Page 20 of 20

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:01 pm
by Elihu
Repeat ad-nauseum

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:19 pm
by Searcher08
seemslikeadream wrote:Ron Paul is a racist... just saying
Where and when?



I am waiting for Alternet's next exciting revelations :shock2:
Ron Paul is a raving homosexualist anti-semite Grande Wizard of both the KKK And Hogwarts who posts on sturmfrunt while wearing the panties of his Islamic secret lover on his head and who hates America

"Ron Paul in globalisation is a bad idea horror video"

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:43 pm
by vanlose kid
*





*

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:52 pm
by vanlose kid
*



*

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:12 pm
by vanlose kid
*



*

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:17 pm
by Nordic
Now they've found some "former aide" to dish up the dirt. Tonight he's saying Ron Paul has said Israel doesn't have a right to exist.

Trying to get any evangelicals away from Paul, with Perry blatantly pandering to that group now.

Poppy Bush has publicly endorsed Romney now -- now big surprise, he was Romney's sponsor in 2008.

Need to find the link for this (on my mobile right now which is a pain in the butt) but I read where the Repubs are going to collect the ballots and take them to an "undisclosed location" to count them.

Yeah right. The whole thing is a damn joke.

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:23 pm
by vanlose kid
*



*

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:07 pm
by vanlose kid
*



*

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:55 pm
by freemason9
"These things are only incendiary because people like you keep asking me questions."

i like his style, at least he's honest about the business of politics

Re: Ron Paul: CIA runs the U.S. government

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:15 am
by dbcooper41
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/3 ... tml?page=1

nothing new here but intreresting(to me) that huffpo felt a need to run this story.
they do take a final pot shot at the late gary webb.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, published a
massive package dedicated to debunking Webb's story. When a congressional
investigation later confirmed the major elements of Webb's reporting, the papers
barely covered it. (I go into the media attack in more detail in the book.)
In the face of the media onslaught, Webb's editor retracted the story. Webb was
demoted and sent to a dustbin bureau 150 miles from San Jose. He resigned after
settling an arbitration claim and went to work for a small alt-weekly. Over the
next several years, his marriage fell apart and his wages were garnished for
child support. On Dec. 10, 2004, Webb was discovered dead, shot twice in the
head with his father's .38. The local coroner declared the death a suicide.
Obituaries in the major papers referenced his "discredited" series. The Los
Angeles Times obit recalled his "widely criticized series linking the CIA to the
explosion of crack cocaine in Los Angeles," noting that "[m]ajor newspapers,
including the Los Angeles Times, New York Times and Washington Post, wrote
reports discrediting elements of Webb's reporting." The New York Times ran a
five-paragraph Reuters obit that began, "Gary Webb, a reporter who won national
attention with a series of articles, later discredited." The obit continued,
"The articles led to calls in Congress for an investigation, but major
newspapers discredited parts of Mr. Webb's work." It made no mention of the fact
that those calls for an investigation were heeded and that the investigation
confirmed a great deal of Webb's reporting.
The headline "Web of Deception" ran atop Howard Kurtz's story in the Washington
Post. "There was a time when Gary Webb was at the center of a huge, racially
charged national controversy. That was eight years ago, and it turned out badly
for him," Kurtz wrote. "The lesson," he concluded, "is that just because a news
outlet makes sensational charges doesn't make them true, and just because the
rest of the media challenge the charges doesn't make them part of some
cover-up."