compared2what? wrote:I don't have any political objections to people voluntarily allowing cops into their houses when they reasonably believe it's in their interests.
I imagine your interpretation of "voluntary" is a bit broader than mine.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
compared2what? wrote:I don't have any political objections to people voluntarily allowing cops into their houses when they reasonably believe it's in their interests.
Nordic wrote:stickdog99 wrote:As long as the only casualty is the Constitution, I say we all need to give a hearty round of the applause to the police state!
Exactly.
http://m.local10.com/news/Watertown-man ... index.htmlPEMBROKE PARK, Fla. -
A man living in Watertown, Mass., described having police officers search his apartment as they looked for one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.
"It started around midnight last night with hearing gun shots and explosions," Jim Bonasoro told Local 10's Christina Vazquez. "It's sort of one of those things where you see it on TV and then all of a sudden you hear it outside. It's totally crazy."
Bonasoro said when he and his fiancé woke up Friday morning, their neighborhood looked like a war zone.
"There's police, state police, military everywhere. There's a Black Hawk helicopter in the sky," he said.
The neighborhood was locked down as authorities searched for Dzhokar Tsarnaev, who escaped an overnight shootout in Watertown with police that left his brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev -- the other man wanted in the bombings -- dead.
"I was hoping we had enough food and there was enough beer in the fridge," said Bonasoro.
Bonasoro said two state police officers donning full tactical gear later searched his home.
"I went to my back door where they were coming up the steps. They had entered through the basement, through the side door, which was actually unlocked," he said. "They had their guns drawn, asked if anyone else was home. I opened the door, they made me put up my hands, asked me a couple of questions, cleared the house, and just moved on. They were professional but it did scare me and my fiancé."
My stepdaughtet was caught in one of these a few nights ago. The police locked down an entire neighborhood quite close to us where she was visiting a friend. She was stuck there all night. We could not reach her and she was not allowed to leave the building she was in. If she had tried to leave who knows what would have happened? There were cops and SWAT all around her, looking for one particular jewelry store thief who hadn't even hurt anyone. But that's ok because the LAPD are above the law and have our safety as their priority, right? Who cares about the Constitution when those shining knights in blue are protecting uf from evildoers?
And its especially ok because lets face it -- LA is just a little bit better than your shitty city!
Nordic wrote:Wow. Full blown retard on this thread.
I feel like i'm back in high school.
"this is MY city! Mine! It's better than your city!"
And
"we staff our own government".
Am I really reading this kind of juvenile pap at RI?
Sure let's throw away the 4th amendment because we're scared.
Pussies, every ladt one of you fucking cowards who feels that way.
What a sickening few days it's been.
Not because of the bombings
which were sickening in their own way,
but because of americans acting like a bunch of hypocritical high schoolers and bloodthirsty gullible lynch mobs. And why would anyone with half a brain be proud of their own provincialism?
Astounding. One little bombing, something our country dishes out every fucking day of the week -- only hell, lets face it, had we perpetuated this attack in, say, a wedding party in Afghanistan nobody would have given the slightest fuck at all.
America -- they can dish it out but they sure can't take it.
MY city! MINE!
compared2what? wrote:stickdog99 wrote:As long as the only casualty is the Constitution, I say we all need to give a hearty round of the applause to the police state!
But the Constitution wasn't and hasn't been affected by it, one way or the other. It's exactly where, how and what it was on April 14.
It's not a police state unless the police are running it in some way that goes beyond doing police work. And I wasn't applauding them. I was pointing out that there's no reason to expect an imminent expansion of the crackdown on liberties.
Corporate profits usually have to be at risk before that happens. For one thing. Markets were barely affected by this.
Spiro C. Thiery wrote:compared2what? wrote:I don't have any political objections to people voluntarily allowing cops into their houses when they reasonably believe it's in their interests.
I imagine your interpretation of "voluntary" is a bit broader than mine.
Nordic wrote:C2W:
Wtf are you talking about? Everything has changed. Where you been since 2001, locked up in Gitmo or something? Comments like that make me wonder if you're really that ignorant or forgetful, or just bored and looking for a fight?
Patriot Act, NDAA, blah blah blah. This kid, if they dont just kill him while in custody (because he messed with the coolest city in the world, allegedly) is probably gonna get disappeared as an "enemy combatant" and all of that shit, and it could happen to anybody. It could start happening to any of us because of what we write here, and you don't give a shit about it and blithely proclaim that "nothing has changed"?
Bye. I may be back or i might not be. This isn't the place i used to frequent. Y'all have taken the emoti-bait. Nice to see.
stefano wrote:7-Eleven robbery not related to Boston bombing suspects
Margaret Chabris, the director of corporate communication at 7- Eleven, says the surveillance video of the crime was not taken at a 7-Eleven and that the suspect that did rob the 7-Eleven does not look like Tamerlan or Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
"The suspect in the photos for that particular 7-Eleven robbery looks nothing like the suspects," Chabris says. "The police or someone made a mistake. Someone was confused."
The suspects were at the 7-Eleven around the time of the robbery but they did not rob the store said, State Police Superintendent Timothy Alban at an evening press conference on Friday.
Nordic wrote:Wtf are you talking about? Everything had changed. Where you been since 2001, locked up in Gitmo or something? Comments like that make me wonder if you're really that ignorant or forgetful, or just bored and looking for a fight?
Patriot Act, NDAA, blah blah blah. Rhis kid, if they dont just kill him while in custody (because he messed with the coolest city in the world, allegedly) is probably gonna get disappeared as an "enemy combatant" and all of that shit, and it could happen to anybody. It could start happening to any of us because of what we write here, and you don't give a shit about it and blithely proclaim that "nothing has changed"?
Bye. I may be back or i might not be. This isn't the place i used to frequent. Y'all have taken the emoti-bait. Nice to see.
stickdog99 wrote:compared2what? wrote:stickdog99 wrote:As long as the only casualty is the Constitution, I say we all need to give a hearty round of the applause to the police state!
But the Constitution wasn't and hasn't been affected by it, one way or the other. It's exactly where, how and what it was on April 14.
It's not a police state unless the police are running it in some way that goes beyond doing police work. And I wasn't applauding them. I was pointing out that there's no reason to expect an imminent expansion of the crackdown on liberties.
Corporate profits usually have to be at risk before that happens. For one thing. Markets were barely affected by this.
Yep. Nothing to see here, folks.
The huge military response to two probable patsies should be applauded.
Look on the bright side, fellow frogs! The water is no more than one degree hotter than it was a minute ago!
FourthBase wrote:....
justdrew wrote:FourthBase wrote:....
that was not necessary 4B, ones who love peace should TRY making it once in a while
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest