Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
uhh was just wondering, the whole "nuke" thing is just a memetic farce no? does its childlike simplicity not give it away? persia likened to a rabid dog on chain? the ultimate irrational/unreal pang of scare? the heck of it is, a nuke could in reality go off anywhere anytime. just a matter of which contractor/agent gets tapped for the honor....are HOPING Iran makes a nuke and shows it off. And they would gladly HELP Iran get such a nuke.
The Consul wrote:There is no way to know a war. It is not a person, or a pet. There was a girl who survived Hiroshima who remembered seeing a woman, her clothing burned off of her, her flesh a smoking orange stew, dripping off her bones as she walked toward the girl with her eyeballs dangling from their sockets.
What is the price of our undying allegiance to Israel?
Simulist wrote:... Appearances can be deceiving — especially in a fake democracy that draws its very breath from deception.Author Jeffrey Goldberg suggests Obama would act militarily against Iran if he were persuaded Israel was at critical risk.
Hammer of Los wrote:Simon Tisdall in the Guardian is not interested in telling you the truth, but something else entirely.
I mean what the hell is this supposed to mean exactly;Tisdall wrote:Having fluffed his lines on Afghanistan, climate change and the Arab spring, he is under growing pressure to fulfil his pledge to prevent Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.
He's telling me the Obama presidency has been a failure without specifying what those failures were exactly.
Still, I believe we might learn something from reading between his lines.
A test indeed! What must Obama do to pass his "test?"
They have backed Obama into a corner. They have made his presidency increasingly difficult in order to convince him he has no option.
Tisdall's piece is preparatory propaganda. The narrative is that Obama was under tremendous pressure to attack Iran, so he did so, and then his political career was over. That is the narrative they are selling you. And I guess that may be what happens if they get their Iran War Wish. Still, all their wishes have backfired so far, so perhaps all we need is a little, or even a truckload of Faith.
....
AlicetheKurious wrote:But the fact remains: when all the smoke and bullshit are cleared away, there is no rational reason for attacking Iran, and the US simply cannot afford to do so.
Simulist wrote:Whether we are at endgame right now is my only question — not whether a form of Manifest Destiny has been operative in the strategy we've been watching unfold for the past sixty-odd years now (and much more in recent years). This didn't hit home with me until I looked at a map of the region. The strategic locations of these various countries suggest — strongly to me — future moves on the grand chessboard.
Pawn structure, the control of key squares, tactics and strategy — it's all been pretty classic.
AlicetheKurious wrote:Ah, but I guarantee you that the Iranians are much better chess players than the Americans -- they invented the game, after all!
In fact, the Americans, at great cost to themselves and to the two countries in question, have so far only succeeded in effectively neutralizing Iran's enemies in Iraq and in Afghanistan and handing both nations on a silver platter to Iran, which is busily reaping the benefits, along with its ally China (another really good chess-player).
U.S. Becomes Net Exporter Of Fuel For First Time In Nearly 20 Years
First Posted: 05/ 3/11 04:28 PM ET
www.huffingtonpost.com
According to data from the Energy Department, starting last November -- with the exception of the month of January -- the U.S. began exporting more petroleum products than it imported.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests