Page 72 of 296

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 2:21 pm
by seemslikeadream
Image

http://www.msnbc.com
Donald Trump does not have a campaign
06/06/16 09:02 AM—UPDATED 06/06/16 02:15 PM

By Benjy Sarlin, Katy Tur and Ali Vitali
Donald Trump is a candidate without a campaign – and it’s becoming a serious problem.

#trumpisawhinybitch



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB4sGX0 ... e=youtu.be

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:45 pm
by JackRiddler
Donald Trump has the same campaign he's always had. It's called MSNBC, CNN, The New York Post, and those networks the old people still watch.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:30 pm
by 82_28
MSNBC actually has a couple of good token "liberal" shows that I watch from time to time. Rachel Maddow obviously and Lawrence O'Donnell. Those two are trying to hammer trump hard and do a pretty good job at it.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:36 pm
by JackRiddler
"Morning Joe" which gets the highest ratings, I believe, has until now functioned as Trump's daily call-in show. And as for the "liberals" on that network... In case you haven't noticed, "being hammered" by the corporate media has been half the force of Trump's campaign. A huge favor, because that is how professional wrestling heels are built. In this case, it really is all about the exposure. Trump's success is one-half the open appeal to the racism and xenophobia the Republican party has cultivated since the 1960s and one-half the self-fulfilling prophecy of commercial platforms that wanted him to play the stage villain he wanted to be. The crux fact of this farce has been the ratio of 20:7:>>1 in network TV time devoted to Trump, Clinton and Sanders, respectively, during the whole of 2015.

Add 400 establishment politician endorsements for Clinton by summer 2015, by the politicians who are not only superdelegates but control all the D-Party machinery. (Then they went to work on the additional rigging.) From there the outcomes were set up and Sanders' performance remains nothing short of incredible - because of the additional, invisible-to-media crux fact of the "real" political moment among large masses of people.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:39 pm
by 82_28
8bit sent me a link the other day that MSNBC is going to go full on right wing or something. Hell they got rid of Donahue and Olbermann.

Ah yes, this:

MSNBC Now Openly Bragging About Abandoning its Liberal Brand In New Ad

http://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbc-no ... in-new-ad/

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:50 pm
by 8bitagent
Trump in Trump Tower literally has just a small handful of campaign staff, firing people. He has control of the GOP who just grin and bear whatever insanity he has to say.
And virtually every day he seems to be saying crazier and crazier stuff....is it possible..

is it possible Trump truly does NOT want to win in November? And or he's truly gone insane?
Have we all been hoodwinked?

Image

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:57 am
by NeonLX
8bitagent » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:50 pm wrote:Trump in Trump Tower literally has just a small handful of campaign staff, firing people. He has control of the GOP who just grin and bear whatever insanity he has to say.
And virtually every day he seems to be saying crazier and crazier stuff....is it possible..

is it possible Trump truly does NOT want to win in November? And or he's truly gone insane?
Have we all been hoodwinked?

Image
That picture is fucking disgusting.

And we've been getting hoodwinked for a long time now. But this time around, it seems a bit more out in the open. Yet we passively sit back and take it.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:16 am
by seemslikeadream

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:05 pm
by seemslikeadream
Image

Image

Unrecognizable in her costume, Streep's Trump traded Shakespearean jabs with Baranski's Clinton, captured on video and shared on Twitter by reporters and attendees:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/politics/ ... index.html

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:25 pm
by Luther Blissett
Curtis Yarvin for VP.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:46 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
"And this guy, I mean, let me tell you, he's so smart -- probably the smartest VP pick this great country has seen, really, he is. I never, I mean, I never know what he's even talking about, I just know it's brilliant, and I know he's right. He's read so many books! More books than anyone in Washington, DC, more books than anyone you know. He's read books nobody else has even heard of, folks! I'm talking, books where the authors don't even know they wrote those books anymore. Because they're dead. And let me tell you, folks, that's not all, that's not even all of it. He's also a software developer, Urbit, huge. This is just gonna be huge. It's such a big deal, we don't even know what it is yet. I mean, maybe he doesn't even know, either. That's how, how brilliant this man is. So let me bring him out..."

Image

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:26 pm
by seemslikeadream
Why the Trump University lawsuits could be catastrophic for Trump
Updated by Libby Nelson on June 8, 2016, 8:40 a.m. ET @libbyanelson

Donald Trump is no stranger to lawsuits. During his career, he's been sued nearly 1,500 times and sued others even more than that. Right now, as the presumptive Republican nominee for president, he's the subject of more than 50 civil suits.

But the lawsuits over the defunct Trump University clearly have Trump rattled. Since February, he's made the judge in the case, Gonzalo Curiel, a target of racist insults, arguing that Curiel's Latino heritage means he can't judge fairly. Given that hearings and court dates are scheduled throughout the summer before a trial begins in November, the controversy isn't going away.

Trump has good reason to fear the lawsuits over Trump University: They put lie to a central plank of his campaign. The disappointed students suing him argue that Trump is not a wildly successful entrepreneur or a canny dealmaker but rather a fraudster who made promises he couldn't keep. The legal proceedings have already revealed the details of the Trump University scam. Thanks to an order from Curiel, they could also reveal a closely guarded secret: Trump's net worth.

Even worse, the targets of Trump University look very much like Trump's voters: middle-class Americans who think he can solve their problems and provide them with a better life. Trump's campaign rests on the promise that he will turn his nastiness outward in order to help the country — that he will, in his words, be "greedy for the United States." The Trump University case suggests that even when Trump was purporting to uplift others, he was mostly enriching himself.

Trump University, later renamed the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative, folded in 2010. But it lives on in three lawsuits still making their way through the courts. The lawsuits all make essentially the same claim: that Trump University was a scam. Donald Trump didn't "handpick" the instructors, and his only goal was to persuade people to keep paying in hopes of gaining access to his real estate secrets.

Lawsuit 1: Cohen v. Trump, the case that could reveal Trump's net worth

The basic charge at the heart of two class-action lawsuits against Trump — Cohen v. Trump and Low v. Trump — is that his "university" was a fraud.

Both cases are overseen by Curiel in the Southern District of California. And while Curiel hasn't always given the plaintiffs everything they want, two of his rulings in particular have hit Trump where he's vulnerable. (Mother Jones's Kevin Drum has a good rundown of some of the key decisions in both cases.)

First, Curiel allowed one lawsuit, Cohen v. Trump, to go forward in the first place as a class-action lawsuit under RICO, the federal anti-racketeering law. The case is on behalf of anyone who purchased Trump University classes after January 1, 2007, and because of the way RICO cases work, it could end up being very expensive: Hundreds or thousands of people could get triple their money back.

Then in July 2015, Curiel ruled that Trump would have to do what many observers suspect he fears. He'll have to talk about how much he's actually worth under penalty of perjury. A magistrate judge had decided that Trump wouldn't need to reveal his net worth or respond to questions about how much money he'd put into, or made in profit, from Trump University. People could just Google how much Trump is worth, he'd said.

Curiel reversed that ruling. "It is not fair to say that Trump’s net worth is equally available … from publicly-available sources," his ruling read in part. "Publicly available figures of Trump’s wealth have been the subject of wild speculation and range anywhere from $4 to $9 billion."

Besides, Curiel continued, Cohen's lawyers wanted more specific information than just net worth, and it was fair to ask how much Trump had profited from the university that bore his name.

Then last week, Curiel granted a request from the Washington Post to unseal Trump University's "playbooks" — documents outlining how Trump University events worked that Trump argued should be kept from the public because they contain trade secrets.

Those orders allow Cohen's lawyers to gore Trump in his soft underbelly. You can call Trump a racist or a demagogue or a know-nothing, but what he's really sensitive to is the charge that he isn't as good of a businessman as he appears. That's why, many speculate, he's so reluctant to release his tax returns.

And Curiel's orders now allow a legal attack on two fronts: first, that Trump defrauds not just his opponents or the people he makes deals with but his own admirers. And second, that Trump isn't as rich as he claims to be.

The next hearing is scheduled for July 22, 2016 — the day after Trump will speak at the Republican National Convention to formally accept his party's nomination for president. Curiel will consider a motion from Trump's lawyers to make the case an individual suit rather than a class action, as well as dueling requests about what testimony will be included.

A final pretrial conference is set for August. But given the way the justice system works, it's likely to be much longer before the case actually goes to trial.

Lawsuit 2: Low v. Trump, an epic legal battle where the lead plaintiff quit

The second lawsuit in Curiel's court has a much longer history. Now called Low v. Trump, it was filed in 2010 as Makaeff v. Trump. In 2014, after years of legal wrangling, Curiel certified it as a class-action lawsuit in New York, California, and Florida but denied the plaintiffs' request to certify a class-action lawsuit in all 50 states.

The arguments about what Trump did wrong are basically the same as in Cohen v. Trump, but Low v. Trump has featured a side drama. Trump sued the initial plaintiff, Tarla Makaeff, and lost, although Curiel reduced the amount of court costs she could claim from $1.3 million to $790,000.

Then, after spending five years as the lead plaintiff and successfully defeating Trump in his countersuit, Makaeff decided she wanted out, saying she worried that the stress of the trial would damage her health.

"Trump was a celebrity when the case was filed, but no one could have anticipated that he would become a viable presidential candidate and a 24/7 media obsession as this case neared trial," her lawyers wrote in a court filing. "Subjecting herself to the intense media attention and likely barbs from Trump and his agents and followers simply would not be healthy for her."

Curiel allowed Makaeff to withdraw, which Trump's lawyers opposed, arguing they'd been preparing to attack her credibility. But he barred her from benefiting from the class-action suit should her fellow plaintiffs win.

The trial in the case has been scheduled for November — after the election.

Lawsuit 3: The state of New York's case against Donald Trump

Trump hasn't made any racist attacks on the judge in another case against him, but it's worth noting anyway.

The New York attorney general, Eric Schneiderman, is known for high-profile lawsuits that liberals love. In 2013, he was pursuing for-profit colleges — one of which was Trump University.

The lawsuit, People of the State of New York v. the Trump Entrepreneurship Initiative, accused Trump University and Trump himself of fraud, deceptive practices, false advertising, violating state rules for educational institutions, operating an unlicensed school, and disregarding buyers' rights to cancel a transaction. It sought millions of dollars of damages.

Trump's response was to sue Schneiderman, a suit that was thrown out. A trial court initially ruled that Schneiderman was filing his suit against Trump too late, throwing out most of the charges against him. But in March, a state appeals court decided the statute of limitation hadn't passed and that it could include evidence from up to six years ago about Trump University's deceptive practices.

The lawsuit is now being appealed to the state's highest court, meaning it's unlikely to be heard before November.

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:54 pm
by seemslikeadream
Trump’s fundraisers see no chance of hitting $1 billion
Dramatic shortfall expected as donor dismay about their candidate takes a toll.
By ALEX ISENSTADT 06/08/16 03:48 PM EDT

Donald Trump has so far resisted the donor stroking and courtship that presidential candidates traditionally engage in. | Getty

By JACK SHAFER
Donald Trump’s top financiers are slashing their fundraising expectations and warning the GOP’s presumptive nominee could find himself massively out-gunned by Hillary Clinton.
Image

Image

First GOP Rats Are Starting To Jump Sinking Toxic Trump Ship

Image

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:44 am
by 82_28
Rude Pundit:

I Went to Trump Golf Club to Watch Trump Last Night and Today I Don't Feel Good About America
When the large room in the clubhouse at the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, New York, was filled with friends and relatives and members last night just before Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump entered to speak, I thought, "If the Ebola virus showed up and went through this place, making everyone shit themselves dry while they bleed out of their nipples and eyes until dead, the world would be a better place by several degrees."

I was there as a credentialed member of the press, along with my co-conspirator in these things, Jeff Kreisler, and while watching Trump on television is enough to make you have a stroke, being there in person gave me the feeling that acid was going to bore a hole in my stomach. It wasn't so much his speech, which was on a teleprompter and he riffed on it like a dissonant jazz musician. It was the atmosphere of the event.

For instance, one thing you don't get a sense of from the TV screens is just how disturbingly robotic his family is. They entered with him, Melania, the grown-up kids, their grown-up wives, and lined up behind him. And they just stood there for the entire time. It was goddamned creepy, like they were just waiting for an Eyes Wide Shut orgy to start later on and the Klonopin had taken the edge off.
Whole thing here:

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2016/06/ ... watch.html

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:41 pm
by NeonLX
Drumpf. The scariest thing is that he is real. Very real. And millions of people fervently support the fucker.