Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
PS I also want to be very clear that there is zero chance that Hastings was drinking or on drugs, I have read all of his books the last 2 weeks and in each one he makes it very clear that his sobriety is a very important part of his life and he takes it very seriously, he speaks very openly about it, doesnt hide his past problems and makes it very clear that he is committed to sobriety and has not had any substance abuse problems since he was 19 years old which is about 14 years ago.
Wombaticus Rex » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:51 am wrote:Yes, I was aware that, like most Vermonters, he's a transplant who fell in lurve.
And thank you for this:PS I also want to be very clear that there is zero chance that Hastings was drinking or on drugs, I have read all of his books the last 2 weeks and in each one he makes it very clear that his sobriety is a very important part of his life and he takes it very seriously, he speaks very openly about it, doesnt hide his past problems and makes it very clear that he is committed to sobriety and has not had any substance abuse problems since he was 19 years old which is about 14 years ago.
barracuda » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:41 am wrote:Hi!
Having known hundreds of recovering alcoholics/addicts, I don't harbor any illusions that the fight for sobriety was anything but serious in Hastings' case. But in all alcoholics it remains a fight, usually til the day they die. I've seen years of clean go down the tubes in an instant.
Don't misunderstand me: I'm not here trying to dirty the reputation of this man, or to make his alcoholism and addiction issues central to the plot. They certainly aren't, necessarily. But the if this was a hit, that history was not ignored by the perps. They banked on the idea that he had been involved in a drunken crash before.
@FoxNewsInsider: Michael Hastings' Friend to @MegynKelly: 'He Drove Like a Grandma,' Crash Doesn't Add Up
Our own Jason Torchinsky did a thorough debunking of why this is so unlikely, including how modern cars' internal networks aren't normally equipped to receive wireless instructions and how it's absurd to think that mechanical systems can somehow be easily overridden by a remote signal
barracuda » 26 Jun 2013 11:32 wrote:The thing is, it is highly unlikely that a single individual would have the tech capability to remote hack a vehicle. Unlikely to the point of impossibility. Such a hack is a team effort, i.e. .gov or .mil.
justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:48 am wrote:barracuda » 26 Jun 2013 11:32 wrote:The thing is, it is highly unlikely that a single individual would have the tech capability to remote hack a vehicle. Unlikely to the point of impossibility. Such a hack is a team effort, i.e. .gov or .mil.
no it's not. it only takes one person.
Use the new automatic car unlocker device to gain access ( or steal a spare key)
build a small computer device, like a "raspberry pi" that you've hacked a OBD2 port to, tape a battery to the thing. plug it in and secure the device under the dashboard, the driver won't see it. relock the door and you're done.
MinM » Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:00 pm wrote:@FoxNewsInsider: Michael Hastings' Friend to @MegynKelly: 'He Drove Like a Grandma,' Crash Doesn't Add Up
barracuda » Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:54 pm wrote:justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:48 am wrote:barracuda » 26 Jun 2013 11:32 wrote:The thing is, it is highly unlikely that a single individual would have the tech capability to remote hack a vehicle. Unlikely to the point of impossibility. Such a hack is a team effort, i.e. .gov or .mil.
no it's not. it only takes one person.
Use the new automatic car unlocker device to gain access ( or steal a spare key)
build a small computer device, like a "raspberry pi" that you've hacked a OBD2 port to, tape a battery to the thing. plug it in and secure the device under the dashboard, the driver won't see it. relock the door and you're done.
And right there, in your description, you've already assembled a team: one man who wants him dead, another to build and install the device, at minimum, unless he was murdered by an angry, retributive, computer nerd.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests