'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- thurnundtaxis
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 7:46 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Yeah, Ninakat.
Ure doesn't have too good of a track record other than for scare-mongering. But, sometimes I like to entertain these worst-case scenarios
if only be prepared for the worst and relieved by anything that later proves such speculations wrong.
Matt over at LATOC is a world-class doomer, but he's certainly not usually gullible when it comes to Ure's prognostications.
But, there it is...
Ure doesn't have too good of a track record other than for scare-mongering. But, sometimes I like to entertain these worst-case scenarios
if only be prepared for the worst and relieved by anything that later proves such speculations wrong.
Matt over at LATOC is a world-class doomer, but he's certainly not usually gullible when it comes to Ure's prognostications.
But, there it is...
- Hugo Farnsworth
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:14 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
If the well does not "bridge over" and plug itself, a relief well is the only way to stop it. That will take, at minimum, two months.
Without traversing the edges, the center is unknowable.
- nathan28
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Actually, considering that George Ure just called End of the World again, this is probably the peak opportunity to buy some Louisiana waterfront real estate.
Also, what barracuda said.
Also, what barracuda said.
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"
THE JEERLEADER
THE JEERLEADER
- freemason9
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:07 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Right. And why would anyone want that when corporate control works so well?23 wrote:At first blush, my guess is anyone who is a proponent of nationalizing the oil industry.DrVolin wrote:I'm willing to entertain anything, but who would benefit over this?
Monumental catastrophes are great backdrops for Government takeovers.
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new.
- 2012 Countdown
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Hugo Farnsworth wrote:The bad news is that it is bad, an environmental catastrophe.
The good news is that, at this rate of flow, the well will probably collapse on itself ("bridge over"). The other good news is that out of all the places in the world to spill oil, the Gulf of Mexico's ecology is probably better suited to deal with this toxic crap than any other.
What is really killing the GoM's ecology faster than the oil industry is the agricultural runoff in the central USA that ends up in the Mississippi, and then into the Gulf. There are now "dead zones" in the GoM that are devoid of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia). http://lab.visual-logic.com/?p=331
Economic interests in the US have long treated Louisiana like a red-headed stepchild, the same mentality that now strip-mines Appalachia and blows off the tops of mountains in that region. The coast of Louisiana is disappearing because of the intense canal dredging that took place during the 20th century to extract the oil. Oyster beds and estuaries are disappearing so fast that it defies the imagination. That's just one eco-disaster among so many others. So much in that state has been lost forever--I will give you one example: Up until the early 20th century, there were stands of cypress trees so huge and tall (some of them nearly as large as the Sequoia in California) that, had they not fallen to the axes of lumber companies, would be national parks today. Try to imagine paddling down a bayou or in Atchafalaya Bay and seeing a tree the size of a small skyscraper.
Ever since 'they' shot Huey P. Long, the oil interests have run this state.
As a La. native and life-long New Orleanian, I thank you for expanding on the problem and speaking on it. After Katrina, the state reps fought to finally get our rightful share of oil lease revenues to do coastal restoration. With the budget cuts, those promised funds are now being threatened to be taken away without the first dime being seen. But you are also correct in mentioning the dead zones. And lets not forget about the effect on people. You probably know that from lower Arkansas down is known as 'cancer alley'. If you live along the river, we get everyone else run off and retreated water. Bottled or filtered water is prudent here.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
-
DrVolin
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:19 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
And another parallel: No claim of responsibility.
all these dreams are swept aside
By bloody hands of the hypnotized
Who carry the cross of homicide
And history bears the scars of our civil wars
--Guns and Roses
By bloody hands of the hypnotized
Who carry the cross of homicide
And history bears the scars of our civil wars
--Guns and Roses
- 2012 Countdown
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
But BP has claimed responsibility, no?DrVolin wrote:And another parallel: No claim of responsibility.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
- Sepka
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:56 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
How often does that occur?Hugo Farnsworth wrote:If the well does not "bridge over" and plug itself
- Sepka the Space Weasel
One Furry Mofo!
One Furry Mofo!
- Iamwhomiam
- Posts: 6572
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
The first report I had heard on this disaster was on the day or day after it occurred and it related tha 47,000 gal per day were being released. Later that same day I was surprised to hear only 1,000 gpd was leaking.
As I see it, this could be a so called false flag created disaster for two reasons - 1) that it would completely submerge the sure to pass climate bill and/or 2) to harden our resolve, a least in the minds of the public, that we must continue our resource wars in the middle east in order to liberate their, er, people. Sounds a bit radical tho, imo.
It could have been caused by nothing more than a static spark igniting the escaping natural gas. Regardless of its cause, it is an extreme environmental catastrophe.
As I see it, this could be a so called false flag created disaster for two reasons - 1) that it would completely submerge the sure to pass climate bill and/or 2) to harden our resolve, a least in the minds of the public, that we must continue our resource wars in the middle east in order to liberate their, er, people. Sounds a bit radical tho, imo.
It could have been caused by nothing more than a static spark igniting the escaping natural gas. Regardless of its cause, it is an extreme environmental catastrophe.
- nathan28
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
DrVolin wrote:And another parallel: No claim of responsibility.
Okay, you have officially gone into total paranoia land. Can I offer you some KWH brochures? It's our hottest product.
It is very, very clear who the parties involved in this incident are. Completely. BP. The contractors who installed the rig and the blow-out whatever-it's-called. Possibly the engineering contractor, if a firm, who chose the site. Deep pocket rules dictate that BP will face maximum exposure. This isn't force majeur, "Act of God," because they had every reason to understand and prepare for the possibility of a blow-out--in fact, they had that intention with installing the blow-out device and likewise had engineering data on the relative size of the oil pocket. To the extent that BP avoids paying damages in the $$$ quadrabillions, it fits perfectly with the logic of externalization--externalization being one of the ONLY ways to remain profitable, and likewise being increasingly impossible. I don't know how well equipped Obama DOJ is in the intestinal fortitude dep't, but if the SEC charging Goldman, considered alongside the sweeping "More Bush Than Bush" legal arguments it makes, if those are any indication, then BP is going to spend a long-ass time in court--maybe. OTOH Obama's fondness for machine politics almost dictates that he'll find another way to handle this so that everyone can sit down at the table while the future of the gulf course turns into their meal. If you can't see that you've been befuddled by the corporatist nonsense upthread, like worries of a "Government Takeover"--newsflash, the gov't is already taking over the clean-up, exactly like you'd expect them to. Unless you want to see just how much charity BP will extend, which is probably bad news if you're an oyster or a crawdad, two "heritage" foods about to disappear from America, where we specialize in amnesia.
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"
THE JEERLEADER
THE JEERLEADER
-
DrVolin
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:19 pm
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
You're reading entirely too much into my very simple statements.nathan28 wrote:DrVolin wrote: Okay, you have officially gone into total paranoia land.
all these dreams are swept aside
By bloody hands of the hypnotized
Who carry the cross of homicide
And history bears the scars of our civil wars
--Guns and Roses
By bloody hands of the hypnotized
Who carry the cross of homicide
And history bears the scars of our civil wars
--Guns and Roses
- 82_28
- Posts: 11194
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
- Location: North of Queen Anne
- Contact:
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
It has been brought up, but Halliburton is in there too. Didn't BP farm out, sub contract it's operations to them for this particular rig?It is very, very clear who the parties involved in this incident are.
Hate to say it, but this is looking more and more like the mother of all DOUBLE BINDS given the "political", economic and moreover, moreover, the environmental raamifications.

There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
- 2012 Countdown
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
The first proposals are in my opinion, very weak. I'm going with answer 3.Iamwhomiam wrote:The first report I had heard on this disaster was on the day or day after it occurred and it related tha 47,000 gal per day were being released. Later that same day I was surprised to hear only 1,000 gpd was leaking.
As I see it, this could be a so called false flag created disaster for two reasons - 1) that it would completely submerge the sure to pass climate bill and/or 2) to harden our resolve, a least in the minds of the public, that we must continue our resource wars in the middle east in order to liberate their, er, people. Sounds a bit radical tho, imo.
It could have been caused by nothing more than a static spark igniting the escaping natural gas. Regardless of its cause, it is an extreme environmental catastrophe.
And yes, Halliburtion subcontracting figures prominently in this as well. You know them though. They go from electrocuting soldiers w/faulty electrical work, to blowing up the Gulf in shoddy offshore work.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
- norton ash
- Posts: 4067
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellfighters_(film)
Dammit, where's Red Adair? Oh, right, he's as dead as John Wayne.
Drill, baby, drill.
Dammit, where's Red Adair? Oh, right, he's as dead as John Wayne.
Drill, baby, drill.
Zen horse
- DoYouEverWonder
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:24 am
- Location: Within you and without you
- Contact:
Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse
Exclusive Interview with a Survivor from the Oil Rig Explosion
http://www.marklevinshow.com/Article.as ... spid=32364
Supposedly they verified the survivors identity. If his story is true, Gaia is to blame for this one.
http://www.marklevinshow.com/Article.as ... spid=32364
Supposedly they verified the survivors identity. If his story is true, Gaia is to blame for this one.
