thurnundtaxis wrote:Yeah, 8-bit, I'm kind of baffled by a work of this sort coming from a guy with a background like Mr. Bain's. At first it seems like a lark or an exercise in an extended symbolic metaphor. But apparently he's being rather literal. Either that or he's a deliberate CIA funded disinfo-spewing agent of W.O.O. I'm also intrigued that Peter Levenda would be writing an introduction to a book of this sort since in the past I thought he pretty much bought the straight story on 9/11.
Whatever the case, I 'm certainly glad that there's someone out there like Kris Milligan whose publishing house has been a vanguard purveyor of works which consistently deliver a very interesting and vital historical perspective for the 21st century.
Yeah Trineday is like RI overload(so not surprising Jeff Wells got published with them) Ive seen a number of Trineday books at Barnes and Nobles and other bigger book retailers.
What's curious about Bain's book, least from the chapter online, is that he is well aware and plays with the "new pearl harbor/new american century/neocon" meme regarding 9/11. But instead of a book(like Ronson's) that is a journey through weirdo conspiracy land; he does indeed seem ultimately pretty serious about what he's writing. It looks like he starts the book off with the usual inside job discussions and talks of Dan Brown/Masons/Illuminati, but then leaves that and goes into some really dark waters. I always found the "Illuminati" meme silly conspiratainment pop, safe words for the masses. I notice more serious writers will use words like "black lodge" or "black brotherhood" to denote actual occult links to political events.