rigorousintuition.ca

yea but letting/wanting Trump win because you hate Clinton ......yea you're gonna find solutions that way

seemslikeadream » Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:51 pm wrote:yea but letting/wanting Trump win because you hate Clinton ......yea you're gonna find solutions that way

It'd be far easier to outsmart a buffoon than Hannibal Lecter.

Do you believe the establishment is so aggressively anti-Trump because he is pathological racist assaulter?

Do you believe the establishment is so aggressively anti-Trump because he is pathological racist assaulter?

establishment...if you mean republicans and people that hate Clinton

no ......because he was caught on tape being a pathological racist CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULTER

They were clearly that way before the tape, and in all likelihood is directly connected to the decade old tape being released now... in October

proof/admitting to a crime will do it every time

seemslikeadream » Sat Oct 08, 2016 5:32 pm wrote:proof/admitting to a crime will do it every time

Clearly implied by my comment

I didn't see the word criminal



and I have a good memory


What constitutes Misogyny?

So what

I don't care to hear the word p****y from Trump or from you....and that is what leaves a bad taste in my mouth..hence the attitude...we're probably done at this point

you get your feelings hurt and you call your self a degrading name for a woman ...odd

lyrimal » Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:23 pm wrote:

seemslikeadream » Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:51 pm wrote:yea but letting/wanting Trump win because you hate Clinton ......yea you're gonna find solutions that way

It'd be far easier to outsmart a buffoon than Hannibal Lecter.

Do you believe the establishment is so aggressively anti-Trump because he is pathological racist assaulter?

Certainly not. I do believe he is a pathological racist assaulter, and worse really. What do you believe? Two parts:

1. Do you believe he constitutes a desirable challenge to this establishment?

2. Do you believe he is a pathological racist rape-minded scam artist?

It doesn't matter if he's a "desirable" challenger to the establishment. All they care about is that he MIGHT ACTUALLY BEAT HRC. Clearly all the establishment cares about is installing her as the next rubber stamper of the Neocon Network who has taken over this country.

Trump's "values" are meaningless to them. Hillary is their man and they're gonna shove her into the White House no matter what it takes.

Nordic » Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:12 am wrote:It doesn't matter if he's a "desirable" challenger to the establishment. All they care about is that he MIGHT ACTUALLY BEAT HRC. Clearly all the establishment cares about is installing her as the next rubber stamper of the Neocon Network who has taken over this country.

Trump's "values" are meaningless to them. Hillary is their man and they're gonna shove her into the White House no matter what it takes.

Bing fucking Go. The GOP didnt care about Trump's endless baiting of racist views, war mongering machismo, or selecting hardcore anti-choice anti gay Pence as VP. Oooh no.
They only care that Trump dared say the word "pussy" on television.

All the liberals doing a combo triggered angry jihad meets Clinton coronation dance should realize Hillary is exactly who the slimey globalist scumfucks long ago decided on
to head us into world war...regardless of how slimey her rapist husband's golfing buddy is.

it's not the word p****y ....it is the CRIME that was admitted to...that got them upset



a misogynist blames a woman for her husbands/boyfriends deeds

8bitagent » Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:40 am wrote:

Nordic » Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:12 am wrote:It doesn't matter if he's a "desirable" challenger to the establishment. All they care about is that he MIGHT ACTUALLY BEAT HRC. Clearly all the establishment cares about is installing her as the next rubber stamper of the Neocon Network who has taken over this country.

Trump's "values" are meaningless to them. Hillary is their man and they're gonna shove her into the White House no matter what it takes.

Bing fucking Go. The GOP didnt care about Trump's endless baiting of racist views, war mongering machismo, or selecting hardcore anti-choice anti gay Pence as VP. Oooh no.
They only care that Trump dared say the word "pussy" on television.

All the liberals doing a combo triggered angry jihad meets Clinton coronation dance should realize Hillary is exactly who the slimey globalist scumfucks long ago decided on
to head us into world war...regardless of how slimey her rapist husband's golfing buddy is.

8bitagent » Sun Oct 09, 2016 3:40 am wrote:

Nordic » Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:12 am wrote:It doesn't matter if he's a "desirable" challenger to the establishment. All they care about is that he MIGHT ACTUALLY BEAT HRC. Clearly all the establishment cares about is installing her as the next rubber stamper of the Neocon Network who has taken over this country.

Trump's "values" are meaningless to them. Hillary is their man and they're gonna shove her into the White House no matter what it takes.

Bing fucking Go. The GOP didnt care about Trump's endless baiting of racist views, war mongering machismo, or selecting hardcore anti-choice anti gay Pence as VP. Oooh no.
They only care that Trump dared say the word "pussy" on television.

No they don't. They absolutely do not care that he said pussy (it was not on TV, but on a hot mic on the way to an appearance, by the way: consider how loose you are with minor facts and wonder whether this is symptomatic of something). They don't even care that he said pussy while proudly bragging about his penchant for sexual assault, i.e., in effect confessing serial criminal behavior. They care only about one thing compared to before (since we are seeing nothing about Trump that was not already obvious in the 1980s when he first became a media thing, as an image of the good life of Reagan America). They care that now he's going to drag them down with them. Since by contrast you don't get to break both parties in the two-party system at the same time, I am very cautiously happy about that prospect. Would I have prefered war crimes trials for the invaders of Iraq? Sure. One good thing at a time, we can hope.

Trump's challenge to the establishment is that he is too obviously of and for that establishment in an ugly way that would, along with his awesome, proud and public foolishness and incompetence at anything other than getting media, make it more difficult to manage.

.

Agreed, in that what Trump said is something that cannot be defended in any way. It wasn't the word "pussy" but the gleeful admission to serial sexual assault

So they have to bail on him lest they be tarred with the "he supported the guy who said_______" brush.

Poof!