by Sweejak » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:02 pm
Well welcome to the board Zundel,(poor choice of handles btw) this is what you can expect if you bring up anything related to Israel. people itching for a fight... "the line starts here!" LOL. Because, if you crit Israel your also criticising all Jews, which is anti-semetic. There is no distiction made because if you criticize Israel or one of the Zionisms your really only hiding open criticism of all Jews everywhere. Your articles won't be addressed, winnowing fact from falsehood won't even get a chance. No one will ask you what you think, You'll get a flurry of whois's followed with guilt by association. There is one member that can get away with saying things like "... am I the only one shocked to realize, recently, that Israel sold out to Nazis, while we were being taught that this is the refuge from them." but that person is an Israeli.<br><br>Of course folks like DE will <!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">say</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--> "I don't mean criticism of Israel or Zionism" but you have to make sure your link and every thing you can drill up or down to is "safe". Still, everybody, except apparently Jews, can be put in the center of "a Satanic race who control the entire world" so there is a fair amount of leeway... you can be anti Christians of all stripes, American, Brit, German, Muslim, and lizard, but some say that too is code for "Jews". Personally I don't think there is a center, I think it's a global problem.<br><br>As I said on another thread (locked) this topic is ruled by the hyper-vigilant on one hand and the paranoid on the other.<br><br>My take on Judicial... interesting connections and occasionally bits that are not available elsewhere but very short on documentation and yes, I think actually anti-semetic, errr.. anti-Jew, No one has defined just what anti-semetic is and it keeps changing.<br><br>But you didn't link to a judicial article you linked to another one by Hufshmidt. Well, the tactics laid out seem to be fairly well known intel ops. While the word Israel, or Jew is not mentioned the word Mossad is mentioned, and Soros, and "Hate Crime" which usually applies to Jews, though sometimes Gays and others. Well, I don't know if Soros is religious or even if he is really semetic but you know. Anyway, he also talks about Liberals, but that is probably a code word for Jews, like some say "neo-con" is. Good article. It handily lays out the deception... you need to watch that word too because Ostrovsky wrote a book about the Mossad that highlighted that word, it's propbably code. If it does indeed attempt to point at only the Jews, than I disagree with the trajectory. There, I made a distinction.<br><br>Actually I think it will go down something like this, via a list:<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>You can see what's coming. The exposure of the illuminati etc will be <br>mired in the same fakery as the exposure of 911. The ultimate "truth is <br>lies" scenario, where the illuminati will orchestra the fake exposure of <br>themselves -until things get to the point where it becomes impossible to <br>differentiate between the real exposure and the fake exposure. An entire <br>world view dedicated to the fake struggle against itself.<br><br>People will talk about fighting the new world order in the same way that <br>politicians talk about sustainable growth, and coca cola sponsers health <br>festivals and charity celebrity car races are held to raise money for <br>environmental awareness week.<br><br>There will be every shade of fakery from limited hangout to 1/2 truthers <br>to flat out disinformation. What we've seen in the Orwellian 'truth" <br>movement is a forerunner of the twisting of every intellectual concept <br>to the point that any word or concept means whatever you want it to mean <br>at any particular time.<br><br>Some Ruppert supporter started an argument about the meaning of "truth" <br>when Ruppert had his back to the wall. MI argued about what "source" <br>means, at a time when the word was inconvenient to him, telling the <br>truth will damage the truth movement, the BTS becomes "physical " <br>evidence, The NWO becomes whoever you mean them to be, Cambpell becomes <br>an accurate forecaster because the figures are irrelevant - he still got <br>the idea right...<br><br>Intellectual concepts and language will become like digital imagery - <br>nothing more clip art to be cut and pasted and edited with total <br>artistic freedom following no rules, no guiding concepts, and limited <br>only by the imagination of the user. Photoshopping a plane into an image <br>means that its really there, "disinformation" becomes whatever is <br>damaging to a particular strategy, and strategy itself is defined by <br>whatever euphemism one wants to imagine as success and claim it as such <br>whether it has taken place or not.<br><br>I guess that after the complete destruction of any intekllectual and <br>linguistic guidelines, then they'll start on the same for ethical <br>guidelines, where torture will become re-education and mass murder will <br>be liberation from suffering or torture will become liberation through <br>suffering and imprisonment will become care etc...<br><br>Some of that phase is still hard to articulate at the moment because the <br>language for it is still in its infancy, but I can sense where its going.<br><br>I suppose the word "good" will become subject to the same Orwellianism <br>as "truth", and torturers will sneer at critics who think they know <br>what's "good" better than anyone else.<br><br>A kind of merging of Orwell, the inquisition, free market extremism, <br>apocalyptic fundamentalism, green fascism, consumer driven <br>individualism, conspiracy busting hero worship culture and old fashioned <br>flag waving.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
