Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:56 pm
1- Dragon sent me some mud balls. Made no attempt to charge me for anything. Some other stuff too, some of which looked like jewelry. (About which the Lady major pleased.). I testify that Dragon does not seem to be into what he is doing for money.
2- I cannot in any manner think of how anything was perceived as a threat. Was it where Dragon reported that he went to the Ike on the astral plane?. That gave me the giggles. If home the Ike would be at Pier 12 (of the carrier piers) at NOB. I remember going to the Ike many times. After 9/11 mainly through Gate 4 where there would be kids with M-16s behind sandbags and they looked like they had never fired the weapon. When you would get to Pier 12 there would also be guards with side-arms. It got around quickly that some officer was concerned more of some accident and therefore ordered that those guards would be issued no clips for their 45s. The moderator’s of this site are concerned about what?
3- The moderators took sides. I saw this clearly with the geometry problem. Too Stoned bad mouthed me, very foul language, for some time before I responded in kind. A moderator picked out one small joke of mine concerning geometry teachers, (they should be publicly shamed) that all saw as a joke and tried to make it serious. And at that time ignoring Too Stoned. The moderators see a threat perhaps but certainly not the treat they stated.
4- I too would be concerned with either illegal activity or promotion of such. If that was the case I would have nothing to do with the discussion. I saw none. I still see none. Either the moderators are concerned about something else of which they are not saying or they have not read the material.
5- A moderator also picked up on a remark I made to Dragon. It is back there but something to the effect “Watch your mouth or I will kick the gun over to you..” That too was an obvious joke if one read the thread. Good Lord in heaven, we were talking about a math duel !!!!! It was so odd that Too Stoned mentioned ‘F’ (the name is back there, I will not attempt to spell the French name that ‘dueled’ with Pascal which I think I can spell.) In the 1600’s in Paris, (at a time when math went through many changes) such duels were the rage among the aristocracy. A problem and challenge and such being posted on public billboards. Seems there was far more civility then than there is on this board. I fault the moderators for wrongly protecting Too Stoned. Look clearly at Too Stone’s ploys. He would get upset as the diagram did not have labels such as ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’. The areas of interest were colored or easily referenced in the text. The first construction an equilateral triangle within a large circle, colored. The angle 60 degrees. Two moves would be made (each rather complex). But the first move would eat up much of the less than 8 degrees left, the second move even much smaller. The diagram as such with text appropriate. What was the fear. Only that Too Stoned would be shown for what he is.
6- Mentioning the point above in no manner detracts from the points that MaryKmusic made. It is only an add-on. I agree with MaryKmusic.
Those points made I see a philosophical under-pining that furthers MaryKmusic’s remarks. Dragon spoke of the limitation of Newtonian mechanics, energy and matter. That limitation was being fostered well before Newton. Again the 1600s being very pregnant with this. Because of measurements the idea got around that the universe, cosmos, was a ‘two system’, that it reduced only to energy and matter. Later apologists for this including such as Shopenhour (spelling?) while pretending to argue more fostered the belief. (as paraphrase ‘Well there are such things as will…’, di da di da). It was not long before it was thought unreasonable to believe in elves, archangels, trolls, ghosts, or anything not of a physical nature among the masses. So in some respects those in the Dark Ages had a better world view than the present ‘matrix caught’ masses. Not so the upper classes who continued all through, even to this day, to believe in and use magick. Most of this is based on the cabalistic system of which I am very familiar. (33 degrees of Masonry di da di da). The powers-that-be wish to continue this limiting thought among the masses, that any idea of a world beyond matter and energy is wrong. (therefore no ‘other realities or dimensions etc’). I know that those in control using such magick are limited in its use and fear the masses opening up to the possibility. Is this the real danger that Dragon et al are fostering. And if so who is the danger to?
In that respect I learned much from the story of IO as he made excellent observations. Particularly with the (early uncorrupted) ‘rave’ as it had effect on the soccer madness.
If I am thrown off the list for ‘questioning the moderation’ so be it. But I still agree with Burnt Hill, MaryKmusic and the others.
2- I cannot in any manner think of how anything was perceived as a threat. Was it where Dragon reported that he went to the Ike on the astral plane?. That gave me the giggles. If home the Ike would be at Pier 12 (of the carrier piers) at NOB. I remember going to the Ike many times. After 9/11 mainly through Gate 4 where there would be kids with M-16s behind sandbags and they looked like they had never fired the weapon. When you would get to Pier 12 there would also be guards with side-arms. It got around quickly that some officer was concerned more of some accident and therefore ordered that those guards would be issued no clips for their 45s. The moderator’s of this site are concerned about what?
3- The moderators took sides. I saw this clearly with the geometry problem. Too Stoned bad mouthed me, very foul language, for some time before I responded in kind. A moderator picked out one small joke of mine concerning geometry teachers, (they should be publicly shamed) that all saw as a joke and tried to make it serious. And at that time ignoring Too Stoned. The moderators see a threat perhaps but certainly not the treat they stated.
4- I too would be concerned with either illegal activity or promotion of such. If that was the case I would have nothing to do with the discussion. I saw none. I still see none. Either the moderators are concerned about something else of which they are not saying or they have not read the material.
5- A moderator also picked up on a remark I made to Dragon. It is back there but something to the effect “Watch your mouth or I will kick the gun over to you..” That too was an obvious joke if one read the thread. Good Lord in heaven, we were talking about a math duel !!!!! It was so odd that Too Stoned mentioned ‘F’ (the name is back there, I will not attempt to spell the French name that ‘dueled’ with Pascal which I think I can spell.) In the 1600’s in Paris, (at a time when math went through many changes) such duels were the rage among the aristocracy. A problem and challenge and such being posted on public billboards. Seems there was far more civility then than there is on this board. I fault the moderators for wrongly protecting Too Stoned. Look clearly at Too Stone’s ploys. He would get upset as the diagram did not have labels such as ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’. The areas of interest were colored or easily referenced in the text. The first construction an equilateral triangle within a large circle, colored. The angle 60 degrees. Two moves would be made (each rather complex). But the first move would eat up much of the less than 8 degrees left, the second move even much smaller. The diagram as such with text appropriate. What was the fear. Only that Too Stoned would be shown for what he is.
6- Mentioning the point above in no manner detracts from the points that MaryKmusic made. It is only an add-on. I agree with MaryKmusic.
Those points made I see a philosophical under-pining that furthers MaryKmusic’s remarks. Dragon spoke of the limitation of Newtonian mechanics, energy and matter. That limitation was being fostered well before Newton. Again the 1600s being very pregnant with this. Because of measurements the idea got around that the universe, cosmos, was a ‘two system’, that it reduced only to energy and matter. Later apologists for this including such as Shopenhour (spelling?) while pretending to argue more fostered the belief. (as paraphrase ‘Well there are such things as will…’, di da di da). It was not long before it was thought unreasonable to believe in elves, archangels, trolls, ghosts, or anything not of a physical nature among the masses. So in some respects those in the Dark Ages had a better world view than the present ‘matrix caught’ masses. Not so the upper classes who continued all through, even to this day, to believe in and use magick. Most of this is based on the cabalistic system of which I am very familiar. (33 degrees of Masonry di da di da). The powers-that-be wish to continue this limiting thought among the masses, that any idea of a world beyond matter and energy is wrong. (therefore no ‘other realities or dimensions etc’). I know that those in control using such magick are limited in its use and fear the masses opening up to the possibility. Is this the real danger that Dragon et al are fostering. And if so who is the danger to?
In that respect I learned much from the story of IO as he made excellent observations. Particularly with the (early uncorrupted) ‘rave’ as it had effect on the soccer madness.
If I am thrown off the list for ‘questioning the moderation’ so be it. But I still agree with Burnt Hill, MaryKmusic and the others.