7/7 Dallas Shooting

[82_28]

As a straight male, he looked fairly handsome to me. They say he was a carpenter but I thought the .mil contracted that sort of shit out. But I guess not with a simple google search:

http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/ ... alist.html

[Burnt Hill]

That tattoo is a Yamaha symbol.
Originally for their musical instruments, its also on their motorcycles.

[82_28]

Thanks, Burnt Hill. I was on a wild goose chase trying to track it down.

What is a tuning fork?

A tuning fork is a tool for tuning musical instruments. It was invented by a trumpet player named John Shore (1662-1751). The tuning fork is composed of a handle attached to the center of a U-shaped steel rod. By striking the rod, sound is created, and the frequency of the resulting vibrations per second is used as a standard for tuning a musical instrument.
What is the meaning of the tuning fork mark?

The three tuning forks of the Yamaha logo mark represent the cooperative relationship that links the three pillars of our business -- technology, production, and sales. They also evoke the robust vitality that has forged our reputation for sound and music the world over, a territory signified by the enclosing circle. The mark also symbolizes the three essential musical elements: melody, harmony, and rhythm.
What is a hoo?

The hoo, a Chinese phoenix, is a mythical bird of luck, long revered in China alongside the kylin (an imaginary fiery horse), turtles, and dragons. Its appearance is said to herald the birth of an Emperor possessing saintly virtues. The front part resembles a kylin, and the rear that of a deer; the neck, a snake; the tail, a fish; the back, a turtle; the jaw, a swallow; and the beak, a chicken. In addition, the feathers of the hoo are said to feature a five-colored crest. The design featuring a hoo holding a tuning fork in its mouth was established as the trademark in 1898, one year after Nippon Gakki Co., Ltd. was founded. The trademark was used on organs.

http://www.yamaha.com/about_yamaha/corp ... fork_mark/

[0_0]

You quoted the wrong person. Anyway, that's the logo for Yamaha, so i guess he was into bikes or guitars or something else Yamaha makes.

[82_28]

That's straight from the official Yamaha website. Check the link.

[82_28]

In fact, the symbol was created for the simple branding of the tuning fork alone. Again, gotz to check the link.

Here it is again.

http://www.yamaha.com/about_yamaha/corp ... fork_mark/

[stickdog99]

If the above "black sheep" narrative is true, it's another example of a so called beta-male, unsuccessful with women, lacking in peers, and angry at the world for being so miserable.

To be honest, I find this narrative easier to believe than secret agent, high level cover-up conspiracies designed to panic the public and guide public policy. The world is filled with angry young men and throw in a mix of social media and firearms and there's no reason to stage anything IMO.

Cops kill a bunch of innocent black people causing massive protests nationwide against the encroaching police state.

Government "strategy of tension" agents respond by killing some cops and pinning it on a convenient black patsy.

Police state FTW.

What makes any of this harder to believe than angry lone gunman?

[Burnt Hill]

If the above "black sheep" narrative is true, it's another example of a so called beta-male, unsuccessful with women, lacking in peers, and angry at the world for being so miserable.

To be honest, I find this narrative easier to believe than secret agent, high level cover-up conspiracies designed to panic the public and guide public policy. The world is filled with angry young men and throw in a mix of social media and firearms and there's no reason to stage anything IMO.

Cops kill a bunch of innocent black people causing massive protests nationwide against the encroaching police state.

Government "strategy of tension" agents respond by killing some cops and pinning it on a convenient black patsy.

Police state FTW.

What makes any of this harder to believe than angry lone gunman?

In a sense, a government response like, if that's what it was, sort of evens things out, and reduces tension.
Normal human beings are uniting- black and white, after the events in Dallas.
Of course, uniting in protest of inequality.
And then there is the cover-up problem, lots of loose ends.

* Either way It plays into the police state that the media will encourage, so its a good point stickdog.
I just see the human response differently.

** I would also suppose that "they" would prefer "the police state" to be established insidiously, as it has been.

[MacCruiskeen]

WHY WOULD THE POLICE NOT EVEN MENTION THAT STREET-LEVEL SHOOTER IN ANY OF THEIR PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS?

This is still the issue. It is incredible.

Here's Police Chief Brown giving a press conference many hours after the attack started, saying ONLY: "what we do know is that two snipers, at least two snipers, in elevated positions as the protest rally/march ended, began firing upon our officers" [..] "from two different perches in garages in the downtown area":



It is a plain lie. Brown is plainly lying.

Not once does he even mention (!!) the street-level shooter (White Pants Guy) who had already fired off dozens of rounds and killed at least one police officer, and who had been filmed doing it.

And NB: that street-level shooter was most certainly reported to Brown very quickly, because we see at least seven police officers rushing up immediately on foot to retrieve their dead colleague, along with two police cars which have arrived and parked on the street beside the black SUV with flashing lights.

See Randy Biart's video:




And here's an extremely close-range eyewitness account of a gunman at street level pulling on a tactical vest, saying "I ain't no fucking cop" and then firing off several rounds from an automatic rifle at a passing police car:

http://www.krem.com/news/nation/witness ... /267704568

Police Chief Brown SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ANY OF THIS while spinning yarns for the press, hours later, about multiple snipers perched in elevated positions.

Why hasn't he been sacked?

Why hasn't he been arrested?

Why hasn't a single reporter even asked him to explain any of this??

[0_0]

[Cordelia]

MacCruiskeen » Sun Jul 10, 2016 5:24 pm

Why hasn't he been sacked?

Why hasn't he been arrested?

Because the Dallas Police Department has been corrupt for (at least) 53 years?

[Wombaticus Rex]

Not sure if it's already been mentioned here, but David Brown is a graduate of the FBI National Academy, and another more boutique Quantico seminar, the National Executive Institute.

The NEI has been variously described as the “Director’s own program” and as the crown jewel of the FBI’s executive training initiatives. It has led to the design and implementation of the Bureau’s Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar (LEEDS) program and the Leadership in Counterterrorism Program, or LinCT.

[stickdog99]

Why hasn't a single reporter even asked him to explain any of this??

That's the most annoying and insidious part of each and every one of these potential false flag, made-for-mass-media mass casualty events.

Authorities routinely issue reports that are contradictory. Authorities also routinely take actions and make statements that raise huge, simple, and extremely obvious questions in the minds of anyone who does not have 100% faith in the infallibility and forthrightness of all authority figures.

But nobody ever even asks these authorities to resolve their own contradictions or to answer the obvious questions that their actions and statements engender. They are allowed to Winston Smith the narrative in any manner they please as if everything that was said and done before that point is rendered utterly meaningless in as much as it contradicts or casts any doubt on the latest official proclamation, whether sourced or anonymous.

[Nordic]

The gun this guy supposedly used was a 1945-era SKS rifle. From what I understand these are only highly accurate if in extremely well-maintained condition.

Seems a bit ... Unusual.

I would like to see a timeline myself. It seems the only way to mow down that many cops before they all scatter and take cover would be to shoot them all VERY quickly. It seems logical to accomplish this most easily by having a high vantage point overlooking the crowd.

If so, when the FUCK dos this (supposedly) SAME GUY shoot the cop on street level, the incident we've all seen??

This is the main thing I'm having trouble wrapping my head around.

It's like Dealy Plaza. All the witnesses heard and/or saw the shots coming from the Grassy Knoll but no it was a lone gunman" from someplace completely different.

Yeah sure.

And Novemb3r, these guys are never the "super agent" types, not evil Jason Bournes, they are fucked up MK-ULTRA type guys who can be released with hypnotic instructions to do what they're programmed to do. (Uh, actually sort of like Jason Bourne before he had his awakening I suppose)

This reminds me very much of the DC Sniper. Remember Charles Moose and "duck in a noose" and all if that high weirdness?

They seem to have these guys in reserve, secret weapons so to speak. One phone call with the right triggers and these guys go off, doing what they are programmed to do.

OR it could have been a disgruntled black dude with a 65 year old rifle and supernatural abilities to be in 2 places at once.

[km artlu]

Pure speculation, admittedly:
My reaction to the initial official statements - of multiple shooters in a coordinated op - was the sense that a tipping point had arrived. That there was a qualitative, as well as quantitative, leap in play. This view extended to the upcoming conventions and the months of summer still to come.

Then came the dialed-back amended official narrative, which led me to the following scenario: The first few hours of social media reaction were of course closely monitored at Overlord Central, and predictive models indicated that the original desired effects were not in line with targets. Word then came down to change the narrative to a prepared alternate, and multiple designated patsies were extracted. (possibly the three persons of interest)

Not at all a problem, given the submissive, effectively collaborative, state of the media today as described earlier in this thread.