Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:52 am
A MAN BLAMING A WOMAN FOR THE DEEDS OF HER HUSBAND IS MISOGYNY ...ONE MORE TIME..I CAN'T BE CLEARER THAN THAT.


What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=39666

Anderson Cooper told Trump ‘That is sexual assault.’ The Justice Department agrees.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/won ... ?tid=sm_tw
In January 2016, Broaddrick said on Twitter, “I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73….it never goes away.seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:15 pm wrote:To all the women who know that your husband is cheating on them....but stay in your marriage...YOU are responsible for your husbands cheating and should be punished
seemslikeadream » Wed Sep 28, 2016 9:47 am wrote:Trump Rape Accuser to Refile Suit in New York
http://www.courthousenews.com/2016/09/2 ... w-york.htm
Ex-Wife: Donald Trump Made Me Feel ‘Violated’ During Sex
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... g-sex.html
Here are all the times Donald Trump has been accused of rape or attempted rape
http://fusion.net/story/328522/donald-t ... l-assault/
And *this* is why I love Karen Straughan and Christina Hoff Summers and Camille Paglia.seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:32 pm wrote:you don't know that...but you got one thing right INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY....too bad you only chose who gets that privilege
but
Thanks for playing
I want Trump (THE ACTUAL REAL RAPIST) to be President
and I will blame women for their husbands deeds ....just because they are
If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.
Camille PagliaPeople who can’t see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism — the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.
Breitbart Columnist Milo Yiannopoulos: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads”
September 16, 2015 Crackpots, LGBT News
Notorious British homocon and raging misogynist Milo Yiannopoulos is writing for Breitbart these days and today he explains why he “went gay,” why women are inherently less intelligent, why the female orgasm is a myth, and why sex robots will replace the need for girlfriends. Seriously. Here’s a sample:
“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”
There’s much, much more assholery at the link.
http://www.joemygod.com/2015/09/16/brei ... ty-broads/

Hmm...let me think. I remember standing at a drug store magazine rack when I was 12 and an older guy 'grabbed my ass'. I felt humiliated, degraded and at fault. If it happened in today's climate, I guess a healthy response would include "Phew, at least he didn't saw off my head."Nordic » Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:25 pm wrote:You guys are totally misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm saying Jeffrey Dahmer is a worse choice than Brock Turner.
Understand yet?
I don't want either of them. But one is a serial killer and the other is a groper/assaulter (Trump not Turner. Turner is a rapist)
Would you rather have your head sawed off and stored in a fridge, or someone grabbing your ass?
Both are bad. One is worse.
JackRiddler » Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:04 pm wrote:Actually all or most of this better belongs off this board. It matches the level of that "debate."