Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Wombaticus Rex wrote:No. He was 14 years old and posed as a Christian to survive.
He did go around with his adopted "godfather" and confiscate property from Jews in Budapest, though.
He discussed this frankly on 60 Minutes. To frame him as "unapologetic" is a flat-out hateful lie.
norton ash » 05 Sep 2016 20:25 wrote:This thread and title should be stricken from the board.
We get your fucking drift, mouse.
JackRiddler » 05 Sep 2016 21:17 wrote:In the world there are unforgivable fuckwits. Although they are clearly Internet capable, based on their presence, they pretend not to know even how to google the long-refuted defamations they "hear." Nah. Why do that? Why source? Why link? "I heard that..." Gimme a fucking break. Not-too-bright in this case is obvious, but the moron act is disingenuous. It's a strategy is to bring the slanders to a public, and "innocently" pose them as questions. As long as it rhymes with their own preference in hate rhetoric! Are we supposed to believe this shit, that Soros-obsessives just "heard" this for the first time ever?
"Golly, I just happened to hear" (somewhere, no source, just "heard")... that that evil Jew whom I keep blaming for single handedly destroying the world and especially for running the liberals and leftists and feminists, is actually also a Nazi! "Gosh! Is that true? Do you smart people know anything about that?" "Let's have an open-minded discussion!"
I don't think this should be excused. No thread should ever be deleted, it should be firepitted, and its progenitor (as well as its long-term twin, who showed up) should finally get the banishment that's been coming to him/them/it for about 10 years.
.
Burnt Hill » Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:48 pm wrote:Soros made a cavalier comment at the end of that interview that could be interpreted as "unapologetic",
by those so inclined.
Not the "happiest time" comment referenced above.
Soros as an individual is worthy of conversation, but not in the context of the op.
JackRiddler » 05 Sep 2016 21:50 wrote:This is what I do not forgive: "Heard recently..."
So of course, you bring it straight here. Innocently! In a new thread, when there are like a dozen already on the person.
How about the device at the following link, you ever hear of that?
https://www.google.com/search?client=op ... 8&oe=UTF-8
backtoiam wrote:Burnt Hill » Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:48 pm wrote:Soros made a cavalier comment at the end of that interview that could be interpreted as "unapologetic",
by those so inclined.
Not the "happiest time" comment referenced above.
Soros as an individual is worthy of conversation, but not in the context of the op.
The names of Jewish people fly across this site all the time and the bullets don't fly. Take Kissinger for example. Kissinger gets trampled and derided on a regular basis around here, he is Jewish, and nobody seems to care, and that crafty old fox is probably ten times richer than anybody would ever guess too.
Soros is a high profile mega billionare with a ton of influence and heavily involved in world affairs and politics. He makes himself the topic of conversation by his own choosing. He chooses to be very high profile and very involved.
At one time Kissinger was high profile too but he keeps a low profile now. But Soros chooses to stand out there so he should be fair game like everybody else. He is a news maker in his own right by his own choice. Its ok to discuss Kissinger but not Soros for some reason.
Burnt Hill » Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:17 pm wrote:backtoiam wrote:Burnt Hill » Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:48 pm wrote:Soros made a cavalier comment at the end of that interview that could be interpreted as "unapologetic",
by those so inclined.
Not the "happiest time" comment referenced above.
Soros as an individual is worthy of conversation, but not in the context of the op.
The names of Jewish people fly across this site all the time and the bullets don't fly. Take Kissinger for example. Kissinger gets trampled and derided on a regular basis around here, he is Jewish, and nobody seems to care, and that crafty old fox is probably ten times richer than anybody would ever guess too.
Soros is a high profile mega billionare with a ton of influence and heavily involved in world affairs and politics. He makes himself the topic of conversation by his own choosing. He chooses to be very high profile and very involved.
At one time Kissinger was high profile too but he keeps a low profile now. But Soros chooses to stand out there so he should be fair game like everybody else. He is a news maker in his own right by his own choice. Its ok to discuss Kissinger but not Soros for some reason.
Soros is fair game and open to criticism.
Innuendo about his being a pro-Nazi anti-Semite is not fair play.
So the op as presented is junk.
slimmouse could change the title and apologize, and maybe we could have a discussion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests