Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
chump » Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:15 pm wrote:Look: A category 3 Hurricane Erin was closing in on New York City - until just before the towers blew! And it was practically kept a secret!? See the Eye? In my twisted imagination, the pupil is growing.
Uploaded on Nov 1, 2011
(FEDERALJACK) Ten (10) years ago a category 3 hurricane named Erin was headed directly at NYC & the Tri-State area. It was set to make landfall on September the 11th 2001. If hurricane Erin had continued on it's path NYC would have had a category 3 storm to contend with instead of the "terror" attacks that occurred. Could this monster storm have been steered away from NYC to allow for the attacks to happen? This documentary not only answers that question, it shows how it could be done with technology that already exists today and did ten years ago. The government of the U.S. has had the ability to modify weather since the 1960's. Weather warfare was first used in the Vietnam war and is very much alive today. The worst attack on American soil could have been prevented by hurricane Erin and yet somehow the category 3 hurricane makes a sudden u-turn at the very last minute, do you think Bin-Laden did that from a cave with a laptop.... I don't. Just more evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.
Lord Balto » 06 Feb 2014 12:34 wrote:They couldn't just wait a week? The response to the failure of the Chicago plot to kill John Kennedy on November 2, 1963, was to wait three weeks and kill him on the 22nd in Dallas.
The deeper question, of course, is why do folks like to introduce extraneous nonsense that just makes those of us looking for the real truth look like nutjobs? I mean, really? Is this not John Birch Society style technoparanoia?
Lord Balto » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:34 am wrote:They couldn't just wait a week? The response to the failure of the Chicago plot to kill John Kennedy on November 2, 1963, was to wait three weeks and kill him on the 22nd in Dallas.
The deeper question, of course, is why do folks like to introduce extraneous nonsense that just makes those of us looking for the real truth look like nutjobs? I mean, really? Is this not John Birch Society style technoparanoia?
Elvis » Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:44 am wrote:I just cannot dismiss the possibility of controlled demolition, and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth seems to make a very good case for it.
Lord Balto wrote:So what's your point? Building 7 wasn't a controlled demolition because some dodo flipped a video and added some special effects? And remember, firemen on the scene said out loud that they heard explosions.
Lord Balto wrote:"Blue helmets"? Oh noes! It's the United Nations! Somebody call Alex Jones!
As with the photograph of Ed Lansdale in Dealey Plaza, I would imagine that any extraneous personnel at Building 7 were there to help blow it to kingdom come. I have long suspected that the significance of Building 7 is that it was wired in advance because the Shanksville plane was meant to crash into it.
the field interference generated by a blatantly ignored category 3 Hurricane Erin - spinning just offshore - on the very same day, disintegrated some steel in 1, 2 and 7.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests