Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Naomi Klein Warns Us to Brace Ourselves for the ‘First Shocks of Trump’s Disaster Capitalism’
WE ALREADY KNOW that the Trump administration plans to deregulate markets, wage all-out war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” trash climate science and unleash a fossil-fuel frenzy. It’s a vision that can be counted on to generate a tsunami of crises and shocks: economic shocks, as market bubbles burst; security shocks, as blowback from foreign belligerence comes home; weather shocks, as our climate is further destabilized; and industrial shocks, as oil pipelines spill and rigs collapse, which they tend to do, especially when enjoying light-touch regulation.
All this is dangerous enough. What’s even worse is the way the Trump administration can be counted on to exploit these shocks politically and economically.
Naomi Klein explains how the Trump administration might take advantage of coming crises to Jeremy Scahill at the Women’s March, Jan. 21, 2017.
Speculation is unnecessary. All that’s required is a little knowledge of recent history. Ten years ago, I published “The Shock Doctrine,” a history of the ways in which crises have been systematically exploited over the last half century to further a radical pro-corporate agenda. The book begins and ends with the response to Hurricane Katrina, because it stands as such a harrowing blueprint for disaster capitalism.
That’s relevant because of the central, if little-recalled, role played by the man who is now the U.S. vice president, Mike Pence. At the time Katrina hit New Orleans, Pence was chairman of the powerful and highly ideological Republican Study Committee (RSC). On September 13, 2005 — just 14 days after the levees were breached and with parts of New Orleans still under water — the RSC convened a fateful meeting at the offices of the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.
Under Pence’s leadership, the group came up with a list of “Pro-Free-Market Ideas for Responding to Hurricane Katrina and High Gas Prices” — 32 policies in all, each one straight out of the disaster capitalism playbook.
Vehicles form a line at an Exxon gas station off of Interstate 55 in Jackson, Miss., Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2005. The station was one of the few in the city with both power and gas one day after Hurricane Katrina made landfall. (AP Photo/The Calrion Ledger, Rick Guy) Vehicles form a line at an Exxon gas station off of Interstate 55 in Jackson, Miss., Aug. 30, 2005. The station was one of the few in the city with both power and gas one day after Hurricane Katrina made landfall. Photo: Rick Guy/The Calrion Ledger/AP
To get a sense of how the Trump administration will respond to their first crises, it’s worth reading the list in full (and noting Pence’s name right at the bottom).
What stands out in the package of pseudo “relief” policies is the commitment to wage all-out war on labor standards and on the public sphere — which is ironic because the failure of public infrastructure is what turned Katrina into a human catastrophe. Also notable is the determination to use any opportunity to strengthen the hand of the oil and gas industry.
The first three items on the RSC list are “automatically suspend Davis-Bacon prevailing wage laws in disaster areas,” a reference to the law that required federal contractors to pay a living wage; “make the entire affected area a flat-tax free-enterprise zone”; and “make the entire region an economic competitiveness zone (comprehensive tax incentives and waiving of regulations).”
Another demand called for giving parents vouchers to use at charter schools, a move perfectly in line with the vision held by Trump’s pick for education secretary, Betsy DeVos.
All these measures were announced by President George W. Bush within the week. Under pressure, Bush was eventually forced to reinstate the labor standards, though they were largely ignored by contractors. There is every reason to believe this will be the model for the multi-billion-dollar infrastructure investments Trump is using to court the labor movement. Repealing Davis-Bacon for those projects was reportedly already floated at Monday’s meeting with leaders of construction and building trade unions.
Back in 2005, the Republican Study Committee meeting produced more ideas that gained presidential support. Climate scientists have directly linked the increased intensity of hurricanes to warming ocean temperatures. This connection, however, didn’t stop Pence and the RSC from calling on Congress to repeal environmental regulations on the Gulf Coast, give permission for new oil refineries in the United States, and to green-light “drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.”
All these measures are a surefire way to drive up greenhouse gas emissions, the major human contributor to climate change, yet they were immediately championed by the president under the guise of responding to a devastating storm.
The oil industry wasn’t the only one to profit from Hurricane Katrina, of course. So did a slew of well-connected contractors, who turned the Gulf Coast into a laboratory for privatized disaster response.
The companies that snatched up the biggest contracts were the familiar gang from the invasion of Iraq: Halliburton’s KBR unit won a $60 million gig to reconstruct military bases along the coast. Blackwater was hired to protect FEMA employees from looters. Parsons, infamous for its sloppy Iraq work, was brought in for a major bridge construction project in Mississippi. Fluor, Shaw, Bechtel, CH2M Hill — all top contractors in Iraq — were hired by the government to provide mobile homes to evacuees just ten days after the levees broke. Their contracts ended up totaling $3.4 billion, no open bidding required.
And no opportunity for profit was left untapped. Kenyon, a division of the mega funeral conglomerate Service Corporation International (a major Bush campaign donor), was hired to retrieve the dead from homes and streets. The work was extraordinarily slow, and bodies were left in the broiling sun for days. Emergency workers and local volunteer morticians were forbidden to step in to help because handling the bodies impinged on Kenyon’s commercial territory.
And as with so many of Trump’s decisions so far, relevant experience often appeared to have nothing to do with how contracts were allocated. AshBritt, a company paid half a billion dollars to remove debris, reportedly didn’t own a single dump truck and farmed out the entire job to contractors.
NEW ORLEANS - AUGUST 31: People wait for assistance after being rescued from their homes a day earlier in the Ninth Ward as a small fire burns after Hurricane Katrina August 31, 2005 in New Orleans, Louisiana. Devastation is widespread throughout the city with water approximately 12 feet high in some areas. Hundreds are feared dead and thousands were left homeless in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida by the storm. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images) People wait for assistance after being rescued from their homes a day earlier in the Ninth Ward as a small fire burns after Hurricane Katrina Aug. 31, 2005 in New Orleans. Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images
Even more striking was the company that FEMA paid $5.2 million to perform the crucial role of building a base camp for emergency workers in St. Bernard Parish, a suburb of New Orleans. The camp construction fell behind schedule and was never completed. When the contractor was investigated, it emerged that the company, Lighthouse Disaster Relief, was actually a religious group. “About the closest thing I have done to this is just organize a youth camp with my church,” confessed Lighthouse’s director, Pastor Gary Heldreth.
After all the layers of subcontractors had taken their cut, there was next to nothing left for the people doing the work. For instance, the author Mike Davis tracked the way FEMA paid Shaw $175 a square foot to install blue tarps on damaged roofs, even though the tarps themselves were provided by the government. Once all the subcontractors took their share, the workers who actually hammered in the tarps were paid as little as $2 a square foot. “Every level of the contracting food chain, in other words, is grotesquely overfed except the bottom rung,” Davis wrote, “where the actual work is carried out.”
In Mississippi, a class-action lawsuit forced several companies to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in back wages to immigrant workers. Some were not paid at all. On one Halliburton/KBR job site, undocumented immigrant workers reported being wakened in the middle of the night by their employer (a sub-subcontractor), who allegedly told them that immigration agents were on their way. Most workers fled to avoid arrest.
This corruption and abuse is particularly relevant because of Trump’s stated plan to contract out much of his infrastructure spending to private players in so-called public-private partnerships.
In the Katrina aftermath, the attacks on vulnerable people, carried out in the name of reconstruction and relief, did not stop there. In order to offset the tens of billions going to private companies in contracts and tax breaks, in November 2005 the Republican-controlled Congress announced that it needed to cut $40 billion from the federal budget. Among the programs that were slashed were student loans, Medicaid and food stamps. In other words, the poorest people in the United States subsidized the contractor bonanza twice: First, when Katrina relief morphed into unregulated corporate handouts, providing neither decent jobs nor functional public services; and, second, when the few programs that directly assist the unemployed and working poor nationwide were gutted to pay those bloated bills.
Jenny Bullard carries a pair of boots from her home that was damaged by a tornado, Sunday, Jan. 22, 2017, in Adel, Ga. Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal declared a state of emergency in several counties, including Cook, that have suffered deaths, injuries and severe damage from weekend storms. (AP Photo/Branden Camp) Jenny Bullard carries a pair of boots from her home that was damaged by a tornado, Sunday, Jan. 22, 2017, in Adel, Ga. Photo: Branden Camp/AP
This is the disaster capitalism blueprint, and it aligns with Trump’s own track record as a businessman all too well.
Trump and Pence come to power at a time when these kinds of disasters, like the lethal tornadoes that just struck the Southeastern United States, are coming fast and furious. Trump has already declared the U.S. a rolling disaster zone. And the shocks will keep getting bigger, thanks to the reckless policies that have already been promised.
What Katrina tells us is that this administration will attempt to exploit each disaster for maximum gain. We’d better get ready.
Portions of this article were adapted from The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.
https://theintercept.com/2017/01/24/get ... apitalism/
Trump’s Visa Ban Is About Anti-Muslim Bigotry, Not Security
Posted on Jan 25, 2017
By Juan Cole / Informed Comment
Shepard Fairey
Reuters is reporting that on Wednesday, Trump will announce a halt to the issuing of visas to citizens of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. If this report is correct, Trump will represent this step as being about security, but it is not. Of the 750,000 refugees admitted since 2001, hundreds of thousands of them from the Middle East, virtually no refugees have committed an act of terrorism on US soil (typically they are running away from the violent people). He will say that refugees and immigrants from these countries need to be better vetted, but refugees are already subjected to a rigorous 18-month vetting process.
This measure, if it is taken, is just more racial and religious exclusion, policies we have seen before in the long and rich history of American racism. The 3 million Muslim-Americans are in Trump’s sites.
By far the majority of terrorist acts and political violence in the United States is committed by white supremacists.
It would be really bad if we got more white supremacists from abroad through immigration, since they are a clear terrorist threat. The head of German intelligence recently warned that far right extremist groups in his country are hooking up with US gangs and planning attacks.
In fact, about a quarter of seats in the European Parliament are now held by far right parties. A far right party founded by ex-Nazis almost took over Austria last year. A far right party has been ruling Hungary. Marine LePen is credible as the next president of France, and she heads a far right party. Maybe Trump should stop visas for Europe until we figure out what is going on.
If the argument is that these seven countries are violent, then what about South Sudan, Ukraine, Colombia, Venezuela, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic? These countries are among the lowest ranked in the Global Peace Index. Want to know what the difference is? Religion. The seven Trump-designated countries are all Muslim-majority.
Iran isn’t even typically ranked all that high for violence. It is ranked as more stable than Thailand. Thailand isn’t on Trump’s list.
It should be remembered that there are hundreds of thousands of US citizens from the 7 countries being blacklisted, and part of what Trump is saying is that their relatives and friends cannot visit them. If the Reuters report is correct, he is taking a basic right, to see family, away from Americans. And of course it is sometimes difficult for these Americans to travel to the countries listed for political reasons or because of instability.
Take the 300,000 to 400,000 Iranian-Americans. Many are members of religious minorities– Jews, Armenian Christians, and Baha’is who fled Khomeini. But they often do still have family or friends back home. Large numbers of Shiite Muslims, the Iranian majority, in the United States are militantly secular. With the JCPOA nuclear deal, Iranian-Americans could have been important in establishing new trade and business ties with Iran. Iran has a GDP the size of Poland’s and a population nearly as large as Germany’s. It is a virtually untapped market, from which Trump is cutting American businesses off.
Or take the some 200,000 Iraqi-Americans. How many of them would even be refugees had it not been for the illegal war of aggression launched on them by the United States? Does the US owe Iraq nothing? And note that the government of Iraq is partnering with the US to fight ISIL. How do you think our Iraqi allies feel about being blackballed? How will the US contribute, as it pledged, to the rebuilding of Iraq after all the destruction its rampaging caused, if Iraqi businessmen cannot even come to New York?
The US is, like it or not, in competition with Iran for Iraq’s friendship and trade . Trump just helped push Iraq into the arms of Iran, Russia and China. And he enunciated yet another insult to Iraq, after having talked Saturday at the CIA about “taking their oil” and after having upset Iraqis with talk of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem (the east of which is viewed by Palestinians as their future capital and all of which is subject to final status negotiations).
Trump’s visa ban, if he does announce one, makes no logical sense. It does not increase US security. It is intended to begin the creation of a hierarchy, whereby Muslims are the low ethnicity on the totem pole in US law and may be freely discriminated against. (Muslims are not just a religious group, but intermarry enough so that they also form a set of ethnic groups). The political right is all about creating unfair hierarchies, branding some racial groups good and others inferior. In the Europe of the 1930s it was Jews and Blacks who were treated this way. Today it is Muslims (though the turn of Jews and Blacks may yet come, given the attitudes visible in Trump and his circle).
If Trump announces his invidious policy Wednesday, it is a day of ethnic hatred. It is a sad day. It is a day on which America harmed itself.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/tru ... y_20170125
Report: Trump to Ban Citizens of Seven Countries Visiting US
Ban to Include Syrians, Iraqis, and Iranians
According to officials who have been briefed on the matter, President Trump is planning to sign an executive order that would impose a temporary ban on visas for citizens of seven countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa, a move which some reports indicate could just be the beginning of further limits.
The ban will exclude all people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, and Yemen from visiting the United States. It is also to include a total ban on refugees entering the United States from anywhere, with some exceptions for religious minorities.
Trump campaigned on the idea of banning all Muslims from entering the United States, and while he’s said to have moderated on that position since then, this appears to be at least the start of a policy in that vein. At the same time, the ban list has some conspicuous absences.
Despite presenting such moves as a national security measure intended to prevent terror, the nations from which 9/11 plotters originated (primarily Saudi Arabia, but also including Egypt and the UAE) were left off the new ban. Also, while the US may fear blowback from wars in Iraq and Syria, and constant drone strikes in Yemen, they did not include Afghanistan, 15 years into America’s occupation, nor Pakistan, which has borne the brunt of America’s drone war.
It is thus very difficult to figure exactly how they came by this list, with nations like Iran seemingly just included for political value, and the other countries on the list just sounding scary.
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/01/24/repo ... siting-us/
Carnage and Cooptation Under Trump’s Reign
by FRAN SHOR
Trump’s declamation in his inaugural address that he would end the “carnage” produced by poverty, deindustrialization, crime, drugs, and gangs is another egregious example of his frenzied rhetoric that obliterates causality while telegraphing his own demented posturing. While one could hardly expect Trump to denounce the structural inequalities embedded in capitalism and racism, Trump’s brand of authoritarian and right wing populism was an attempt to summon the masses to embrace his agenda of nationalist salvation. Of course, hidden behind this populist gloss were the snarling politics of a vengeful brand of a Trumpian admixture of reactionary Republicanism and Nixonian calculation.
That reactionary Republican agenda, cultivated over decades and represented by Trump’s VP, Mike Pence, was immediately evident in a number of executive orders signed by Trump. Among these was the re-institution of the so-called “gag rule” which would eliminate any funding for international agencies and NGO’s that include among their family services abortion, even if only as an option. According to the World Health Organization the prior funding policy saved an estimated 289,000 women from pregnancy or childbirth related ills. One NGO dealing with family planning projected that the loss of income would result in 2.1 million unsafe abortions. Apparently, carnage that impacts poor women in the underdeveloped world does not register with Trump and his misogynistic minions!
Another example of this misogyny can be found in Trump’s effort to eliminate the Violence Against Women programs in the Department of Justice. Programs ranging from funding for local rape crisis centers to the National Domestic Violence Hotline to educational seminars on sexual assault for hundreds of thousands of police are now in the crosshairs of a Republican dominated Congress as a consequence of this initiative by the Predator-in-Chief.
In keeping with the Republican obsession to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Trump signed another executive order that has little more than symbolic significance at this time. Perhaps, fiddling with regulations and cutting back on some provisions of the act may emerge in the next few weeks, especially with Rep. Tom Price as head of Health and Human Services. Certainly, there is no consensus even among Republicans about what would replace the ACA. Without any replacement and maybe even with a market-based one (that is more market-based than Obamacare), close to 30 million could lose any health care coverage, leading to the possibility of 30-45 thousand deaths annually.
On the labor front, Trump’s executive order freezing hiring of federal workers contains a nod towards the neoliberalism represented by corporate Democrats like former President Bill Clinton who tried to triangulate Reagan’s critique of “big government.” It also reflects the policies adopted by Koch financed Republican Governors and legislatures who have assiduously attacked public sector workers. By scapegoating these workers, made up in large numbers by women and people of color, as feeding at the public trough, they attempt to cover up the corporate handouts promulgated by Republican legislatures and Governors.
What Trump has also undertaken with the termination of the TPP and re-negotiating NAFTA suggests a shrewd populist posturing, albeit within the confines of his white nationalist agenda. Meeting with certain labor leaders from the building trades to discuss infrastructure investment, albeit mostly of the corporate shill game type, indicates that he has learned the lessons of Nixon’s bargain with construction workers as a wedge into the white working class. Indeed, with much of labor still wedded to the fossil fuel economy, Trump can further co-opt this segment with his stated objective of backing the Keystone pipeline. Leading to additional ravages of the land, water, and air, the continued deaths from these toxic policies will silently accumulate.
Beyond the cooptation of what might still be designated as the “aristocracy of labor,” Trump’s nationalist populism eerily harkens back beyond Nixon to the dystopian visions revealed in Jack London’s 1906 novel, The Iron Heel. London foresaw an Oligarchy relying upon favored unions made up of exclusionary white and skilled workers to create a repressive authoritarian regime called “The Iron Heel.” Whether insurgent workers and the new resistance of women, youth, and communities of color can forestall Trump’s version of the “Iron Heel” will determine the degree to which his special carnage will take its toll here and around the globe.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/25/ ... mps-reign/
Trump Poised to Lift Ban on C.I.A. ‘Black Site’ Prisons
By CHARLIE SAVAGEJAN. 25, 2017
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing a sweeping executive order that would clear the way for the C.I.A. to reopen overseas “black site” prisons, like those where it detained and tortured terrorism suspects before former President Barack Obama shut them down.
President Trump’s three-page draft order, titled “Detention and Interrogation of Enemy Combatants” and obtained by The New York Times, would also undo many of the other restrictions on handling detainees that Mr. Obama put in place in response to policies of the Bush administration.
If Mr. Trump signs the draft order, he would also revoke Mr. Obama’s directive to give the International Committee of the Red Cross access to all detainees in American custody. That would be another step toward reopening secret prisons outside of the normal wartime rules established by the Geneva Conventions, although statutory obstacles would remain.
And while Mr. Obama tried to close the Guantánamo prison and refused to bring new detainees there, the draft order directs the Pentagon to continue using the facility “for the detention and trial of newly captured” detainees – including not just more suspected members of Al Qaeda or the Taliban, like the 41 remaining detainees, but also Islamic State detainees. It does not address legal problems that might raise.
The draft order does not direct any immediate reopening of C.I.A. prisons or revival of torture tactics, which are now barred by statute. But it sets up high-level policy reviews to make further recommendations in both areas to Mr. Trump, who vowed during the campaign to bring back waterboarding and a “hell of a lot worse” – not only because “torture works,” but because even “if it doesn’t work, they deserve it anyway.”
C.I.A. ‘Black Sites’ Where Prisoners Were Held in Secret
Stare Kiejkuty
Poland
Vilnius
Lithuania
Bucharest
Romania
Guantánamo Bay
Cuba
Chiang Mai
Thailand
Kabul
Afghanistan
2004
2005
2008
2006
2007
2002
2003
Chiang Mai
When Sites Were Used
Kabul
Stare Kiejkuty
Kabul
Bucharest
Guantánamo Bay
Kabul
Vilnius
Kabul
Tim Wallace/The New York Times
Elisa Massimino, the director of Human Rights First, denounced the draft order as “flirting with a return to the ‘enhanced interrogation program’ and the environment that gave rise to it.” She noted that numerous retired military leaders have rejected torture as “illegal, immoral, and damaging to national security,” and said many of Mr. Trump’s cabinet nominees had seemed to share that view in their confirmation testimony.
“It would be surprising and extremely troubling if the national security cabinet officials were to acquiesce in an order like that after the assurances that they gave in their confirmation hearings,” she said.
A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to an email inquiring about the draft order, including when Mr. Trump may intend to sign it. But the order was accompanied by a one-page statement that criticized the Obama administration for having “refrained from exercising certain authorities” about detainees it said were critical to defending the country from “radical Islamism.”
Specifically, the draft order would revoke two executive orders about detainees that Mr. Obama issued in January 2009, shortly after his inauguration. One was Mr. Obama’s directive to close the Guantánamo prison and the other was his directive to end C.I.A. prisons, grant Red Cross access to all detainees, and limit interrogators to the army field manual techniques.
In their place, Mr. Trump’s draft order would resurrect a 2007 executive order issued by President George W. Bush. It responded to a 2006 Supreme Court about the Geneva Conventions that had put C.I.A. interrogators at risk of prosecution for war crimes, leading to a temporary halt of the agency’s “enhanced” interrogations program.
Mr. Bush’s 2007 order enabled the agency to resume a form of the program by specifically listing what sorts of prisoner abuses counted as war crimes. That made it safe for interrogators to use other tactics, like extended sleep deprivation, that were not on the list. Mr. Obama revoked that order as part of his 2009 overhaul of detention legal policy.
LASTING SCARS
Articles in this series examine the American legacy of brutal interrogations.
How U.S. Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds
After Torture, Ex-Detainee Is Still Captive of ‘The Darkness’
Where Even Nightmares Are Classified: Psychiatric Care at Guantánamo
Secret Documents Show a Tortured Prisoner's Descent
Memories of a Secret C.I.A. Prison
One of the Obama orders Mr. Trump’s draft order would revoke also limited interrogators to using techniques listed in the Army Field Manual. But in 2015, Congress enacted a statute locking down that rule as a matter of law, as well as a requirement to let the Red Cross visit detainees. Those limit would remain in place for the time being.
One of the Obama orders Mr. Trump’s draft order would revoke also limited interrogators to using techniques listed in the Army Field Manual. But Congress later enacted a statute locking down that rule as a matter of law, so that limit would remain in place for the time being.
Still, the draft order says high-level Trump administration officials should conduct several reviews and make recommendations to Mr. Trump. One was whether to change the field manual, to the extent permitted by law. Another was “whether to reinitiate a program of interrogation of high-value alien terrorists to be operated outside the United States” by the C.I.A., including any “legislative proposals” necessary to permit the resumption of such a program.
It is not clear whether the C.I.A. would be enthusiastic about resuming a role in detaining and interrogating terrorism suspects after its scorching experience over the past decade. In written answers to question by the Senate Intelligence Committee, Mr. Trump’s C.I.A. director, Mike Pompeo, said he would review whether a rewrite of the field manual was needed and left the door open to seeking a change in the law “if experts believed current law was an impediment to gathering vital intelligence to protect the country.”
While Mr. Trump’s order says no detainee should be tortured or otherwise subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment “as prescribed by U.S. law,” it makes no mention of international law commitments binding the United States to adhere to humane standards even if Congress were to relax domestic legal limits on interrogations, such as the Convention Against Torture or the Geneva Conventions.
Another core national security legal principle for Mr. Obama was to use civilian court, not military commissions, whenever possible in terrorism cases – and to exclusively use civilian law enforcement agencies and procedures, not the military, to handle cases arising on domestic soil. The draft order also signals that the Trump administration may shift that approach as well.
Get the Morning Briefing by Email
What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.
Sign Up
Receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.
SEE SAMPLE PRIVACY POLICY
In 2012, after Congress enacted a statute mandating that the military initially take custody of all foreign Qaeda suspects, Mr. Obama issued a directive that pre-emptively waived that rule for most domestic circumstances, such as if the F.B.I. had arrested the suspect and was already interrogating him.
But Mr. Trump’s draft order calls for the attorney general, in consultation with other national-security officials, to review that directive and recommend modifications to it within 120 days.
Many Republicans – including Senator Jeff Sessions, Mr. Trump’s attorney general nominee – criticized the Obama administration’s approach as weak, even though the civilian court system has regularly convicted terrorists at trial while the military commissions system has proved to be dysfunctional. During the campaign, Mr. Trump said he would prefer to prosecute terrorism suspects at Guantánamo – including American citizens, although the law currently limits the commissions system to foreign defendants.
Against that backdrop, Mr. Trump’s draft order would direct Defense Secretary James N. Mattis, along with the attorney general and the director of national intelligence, to “review the military commissions system and recommend to the president how best to employ the system going forward to provide for the swift and just trial and punishment of unlawful enemy combatants detained in the armed conflict with violent Islamist extremists.”
Tom Malinowski, who was assistant secretary of state for human rights in the Obama administration, said the draft order showed that everyone who thought the office of the presidency or the advice of cabinet secretaries like Mr. Mattis would temper Mr. Trump “is being shown wrong again.”
“He’ll listen to his worst instincts over his best advisers unless restrained by law,” Mr. Malinowski said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/us/p ... isons.html
Pinned Tweet
AltUSNatParkService @AltNatParkSer 15h15 hours ago
Can't wait for President Trump to call us FAKE NEWS.
You can take our official twitter, but you'll never take our free time!
National Park Service launches unofficial Twitter account that Donald Trump can’t touch
By Bill Palmer | January 24, 2017 | 0
In his first days in office, Donald Trump has made a point of censoring and restricting what the National Park Service can and cannot say on its various official Twitter accounts. After the NPS tweeted photos of Trump’s small inauguration crowd, he temporarily suspended its Twitter privileges. And when the Badlands tweeted about climate change today, those tweets were then deleted. But now some unnamed individuals within the National Park Service have created an unofficial Twitter account that Trump can’t touch.
Trump doesn’t have the ability to shut down a Twitter account, or to suspend it from being usable; only Twitter the company would be able to do that. Instead he’s been sabotaging the National Park Service Twitter accounts by presumably threatening to fire people if they dare to tweet things he doesn’t like, or if they tweet during times when he’s put them in the penalty box. But he can only do that if he knows who’s tweeting.
When it comes to official Park Service accounts like @NatlParkService or @BadlandsNPS, specific employees have access to those accounts, so it’s easy for Trump to know who’s posting any tweets he doesn’t like — and whom to punish. So instead, Park Service employees whose identities are unknown have created an unofficial Twitter account at @AltNatParkSer.
https://twitter.com/altnatparkser
The unofficial National Park Service account started six hours ago by reposting the Badlands tweets that had been deleted. It’s since continued posting all the climate change data it can find, and it’s been documenting Trump’s strange attempts at cracking down on the official accounts. This unofficial Twitter account has quickly gained ninety thousand followers (likely a lot more by the time you’re reading this), as Americans are flocking to the account to keep up with the real National Park Service news.
Best of all, as long as Donald Trump can’t figure out who at the Park Service is doing the unofficial tweeting, he can’t punish the employees behind it. And Twitter the company has shown a history of not sharing this kind of information. So there’s probably nothing Trump can do. You can follow the unofficial National Park Service Twitter account here.
If you appreciate the investigative reporting of Palmer Report, consider making a contribution:
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/nat ... ouch/1159/
seemslikeadream » Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:10 am wrote:trump would shut out the Jews from coming to this country during WWll the way he is acting today
The U.S. Government Turned Away Thousands of Jewish Refugees, Fearing That They Were Nazi Spies
In a long tradition of “persecuting the refugee,” the State Department and FDR claimed that Jewish immigrants could threaten national security
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/u ... 180957324/
Decade Average per year
1900–09 820,200
1910–19 634,738
1920–29 429,600
1930–39 69,900
1940–49 85,700
1950–59 249,900
1960–69 321,400
1970–79 424,800
1980–89 624,400
1990–99 977,500
2000–09 1,030,000
2010–15 1,032,400
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigrati ... ted_States
seemslikeadream » Wed Jan 25, 2017 1:10 pm wrote:and we should go back to that?
Published on
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
byCommon Dreams
Trump's Voter Fraud Conspiracy Theory Dubbed "Prelude to Massive Suppression"
Trump's unsubstantiated claims send "a message to every Republican governor in this country to go forward with voter suppression," says Sen. Bernie Sanders
byDeirdre Fulton, staff writer
"Those who champion voter suppression laws are often the most vocal voter fraud conspiracy theorists." (Photo: Penn State/flickr/cc)
President Donald Trump's call for a "massive investigation" into widely debunked "voter fraud"—and his vow to "strengthen up voting procedures" depending on what that probe reveals—is merely laying the groundwork for further Republican voter suppression measures, democracy experts are warning.
After his latest reiteration of the lie that millions of people voted illegally in the 2016 election, Trump took to Twitter Wednesday morning to announce he would ask for an investigation into "voter fraud, including those registered to vote in two states, those who are illegal and....even, those registered to vote who are dead (and many for a long time)."
In addition to serving as a potential distraction from the other items on the president's Wednesday agenda (like his plans to lift a ban on CIA "black site" prisons or to order a temporary ban on most refugees and a suspension of visas for citizens from seven majority-Muslim countries), Trump's voter fraud threats are a misleading "prelude to massive voter suppression by [the] GOP," as The Nation's Ari Berman warned.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued a similar analysis on Tuesday, saying that when Trump asserts such falsehoods, "he is sending a message to every Republican governor in this country to go forward with voter suppression."
Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, was just one more voice cautioning the same.
Not only do the things Trump listed not necessarily constitute "fraud," but his stated solution—to "strengthen up voting procedures!"—is a clear pretext for Republican-led initiatives such as large-scale purging of voter rolls or a national voter ID push, observers
What's more, voting rights are already at-risk if Sen. Jeff Sessions is confirmed to helm the U.S. Department of Justice. NAACP President Cornell Brooks has described Sessions' history on voting rights as "perhaps the most troubling" aspect of his record. And when asked by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) about Trump's voter fraud claims at his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Sessions refused to debunk the president-elect's assertions and in fact perpetuated them. "I do believe we regularly have fraudulent activities occur during election cycles," he said.
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights pointed out on Wednesday that Sessions "once made up fraud charges to wrongly prosecute voting rights activists, and the White House appears to be using the same anti-civil rights playbook."
As Liz Kennedy and Danielle Root of the Center for American Progress wrote in November: "Those who champion voter suppression laws are often the most vocal voter fraud conspiracy theorists. They know that voter ID laws and cuts made to polling places and early voting disproportionately affect people of color, people with low incomes, as well as students and youths—groups that tend to vote for Democrats."
"Fearmongers have succeeded in convincing nearly half of all Americans that widespread voter fraud is real," they continued. "In doing so, they have been able to pass laws that deprive eligible Americans of their right to vote. Voter fraud does not pose a threat to American democracy because it simply does not exist. Voter fraud conspiracy theories, on the other hand, have led to a direct assault on our democracy and our fundamental constitutional rights through tactics to suppress American voters."
Indeed, Public Citizen president Robert Weissman declared Wednesday: "Trump's call for a 'major investigation' into nonexistent voter fraud is a fraud on democracy. It is the latest escalation of a voter suppression campaign designed to deter people of color and young people from registering and voting. That voter suppression, which denies vast numbers of Americans their democratic voting rights, does merit a full-fledged investigation, restoration of the Voting Rights Act and enforcement of the law."
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/0 ... uppression
Rep. Keith Ellison ✔@keithellison
'Major investigation' on 'voter fraud' is about pushing Photo ID plus proof of citizenship to vote. Fight it NOW! http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-h ... te-n711136 …
8:32 AM - 25 Jan 2017
685 685 Retweets 1,490 1,490 likes
8bitagent » Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:24 am wrote:Noone seems to be taking the time out to appreciate what a truly meta bizarro altenrate reality we're now in (...) we're far deep in bizarro world
Hillary Clinton is reportedly considering the launch of a TV show to keep herself in the news
The move would position her for a 2020 presidential run, according to an insider
She recently offered a toast to friends gathered at her Washington home, affecting an Arnold Schwarzenegger accent and promising: 'I'll be back'
Clinton doesn't think Barack Obama will fight enough for liberal priorities, 'which leaves an opening for her to be the acknowledged leader-in-exile of her party'
Best of all, as long as Donald Trump can’t figure out who at the Park Service is doing the unofficial tweeting, he can’t punish the employees behind it. And Twitter the company has shown a history of not sharing this kind of information. So there’s probably nothing Trump can do. You can follow the unofficial National Park Service Twitter account here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests