Zombie Restaurants

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Zombie Restaurants

Postby 82_28 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:49 am

I don't know how many peeps here are in the "industry" as I am, but this is a great article and explains a lot.

Slicing Costs, and Still Serving
You see them all across the country, in shopping malls and street corners, suburban towns and city centers: zombie restaurants.

Many of the undead are part of familiar chains that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this year: Friendly’s, Chevys, Sbarro, Perkins. The zombie restaurants, barely bringing in enough cash to cover basic expenses, always seem to be one sizzling fajita or glazed chicken skewer away from a merciful end, but somehow keep hanging on — leaving too many restaurants chasing after scarce dining dollars.

“There’s a lot of walking dead,” said Bob Goldin, executive vice president for Technomic, a consulting firm that works with restaurant companies. “A lot of chains, they hang in there and they’re hard to kill off.”

Consumers, who have generally cut back on the number of meals out since the recession began, are benefiting from the proliferation of zombies. Healthy and failing restaurants alike have been forced to discount relentlessly to lure diners. But for the restaurants, particularly small independent operators, the competition from the undead is a nightmare that just won’t end.

The hard times for restaurants began in 2008, as the recession and staggering unemployment forced Americans to cut back on dining out. During the 12-month period ending in August, the average American ate or got takeout at restaurants 195 times, down from 208 times in 2008, according to Harry Balzer, the chief food industry analyst for the NPD Group.

The industry puffed up like a soufflé in the boom years. Led by quickly expanding chains, the number of restaurants in the country grew by more than 100,000 from 1996 to 2008. By that year, there were 545,678 restaurants nationwide, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

When things turned bad, many analysts said the total number of restaurants needed to shrink by at least 20,000 to bring supply and demand back into balance.

Instead, the number of restaurants kept growing, albeit more slowly.

Sales have taken a beating along the way. For example, at Applebee’s, one of the nation’s largest midprice chains with more than 2,000 restaurants, sales at restaurants open at least 18 months slumped every quarter from mid-2008 through the middle of 2010. The chain’s sales have grown modestly since then, compared with the low level of sales during the recession, but dipped again in the three months ending Sept. 30.

Analysts say the restaurant industry bears some similarities to the consumer electronics retail industry. Before 2009, there were far too many electronics stores. Then, Circuit City failed, closing 567 stores. The sudden shuttering was painful for the chain’s 34,000 employees, but it meant greater market share for other retailers, like Best Buy, Walmart and Target.

“We need that Circuit City event,” said Steve West, a restaurant industry analyst for ITG Investment Research.

That kind of reckoning has remained elusive, despite bankruptcy filings this year by several major chains.

When Friendly’s Ice Cream, the chain based in Massachusetts, filed for bankruptcy protection in October, it said it would close 63 underperforming restaurants. But the company said it would continue to operate 420 stores, and a spokesman said it was making plans to expand again.

In California, Real Mex Restaurants, which owns several chains, including the midprice Chevys Fresh Mex, closed just 30 outlets after it filed for bankruptcy in October. It continues to operate 156 restaurants.

After Sbarro, the Italian fast-food chain, filed for bankruptcy in April, it closed 31 stores in the United States, but kept the doors open on 429.

Mr. West said that many chains and independent restaurants were able to survive the recession because their costs fell along with demand. Labor costs went down, as high unemployment led to lower worker turnover and gave restaurant owners greater ability to adjust worker schedules and hours.

Prices for food commodities also fell sharply. “It saved all these companies that we thought were going bankrupt,” Mr. West said.

The most crowded sector of the industry is midprice restaurants, which include chains like Applebee’s and Chili’s. Mr. West estimated that as many as 13,000 midprice restaurants would have to close to balance supply and demand and return the industry to prerecession levels of profitability.

The oversupply is partly a result of the economics of the restaurant chains, which often keep underperforming restaurants open as long as they are generating enough money to cover basic costs, said Mark F. Fallon, vice president for real estate for Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate, a Cincinnati company that develops shopping centers and operates 15 restaurants, including 12 Hooters franchises.

Mr. Fallon said that zombie operators cut costs to the bone to stay in business.

“It has nothing to do with the quality of the food or serving the customer,” he said. “It’s just a financial play.” He said his company operated differently and located new restaurants in areas with healthy demand.

But in the eyes of some competitors, Anderson Real Estate may be contributing to the oversupply problem. The company is in the process of completing a new development in downtown Cincinnati called the Banks, which will include 300 apartments and, by the end of next year, up to 10 new restaurants, with a total of about 3,000 seats. They include chains like Johnny Rockets and Toby Keith’s I Love This Bar and Grill.

Harry E. Stephens, the co-owner of two Cincinnati restaurants, one a short drive from the new development, can hardly believe it. “There are restaurants downtown that are struggling now and you add all those seats,” he said. “They’re going to drain our market share for sure.”

While many restaurant chains have been able to scrape by through difficult economic times, independent restaurants like those run by Mr. Stephens have had a much harder time of it, with more of them closing than opening during the recession even as the number of chain restaurants has increased or held steady.

The imbalance does not seem likely to end soon. Indeed, one midprice chain that everyone thought was dead and buried — Bennigan’s — is now coming back from the crypt.

Bennigan’s declared bankruptcy in 2008 and abruptly shut down the approximately 240 restaurants operated by the company, though some franchise-run Bennigan’s restaurants stayed in business.

Now, a group of investors has resurrected the franchising company and plans to open a small number of company-owned restaurants and dozens of new franchised outlets over the next five years. Paul M. Mangiamele, chief executive of Bennigan’s Franchising, said he had come up with a new design for stores and a revamped menu that would inject new life into the brand.

He said he did not worry about overcrowding in the industry but acknowledged that it would be good if some “old, tired restaurants” — a description he said once fit Bennigan’s — would get out of the way.

“I don’t think we’re overbuilt,” he said of the industry. “I think we’re underdemolished.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/28/busin ... wanted=all

I can chime in with what I think and personal experiences if the thread somewhat proliferates at all. But for now, as it's late, there's that. The dude that ripped us off and many other private and public companies is now an executive for one of the "zombie companies" listed in this story. Next time you're in NYC, Chicago or even Seattle and you see the tourists lined out the door of a Cheesecake Factory in a city rich with culinary adventure -- now you know the mentality of these cocksuckers.

"He said he did not worry about overcrowding in the industry but acknowledged that it would be good if some “old, tired restaurants” — a description he said once fit Bennigan’s — would get out of the way.

“I don’t think we’re overbuilt,” he said of the industry. “I think we’re underdemolished.”"


What a fucking dick.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:36 pm



“I don’t think we’re overbuilt,” he said of the industry. “I think we’re underdemolished.”



Same thing...

This is an effect of saturation of the market. Capitalism is A+ allegedly when there are ever many competitors in the market, however a direct result of this is that the market becomes saturated and stagnates. The reason companies like Boeing do so well is that they are closest to the "source" (aka government) and because they have such a huge market share. Their success is therefore very anti-capitalistic. Franchised restaurants should be seen as small businesses. Isn't there a figure that 70% of small business fail? A small business start-up would demonstrate perhaps a thousandth of a percent of market share, or even worse.

Info allegedly from the SBA (bad google job, sorry): 50% of small business fail in their first five years http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/smallbusiness/a/whybusfail.htm
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/smallbusi ... usfail.htm


Prime reason for failure of business seems to be insufficient capital. Sufficient capital is only guaranteed with enough market share. Not enough market share guarantees insufficient capital. Takes one to get the other in a chicken-n-egg scenario. With start-up small business the odds are stacked against them from the get-go. Unless you are an established and politically connected conglomerate of commercial and government activity, of course. Or act as a centralized government activity (see Walmart's commercial distribution system).

It's interesting to me that in an effort to revitalize that district of Cincinnati in the post, they choose to add to the problem.
But in the eyes of some competitors, Anderson Real Estate may be contributing to the oversupply problem. The company is in the process of completing a new development in downtown Cincinnati called the Banks, which will include 300 apartments and, by the end of next year, up to 10 new restaurants, with a total of about 3,000 seats. They include chains like Johnny Rockets and Toby Keith’s I Love This Bar and Grill.

Harry E. Stephens, the co-owner of two Cincinnati restaurants, one a short drive from the new development, can hardly believe it. “There are restaurants downtown that are struggling now and you add all those seats,” he said. “They’re going to drain our market share for sure.”



While being oblivious to the fact that on the whole, the system is going to suffer. Existing restaurants having a hard enough time as it is. Just another effect of too much stuff materialism.
Last edited by Occult Means Hidden on Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:38 pm

"Underdemolished" is a fascinating chunk of insight, though! Seems like a luminously important peek into the pathology, and I value those. Thanks for this article.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby slomo » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:16 pm

Wombaticus Rex wrote:"Underdemolished" is a fascinating chunk of insight, though! Seems like a luminously important peek into the pathology, and I value those. Thanks for this article.

Peak-oil folks would argue that our whole civilization is "underdemolished".
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:49 pm

Some of them, surely, but there's a lot of very sane and responsible and infrastructure minded folks in that camp, too.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby slomo » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:15 pm

Wombaticus Rex wrote:Some of them, surely, but there's a lot of very sane and responsible and infrastructure minded folks in that camp, too.

I'm not using "underdemolished" quite so literally. I think there is general agreement in the peak-oil community (or at least among those that hold no hope for a deus-ex-machina non-fossil-fuel based energy source equivalent to petroleum, which is a very large fraction if not the majority) that most or all of our systems and institutions are overly complex and must be downsized. "Demolished" suggests a more catastrophic form of downsizing, but I don't think that need be the case (though probably will end up being what happens, humans being what we are).
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Pickle Pizza » Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:40 pm

Great article. Thanks!
User avatar
Pickle Pizza
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:51 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby jlaw172364 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:11 pm

It gets even better. While in university, I noticed a large Chinese restaurant that NEVER seemed to do ANY business, yet it occupied an enormous space. My friends and I would go there once in a blue moon, and we would always be the only people in the restaurant.

I assumed it might be a front for something.

Years later, I talked with people who worked for a private security company contractor to the federal government, and they basically told me that many restaurants are simply money laundering operations for various organized crime outfits. And by many, they implied the vast majority. The federal government monitors all of their activities, but rarely intervenes, unless its for political reasons, or for tax reasons. The IRS still expects taxes to be paid, even from criminal enterprises, so a criminal enterprise that pays some taxes through a front business, may basically be paying protection to the feds to keep them off their backs. The feds obviously lack the resources to bust all these enterprises at the same time, and then they would cut off a source of their own funding, because criminals are economically productive in their own way. They would also not want to risk reprisals, or tip off the criminal groups as to their true strength or weakness.
jlaw172364
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby 82_28 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:39 pm

jlaw172364 wrote:It gets even better. While in university, I noticed a large Chinese restaurant that NEVER seemed to do ANY business, yet it occupied an enormous space. My friends and I would go there once in a blue moon, and we would always be the only people in the restaurant.

I assumed it might be a front for something.

Years later, I talked with people who worked for a private security company contractor to the federal government, and they basically told me that many restaurants are simply money laundering operations for various organized crime outfits. And by many, they implied the vast majority. The federal government monitors all of their activities, but rarely intervenes, unless its for political reasons, or for tax reasons. The IRS still expects taxes to be paid, even from criminal enterprises, so a criminal enterprise that pays some taxes through a front business, may basically be paying protection to the feds to keep them off their backs. The feds obviously lack the resources to bust all these enterprises at the same time, and then they would cut off a source of their own funding, because criminals are economically productive in their own way. They would also not want to risk reprisals, or tip off the criminal groups as to their true strength or weakness.


