rigorousintuition.ca

3. A Declaration of pre-emptive War (book 3)
LEGAL DISCLAIMER (for certain chapters in Book 2 and Book: 3. A Declaration
of pre-emptive War):
Book 3, “A Declaration of preemptive War” and certain chapters in book 2 in this
compendium, titled “2083”, and all related research files describes a hypothetical
response to a perceived threat (so called cultural Marxist/multiculturalist atrocities and
the threat of Islamisation). As such, it is a fictional description regarding how it could be
like if Islam would be dominant in Europe. The concept of the story/plot is based on what
it would be like if certain Christian/conservative/nationalist resistance groups/individuals
chose to oppose these so called perceived threats and enemies. It describes in shocking
detail how they would most likely rationalise/think/justify/argue and behave towards
these perceived threats/enemies. This books chapter 3 describes how a “fictional”
resistance group is emerging and how it would operate from the so called “Phase 1
through Phase 3” in order to prevent these perceived threats and atrocities from futher
manifesting and to prevent an alleged future Muslim takeover. It also describes
specifically how this hypothetical fictional group, “PCCTS, Knights Templar”, would choose
to respond towards the so called ”enablers” or the so called “cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist” elites that are allegedly allowing millions of Muslims to enter
Europe. The book contains detailed strategies (guerrilla tactics, instructions to execute,
political campaigns etc.) which normally would be partly incriminatory to anyone who
published or distributed the book (had it not been fiction). It also describes indirect and
direct armed and non-armed strategies towards these so-called “traitors” - referred to as
the cultural Marxists/ multiculturalists. The motivation for this “fiction-writer-approach” is
to contribute to create a new type of innovative writing style. By defining, in a horrifically
detailed way, a fictional scenario, the reader will be shocked due to the “hopefully”
credible and extremely detailed elaborations. It should be noted that the author, as a scifi
enthusiast, wanted to bring and create a complete new writing style that has the
potential to shock the reader with an incredibly credible fictional plot (written in first,
second and third person narrative). The author or distributor does not condone or agree
with any of the descriptions or methods used in this book and the related chapters.
However, the book was created to try to explain to the European political elites how the
continuation of given political doctrines could result in similar manifestations
(radicalisation of certain groups/individuals), as history has already proven, if they
continue with their current policies. As such, it is a reminder to the current establishment
what might happen if they repeat the mistakes of the past. Ignoring the will of the people
will only contribute to radicalise groups/individuals and therefore contribute to polarise
the political fronts and increase the chances of future conflicts. A continued humanist
approach to mass Muslim immigration, and the implementation of Sharia on a local,
national and pan-European level could result in a long term catastrophe. Not only as a
result of a political Islamic consolidation from phase 1-3 but also the danger that REAL
“resistance organisations” equivalent to the fictional group called “PCCTS” arises as a
result of the discontent. Simulating the creation and detailed information about the
actions of organisations like this is presented in detail (included combat/guerrilla
simulations, planning phase, attack strategies etc) to try to forward a realistic impression
to the reader and current European governments regarding what COULD develop if the
current Islamisation process is allowed to continue. The detailed so called “terror
descriptions” is therefore in place to create a sense of perceived credibility, reality under
a credible fictitious framework. The threats, the discriminatory content and information
about guerrilla warfare and violence, threats regarding killing of so called “traitors” and
instruction on how to employ WMDs (which is all available through Wikipedia and other
online sources to anyone btw) is therefore all a part of this fictional story/plot to
strengthen the credibility of the framework. The book should therefore never be
considered anything else than fiction (not real). Please note that in order to do some of
the research in this compendium the author had to visit/seek several controversial
websites/sources in order to gain access to the information. This does not mean that the
author or distributor have any sympathy or empathy for any specified or un-specified
violent or non-violent groups. All ”threats” etc in these fictional books are ”in character”
and its primary goal is to give an impression of what it would be like if we were under
threat by an extremist organisation. However, certain aspects of the content describing a
lead character (a fictional political activist who has decided to become a so called
“Jusiciar Knight”) sounds very realistic due to the detailed descriptions. However, all
incriminatory information in this work is written “in character” and must not be confused
with an actual plan, or strategy to attempt to harm any individuals or infrastructure, any
political groups or attempt to seize political or military control of Western European
regimes. This book is therefore unique in many ways. It is speculated that this type of
original approach has the potential to forward and present information in a new and
original context. It is therefore no need for concern by any police/state/government
prosecutors or intelligence agencies about the content of this book due to its fictional
nature. This legal disclaimer was created to remove any doubt whatsoever that the
author or anyone chosing to distribute the book “2083” has any hostile motives or
intentions. If any legal authority have reservations against this new and innovative form
of writing style, they may address or contact the author, any publisher or distributor and
share their concerns which will be taken under consideration. Changes will be considered
and implemented. As such, the content in its current form will not incriminate anyone,
the author or any distributor.

ShinShinKid wrote:Nazi-Dwarves, Albino-Muslims...it's all starting to make sense, now.
I think it's time we address the issue of SCUBA laden dwarves, I mean, are they Indian, or European?
Does anybody have the lung capacity data for a Punjabi little person?

Pierre d'Achoppement wrote:Interesting post Harvey. I suppose he wrote that elaborate disclaimer in case he got arrested before actually being able to go through with his plan. Another possibility is that he really did write it as fiction, sent it to a publisher, got 70.000 euro in advance royalties on it, hired the farm to finish the manuscript, made some glamphotos for the backcover and now is very surprised it's not fiction anymore.

Pierre d'Achoppement wrote:Yeah, the lacoste thing. He wore a black lacoste in one of those posed pics, then when they drove him to court he had the red lacoste. Where did he get it from? Was it in his trunk? Did they go get it for him from his home? I don't know how these things work.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8660257/Norway-killer-Anders-Behring-Breiviks-cultural-references.html

barracuda wrote:You have yet to see just how craven I can be, zogster.

stickdog99 wrote:I never trashed a single victim. The 7 people who escaped the island on the ferry within 5 minutes of when the shooting began were not victims. They were selfish pricks whose unfathomable decision to drive the ferry as far north as humanly possible before finally docking cost some young people their lives.

It seems as if a few pages have passed since the last time I informed you and the group just what a despicable and cowardly thing that is to say. Allow me to do it again. It is.

DU moderator wrote:This thread could easily make this site one of the many laughingstocks of the interwebz and that's saying something.

What is Searchlight?

Searchlight opposes racism and fascism in Britain and abroad.

It was founded in 1962 as an occasional publication and press agency specialising in gathering and analysing intelligence on the far right.

Searchlight magazine has appeared monthly since 1975 and is the first port of call for activists, journalists, politicians and academics seeking information or organised racism in Britain.

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/about-us/ ... earchlight

Norway Massacre: The Role of Western Governments and Media As Accomplices to a Lone NeoNazi

by Finian Cunningham

...snip...

As for governmental accomplices in Breivik’s horrific onslaught, there are culprits. But to invoke Mossad, the CIA and banksters, does not stand up on grounds of evidence or motive. These agencies are well capable and willing to carry out such atrocities, but on this occasion that doesn’t make sense.

Besides, to engage in such theorising is to miss the most obvious relation between the massacre in Norway and the role of Western governments.

Of all the toxic pathological ideas against his mother, his father, Marxists, feminists, multiculturalists, Breivik is indisputably a creation from the “war on terror” mindset that has been fomented by the governments and media of the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy and other Western countries over the past ten years. These governments include even that of Norway, which has been a significant military player in Afghanistan.

In the 10th anniversary year of the September 11 terror attacks in New York, we need to see the Norway massacre in that context. For 10 years, Western governments under Bush, Obama, Blair and Cameron, have waged criminal wars all over the globe allegedly to defend democracy from Islamic terrorists (terrorists that either do not exist, or where they do exist there is a murky history of Western governments creating them in the first place.)

This phony war on terror – a cover for neoimperialist wars by capitalist governments – has been given uncritical full vent by the mainstream media over the past decade. Despite obvious fraudulent rationale, despite bankrupting economies, despite lawlessness at home and abroad, the Western mainstream media continue to cover the war on terror as if it is some necessary, noble crusading cause.

When Breivik went on this murderous rampage, the media followed the Western politicians, including Obama and Cameron, in automatically assuming the action was that of “Islamic terrorists”. Well, that’s par for the course. After 10 years of relentless, unswerving propaganda, the response of political leaders and Western media is the product of brain washing.

Breivik, and many like him, are of the view that Europe is under some kind of cultural or security assault from dark-skinned Muslims. This Islamophobia did not conjure out of thin air. It is the logical conclusion from an ideological mental slide created by Western governments and their dutiful media.

From Bush’s “you are either with us or against us” to Cameron’s speech in Munich earlier this year in which the British leader reiterated the views of German Chancellor Angela Merkel when he deliberately used the toxic words “state multiculturalism is a failure”. How much would Breivik and his neoNazi ilk got off on that?

This was Cameron effectively saying to Islamophobes: you are right to target Muslims as the cause of terrorism. And why wouldn’t he? After all this is the ineluctable logic of the West’s phony war on terror.

In this system of mind control, each and every heinous act is and must be attributed to “Islamic jihadis”. Even when the perpetrator of the Norway massacre was clearly a white, ultraright Scandinavian who detested Muslims, the Western media still persisted in somehow linking Islamists to the event.

This is not to say Islamic extremists do not exist or operate. The weekend of the Norway horror, five Afghan children were wounded by a British Apache helicopter “firing on militants” in Helmand Province. So long as Western governments continue criminal wars of aggression, continue denying Palestinians their long-overdue rights or continue sponsoring unelected tyrants in places like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, then there will always be the danger of backlash. But it is the West and its imperialist screwing of the planet and other people’s right that is the lash.

In the aftermath of the Norway killings, a BBC reporter asked incredulously: “Where could such hatred come from?”

The answer is quite simple: from the toxic climate of hate that Western governments and their media have spent 10 years fostering to cover for criminal wars of aggression.

Finian Cunningham is a Global Research Correspondent based in Belfast, Ireland.

stickdog99 wrote:

DU moderator wrote:This thread could easily make this site one of the many laughingstocks of the interwebz and that's saying something.

Anders Behring Breivik, Mystery Man

Following the money trail
by Justin Raimondo, July 29, 2011
Email This | Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum

What do we really know about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norway mass murderer who killed in the name of his anti-Muslim ideology, nearly a week after his horrific rampage? We know what he did, and why he did it: he left behind not only a 1,500 page manifesto, in which he pours out his hatred of Muslims, but also a day-by-day diary that details his elaborate preparations, in which he claims his crime was nine years in the making.

That’s an awfully long time for a "lone wolf" to keep his plans to himself, yet the head of Norway’s intelligence agency was quick to state Breivik acted alone – this is spite of Breivik’s own contention, in his online "book," that two other cells of his "Knights Templar Europe" exist. Furthermore, according to Breivik, the Knights were founded at a London meeting in 2002, at which his British "mentor" and representatives from across the continent were in attendance.

What we don’t know, however, is how he did it. Oh, he gives us a detailed account of his obsessive preparations, including how much protein he added to his weightlifting regimen. We know he set up a front company, Breivik Geofarm, supposedly devoted to the growing of tubers, which is how he managed to get the fertilizer that was a key component of his car bomb. What we don’t know, however, is where money came from.

Breivik hadn’t had much income recently, as detailed here – yet he seemed to have some assets. The exact source of these assets is unknown. According to him, he "earned his first million kroner as an entrepreneur at the age of 24." Yet a number of news accounts flatly contradict this, notably the Sydney Morning Herald, which reports:

"Government records suggest that despite his management qualifications, his early attempts at business were a failure until he established Breivik Geofarm in eastern Norway for the cultivation of ‘’vegetables, melons and tubers.’ The business would have given Breivik access to nitrogen-based fertilizer – one of the main ingredients of a fertilizer bomb."

Yet "Breivik Geofarm" was, according to Breivik, just a "front" company, a legal shell meant to shield his activities from prying eyes. We don’t know that he ever grew a single tuber. The Wall Street Journal tells us:

"Government records show Mr. Breivik registered a business, Geofarm, in May 2009, though its main business activity was at first listed as trading stocks and other investments. Tax records show he reported no income that year but listed 390,171 kroner (about $50,000) in unverified assets."

If Breivik’s business ventures were failures prior to the Geofarm project, then where did these unverified assets come from? According to the Independent:

"After school, Breivik did a brief stint in the army, and then appears to have gone from one job to the next. He is believed to have started a computer company and earned enough money to live in a luxury apartment and sport a Breitling watch. However, other reports suggest that for years he worked in a lowly call center and lived almost anonymously.

"… Exactly what he lived on in the run- up to the massacre remains a mystery. But his bank details reveal that in 2007, a sum equivalent to €80,000 (£70,000) was added to his account, which would have enabled him to live without having to work."

The mystery deepens….

Check out Breivik’s resume here, wherein he claims to have been the "managing director" of "E-Commerce Group AS," which is described as a "part investment company – 50%, part sales/outsourcing company – 50%," with a "total of 7 employees: 3 in Norway, 1 in Russia, 1 in Indonesia, 1 in Romania, 1 in the US." Like Breivik Geofarm, he says:

"This was a front (milking cow) with the purpose of financing resistance/liberation related military operations. The company was successful although most of the funds were channeled through a Caribbean subsidiary (with base in Antigua, a location where European countries do not have access): Brentwood Solutions Limited with bank accounts in other Caribbean nations and Eastern Europe. E-Commerce Group was terminated in 2007 while most of the funds were channeled in an ‘unorthodox manner’ to Norway available to the coming intellectual and subsequent operations phase."

There is no online record of Breivik’s "E-Commerce Group AS," as far as I can see: an odd happenstance for an e-commerce outfit, wouldn’t you say? As for Brentwood Solutions Limited, there is no record of those guys, either: however, there is a Brentwood Solutions LLC in Naples, Florida. In any case, what I want to know is how did Breivik manage to get his hands on the equivalent of nearly $115,000 added to his account in 2007? If the money was legitimately earned, then why hide it in Caribbean and Eastern European banks and why go through "unorthodox" procedures in order to sneak it into Norway?

Okay, now let’s summarize what we know about Breivik’s money trail, based not on what he says in his diary but on what little investigative reporting has been done on the matter. It boils down to this: His tax records show a small income in 2007 – the year all that money miraculously appeared in his bank account – and a bit more in 2008. He had no reported income in 2006 and 2009. Prior to that, there is no evidence of his "first million" anywhere to be seen.

While his diary emphasizes that he saved every penny to finance his terrorist operation, there had to be some income coming in from somewhere. And then there’s that mysterious $115,000 – did he rob a bank? Or did he have a benefactor? Here is where Breivik’s money trail simply … trails off.

The idea that Breivik acted alone is absurd: he had to have help, just on logistical matters, never mind the financial side of such an operation. Furthermore, it’s hard – nay, impossible – to believe he kept the secret to himself for nine years. In order to escape detection, and have the means to carry off such a complicated operation, Breivik must have had some organized assistance – and not from amateurs, by any means. At this point, we don’t know from whom.

However, we can see in the reaction to his murderous assault a kind of support network that has sprung up, if not to defend him personally then to defend his motivations and the ethos from which his hatred welled up. As I have said in my other columns on this subject, the so-called counter-jihadist milieu – whose writings were copiously cited in the online manifesto – provided the theoretical basis for Breivik’s horrific actions. The "anti-jihadist" pro-Israel blogosphere played an important role in reinforcing and elaborating Breivik’s crazed worldview, and there is even some frightening evidence that they played more of an activist role than that.

In a post dated June 24, 2007, Pamela Geller, a leading light of the counter-jihadi movement, posted the following on her web site:

"I am running an email I received from an Atlas reader in Norway. It is devastating in its matter-of-factness.

"Well, yes, the situation is worsening. Stepping up from 29 000 immigrants every year, in 2007 we will be getting a total of 35 000 immigrants from somalia, iran, iraq and afghanistan. The nations capital is already 50% muslim, and they ALL go there after entering Norway. Adding the 1.2 births per woman per year from muslim women, there will be 300 000+ muslims out of the then 480 000 inhabitants of that city.

"Orders from Libya and Iran say that Oslo will be known as Medina at the latest in 2010, although I consider this a PR-stunt nevertheless it is their plan.

"From Israel the hordes clawing at the walls of Jerusalem proclaim cheerfully that next year there will be no more Israel, and I know Israel shrugs this off as do I, and will mount a strike during the summer against all of its enemies in the middle east. This will make the muslims worldwide go into a frenzy, attacking everyone around them.

"We are stockpiling and caching weapons, ammunition and equipment. This is going to happen fast.

"Before, I thought about emigrating to Britain, Israel, USA, South Africa, etc. for taxes and politics, but instead (although I believe we are the very last generation on earth before the return of God) I will stay and fight for the right to this country and indeed the entire peninsula, for the God-fearing people, just in case this isn’t the end of the world after all. Doesn’t hurt to have a backup plan.

"It’s far from impossible to achieve, after all my people has done it every time before, in feats that match the ancient Greek, hebrew and british ‘legends’.

"Oslo and the southeast may fall easily, but there are other lines than ‘state’-borders drawn across this country since long before there was even a single muslim in the world, and we have held them this long, against everyone else too. We are entering a new golden age for my people, and those of a handful other countrys, but only through struggle.

"Never fear, Pamela. God is with you too in this coming time."

In the comments, one of Geller’s readers warns that the author of the letter could be prosecuted by Norewegian authorities. Geller replies: "Yes … which is why I ran it anonymously."

So here is some nut stockpiling "weapons, ammunition, and equipment," because "this is going to happen fast" – with Geller’s enthusiastic encouragement. Indeed, she’s so concerned her correspondent might be arrested that she’s protecting his identity.

Who is Geller’s mystery correspondent – is it the same Norwegian nut-case who ruthlessly cut down dozens of children, or a different one waiting in the wings to do the same? Come on, Pamela – clear up the mystery. Or would you rather continue to shield your fellow "counter-jihadist"?

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the leaders and "scholars" who provided Breivik with the intellectual and political support he needed also provided more substantial support, such as ensuring the confidentiality of communications with the "Knights." Geller has already gone on the public record as supporting the thugs of the English Defense League, who troll the streets of British cities looking for Muslim victims – why not Breivik?

Never has a "lone wolf" had this much company.