Gnomad wrote:I do not deny that it would't have been a target back then, but what is the point of putting out a game now, when it has been banned for a few decades and is not going to be reallowed?
(fwiw, it was partially banned in 1969 here, and completely banned in 1976).
This is where Jeff Wells bans me from a thread for using science to explain how psyops uses neurolinguistics, thanks to disrupting trolls trying to make the subject a no-go.
So I'll repeat what I posted above about 1962/63 when Carson finally published and a guy named Carson got a famous TV job-
The damning number of CIA-Hollywood movies with the word "bird" in the title that came out all of a sudden is what is NOW being covered up because not only does it give away the social-control-through-media game but this AHA can be re-triggered every time someone sees a bird. Which is why Carson was out-marketed the way she was back when she published.
There are two cover-ups in 'Angry Birds.'
> How psyops works like it did against Rachel Carson in '62/'63
> How 9/11 really happened, not the kamikaze cover story.