Yes, yes indeed they are!!! I am going to chime in some more tonight, but oddly enough I was just asked by my super cool (btw) boss to come down and help as they are getting slammed. I just got off work too. Heading back in, yo.

But this comment is right on the money, absolutely. Most of those restaurants you always wonder about are indeed fronts. I have mucho second hand proof. They're even left alone by the health departments and such. It goes on. I'll write more later. . .
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby 82_28 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:41 pm

Oh and Pickle Pizza, fuck off.

He's the dude I run Classified Humanity with, a friend and also the dude that sent me that article last night.

See what I have to deal with?
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Gnomad » Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:52 am

jlaw172364 wrote:It gets even better. While in university, I noticed a large Chinese restaurant that NEVER seemed to do ANY business, yet it occupied an enormous space. My friends and I would go there once in a blue moon, and we would always be the only people in the restaurant.

I assumed it might be a front for something.



Hah, I know a couple of places like that.
In one large bar they almost refused to sell even a beer to a friend of mine, practically ignoring us, the only customers. Acted really badly otherwise too, and there are never any people in there. Its also been there for years...No way is it a legitimate business.
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby jlaw172364 » Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:52 pm

I suspect that the vast majority of "independent" restaurants have ties to organized crime. When the economy expands, people borrow money and open restaurants. Things go well for awhile, but then the economy contracts, and then the mob comes in and takes over the restaurant. And I'm sure its not only restaurants, but other small businesses.

There are just too many restaurants with too many costs, and there's not much patrons to go around, can't you see this is the land of illusion.

Lol.

Anyway, I live near a major metropolitan area, and I cannot help but notice how empty most of the restaurants seem as I walk by them . . . year after year . . .after year . . . after year.

The PTB touchs on this on the TV show Breaking Bad.

***SPOILER ALERT***





Walter White gets the option of investing his illicit proceeds in a laser tag arena and a massage parlour, before opting to buy the car wash that he used to work part time at.

And the Chicken Brothers launders money for a drug cartel, while a car wash sits on top of a meth lab to disguise the environmental impact.
jlaw172364
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby Elihu » Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:00 pm

The Laffer Curve And Austrian School Economics
By Keith Weiner, on December 29th, 2011

Jude Wanniski, a writer for the Wall Street Journal, coined the term “Laffer Curve” after a concept promoted by economist Art Laffer. Laffer himself says the idea goes back to the 14th century

The idea is that if one wants to maximize the government’s tax revenue, there is an optimal tax rate. (Ignore for the moment whether or not you think this makes good economics in the long run, or whether or not you think this is even moral.)

Laffer noted that if the tax rate is zero, then the government gets no revenue. But likewise, if the rate is set at 100%, the government also gets no tax revenue. Mainstreamers say that there is no incentive to produce income at 100% tax rate, and this is true. But even more importantly, there is no means: a 100% tax rate is pure capital destruction.

The “Laffer Maxima”, i.e. the tax rate which maximizes the tax take, is somewhere between 0% and 100%. The Wikipedia article shows a picture of a Laffer Maxima at 70%, and implies that although it’s somewhat controversial this may be the right number.

There are two points about the Laffer Curve that are important to consider.

First, what in the world makes any economist think that he can gin up some differential equations and compute the right value for this Maxima? In the first place, every market is composed of an integer number of people transacting an integer number of trades, and each of those trades consists of an integer number of goods. People do not behave like particles in an ideal gas—they have reason and volition. The very idea of modeling a large number of people with equations is preposterous. Never mind that degrees are awarded every year to economists who purportedly do just that.

Second, what makes anyone think that the Laffer Maxima is a constant?

Let’s do a thought experiment that is in the vein of the Austrian School of economics. Let’s consider the boom-bust cycle, or what Austrians note is really the credit cycle. The central bank first expands credit, which flows into wealth-creating as well as wealth-destroying activities (malinvestment). As the expansion ages, an even greater proportion of credit funds wealth-destroying activities. Sooner or later the boom turns to bust. Malinvestments are liquidated, people are laid off from their jobs, portfolios take big losses, tax revenues decline, etc.

One clue can be found right there, in my description of the bust: tax revenues decline.

OK, maybe the Laffer Curve remains static and the only thing that changes is the absolute tax dollars?

Let’s continue comparing the boom and the bust phases. In the boom phase what’s happening is that economic activity is being stimulated, i.e. beyond what it would naturally have been. This fuels demand for everything: commodities, labor, construction, fuel, professional services, etc. And all of the people hired in the boom are demanding everything too. It feeds on itself synergistically, for a while.

At this stage, the frictional cost of taxes may be masked by the lubricant and fuel of credit expansion. This is especially so when everyone feels richer and richer on paper. People spend freely and we saw this in spades in the most recent boom that ended in 2007.

Now let’s look at the bust phase. The net worth of most people is falling sharply. Many are laid off, their careers, and sometimes lives, shattered. A huge component of the marginal bid for everything is withdrawn. People struggle to make ends meet. Budgets are stretched to the max.

I submit for the consideration of the reader that in the bust phase, any change in the tax rate drives a big change at the margin of economic activity. The tax rate is more significant in the bust phase than it was in the boom phase. The Laffer Maxima is not a hard-wired, intrinsic value of 70 (or 42 for fans of Douglas Adams). Like everything else in the market, it moves around. It is subject to the forces of the markets.

I will close with an example. Consider the marginal restaurant. Let’s say it is generating $25,000 per month in gross revenues. Net of $24,700 in expenses, it is generating positive cash flow of $300 per month. Why would the owner even keep it open? Well, times may get better…

Now, let’s say the tax rate goes up a little, say 100 basis points. The restaurant, making little money, pays essentially no taxes anyway. So this does not cause a direct impact. But what about the patrons of the restaurant? If their blended tax rate was 25%, then an increase of 100 basis points (i.e., to 26%) is a tax increase of 4%. These people will have to reduce their budget by 4%.

One logical place to cut is eating out. Suppose that they reduce their spending in the restaurant by $1,000, in aggregate. Now our restaurant has $24,000 per month in gross revenues. But its fixed costs cannot be reduced. And even the labor can’t be reduced in this case. The only reduction will be food supplies. So let’s say food supplies are reduced 1/3 of $1,000, or $333. So now the restaurant has expenses of $24,367. Whereas it formerly made $300 profit per month, now it makes a loss of $367 per month.

The owner can’t continue this very long. And so he closes shop. He defaults on the loans on the fixtures and tenant improvements, lays off 8 people, leaves the electric and gas companies with fixed infrastructure which no longer produces revenue for them, etc.

The impact to the economy (and hence to the total taxes collected) is negative and disproportionate to the tax increase.

© Dec 29, 2011 Keith Weiner
But take heart, because I have overcome the world.” John 16:33
Elihu
 
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby jlaw172364 » Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:09 pm

Right, so instead of defaulting on the loan, firing people, letting equipment depreciate in value while not being used, and cancelling food and service contracts, the mob is allowed to launder money, and the government looks the other way to collect the illicit revenues, in place of NO revenues, and everyone gets paid . . . all of the back of drug addicts.
jlaw172364
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Zombie Restaurants

Postby wetland » Sat Dec 31, 2011 8:37 pm

I wonder about this sort of stuff all the time. I also wonder if there is any connection to the recent evangelical establishment vogue for advising sheep to invest in becoming franchisees of one sort or another (restaurants, dollar stores, etc).

Meanwhile – speaking of fronts – check this out:

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2011/dec/18/local-companies-tied-offshore-payday-lenders/?businesstnvalley

From the outside, the shared headquarters of Terenine, Area 203 and ACH Federal looks like a typical Chattanooga office building.

But those businesses are actually a front for an unlicensed Internet payday loan empire...



Usury for Jesus, anyone? May I interest you in a little usury for Jesus? It's for Jesus, you know.
User avatar
wetland
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: At large, United States of America
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests