A bit of good news - Faux in freefall.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

A bit of good news - Faux in freefall.

Postby slimmouse » Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:47 pm

<br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/1/111723/4980">www.dailykos.com/story/20...11723/4980</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br> <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>As we all know, the media is rampant with sycophantic, corporate shills and can't be trusted to deliver a pizza. But an intersting trend is developing that ought to shake their confidence in the suck-up school of journalism.<br><br>The just released February ratings (pdf) for cable news networks tell a tale that is decidedly downbeat for Fox News, the leader in propaganda programming. In a comparison with February 2005, the numbers for every network are up except for Fox. Details follow.....<br><br>Cross-posted at...<br><br> * KingOneEye's diary :: ::<br>*<br><br>This may come as some surprise to Bill O'Reilly who, in a moment of empathy for his competition at MSNBC, started a petition to replace Keith Olbermann with former MSNBC host, Phil Donahue. O'Reilly felt sorry for what he said was the net's poor performance. Never mind that Olbermann's show drew more viewers than MSNBC's conservative hosted shows. And I certainly doubt that Bill was just being indignant because Keith was being mean to him on a nightly basis. Now Bill has to swallow the difficult truth that Keith's viewership is growing while his own is shrinking. In the key demographic group of viewers aged 25-54, the Total Day ratings for MSNBC rose 47% while Fox declined -13%.<br><br>Fox's Prime Time erosion was even greater at -21%. In fact, in every hour in the daypart, from 3:00pm till midnight, Fox numbers were lower. This is a distinction that only Fox, of the five nets surveyed, was able to achieve.<br><br>The largest decline was suffered by Greta Van Susteran's On The Record (-22%), followed closely by O'Reilly (-21%). Hannity & What's His Name took the Bronze (-17%). Of the MSNBC programs opposite those losers, Olbermann's Countdown was the biggest gainer (55%), which I'm sure doesn't bother O'Reilly at all.<br><br>The growing feud between Bill and Keith is something unique in commercial television. It has taken on a personal tone that I can't recall witnessing before. There is, however, a difference in style. While Olbermann is merciless in his mockery, he sticks to commenting on the substance of O'Reilly's program and the stupid or demonstrably false things that O'Reilly says. Billy, on the other hand, seems to respond only by pointing out that more people watch his show than Olbermann's. You know, the 2 million flies defense. But if O'Reilly isn't careful, he may soon not have even that to crow about.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br> I suppose the bad news is that the others are up. But the thousand mile march begins with the first small step <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: A bit of good news - Faux in freefall.

Postby professorpan » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:09 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> suppose the bad news is that the others are up. But the thousand mile march begins with the first small step<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Amen.<br><br>With the Katrina video making the rounds, even on Faux News, I think even the hardest Bush Cultists are seeing the writing on the wall. I'm not counting on it, but I can keep my fingers crossed. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests