rigorousintuition.ca

Joao » Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:05 pm wrote:"To new victories in labor and sports"

Tongue-in-cheek but this thread could do with a counterexample. Kinda getting worried I should lay off the bicep curls lest they lead to starting an Ayn Rand book club.

guruilla » Thu Dec 17, 2015 1:35 am wrote:

Sublime on so many levels. Thanks.

Wombaticus Rex » Thu Dec 17, 2015 1:32 pm wrote:Well, the biggest counterexample I can think of offhand is MMA fighter Jeff Monson, who is not only a liberal but an anarchist.

He's had an interesting career, many successes but was never able to break into the majors, ie defeat top talent.

Belligerent Savant » Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:38 pm wrote:.

A feminine penis?

A mind can explode with visuals...

Can a penis be feminine?

Is this based on physical attributes alone (for example: does it resemble a clitoris -- in which case, my condolences to this person if such resemblance is based on the length and girth of the average clitoris; can it have multiple orgasms in rapid succession -- in which case, I and surely many other men would be quite envious)?

Or is this more of a 'mental' thing? Or both?
(neither?)

“By attempting to teach men not to rape, what we have actually done is teach women not to care about being raped, not to protect themselves from easily preventable acts, and not to take responsibility for their actions,” he wrote at the time. “I thought about this problem and am sure I have the solution: make rape legal if done on private property.”

“I propose that we make the violent taking of a woman not punishable by law when done off public grounds,” Valizadeh said.

However, the planned meetings are already receiving opposition in some countries.

“Sex without consent is rape. There are no excuses. If someone is drunk or drugged they cannot give consent,” a spokesperson for Police Scotland told The National. “We must do all we can to prevent rape and sexual assaults amongst offering all the necessary support and protection to those who are victims.”




Roosh Vörek

---

jakell » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:14 am wrote:Has this guy got anything to do with the far right? I know a whole bunch of lazy associations could be dragged up to weakly suggest such a thing, and that is probably enough for some folks, but not all.

American Dream » Wed Feb 03, 2016 12:41 pm wrote:Of course most of those friendly towards the far right l say thought-stopping shit to avoid dealing with the ugly realities in which they may be personally entangled. One wonders if and when they would actually repudiate such bozos- mostly they never do...

http://www.dailystormerdotcom/regarding ... azi-video/
Even if we don’t want to be marching through the streets in uniforms waving Nazi flags, trolling people and making them think we want to do that has no negative effects. Obviously if you’re a serious political party you don’t troll people in that manner, but the Daily Stormer and /pol/ are not serious political parties: this is just the internet.

I did not make this method up. This has been used by literally every single leftist revolutionary movement. They always have a group which is pushing the most hardcore positions possible for the purpose of making other less hardcore positions more socially acceptable.

Just an example here: the gay rights movement of the 1990s had NAMBLA, which was openly campaigning for the right to have sex with little boys. That was all in the media. The non-pedo gays never condemned them. They marched beside them. Eventually, the gays got their rights, not despite NAMBLA, but because of them. They had made the positions of the more mainstream activists seem significantly less dangerous and offensive by pushing the most dangerous and offensive positions imaginable.

Just another example here: The Black Panthers marching through the streets with guns chanting that they were going to kill cops made it a whole lot easier for people to accept Martin Luther King’s master plan.

What hardcore extremists are doing is helping to push a social climate wherein people who present themselves as the alt-right presents itself are in a better position to be viewed as reasonable. And yet, these people come out and attack us. It is utterly baffling. I have repeatedly asked these people to take a look at the way the leftist revolutionary groups carried out their agendas, and they are apparently refusing to do so. This is very, very simple stuff, even if it isn’t immediately intuitive.