slimmouse » Wed Feb 26, 2014 8:50 am wrote:I dont know if this link is in the right place here, yet I thought I'd drop a link to the video in here because it heartily involves the "Global warming" issue as does the Rockerfeller foundation, not to mention the oft repeated name of another RI favourite by way of Maurice Strong, who was also in on all of this from the begginning apparently.
"The great global warming debate" from Mark Windows and TPV. I should inform anyone taking the time to watch this that the body language of the man talking about trees can be somewhat dsruptive to what was to me at least some extremely useful information, so you have been warned !
This is a link to the video, you have to look for it from there. It is still on the front page at the time of posting the link ( scroll to the "windows on the world" section, where the said "great global warming debate" is amidst those available)
http://www.youtube.com/theTPVchannel
Im leaning ever increasingly towards the idea that the multibillion dollar industry that climate change has become, is quite patently something of a collossal fraud feisted upon each and every last one of us.
Furthermore whilst the following idea is maybe in some peoples eyes a bit of a long shot, it appears perfectly feasible to me. Namely the idea that if you already know based upon data throughout previous recorded history where the temperature patterns are likely to be heading over the next quarter of a century, you can tell people without the benefit of this data that we're entering "new territory". Back that up with a body that repeatedly tells us any number of interpretational half truths, ( IPCC), who insist that all of their studies are peer reviewed, when about one third of it apparently is nothing of the sort, and youre in business. Especially if youre designated experts have been told how to present the info.......or else go find another job.
Holy fucking shit - I can't believe I actually watched that piece of shit. I'm tempted to use further, more depraved scatological descriptive language - that was one of the most biased and one sided horror shows of disinformation (and outright lies) I have ever experienced. Lord Monckton is one of their key guests!
You talked this shite up like it was informative and challenged the scientific status quo - it does nothing of the sort.
By the way, if you think the Climate Change Hoaxers are from the establishment, then who the fuck do you think Lord Monckton belongs to? Jesus, i feel dirty - I gave you the benefit of the doubt, slimmouse. You keep posting steaming piles of excrement, claiming that the are legit sources of truth and information, and then claiming you didn't realize that they were steaming piles of shite all along? 'Opps! My bad - I didn't know that Lord Monckton (3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley) was from a hereditary family of Tory establishment insiders, who had been the Sunday Torygraph editor. Oh, and he's a spastic, retarded, birther, just for good measure. The man is a paid shill - one of the most persistent and mendacious. That they put him on the show at all means that they weren't interested in disseminating facts or truth.
What the fuck, dude? That was even more a horrific contribution than the Lyndon LaRouche sourced fuckwit you posted in the other thread. I'm starting to think that you are just deliberately posting the most biased and easy to discredit bullshit you can find.
This is not cool - do some basic fucking research before you post further execrable garbage