Bill Bennett: Abort Black Babies = Reduce Crime Rate

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Bill Bennett: Abort Black Babies = Reduce Crime Rate

Postby proldic » Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:37 pm

Bill Bennett: "[Y]ou could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down"<br><br>Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far-reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crime ... if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." Bennett conceded that aborting all African-American babies "would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do," then added again, "but the crime rate would go down."<br><br><br>Bennett's remark was apparently inspired by the claim that legalized abortion has reduced crime rates, which was posited in the book Freakonomics (William Morrow, May 2005) by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. But Levitt and Dubner argued that aborted fetuses would have been more likely to grow up poor and in single-parent or teenage-parent households and therefore more likely to commit crimes; they did not put forth Bennett's race-based argument.<br><br>From the September 28 broadcast of Salem Radio Network's Bill Bennett's Morning in America:<br><br>CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot about the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund Social Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in recent months here, that the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade, the lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30-something years, could fund Social Security as we know it today. And the media just doesn't -- never touches this at all.<br><br>BENNETT: Assuming they're all productive citizens?<br><br>CALLER: Assuming that they are. Even if only a portion of them were, it would be an enormous amount of revenue.<br><br>BENNETT: Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be, too. I think as -- abortion disproportionately occur among single women? No.<br><br>CALLER: I don't know the exact statistics, but quite a bit are, yeah.<br><br>BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that abortion is up. Well --<br><br>CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate.<br><br>BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is either, because first of all, there is just too much that you don't know. But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.<br><br>Bill Bennett's Morning in America airs on approximately 115 radio stations with an estimated weekly audience of 125 million listeners. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Bennett: Abort Black Babies = Reduce Crime Rate

Postby thumperton » Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:49 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://pichold.com/Images/Smilies/hsugh.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

heh

Postby glubglubglub » Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:59 pm

is that william 'bookey of virtue' bennet, or am I confusing morons. <p></p><i></i>
glubglubglub
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

so is this gloves off or what?

Postby zangtang » Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:02 pm

shit,man - i aint touching that with a bargepole!<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Reality Poem

Postby proldic » Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:05 pm

Fite Dem Back <br><br>we gonna smash their brains in <br>cause they ain't got nofink in ´em <br>we gonna smash their brains in <br>cause they ain´t got nofink in ´em <br><br>some a dem say dem a niggah haytah <br>an´ some a dem say dem a black beatah <br>some a dem say dem a black stabbah <br>an´ some a dem say dem a paki bashah <br><br>fashist an di attack <br>noh baddah worry ´bout dat <br>fashist an di attack <br>wi wi´ fite dem back <br>fashist an di attack <br>den wi countah-attack <br>fashist an di attack <br>den wi drive dem back <br><br>we gonna smash their brains in <br>cause they ain´t got nofink in ´em <br>we gonna smash their brains in <br>cause they ain´t got nofink in ´em <br><br>Linton Kwesi Johnson 1979 <p></p><i></i>
proldic
 
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to SRA and Occult Crime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest