such devastating effects on them that they are adopted the "white" way of being exclusive with their "beliefs."

And I say "white" because we all need to remember, we are ALL from tribal cultures. Ours were just wiped out before the Western Hemisphere's. Really, the problem is monotheism and agriculture. People can yap about how great it is, but we are in the process of watching its culmination destroy the planet. Derrick Jensen says it starts with slavery. One need only look at the Mayan/Aztec empires to see what gigantic cultures do.

And to jump ahead in the discussion and go all tinfoilly: I don't have a real strong ideology either way on this subject, and I hope I'm not coming across that I do. I honestly feel that the whole thing is some giant experiment. If one reads about the Spanish invasion of Central American one can't help but see that something was very, very wrong about that. Approximately three hundred men wiped out an entire civilization? And people can talk about the disease aspect all they want, when a civilization has millions against three hundred men, and it's obvious things are going awry and nobody is stopping them.....

Of course, the divisions were very deep there. And just as I discussed earlier, many people hated their lives, and were more than willing to let (and help) these white guys get the upper hand. But still. Once the Spanish imposed the exact same system, why didn't they do anything? I think a lot of it has to do with that weird aspect of, it was just TIME. Anyway, that's musings outside of the academic aspect of this discussion.
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Debunking the `Tragedy of the Commons'

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:39 pm

Oh, and as soon as grades are posted I intend to send 'Debunking the Tragedy of the Commons' to this professor. :bigsmile
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests