Page 77 of 137

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:29 pm
by Searcher08
seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:58 pm wrote:of course you would ...I would expect nothing less
If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.
People who can’t see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism — the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.
Camille Paglia

Breitbart Columnist Milo Yiannopoulos: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads”
September 16, 2015 Crackpots, LGBT News

Notorious British homocon and raging misogynist Milo Yiannopoulos is writing for Breitbart these days and today he explains why he “went gay,” why women are inherently less intelligent, why the female orgasm is a myth, and why sex robots will replace the need for girlfriends. Seriously. Here’s a sample:

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

There’s much, much more assholery at the link.

http://www.joemygod.com/2015/09/16/brei ... ty-broads/
Thanks for that!
I love that Milo is now described as "raging" by the Trigglypuff brigade :wink

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:53 pm
by seemslikeadream
Black Voters - Clinton 91%

Women Voter - Clinton 53 %

of course all these Black people and all these women are too stupid to understand what is best for them...the men must get that through their pretty little heads

Trump was winning men 49 to 37 percent. of course

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:06 pm
by Searcher08
seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:53 pm wrote:Black Voters - Clinton 91%

Women Voter - Clinton 53 %

of course all these Black people and all these women are too stupid to understand what is best for them...the men must get that through their pretty little heads

Trump was winning men 49 to 37 percent. of course
Which men?

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:09 pm
by seemslikeadream
the old misogynistic white ones of course :P

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:52 pm
by Searcher08
seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:09 pm wrote:the old misogynistic white ones of course :P
:lol:

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 4:25 pm
by seemslikeadream
Prominent Cuban-American Trade Group Endorses Clinton

Nod is first endorsement of a Democrat in Latin Builders Association's history

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/1 ... s-clinton/

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:32 am
by 8bitagent
Hillary Clinton in private emails with John Podesta talked of how Saudi Arabia and Qatar are financing ISIS.
Which is ironic, as Saudi Arabia has given tens of millions to the Clintons

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774
While this military/para-military operation is moving >> forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence >> assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, >> which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and >> other radical Sunni groups in the region. This effort will be enhanced by >> the stepped up commitment in the KRG.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/10/hilla ... z4MjuTIjFJ

Ya def wont see Vice, Huffpo, DailyKos, Daily Beast, ect covering this

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:33 am
by 8bitagent
seemslikeadream » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:25 pm wrote:
Prominent Cuban-American Trade Group Endorses Clinton

Nod is first endorsement of a Democrat in Latin Builders Association's history

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/1 ... s-clinton/
You should start a positive Hillary Clinton thread. This is a thread exposing the danger of Clinton

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:07 am
by JackRiddler
God no. Let this be the only HRC thread, and the Trump thread the only one on him, and no more. It's just reproducing the same convos anyway. The Cuban endorsement is an interesting piece of news, anyway.

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:54 am
by 8bitagent
Rapist War Criminal Crook Bill Clinton looked like he saw a ghost last night with his rape victims sitting right next to him

Image

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:19 am
by coffin_dodger
To my dear Americans - really, what do you expect? What kind of person is required to lead a nation like yours? A nation that has hundreds of military bases scattered around the world to defend it's empire? That kills indiscriminately at home and abroad? That has almost divorced itself from physical conflict by using gadgets? That genuinely believes itself special and indespensible? That vastly outconsumes any other peoples? Where how many digits in your bank account defines whether you are a success or failure? That quite openly advocates doing whatever it takes to retain this status?

You are getting what you need, not what you want.

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:05 am
by semper occultus
You are getting what you need, not what you want.
...hey how about a bit of sympathy for the Great Satan...

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:11 am
by coffin_dodger
semper occultus wrote:
You are getting what you need, not what you want.
...hey how about a bit of sympathy for the Great Satan...
Hey, I'm not claiming the high-ground here - look at the mess we're in, in the UK.
We need change all round.
Realising what we are is a big step.

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:17 am
by semper occultus
......it was a humorous fist-bump Mr Dodger..... :partydance:

you did clock that - for some reason - Trump used You Can't Always Get What You Want as the play-out music on stage during the Rep Party Congress I take it ?

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:28 am
by coffin_dodger
semper occultus wrote:...Trump used You Can't Always Get What You Want as the play-out music on stage during the Rep Party Congress I take it ?
No, haven't seen it - pure synchro, I guess. :zomg