Former Accused Iraqi Agent Reveals Facts about 9/11

Hugh Manatee Wins · Post by **Hugh Manatee Wins** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:10 pm

barracuda wrote:Yes , a setting that has nothing to do with thermite.

TIMING. RYAN. TOMORROW.

Decontextualizing events is really "going nowhere."

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:13 pm

Lindauer puts another nail in the controlled demolition coffin, and you have to spam the thread with thermite? I really don't mind the suppositions about media, they have merit. But the spam is counter-productive.

Hugh Manatee Wins · Post by **Hugh Manatee Wins** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:24 pm

barracuda wrote:Lindauer puts another nail in the controlled demolition coffin, and you have to spam the thread with thermite? I really don't mind the suppositions about media, they have merit. But the spam is counter-productive.

What a bizarre comment from you. Zero logic. whew.

Lindauer can't change the laws of physics anymore than Muslims can and nothing attributed to her even goes there..

My showing what Ryan will speak on tomorrow makes the case that we're getting Lindauer spew now as diverision plus reinforcing focus on eee-vil Ayrabs.

This is getting creepy bye.

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:32 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:This is getting creepy bye.

Don't go away mad. At least you got your commercial in.

orz · Post by **orz** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:39 pm

Warning: Don't take her 'revelations' at face value.

* mocks perfectly reasonable, well documented evidence which could lead to real progress *
* gets excited about some dumb goalpost-moving, crack-papering, straw-grasping theory which requires inventing whole new undocumented sci-fi weapons to seem feasible *

Hmm i'm not so good at this whole sarcastic * uses asterisks to indicate an action * posting but you get the idea.

orz · Post by **orz** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:41 pm

I'm about to google "nano-thermites" and I will not only find zero 'keyword hijacking' of the subject, but also predict zero mention of the stuff outside of 9/11 fanfic sites on at least the first 2 pages of results.

orz · Post by **orz** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:42 pm

I was wrong there were like 3 actual real-life mentions in there.

orz · Post by **orz** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:43 pm

"wrong"

vigilant · Post by **vigilant** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:43 pm

compared2what? wrote:I've got to say, that's the only piece of whistleblowing I've ever seen that draws back a curtain to reveal how praiseworthy and fully vindicated by events the only named individual wrt whom she reveals any first-hand or insider information really was.

Gee. If only she'd parked outside Andy Card's house at a time when he was home. Because you certainly can't blame her for her failure to warn him in person prior to the event. I mean, she waited for hours. What else could she possibly have done?

That said, I'm not jumping to any conclusions about how actionable or verifiable the rest of her story might be. It's not out of the question that she has a good reason for unfolding the story gradually. It just seemed worth noting how little whistle and how much blowing is going on in the story as she's told it so far.

"word"....C2W

Anything new here? I didn't see it. Long on drama, long on chaff, short on wheat, and a game of "pin the tail on the semitic people it was all them". I do not doubt there were peoples of most colors and flags involved, including Mossad, but this seems like focused misdirection and concentrated blame, as it leaves a few colored folks out. White is a color too ya know? I'm not maligning her character though, people deep in this game are under a lot of pressure.

vigilant · Post by **vigilant** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:51 pm

Nordic wrote:Right, Hugh, she's the only person in the world named "Susan."

Man, you can really fuck up this site.

Hugh might not be right in every instance, and there is no way to prove when he is and when he isn't. Try doing some research on some folks in certain venus and you will see the patterns he speaks of. Rummies investments in Mustang, a private financial group have been buried with references to a mustang automobile. This happens all the time. Mustang vehicle is great cannon fodder for search engines.

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:52 pm

All I'm saying, really, is that she is someone obviously in the know, as her incarceration proves to me. Whether she is now being "used" as a condition of her release, I don't know, but if she were being used, I somewhat doubt it would be as a cover-up of the Kevin Barrett radio show.

nathan28 · Post by **nathan28** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:55 pm

vigilant wrote:
compared2what? wrote:I've got to say, that's the only piece of whistleblowing I've ever seen that draws back a curtain to reveal how praiseworthy and fully vindicated by events the only named individual wrt whom she reveals any first-hand or insider information really was.

Gee. If only she'd parked outside Andy Card's house at a time when he was home. Because you certainly can't blame her for her failure to warn him in person prior to the event. I mean, she waited for hours. What else could she possibly have done?

That said, I'm not jumping to any conclusions about how actionable or verifiable the rest of her story might be. It's not out of the question that she has a good reason for unfolding the story gradually. It just seemed worth noting how little whistle and how much blowing is going on in the story as she's told it so far.

"word"....C2W

Anything new here? I didn't see it. Long on drama, long on chaff, short on wheat, and a game of "pin the tail on the semitic people it was all them". I doubt there were peoples of most colors and flags involved, but this seems like focused misdirection and concentrated blame, as it leaves a few colored folks out. White is a color too ya know? I'm not maligning her character though, people deep in this game are under a lot of pressure.

Exactly.

Is Lindauer innocent, a useful idiot or an actual disinfobot? I can't really tell. But the fact that she had NY Times coverage is enough to make me wonder just how blatant, if the third possiblity holds, disinformation can be. I expect the NY Times to run stories about Palestinians eating Israeli babies, about New York megalaw lawyers earning $180k to start being the new "neglected class" and about the Great Oriental Menance. I just did't expect them to give press time to someone I'd pegged as a Finnegan's Wake-meets-The Castle psychiatric case.

vigilant · Post by **vigilant** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:02 pm

nathan28 wrote:
vigilant wrote:
compared2what? wrote:I've got to say, that's the only piece of whistleblowing I've ever seen that draws back a curtain to reveal how praiseworthy and fully vindicated by events the only named individual wrt whom she reveals any first-hand or insider information really was.

Gee. If only she'd parked outside Andy Card's house at a time when he was home. Because you certainly can't blame her for her failure to warn him in person prior to the event. I mean, she waited for hours. What else could she possibly have done?

That said, I'm not jumping to any conclusions about how actionable or verifiable the rest of her story might be. It's not out of the question that she has a good reason for unfolding the story gradually. It just seemed worth noting how little whistle and how much blowing is going on in the story as she's told it so far.

"word"....C2W

Anything new here? I didn't see it. Long on drama, long on chaff, short on wheat, and a game of "pin the tail on the semitic people it was all them". I doubt there were peoples of most colors and flags involved, but this seems like focused misdirection and concentrated blame, as it leaves a few colored folks out. White is a color too ya know? I'm not maligning her character though, people deep in this game are under a lot of pressure.
Exactly.

Is Lindauer innocent, a useful idiot or an actual disinfobot? I can't really tell. But the fact that she had NY Times coverage is enough to make me wonder just how blatant, if the third possiblity holds, disinformation can be. I expect the NY Times to run stories about Palestinians eating Israeli babies, about New York megalaw lawyers earning $180k to start being the new "neglected class" and about the Great Oriental Menance. I just did't expect them to give press time to someone I'd pegged as a Finnegan's Wake-meets-The Castle psychiatric case.

My post above was edited for typo.

"I doubt that people of all colors and flags, etc...." was wrong.

I mean to say, "I do not doubt that peoples of all colors and flags were involved, including Mossad, but this seems like focused misdirection and concentrated blame, as it leaves a few colored folks out. White is a color too ya know?"

Joe Hillshoist · Post by **Joe Hillshoist** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:14 pm

White isn't a colour its all of them.

LIHOP
MIHOP
or
IHOP

Col. Quisp · Post by **Col. Quisp** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:07 pm

Something's rotten here. If Dr. FUZE knew about the attacks already, why was he prodding Suddenly Susan to obtain info thru her "back channels?" The whole thing reads like fiction.

I don't pretend to know why this is being released though, other than to stir up anti-Israel feeling. And to make Bush look bad --- i.e., the war in Iraq opened the door for al Qaeda to take root there because Hussein hated O'Sama (sorry, it's getting close to St. Paddy's day).

Too many holes in her story. Too pat. Reads like a bad spy novel.

rigorousintuition.ca

Former Accused Iraqi Agent Reveals Facts about 9/11

International House of Pancakes