why not: one more time

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

why not: one more time

Postby dude h homeslice ix » Thu May 18, 2006 8:53 pm

im beginning to think this morphogenic field may know something we dont.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_808.shtml">onlinejournal.com/artman/..._808.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
dude h homeslice ix
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:09 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: why not: one more time

Postby dugoboy » Fri May 19, 2006 12:02 am

i saw a documentary about demolition companies on discovery channel. this gas tank demolition was featured. i read somewhere that this demolition just kinda happened for no reason, there was no immediate need to take them down.<br><br>edit: this is actually very interesting... there are some theories that say the WTC towers were taken down with the help of small nukes. what if these gas tanks were removed in case the natural gas inside the tanks explode.... this is way out there, i know, lol. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/18/06 10:07 pm<br></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: why not: one more time

Postby dugoboy » Fri May 19, 2006 12:10 am

from the article linked above:<br><br>Nor did the nasty powers that be stop there. Few people know that <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Tower 6</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, the seven-story Customs House across from Tower 7, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>went down also from a huge explosion from under the building, an explosion that left an eight story deep pit.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Previous explanations blamed Tower 6’s fall on wreckage from Tower 1 or 2. Wrong. <br><br>i mentioned this in the pentagon tapes thread. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: why not: one more time

Postby chiggerbit » Fri May 19, 2006 12:26 am

Em, hate to sound dumb here, but just how many WTC-related buildings went down as a result of the plane crashes? Four? When? <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: why not: one more time

Postby dugoboy » Fri May 19, 2006 12:47 am

wtc 1 & 2 had planes in them. the WTC complex had like 7 or 8 buildings on it. they were all destroyed. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: why not: one more time

Postby Dreams End » Fri May 19, 2006 3:41 am

A lot of crazy people believe that only wtc 1, 2 and 7 were destroyed. <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 


Return to UFOs and High Weirdness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests