Has the CW poll been completed? And where is that thread?

[Jerky]

Cuda, I believe you, personally, have it in for C_W for some reason. In any case, trust me, you are FAR more invested in this bullshit than I am.

I am not the one who is trying to perma-ban someone who has been here 8 years and has paid money to participate.

Has it ever occurred to you that I don't believe she deserved to be banned six times?

"Oh my god! She called B'kin a TERRORIST!!!"

GASP!!!! Fetch the rope! The evil! IT BURNS!!!

Also, I would like it noted that Witler has personally insulted me by calling me a "Jerkoff". How many times will he or she be allowed to insult me, personally, before he or she accumulates his or her first BAN?

Answer at your earliest convenience, please.

YOPJ

[justdrew]

that person can contribute, all they have to do is use a new name and not fess up.

Not that it matters but, I think I'd be fine with c_w being unbanned, IF we never bring this up again. no more persecution talk. no drama. no disruption. no talk of fairness. just a fresh start.

[Jerky]

Same here, JustDrew.

In fact, I think your terms should be a pre-requisite of her return, and I have communicated as much to her in recent days. She has agreed to be on her best behavior and simply IGNORE anybody who tries to goad her into getting herself in trouble again.

YOPJ

[barracuda]

Cuda, I believe you, personally, have it in for C_W for some reason. In any case, trust me, you are FAR more invested in this bullshit than I am.

I don't have anything in for Canadian_watcher, on a personal level. I'm not holding a grudge. What I am doing is participating in the discussion, because yes, I am invested in the forum itself and don't care for what has gone on here the last two days or so.

I am not the one who is trying to perma-ban someone who has been here 8 years and has paid money to participate.

I'm not a mod anymore, my old friend. I cannot ban anyone.

Has it ever occurred to you that I don't believe she deserved to be banned six times?

I don't recall you vociferously stepping up to the plate to petition the mods and admin for leniency on her account before this time, no.

Also, I would like it noted that Witler has personally insulted me by calling me a "Jerkoff". How many times will he or she be allowed to insult me, personally, before he or she accumulates his or her first BAN?

Answer at your earliest convenience, please.

I'm not a mod here anymore. If I were I'd be arguing against the prohibition of the word "jerkoff" in general usage to describe persons of differing opinions. It seems fairly mild as an attack and an obvious parodic choice considering your username. But if you are concerned about it, I'd advise you to flag the post and request that the moderators have wintler scale back the sarcasm before he gets in trouble here.

The moral of this story is: protect your friends and those you value on the forum from their own worst impulses. If you wait 'til they're banned to show concern for their behavior, it may be too late. As I fear is the case for the object of your OP.

Take responsibility. Friends don't let friends post complete fucking bullshit.

[Jerky]

It seems to me that the majority of participants here would like C_W to be invited back.

So... is that going to happen? Or are the mods going to leave the gulag'd poll up just long enough so that they can keep creeping up the vote surreptitiously one sock puppet vote at a time in order to make the vote seem closer than it actually was?

All before "regretfully" making their decision to do nothing?

YOPJ

[Jerky]

If I address the mods, and you are not a mod, then why respond? Obviously if I was addressing the mods and you are not a mod, then I was not addressing you, Cuda.

YOPJ

[barracuda]

I'll respond to any goddam public posting on this forum that I care to, my old pal.

[wintler2]

Also, I would like it noted that Witler has personally insulted me by calling me a "Jerkoff". How many times will he or she be allowed to insult me, personally, before he or she accumulates his or her first BAN?

Answer at your earliest convenience, please.

Re Jerkoff, i'm sorry if you have a complex about masturbation, or even worse, have never actually done it. I use it more in hope than anything, the act usually has some sort a conclusion. Regardless, your text-based selfpleasing positively demands the label.

Back to topic: whining about the unfairness of mods doesn't seem to be working, maybe you should try another strategy..

[Jerky]

I was not suggesting that you shouldn't respond to public posts. My point was that you shouldn't have assumed I was addressing you when I was addressing mods (i.e., take it personally) - which is what you appear to have done - if you're not a mod. That's all. Nothing else.

YOPJ

I'll respond to any goddam public posting on this forum that I care to, my old pal.

[Jerky]

I don't have a complex about masturbation.

In fact, why don't you give me your home address so I come masturbate right in your smug little face?

Love,
Jerky

Also, I would like it noted that Witler has personally insulted me by calling me a "Jerkoff". How many times will he or she be allowed to insult me, personally, before he or she accumulates his or her first BAN?

Answer at your earliest convenience, please.

Re Jerkoff, i'm sorry if you have a complex about masturbation, or even worse, have never actually done it. I use it more in hope than anything, the act usually has some sort a conclusion. Regardless, your text-based selfpleasing positively demands the label.

Back to topic: whining about the unfairness of mods doesn't seem to be working, maybe you should try another strategy..

[wintler2]

I don't have a complex about masturbation.
In fact, why don't you give me your home address so I come masturbate right in your smug little face?
Love,
Jerky

Your definition of love suggests too much time watching degrading porn. How sad.

[Project Willow]

Since this thread is serving no purpose other than affording additional area in which hurl insults, I'm locking it.

Discussion on the topic is located here: http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=36811