What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=39666
Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:15 pm wrote:If it's the problem doesn't mean that it is.seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:00 pm wrote:that doesn't mean it is not the truth
If a nation chooses to be corralled, how would it sing of it's captivity except as blessed? There was no choice right?
Wow! Sounder, that is one very smart post.Sounder » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 am wrote:JR:dodger wrote...That you are probably a repulsive slug in real life is likely...
...when your very pat and simplistic and often fact-free views...
I guess you must harbor a lot of anger...
All this suggests a very immature person...
...it suggests a man who is probably very frustrated and hateful at having to deal with people who are smarter than him... (my personal favourite - condescending and using intelligence as a weapon)
I'm guessing you might have got lousy SATs...
You could learn, but you prefer to make apologies...
One can actually be a lot more than a hateful slug...
This constant, unremitting belittlement of the intellectual capacity of anyone in disagreement is so indicative of elitist thinking structures.
It's losing its power quickly, though.
My favorite is; I guess you must harbor a lot of anger...
Smart people are considered smart because they are the ones that know best how to converse and convince in terms of our current 'categories of understanding'. Therefor they are most responsible for the maintenance of intellectual structures, our dominant narrative. They are then the ones responsible for the messed-upness in this world, not regular people.
Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit.
Poetic license.seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:18 pm wrote:Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:15 pm wrote:If it's the problem doesn't mean that it is.seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:00 pm wrote:that doesn't mean it is not the truth
If a nation chooses to be corralled, how would it sing of it's captivity except as blessed? There was no choice right?
If a nation chooses to be corralled....could you provide proof of that statement please?
Yeah, seriously. It must be the smartest post ever on this board. Sounder is a very, very smart guy. As he argues, he's responsible for this mess of a world and one cannot trust him.Iamwhomiam » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:20 pm wrote:Wow! Sounder, that is one very smart post.
It's metaphorical.Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.
I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.
We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
Someone tell that to the chimpsdada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:14 pm wrote:It's metaphorical.Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.
I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.
We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
I disagree. The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind
I believe all news services have prepared ahead of time their lead story for whomever wins, leaving out the finer details, just so they're ready to go to press after a slight editorial touch-up. I wouldn't doubt another would be found there announcing Trump the winner.Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:02 am wrote:Anything beside the obvious..? I read that he's 'controversial' figure, okay. Is there anything to the story? I don't have relevant knowledge in order to judge.JackRiddler » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:01 pm wrote:"Soros and his minions will steal the election and make it illegal to stop them" sort of leaps out, yes.Harvey » Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:54 am wrote:Some automated server just blurted out the results of the election (apparently this is a grab of the page) according to Jim Stone:
http://82.221.129.208/basepaget1.html
Anything leap out? BS?
I'll try reading 'Listen, Little Man' to them next time we're sitting around the campfire.Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:16 pm wrote:Someone tell that to the chimps
Hey Jack, you cocksucker, you missed this bit.Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit
That you are.slimmouse » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:25 pm wrote:Hey Jack, you cocksucker, you missed this bit.Elitists feed us shit then deride folk as being stupid if they choose to not eat that shit
That would be you jack. Along with several others around this place who dont have the fuckn brains they were born with, despite claiming such.
Im out of here.
Very true. Persuading people that that software is actually hardware has been one of the most successful enterprises in a forty-year mass-media programming process. "Your genes are selfish and so are you." "Complaining about your rulers just proves you want to be a ruler too." "You know you really want to beat your wife and kids, why won't you admit it? Read some SCIENCE, man."dada wrote:The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind.
Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:16 pm wrote:Someone tell that to the chimpsdada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:14 pm wrote:It's metaphorical.Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:11 pm wrote:re dada.
I've read the Dune series. And we are never going to colonize the stars. Can't and won't happen, like it or not as you may.
We're stuck here with our silly little elections, the tendency of power to corrupt, and hardwired primate authoritarian drives.
I disagree. The Authoritarian drive is not hardware, it's software. In your mind
The original german, or the english translation? Either way, the subtleties of Reich's argument will surely assist them as they liberate us with their teeth from our worldly delusions about hardware and software.dada » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:21 pm wrote:I'll try reading 'Listen, Little Man' to them next time we're sitting around the campfire.Rory » Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:16 pm wrote:Someone tell that to the chimps
Luther, hasn't the R leadership already promised an 8 justice court for 4 or 8 years, claiming they would stonewall any nominee suggested by Clinton?Luther Blissett » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:33 pm wrote:I added it to the Prediction Data Dump: only conservative justices from here on out.
I weep for how difficult life will be for women under Clinton's patriarchal Supreme Court appointees.
backtoiam » Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:01 pm wrote:I have seen this posted around the internet but I cannot verify if the video actually was shot in the places indicated. It does appear to be people stuffing ballot boxes but the when and where I am not sure of. I have not seen it grabbing any traction such as people being arrested for it. It is actually comical the way they go about stuffing the boxes.
https://youtu.be/8YsRU0TFQTY