The peoples voice.

[slimmouse]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

And is actually doing so, where required.

Which I might suggest on edit, is something that all of us posting onto this site need to be aware of.

We are not liable, but the host is.

Are you not up to speed or something ?

[American Dream]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

And is actually doing so, where required.

Which I might suggest on edit, is something that all of us posting onto this site need to be aware of.

We are not liable, but the host is.

Are you not up to speed or something ?

Are you not up to speed or something?

The host doesn't want any crazy, racist spin on the Nazi Holcaust...

[DrEvil]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

Are you saying that the holocaust didn't happen?

[slimmouse]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

Are you saying that the holocaust didn't happen?

Are your really so stupid as to ask that question of me?

And on edit I'll throw this out to a broader audience.

AD, Solace,

Am I a holocaust denier?

[American Dream]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

Are you saying that the holocaust didn't happen?[/quote

Are your really so stupid as to ask that question of me?

Well, what are you saying about why "the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself" then?

[slimmouse]

I didnt make a statement, I asked a question, Mr not so slippery.

Your answer beng?

That question remains,

Since when did the truth require a law to protect it?

Im not holding my breath here.

[American Dream]

I didnt make a statement, I asked a question, Mr not so slippery.

Your answer beng?

That question remains,

Since when did the truth require a law to protect it?

Im not holding my breath here.

"I'm just curious- I want to find out- I'm a truth seeker- just asking some innocent questions- You got anything against questions?"...

[solace]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

Are you saying that the holocaust didn't happen?

Are your really so stupid as to ask that question of me?

And on edit I'll throw this out to a broader audience.

AD, Solace,

Am I a holocaust denier?

I have never seen any evidence that you are. I do however question your ability to truck with Holocaust Deniers/Revsionists. Also your question about "since when does truth need a law to protect it,"suggests to me that you favour Holocaust questioning/Revisionism being done. I find that abominable.

[slimmouse]

And thats your answer to my question, Mr "not so slippery"?

For the millionth time ( to use an AD exxageration), you refuse to answer.

Keep on postin wont ya.

It prolly pays the bills.

[slimmouse]

I have never seen any evidence that you are. I do however question your ability to truck with Holocaust Deniers/Revsionists. Also your question about "since when does truth need a law to protect it,"suggests to me that you favour Holocaust questioning/Revisionism being done. I find that abominable.

Were all those questions you have of me not at least answered to my own satisfaction in the affirmative, I would have little option but to agree with you.

However, the question still remains.

Since when did the truth require laws to protect it?

Think of any modern examples, folks?

[American Dream]

And thats your answer to my question, Mr "not so slippery"?

For the millionth time ( to use an AD exxageration), you refuse to answer.

Keep on postin wont ya.

It prolly pays the bills.

My answer: The State often tries to regulate communication, including communications that are true, false, or somewhere in between...

[slimmouse]

I think you missed it,

Since when did the truth need laws to enforce it?

Any recent examples?

[DrEvil]

Well Im sorry Dr Evil, but it appears that when it comes to the Nazi holocaust, then the truth does indeed need a law to protect itself.

Are you saying that the holocaust didn't happen?

Are your really so stupid as to ask that question of me?

And on edit I'll throw this out to a broader audience.

AD, Solace,

Am I a holocaust denier?

Obviously I am that stupid since I asked. And no, I don't think you are a holocaust denier, but it would be nice to hear what exactly it is you think those laws are protecting.

[American Dream]

I want to make sure this doesn't gat lost in the shuffle:



The Fuhrer of the Nazi Hippies

David Icke – Class hatred, Nihilism and Narcissism

http://disillusionedmarxist.wordpress.c ... nt-page-1/

[seemslikeadream]

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.