MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway:

slimmouse · Post by **slimmouse** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:29 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>I mean, come on! This board is called "Rigorous Intuition," not "Mindless Regurgitation."<hr></blockquote> Agreed Proffy. Lets all take one step back a moment and work our way into this. How about this instead ? <a href="http://www.crisispapers.org/essays-w/horrors.htm">www.crisispapers.org/essa...orrors.htm</a> Try comparing a few of the names.

Rigorous Intuition · Post by **Rigorous Intuition** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:33 pm

I want to back away slowly, and avoid making eye contact. Maybe that's unkind, but I find him erratic and unreliable. This stuff we study isn't the healthiest material, and I believe it can exacerbate predispositions for mental illness: depression, mania, paranoia. Webb strikes me as someone who lost his footing.

OnoI812 · Post by **OnoI812** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:46 pm

Ok - sorry I'm late to the thread...lot's of events happening today. I first posted the Chicago happenings in the other thread last night. But I've known about the warning since about 5:15 pm PST Monday , when Heneghan announced it live on Truthradio. His information pointed to a thursday (today) Chicago attempt. He said the orders were coming from the queen. According to Tom, the purpose was to stall the Plame grand jury meeting there today. This London incedent could be plan B. It also could be cover for the resigning of the patriot act scheduled for today, and Cafta next week or some other cover reason. They want the plame investigation to go away. Chicago is central time...6:30 pm would equal 4:30 pm PST , I doubt Heneghan would know about what was going on in the Chi subway prior to airtime. So he had to have had other intel. On Tuesdays show(5 pm pst) he reported the Monday subway shutdown , and the apprehension of the Brittish agents. I should have brought it up then, but my search for an alternate source was fruitless, partly due to my busy schedule. If Heneghan is right , this London incident could be related. He's on the record for a Thursday prediction as of Monday evening. Sorry, this is more background than evidence.

OnoI812 · Post by **OnoI812** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:58 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Let me ask ONE simple question. If this story is true, wouldn't it be a simple thing to check the court records to see if four people had been charged for explosives? Wouldn't the arrest of 4 people with explosives, and the subsequent charging in Federal Court, hit the news radar<hr></blockquote> According to Henneghan they were intercepted by the US Marshalls who were acting on intel provided by French intel working within the USA covertly and in conjuntion with elements of American intelligence. you have to search the US Marshall's arrest records. But apparently there is Diplomatic immunty being pressured, so those records may not be available. Henneghan says the Trib is the Queens rag, so you won't find mention of it there unless it's spin.

GDN01 · Post by **GDN01** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:59 pm

Slimmouse, I had not heard the info from that article concerning the 8 pages - very interesting. Could the WH be "wagging the terrorist" if this case is as far-reaching as that article suggests?

OnoI812 · Post by **OnoI812** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:23 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>I was talking to a friend who asked me if I had heard about terrorists trying to blow up the CTA (Chicago Transit Authority) Brown Line.<hr></blockquote> on edit- could you check with your friend if he was referring to the sunday the 10th incedent, or the newer(18th) incedent? Thanks for answering my question I first asked here @6:25pm Est <a href="http://p097.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=710.topic&start=21&stop=25">p097.ezboard.com/frigorou...21&stop=25</a> ...anyone from Chi town that can verify that the subway was shut down around 6:30 pm monday as Heneghan claims? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=onoi812>OnoI812</A> at: 7/21/05 12:49 pm

professorpan · Post by **professorpan** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:35 pm

Okay, I listened to the Cloak and Dagger radio broadcast and the "breaking news." At one point, the host (not Skolnick) says, "We've been fighting the British on American soil from the beginning... and to the Queen... and her fat ass... sitting on the couch... we will beat you again. Bitch." This entire "story" is raw, baseless conjecture, fueled by Skolnick's bizarre, paranoid anglophobic fixation.

antiaristo · Post by **antiaristo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:32 pm

Professorpan, I tried to raise the issue of Elizabeth Windsor at another website. The response was the same as yours. Contempt. Do you have any evidence to back up your trenchant views? I’d really like to see it. I personally have felt her lash these past eleven years. Bitch is the very least of the names I’d call her. But that is based on hard, documentary evidence. You got any evidence to back up your position on the higher moral ground?

robertdreed · Post by **robertdreed** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:36 pm

"...they were intercepted by the US Marshalls who were acting on intel provided by French intel working within the USA covertly and in conjuntion with elements of American intelligence..." LOL That's right, I'm dismissive. And I'm going to keep on laughing- however mirthlessly- until some actual convincing evidence is supplied, rather than ever more elaborate excuses for its absence.

professorpan · Post by **professorpan** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:48 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Professorpan, I tried to raise the issue of Elizabeth Windsor at another website. The response was the same as yours. Contempt. Do you have any evidence to back up your trenchant views? I’d really like to see it. I personally have felt her lash these past eleven years. Bitch is the very least of the names I’d call her. But that is based on hard, documentary evidence. You got any evidence to back up your position on the higher moral ground?<hr></blockquote> I don't see any contempt in my responses, nor am I asserting any moral positions, so I don't know why you're offended. You're entitled to call the Queen anything you like. My "trenchant" view on this particular thread is that I haven't seen a lick of evidence to support this story of British Intelligence agents being nabbed, with explosives, in a plot to blow up the Chicago subway system. Yet I see people jumping all over this without a trace of skepticism. My other "trenchant" view is that Skolnick is an angry, deluded man who sees the British crown lurking in every shadow. Your views on the British aristocracy don't interest me. That's not contemptuous -- I simply am not interested in that angle.

antiaristo · Post by **antiaristo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:59 pm

Your views on the British aristocracy don't interest me. That's not contemptuous -- I simply am not interested in that angle. Well, yes. That's how a lawyer tries to win, is it not? It's really not up to you to decide what is of interest, now is it? Especially when it is HARD DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Which you say you are looking for. I'm not interested in Karl Rove. Let's solve the Plame case and leave him out of it.

robertdreed · Post by **robertdreed** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:01 pm

I've had about all I can take of Skolnick's wolf-crying. The guy is the Kilgore Trout of conspiracists- one captivatingly bizarre "inside scoop" after another, and no follow-up, fizzling out into nothing. For how long, now? Oh, about 30 years...it's enough to lead one to wonder how he has the juice to stay with it. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 7/21/05 3:06 pm

rain · Post by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:37 pm

know what you mean Robert, you know. and he certainly seems to have a knack of getting people hot under the collar, either in defense of him or against. maybe we should make this a 'Skolnick Anger Management' thread.

dbeach · Post by **dbeach** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:46 pm

This is e-mail from Lenny bloom resonding to my questions about reliability and veracity of Tom H. "I am told that the French and British just, I repeat just may, may break off diplomatic relations and recall ambassadors. Watch for it. That will be the smoking gun you are looking for."

rain · Post by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:53 pm

doubt it. even if any of this has even a whisp of reality to it, no-one wants to break cover yet.

rigorousintuition.ca

MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway:

Re: Wait a minute...

Anytime I see a story linked to Stew Webb

Re: Where is the evidence to support this incredible claim?

Re: Wait a minute...

The Article Slimmouse linked to

Re: Probably a coincidence,

Skolnick, anti-Brits, raving lunacy

Raving lunacy

"According to Henneghan..."

Evidence vs. fear-mongering hearsay

Evidence

Seriously...

re:seriously

Re: re:seriously

re:re:re:seriously